PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C A Possamaï

Publications and source records attributed to C A Possamaï.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Stimulus preprocessing and response selection in depression: a reaction time study.

Depressed subjects are slower than normal controls in reaction time (RT) tasks. However, it is not clear whether depression affects all stages of information-processing or only some of them. In the present study, this question was addressed by using the additive factor method. Ten inpatients and ten control subjects performed a two-choice visual RT task. Stimulus intensity and stimulus-response compatibility were manipulated. The effect of intensity was similar in both groups whereas the effect of compatibility was larger for the patients than for the controls. This suggests that stimulus preprocessing is unaffected by depression whilst response selection is impaired.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Intensity to force translation: a new effect of stimulus-response compatibility revealed by analysis of response time and electromyographic activity of a prime mover.

In reaction time studies of stimulus-response compatibility, emphasis has been placed on the influence of spatial stimulus-response relationships, but what seems to be essential for the emergence of an effect of stimulus-response compatibility is the existence of a conceptual match between stimulus and response variables. This notion was at the origin of the present study to assess the compatibility relationship between the intensity of a visual stimulus and the force of a voluntary muscle contraction. A stimulus-response compatibility effect was demonstrated. This effect was entirely due to premotoric processes.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

The effect of a non-informative cueing signal in a three-choice reaction-time task.

Many studies have shown that in a simple reaction-time (RT) task a non-informative leading cue decreases RT to a subsequent target presented in the same region as the cue. This facilitation lasts about 150 ms; it is then replaced by a sustained inhibition. Experiment 1 tests the hypothesis that the initial facilitation is due to motor, rather than perceptual, processes by using choice RT. Facilitation is greater and lasts longer in choice than in simple tasks, thus supporting the hypothesis. Experiment 2 shows that facilitation occurs even when the subject actively orients his or her attention away from the cue.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

A responding hand effect in a simple-RT precueing experiment: evidence for a late locus of facilitation.

Reaction time (RT) to a peripheral flash target is often shortened by a shortly leading (about 100 msec) non-informative cue presented at the same location; later on (500 msec), to the contrary, RT is lengthened. In this paper, an interaction between target position and responding hand is reported. Subjects made speeded key-press responses to targets presented either 7 degrees to the left or 7 degrees to the right of fixation. A valid (same location) or invalid (mirror-symmetric location) cue preceded the target by either 80 or 500 msec. Depending on the trial, subjects used either the left or the right hand. The crossover in RT, from facilitation to inhibition, is observed only when the target is on the same side as the responding hand. An analysis of the RT distributions suggests that (a) facilitation is due to decision rather than perceptual processes, (b) inhibition is due to motoric processes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1979

Influence of an intertrial interval on sequential effects related to preparatory period duration for reaction time-task.

In reaction time tasks, where the moment of occurrence of the response signal is uncertain, the temporal constraints of preparatory processes imply that subjects distribute their preparation during the preparatory period. The notion of cost of preparation has been proposed to explain the time course of these processes. This experiment was run to determine the effect of the cost of preparation on a serial-RT task and on a RT task where a rest interval of various possible durations (3, 6, or 9 sec.) is introduced. 12 subjects were tested. Data show that the amount spent on preparation during a trial affects the subject's performance during the next trials. But an hypothesis about memory search must also be advanced to explain the effect of the rest interval on the relationship of RT and the current preparatory period.

Humans↗