PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C A Lange

Publications and source records attributed to C A Lange.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Insulin receptor substrates mediate distinct biological responses to insulin-like growth factor receptor activation in breast cancer cells.

Activation of the type I insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-IR) regulates several aspects of the malignant phenotype, including cancer cell proliferation and metastasis. Phosphorylation of adaptor proteins downstream of IGF-IR may couple IGF action to specific cancer phenotypes. In this study, we sought to determine if insulin receptor substrate-1 and -2 (IRS-1 and -2) mediate distinct biological effects in breast cancer cells. Insulin receptor substrate-1 and IRS-2 were expressed in T47D-YA breast cancer cells, which lack IRS-1 and -2 expression, yet retain functional IGF-IR. In the absence of IRS-1 and -2 expression, IGF-IR activation was unable to stimulate proliferation or motility in T47D-YA cells. Expression of IRS-1 resulted in IGF-I-stimulated proliferation, but did not affect motility. In contrast, expression of IRS-2 enhanced IGF-I-stimulated motility, but did not stimulate proliferation. The alphaIR-3, an inhibitor of the IGF-IR, was unable to affect these IGF-stimulated phenotypes unless IRS-1 or -2 was expressed. Thus, IGF-IR alone is unable to regulate important breast cancer cell phenotypes. In these cells, IRS proteins are required for and mediate distinct aspects of IGF-IR-stimulated behaviour. As multiple agents targeting the IGF-IR are currently in early clinical trials, IRS expression should be considered as a potential biomarker for IGF-IR responsiveness.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2001

Transcriptional hyperactivity of human progesterone receptors is coupled to their ligand-dependent down-regulation by mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent phosphorylation of serine 294.

Breast cancers often exhibit elevated expression of tyrosine kinase growth factor receptors; these pathways influence breast cancer cell growth in part by targeting steroid hormone receptors, including progesterone receptors (PR). To mimic activation of molecules downstream of growth factor-initiated signaling pathways, we overexpressed mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK; also known as extracellular signal-regulated kinase) kinase kinase 1 (MEKK1) in T47D human breast cancer cells expressing the B isoform of PR. MEKK1 is a strong activator of p42 and p44 MAPKs. MEKK1 expression increased progestin-mediated transcription 8- to 10-fold above normal PR-driven transcription levels. This was dependent on the presence of a progesterone response element and functional PR. PR protein levels were unchanged by MEKK1 alone but were extensively down-regulated by MEKK1 plus the progestin R5020. MEKK1 expression resulted in phosphorylation of PR on Ser294, a MAPK consensus site known to mediate ligand-dependent PR degradation. MEK inhibitors blocked phosphorylation of Ser294 and attenuated PR transcriptional hyperactivity in response to MEKK1 plus R5020; stabilization of PR by inhibition of the 26S proteasome produced similar results. T47D cells stably expressing mutant S294A PR, in which serine 294 is replaced by alanine, fail to undergo ligand-dependent down-regulation and are resistant to MEKK1-plus-R5020-induced transcriptional synergy but respond to progestins alone. Similarly, c-myc protein levels are synergistically increased by epidermal growth factor and R5020 in cells expressing wild-type PR, but not S294A PR. Thus, highly stable mutant PR are functional in response to progestins but are incapable of cross talk with MAPK-driven pathways. These studies demonstrate a paradoxical coupling between steroid receptor down-regulation and transcriptional hyperactivity. They also suggest a link between phosphorylation of PR by MAPKs in response to peptide growth factor signaling and steroid hormone control of breast cancer cell growth.

Down-Regulation↗
PubMed2000

Phosphorylation of human progesterone receptors at serine-294 by mitogen-activated protein kinase signals their degradation by the 26S proteasome.

