PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C A Power

Publications and source records attributed to C A Power.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Chemokine inhibition--why, when, where, which and how?

Chemokines are small chemoattractant cytokines that control a wide variety of biological and pathological processes, ranging from immunosurveillance to inflammation, and from viral infection to cancer. Genetic and pharmacological studies have shown that chemokines are responsible for the excessive recruitment of leucocytes to inflammatory sites and damaged tissue. In the present paper, we discuss the rationale behind interfering with the chemokine system and introduce various points for therapeutic intervention using either protein-based or small-molecule inhibitors. Unlike other cytokines, chemokines signal via seven-transmembrane GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors), which are favoured targets by the pharmaceutical industry, and, as such, they are the first cytokines for which small-molecule-receptor antagonists have been developed. In addition to the high-affinity receptor interaction, chemokines have an in vivo requirement to bind to GAGs (glycosaminoglycans) in order to mediate directional cell migration. Prevention of the GAG interaction has been shown to be a viable therapeutic strategy. Targeting chemokine intracellular signalling pathways offers an alternative small-molecule approach. One of the key signalling targets downstream of a variety of chemokine receptors identified to date is PI3Kgamma (phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma), a member of the class I PI3K family. Thus the chemokine system offers many potential entry points for innovative anti-inflammatory therapies for autoimmune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and allergic contact dermatitis.

Animals↗

CC chemokine receptor (CCR)4 and the CCR10 ligand cutaneous T cell-attracting chemokine (CTACK) in lymphocyte trafficking to inflamed skin.

The chemokine thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC; CCL17) is displayed by cutaneous (but not intestinal) venules, and is thought to trigger vascular arrest of circulating skin homing memory T cells, which uniformly express the TARC receptor CC chemokine receptor (CCR)4. Cutaneous T cell-attracting chemokine (CTACK; CCL27), expressed by skin keratinocytes, also attracts cutaneous memory T cells, and is hypothesized to assist in lymphocyte recruitment to skin as well. Here we show that chronic cutaneous inflammation induces CD4 T cells expressing E-selectin binding activity (a marker of skin homing memory cells) in draining lymph node, and that these E-selectin ligand+ T cells migrate efficiently to TARC and to CTACK. In 24 h in vivo homing assays, stimulated lymph node T cells from wild-type mice or, surprisingly, from CCR4-deficient donors migrate efficiently to inflamed skin; and an inhibitory anti-CTACK antibody has no effect on wild-type lymphocyte recruitment. However, inhibition with anti-CTACK monoclonal antibody abrogates skin recruitment of CCR4-deficient T cells. We conclude that CTACK and CCR4 can both support homing of T cells to skin, and that either one or the other is required for lymphocyte recruitment in cutaneous delayed type hypersensitivity.

Adoptive Transfer↗

Vaccination against and treatment of tuberculosis, the leishmaniases and AIDS: perspectives from basic immunology and immunity to chronic intracellular infections.

The occurrence of infectious disease represents a failure of the immune system, a failure that must be prevented by effective vaccination or remedied by treatment. Vaccination against acute diseases such as smallpox and polio are very effective, due to the rapid and increased immune response of vaccinated individuals upon natural infection. In contrast, effective vaccination against intracellular pathogens that cause chronic diseases, such as the leishmaniases, tuberculosis and AIDS, has not been achieved. Clinical observations suggest cell-mediated, Th1 responses, exclusive of antibody production and the generation of Th2 cells, are optimally protective against these intracellular pathogens. Effective vaccination must ensure the generation of such a protective response. We explore here whether understanding very broad features of the regulation of the immune response can accommodate modern findings on the immunological features of these diseases, and provide a perspective within which strategies for effective vaccination and treatment can be developed.

AIDS Vaccines↗

The chemokine system: novel broad-spectrum therapeutic targets.

