Biomedical subjects

C A Hrincevich

Publications and source records attributed to C A Hrincevich.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1998

Application of functional independence measure-function related groups and resource utilization groups-version III systems across post acute settings.

OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated alternative patient classification systems for skilled nursing facility and rehabilitation facility patients. METHODS: Medicare patients were selected from a random sample of 27 rehabilitation facilities and 65 skilled nursing facilities participating in a national longitudinal study of subacute care. Detailed casemix and resource use data was obtained on 513 patients with hip fracture and 483 stroke patients. The Functional Independence Measure-Function Related Groups (FIM-FRGs) classification system for rehabilitation facilities was replicated on length of stay and tested on resource use for rehabilitation facility patients as well as for skilled nursing facility patients. Modifications to the FIM-FRGs also were tested. The Resource Utilization Groups-Version III classification was tested on rehabilitation facility patients. RESULTS: The FIM-FRGs explained the same amount of variance in length of stay as in the original FIM-FRGs development sample (R2 hip fracture = 0.14, R2 stroke = 0.28), and similar variance in resource use. A modified version of the FIM-FRGs explained more variance in length of stay (R2 hip fracture = 0.19, R2 stroke = 0.39) and resource use (R2 hip fracture = 0.20, R2 stroke = 0.41). Neither model adequately predicted length of stay or resource use in skilled nursing facility patients. The Resource Utilization Groups-Version III rehabilitation groups accounted for little variance in rehabilitation facility patients' per-diem resource use (R2 = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: The FIM-FRGs are valid for resource use as well as length of stay for rehabilitation facility patients, but are not valid for skilled nursing facility patients. Similarly, the Resource Utilization Groups-Version III system does not apply to rehabilitation facility patients. Related work, however, suggests that development of a single episode-based patient classification system for skilled nursing facility and rehabilitation facility patients is possible and should be pursued.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed1997

Outcomes and costs after hip fracture and stroke. A comparison of rehabilitation settings.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether outcomes and costs differ for elderly patients admitted to rehabilitation hospitals, subacute nursing homes, and traditional nursing homes. DESIGN: Inception cohort stratified by provider type and followed prospectively for 6 months. SETTING: A total of 92 hospital-based units and freestanding facilities from 17 states. PATIENTS: A total of 518 randomly selected patients with hip fracture and 485 stroke patients admitted from November 1991 to February 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 6 months comparing community residence, recovery to premorbid levels in 5 activities of daily living (ADLs), Medicare costs, and the number of therapy and physician visits. Outcomes were adjusted for premorbid residence and function, caregiver availability, comorbid illness, admission function, cognition, depression, sensory deficits, and mobility impairments. RESULTS: On admission, rehabilitation hospital patients were more likely (P<.001) to have caregivers and better cognitive and physical function. Hip fracture patients admitted to rehabilitation hospitals did not differ from patients admitted to nursing homes in returning to the community (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-2.6) or in the number of ADLs recovered to premorbid level (difference, 0.09 ADL; 95% CI, -0.27-0.44), but stroke patients admitted to rehabilitation hospitals were more likely to return to the community (adjusted OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.5-7.2) and recover ADLs (difference, 0.63 ADL; 95% CI, 0.20-1.07). Subacute nursing home patients with stroke were more likely than traditional nursing home patients to return to the community (adjusted OR, 6.8; 95% CI, 2.2-21.4), there was no difference in return to the community for patients with hip fracture (adjusted OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.7-3.6), and there were no differences in recovery of ADLs for either condition. Medicare costs were greater (P<.001) for rehabilitation hospital patients than for subacute nursing home patients, and the costs for subacute nursing home patients were greater (P=.03 for stroke and .009 for hip fracture) than for traditional nursing home patients. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings are consistent with enhanced outcomes for elderly patients with stroke treated in rehabilitation hospitals but not for patients with hip fracture. Subacute nursing homes were more effective than traditional nursing homes in returning patients with stroke to the community, despite comparable functional outcomes.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed1997

Rehabilitation costs: implications for prospective payment.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain information relevant to development of prospective payment for Medicare rehabilitation facilities (RFs) and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs): compares service utilization, length of stay (LOS), case mix, and resource consumption for Medicare patients receiving postacute institutional rehabilitation care. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Longitudinal patient-level and related facility-level data on Medicare hip fracture (n = 513) and stroke (n = 483) patients admitted in 1991-1994 to a sample of 27 RFs and 65 SNFs in urban areas in 17 states. STUDY DESIGN: For each condition, two-group RF-SNF comparisons were made. Regression analysis was used to adjust RF-SNF differences in resource consumption per stay for patient condition (case mix) and other factors, since random assignment was not possible. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Providers at each facility were trained to collect patient case-mix and service utilization information. Secondary data also were obtained. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: RF patients had shorter LOS, fewer total nursing hours (but more skilled nursing hours), and more ancillary hours than SNF patients. After adjustment, ancillary resource consumption per stay remained substantially higher for RF than SNF patients, particularly for stroke. The adjusted nursing resource consumption differences were smaller than the ancillary differences and not statistically significant for hip fracture. Supplemental outcome findings suggested minimal differences for hip fracture patients but better outcomes for RF than SNF stroke patients. CONCLUSIONS: Much can be gained from an integrated approach to developing prospective payment for RFs and SNFs. In that context, consideration of condition-specific per-stay payment methods applicable to both settings appears warranted.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Volume/outcome relationships in small rural hospitals.

This article summarizes a study of relationships between hospital volume and patient outcomes for diagnoses commonly treated and procedures commonly performed in smaller rural hospitals. Literature review findings and results of analyses using secondary data for several conditions suggest few if any volume/outcome relationships (with mortality being the main outcome for which data were available). A basic finding of the study is that most conditions and procedures for which volume effects on mortality have been found typically do not pertain to small rural hospitals. However, the available secondary data are weak, and many conditions and procedures have not been studied for small rural hospitals. Therefore, continued monitoring and review are important, as well as improved data systems, further research, and information dissemination on volume/outcome relationships. In particular, examining relationships between volume and outcomes in addition to mortality is critical to a thorough understanding of this topic.

Cerebrovascular Disorders↗