Ligand-dependent down-regulation that leads to rapid and extensive loss of protein is characteristic of several nuclear steroid receptors, including human progesterone receptors (PRs). In breast cancer cells, >95% of PRs are degraded 6 h after the start of progestin treatment. The mechanism for down-regulation is unknown. We examined the role of PR phosphorylation by mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) in this process. Lactacystin and calpain inhibitor I, specific inhibitors of the 26S proteasome, blocked progestin-induced down-regulation, and ubiquitinated conjugates of PR accumulated in cells. Ligand-dependent PR degradation was also blocked by specific inhibition of p42 and p44 MAPKs. To define the targets of phosphorylation by this kinase, two serine/proline MAPK consensus sites on PR were mutated. We demonstrate that mutation of PR serine-294 to alanine (S294A) specifically and completely prevents ligand-dependent receptor down-regulation. We also find that rapid, ligand-independent degradation of immature PR intermediates occurs by a proteasome-mediated pathway. These results demonstrate that PR destruction, by either of two alternate routes, is mediated by the 26S proteasome. Specifically, down-regulation of mature PRs occurs by a mechanism in which ligand binding activates PR phosphorylation by MAPKs at a unique serine residue, which then targets the receptors for degradation.

Acetylcysteine↗
PubMed1999

Hypothesis: Progesterone primes breast cancer cells for cross-talk with proliferative or antiproliferative signals.

In the breast, data from numerous laboratories suggest that cross-talk exists between PR and growth factor and cytokine signaling pathways at multiple levels (Fig. 4). At the cell surface (level 1), progestins up-regulate growth factor and cytokine receptors. We have expanded this observation by examining the effects of progestins in the cytoplasm (level 2) where progestins regulate several intracellular effectors by increasing the levels and altering the subcellular compartmentalization of Stat5, increasing the association of Stat5 with phosphotyrosine-containing proteins and tyrosine phosphorylation of JAK2, Cbl, and Shc, and potentiating EGF-stimulated p42/p44 MAPKs, p38 MAP kinase, and JNK activities. Together, these events lead to sensitization of downstream signaling pathways to the actions of locally acting secondary factors. Finally, inside the nucleus (level 3), agonist-occupied PR synergize with nuclear transcription factors that are growth-factor regulated, to control the activity of key genes involved in breast cell fate (Figs. 1 and 4). We speculate that after progesterone treatment, orchestrated combinations of steroid hormones and growth factors or cytokines can fine tune the timing and degree of expression of a subset of genes that determine whether progestin-primed cells undergo proliferation, differentiation, or programmed cell death. The paradoxical effects of progesterone have presented a longstanding conundrum to the scientist and clinician. Why are physiological levels of progesterone proliferative in the breast but antiproliferative and protective in the uterus? If progesterone is proliferative in the breast, why is high-dose progestin therapy successful in treating breast cancer? Our intent here has been to open a dialogue addressing these questions. Our data and that of others are beginning to show that one cannot approach the question of progestin actions in isolation. Other important regulatory proteins, whose expression may vary in tissue-specific ways, work in concert with progesterone to decide cell fate. The timing and dose of progesterone may also influence the biological response. Since progestins are widely used in oral contraception, in hormone replacement therapy, and in cancer treatments, it is becoming critically important that the subtleties of their mechanisms of action be clearly understood.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Convergence of progesterone and epidermal growth factor signaling in breast cancer. Potentiation of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways.

During late stages of breast cancer progression, tumors frequently acquire steroid hormone resistance with concurrent amplification of growth factor receptors; this alteration predicts a poor prognosis. We show here that following treatment with the progestin, R5020, breast cancer cells undergo a "biochemical shift" in the regulation of epidermal growth factor (EGF)-stimulated signaling pathways: R5020 potentiates the effects of EGF by up-regulating EGFR, c-ErbB2 and c-ErbB3 receptors, and by enhancing EGF-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of signaling molecules known to associate with activated type I receptors. Independently of EGF, R5020 increases Stat5 protein levels, association of Stat5 with phosphotyrosine-containing proteins, and tyrosine phosphorylation of JAK2 and Shc. Furthermore, progestins "prime" breast cancer cells for growth signals by potentiating EGF-stimulated p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), p38 MAP kinase, and JNK activities. Although the levels of cyclin D1, cyclin E, and p21(WAF1), are up-regulated by R5020 alone, they are synergistically up-regulated by EGF in the presence of R5020. Up-regulation of cell cycle proteins by EGF is blocked by inhibition of p42/p44 MAPK only in the presence of R5020, supporting a shift in the regulation of these cell cycle mediators from MAPK-independent to MAPK-dependent pathways. In summary, progesterone selectively increases the sensitivity of key kinase cascades to growth factors, thereby priming cells for stimulation by latent growth signals. These data support a model in which breast cancer cell growth switches from steroid hormone to growth factor dependence.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1998

Convergence of progesterone with growth factor and cytokine signaling in breast cancer. Progesterone receptors regulate signal transducers and activators of transcription expression and activity.