Chemokines are cytokines that specifically direct the trafficking of immune cells in the body. They offer a novel point of therapeutic intervention, as inhibiting specific chemokines and receptors could prevent the excessive recruitment of leukocytes to sites of inflammation. This approach could be considered to act upstream of the therapies used today which, for the most part, act on the cells already at the site of inflammation. The receptors for chemokines are G-protein-coupled seven-transmembrane receptors, which are particularly tractable for the pharmaceutical industry. The search for small-molecule inhibitors of these receptors has been fruitful and the numbers of patents and, more recently, peer-reviewed publications are growing rapidly. The first clinical trial was initiated this year, so although it is too soon to be able to report these results we hope to see the outcome of this research in the near future.

Animals↗

A chimeric MIP-1alpha/RANTES protein demonstrates the use of different regions of the RANTES protein to bind and activate its receptors.

Human RANTES (CCL5) and MIP-1alpha (CCL3) bind and activate several CC chemokine receptors. RANTES is a high-affinity ligand for CCR1 and CCR5, and it binds CCR3 with moderate affinity and CCR4 with low affinity. MIP-1alpha has similar binding characteristics to RANTES except that it does not bind to CCR3. Here we have generated a chimera of human MIP-1alpha and RANTES, called MIP/RANTES, consisting of the eight amino terminal residues of MIP-1alpha preceding the CC motif, and the remainder of the sequence is RANTES. The chimera is able to induce chemotaxis of human monocytes. MIP/RANTES has >100-fold reduction in binding to CCR1 and does not bind to CCR3 but retains full, functional binding to CCR5. It has equivalent affinity for CCR5 to MIP-1alpha and RANTES, binding with an IC(50) of 1.12 nM, and is able to mobilize calcium and induce endocytosis of CCR5 in PBMC in a manner equi-potent to RANTES. It also retains the ability to inhibit R5 using HIV-1 strains. Therefore, we conclude that the amino terminus of RANTES is not involved in CCR5 binding, but it is essential for CCR1 and CCR3.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Functional expression of CCR1, CCR3, CCR4, and CXCR4 chemokine receptors on human platelets.

Platelets are known to contain platelet factor 4 and beta-thromboglobulin, alpha-chemokines containing the CXC motif, but recent studies extended the range to the beta-family characterized by the CC motif, including RANTES and Gro-alpha. There is also evidence for expression of chemokine receptors CCR4 and CXCR4 in platelets. This study shows that platelets have functional CCR1, CCR3, CCR4, and CXCR4 chemokine receptors. Polymerase chain reaction detected chemokine receptor messenger RNA in platelet RNA. CCR1, CCR3, and especially CCR4 gave strong signals; CXCR1 and CXCR4 were weakly positive. Flow cytometry with specific antibodies showed the presence of a clear signal for CXCR4 and weak signals for CCR1 and CCR3, whereas CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR3, and CCR5 were all negative. Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting with polyclonal antibodies to cytoplasmic peptides clearly showed the presence of CCR1 and CCR4 in platelets in amounts comparable to monocytes and CCR4 transfected cells, respectively. Chemokines specific for these receptors, including monocyte chemotactic protein 1, macrophage inflammatory peptide 1alpha, eotaxin, RANTES, TARC, macrophage-derived chemokine, and stromal cell-derived factor 1, activate platelets to give Ca(++) signals, aggregation, and release of granule contents. Platelet aggregation was dependent on release of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and its interaction with platelet ADP receptors. Part, but not all, of the Ca(++) signal was due to ADP release feeding back to its receptors. Platelet activation also involved heparan or chondroitin sulfate associated with the platelet surface and was inhibited by cleavage of these glycosaminoglycans or by heparin or low molecular weight heparin. These platelet receptors may be involved in inflammatory or allergic responses or in platelet activation in human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Adenosine Diphosphate↗

A key role for CC chemokine receptor 4 in lipopolysaccharide-induced endotoxic shock.

CC chemokine receptor (CCR)4, a high affinity receptor for the CC chemokines thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) and macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC), is expressed in the thymus and spleen, and also by peripheral blood T cells, macrophages, platelets, and basophils. Recent studies have shown that CCR4 is the major chemokine receptor expressed by T helper type 2 (Th2) polarized cells. To study the in vivo role of CCR4, we have generated CCR4-deficient (CCR4(-/-)) mice by gene targeting. CCR4(-/-) mice developed normally. Splenocytes and thymocytes isolated from the CCR4(-/-) mice failed to respond to the CCR4 ligands TARC and MDC, as expected, but also surprisingly did not undergo chemotaxis in vitro in response to macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha. The CCR4 deletion had no effect on Th2 differentiation in vitro or in a Th2-dependent model of allergic airway inflammation. However, CCR4(-/-) mice exhibited significantly decreased mortality on administration of high or low dose bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) compared with CCR4(+/+) mice. After high dose LPS treatment, serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin 1beta, and MIP-1alpha were reduced in CCR4(-/-) mice, and decreased expression of MDC and MIP-2 mRNA was detected in peritoneal exudate cells. Analysis of peritoneal lavage cells from CCR4(-/)- mice by flow cytometry also revealed a significant decrease in the F4/80(+) cell population. This may reflect a defect in the ability of the CCR4(-/-) macrophages to be retained in the peritoneal cavity. Taken together, our data reveal an unexpected role for CCR4 in the inflammatory response leading to LPS-induced lethality.

Animals↗

The strategy of blocking the chemokine system to combat disease.

One of the key characteristics of inflammation is the recruitment of leukocytes to the site of inflammation. Most anti-inflammatory strategies act intracellularly on the target cells, but after the cells have migrated to the site. We therefore propose that the prevention of cellular recruitment by blockade of the relevant chemokine receptor/ligand pair would present a novel therapy in that it would act upstream of the therapies currently in use. The chemokine system is a complex family of over 40 ligands and 18 receptors and as such may appear difficult to inhibit selectively. In the first part of the article we discuss the specificity mechanisms that are beginning to be unraveled which we believe occur at multiple levels. These levels of control of specificity include the temporal regulation of both the ligands and their receptors, which are under the control of pro-inflammatory cytokines; the localization of chemokines on cell surfaces through their interactions with glycosaminoglycans; differential receptor/ligand interactions; and different patterns of receptor trafficking, to name but a few. The chemokine system has been validated as providing good therapeutic targets by several approaches. In our laboratory, we have used a chemokine receptor antagonist in models of inflammation in vivo to demonstrate that this approach is successful in reducing inflammation. Chemokine receptors belong to the class of seven transmembrane spanning receptors, which have proven to be excellent targets by the pharmaceutical industry for many diseases. The number of small molecule inhibitors of chemokine receptors is rapidly growing in the patent literature, and reports both in the literature as well as conferences in the field have shown them to be effective in inflammatory disease models, as well as inhibiting HIV-1 infection. Since clinical trials will begin this year with some of these molecules, hopefully we will fairly soon have the answer of the efficacy of this therapeutic approach.

Animals↗

Evaluation of the Reveal and SafePath rapid Escherichia coli O157 detection tests for use on bovine feces and carcasses.