STATS (signal transducers and activators of transcription) are latent transcription factors activated in the cytoplasm by diverse cell surface signaling molecules. Like progesterone receptors (PR), Stat5a and 5b are required for normal mammary gland growth and differentiation. These two proteins are up-regulated during pregnancy, a period dominated by high levels of progesterone. We now show that progestin treatment of breast cancer cells regulates Stat5a and 5b, Stat3, and Stat1 protein levels in a PR-dependent manner. In addition, progestin treatment induces translocation of Stat5 into the nucleus, possibly mediated by the association of PR and Stat5. Last, progesterone pretreatment enhances the phosphorylation of Stat5 on tyrosine 694 induced by epidermal growth factor. Functional data show that progestin pretreatment of breast cancer cells enhances the ability of prolactin to stimulate the transcriptional activity of Stat5 on a beta-casein promoter. Progesterone and epidermal growth factor synergize to control transcription from p21(WAF1) and c-fos promoters. These data demonstrate the convergence of progesterone and growth factor/cytokine signaling pathways at multiple levels, and suggest a mechanism for coordination of PR and Stat5-mediated proliferative and differentiative events in the mammary gland.

Biological Transport↗
PubMed1998

Progesterone receptor variants found in breast cells repress transcription by wild-type receptors.

Progesterone, through its nuclear receptors (PR), regulates the development and growth of breast cancers. PR also serve as markers of hormone dependence and prognosis in patients with this disease, and functional PR are required to mediate the antiproliferative effects of progestin therapies. We find that normal and malignant breast cells and tissues can express anomalous forms of PR transcripts. We have isolated four variant PR mRNAs that contain precise deletions of exons encoding sections of the DNA- and hormone-binding domains. The transcripts lack exon 2 (PRdelta2), exon 4 (PRdelta4), exon 6 (PRdelta6), or exons 5 and 6 (PRdelta5,6). On immunoblots, PRdelta4, delta6. and delta5, 6 cloned into the background of the PR A-isoform comigrate with similar proteins present in breast tumor extracts; delta6 and delta5, 6 are dominant-negative transcriptional inhibitors of wild-type A- and B-receptors. We propose that expression of variant PR can compromise the accuracy of receptor measurements as markers of hormone-dependent cancers, and can modify the responses of tumors to progestin therapies.

Breast↗
PubMed1997

Biphasic regulation of breast cancer cell growth by progesterone: role of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, p21 and p27(Kip1).

Depending on the tissue, progesterone is classified as a proliferative or a differentiative hormone. To explain this paradox, and to simplify analysis of its effects, we used a breast cancer cell line (T47D-YB) that constitutively expresses the B isoform of progesterone receptors. These cells are resistant to the proliferative effects of epidermal growth factor (EGF). Progesterone treatment accelerates T47D-YB cells through the first mitotic cell cycle, but arrests them in late G1 of the second cycle. This arrest is accompanied by decreased levels of cyclins D1, D3, and E, disappearance of cyclins A and B, and sequential induction of the cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) inhibitors p21 and p27(Kip1). The retinoblastoma protein is hypophosphorylated and extensively down-regulated. The activity of the cell cycle-dependent protein kinase, cdk2, is regulated biphasically by progesterone: it increases initially, then decreases. This is consistent with the biphasic proliferative increase followed by arrest produced by one pulse of progesterone. A second treatment with progesterone cannot restart proliferation despite adequate levels of transcriptionally competent PR. Instead, a second progesterone dose delays the fall of p21 and enhances the rise of p27(Kip1), thereby intensifying the progesterone resistance in an autoinhibitory loop. However, during the progesterone-induced arrest, the cell cycling machinery is poised to restart. The first dose of progesterone increases the levels of EGF receptors and transiently sensitizes the cells to the proliferative effects of EGF. We conclude that progesterone is neither inherently proliferative nor antiproliferative, but that it is capable of stimulating or inhibiting cell growth depending on whether treatment is transient or continuous. We also suggest that the G1 arrest after progesterone treatment is accompanied by cellular changes that permit other, possibly tissue-specific, factors to influence the final proliferative or differentiative state.

Breast Neoplasms↗