The Reveal (Neogen Corp., Lansing, Mich.) and SafePath (SafePath Laboratories LLC, St. Paul, Minn.) tests were evaluated for their performance as beef fecal and beef carcass Escherichia coli O157:H7 monitoring tests. Agreement between these tests and a reference test system was determined using naturally contaminated bovine feces and beef carcasses. The reference system utilized immunomagnetic separation with plating onto cefixime, tellurite, sorbitol MacConkey agar, followed by colony testing using a serum agglutination test for the O157 antigen. Relative to this reference method, the Reveal test showed a sensitivity of 46% and a specificity of 82% on bovine feces and a specificity of 99% on carcass samples. The SafePath test, demonstrated a significantly higher sensitivity at 79% and a similar specificity of 79%. On carcass samples the SafePath test performed similarly to the Reveal test, demonstrating a specificity of 100% relative to the reference system. There was an insufficient number of E. coli O157-positive carcass samples to estimate precisely the sensitivity of these two methods. Both methods show promise as rapid carcass monitoring tests, but further field testing to estimate sensitivity is needed to complete their evaluation. The proportion of positive fecal samples for E. coli O157:H7 by the reference method ranged from 10.2% to 36% in 10 lots of cattle with an overall mean of 17.3% (39/225). Quarter carcass sponging of 125 carcasses revealed 1.6% positive for the pathogen (2/125).

Abattoirs↗

International union of pharmacology. XXII. Nomenclature for chemokine receptors.

Chemokine receptors comprise a large family of seven transmembrane domain G protein-coupled receptors differentially expressed in diverse cell types. Biological activities have been most clearly defined in leukocytes, where chemokines coordinate development, differentiation, anatomic distribution, trafficking, and effector functions and thereby regulate innate and adaptive immune responses. Pharmacological analysis of chemokine receptors is at an early stage of development. Disease indications have been established in human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome and in Plasmodium vivax malaria, due to exploitation of CCR5 and Duffy, respectively, by the pathogen for cell entry. Additional indications are emerging among inflammatory and immunologically mediated diseases, but selection of targets in this area still remains somewhat speculative. Small molecule antagonists with nanomolar affinity have been reported for 7 of the 18 known chemokine receptors but have not yet been studied in clinical trials. Virally encoded chemokine receptors, as well as chemokine agonists and antagonists, and chemokine scavengers have been identified in medically important poxviruses and herpesviruses, again underscoring the importance of the chemokine system in microbial pathogenesis and possibly identifying specific strategies for modulating chemokine action therapeutically. The purpose of this review is to update current concepts of the biology and pharmacology of the chemokine system, to summarize key information about each chemokine receptor, and to describe a widely accepted receptor nomenclature system, ratified by the International Union of Pharmacology, that is facilitating clear communication in this area.

Animals↗

Amino-terminally modified RANTES analogues demonstrate differential effects on RANTES receptors.

Modification of the amino terminus of regulated on activated normal T-cell expressed (RANTES) has been shown to have a significant effect on biological activity and produces proteins with antagonist properties. Two amino-terminally modified RANTES proteins, Met-RANTES and aminooxypentane-RANTES (AOP-RANTES), exhibit differential inhibitory properties on both monocyte and eosinophil chemotaxis. We have investigated their binding properties as well as their ability to activate the RANTES receptors CCR1, CCR3, and CCR5 in cell lines overexpressing these receptors. We show that Met-RANTES has weak activity in eliciting a calcium response in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing CCR1, CCR3, and CCR5, whereas AOP-RANTES has full agonist activity on CCR5 but is less effective on CCR3 and CCR1. Their ability to induce chemotaxis of the murine pre-B lymphoma cell line, L1.2, transfected with the same receptors, consolidates these results. Monocytes have detectable mRNA for CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, CCR4, and CCR5, and they respond to the ligands for these receptors in chemotaxis but not always in calcium mobilization. AOP-RANTES does not induce calcium mobilization in circulating monocytes but is able to do so as these cells acquire the macrophage phenotype, which coincides with a concomitant up-regulation of CCR5. We have also tested the ability of both modified proteins to induce chemotaxis of freshly isolated monocytes and eosinophils. Cells from most donors do not respond, but occasionally cells from a particular donor do respond, particularly to AOP-RANTES. We therefore hypothesize that the occasional activity of AOP-RANTES to induce leukocyte chemotaxis is due to donor to donor variation of receptor expression.

Animals↗

Glycosaminoglycans interact selectively with chemokines and modulate receptor binding and cellular responses.

Chemokines selectively recruit and activate a variety of cells during inflammation. Interactions between cell surface glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and chemokines drive the formation of haptotactic or immobilized gradients of chemokines at the site of inflammation, directing this recruitment. Chemokines bind to glycosaminoglycans on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) with affinities in the micromolar range: RANTES > MCP-1 > IL-8 > MIP-1alpha. This binding can be competed with by soluble glycosaminoglycans: heparin, heparin sulfate, chondroitin sulfate, and dermatan sulfate. RANTES binding showed the widest discrimination between glycosaminoglycans (700-fold), whereas MIP-1alpha was the least selective. Almost identical results were obtained in an assay using heparin sulfate beads as the source of immobilized glycosaminoglycan. The binding of chemokines to glycosaminoglycan fragments has a strong length dependence, and optimally requires both N- and O-sulfation. Isothermal titration calorimetry data confirm these results; IL-8 binds heparin fragments with a K(d) of 0.39-2.63 microM, and requires five saccharide units to bind each monomer of chemokine. In membranes from cells expressing the G-protein-coupled chemokine receptors CXCR1, CXCR2, and CCR1, soluble GAGs inhibit the binding of chemokine ligands to their receptors. Consistent with this, heparin and heparin sulfate could inhibit IL-8-induced neutrophil calcium flux. Chemokines can therefore form complexes with both cell surface and soluble GAGs; these interactions have different functions. Soluble GAG chemokines complexes are unable to bind the receptor, resulting in a block of the biological activity. Previously, we have shown that cell surface GAGs present chemokines to the G-protein-coupled receptors, by increasing the local concentration of protein. A model is presented which brings together all of these data. The selectivity in the chemokine-GAG interaction suggests selective disruption of the haptotactic gradient may be an achievable therapeutic approach in inflammatory disease.

Binding, Competitive↗

A member of the dendritic cell family that enters B cell follicles and stimulates primary antibody responses identified by a mannose receptor fusion protein.

Dendritic cells (DCs) are known to activate naive T cells to become effective helper cells. In addition, recent evidence suggests that DCs may influence naive B cells during the initial priming of antibody responses. In this study, using three-color confocal microscopy and three-dimensional immunohistograms, we have observed that in the first few days after a primary immunization, cells with dendritic morphology progressively localize within primary B cell follicles. These cells were identified by their ability to bind a fusion protein consisting of the terminal cysteine-rich portion of the mouse mannose receptor and the Fc portion of human immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 (CR-Fc). In situ, these CR-Fc binding cells express major histocompatibility complex class II, sialoadhesin, and CD11c and are negative for other markers identifying the myeloid DC lineage, such as (CD11b), macrophages (F4/80), follicular DCs (FDC-M2), B cells (B220), and T cells (CD4). Using CR-Fc binding capacity and flow cytometry, the cells were purified from the draining lymph nodes of mice 24 h after immunization. When injected into naive mice, these cells were able to prime T cells as well as induce production of antigen-specific IgM and IgG1. Furthermore, they produced significantly more of the lymphocyte chemoattractant, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha, than isolated interdigitating cells. Taken together, these results provide evidence that a subset of DCs enters primary follicles, armed with the capacity to attract and provide antigenic stimulation for T and B lymphocytes.

Animals↗

A valid ELISPOT assay for enumeration of ex vivo, antigen-specific, IFNgamma-producing T cells.

We describe an ELISPOT technique for the detection of antigen specific IFNgamma-producing T cells. The technique is performed on spleen cells plated directly ex vivo into ELISPOT trays without an in vitro pre-culture step. Thus, the assay is likely to reflect the in vivo activity of the cells. We have found that very high cell densities (at least 10(6) cells/well) are required for optimal detection of spot forming cells, and only at a high density of cells is the number of spots detected linearly related to the number of primed cells plated. If lower numbers of antigen primed cells are used, then unprimed spleen cells from syngeneic mice can be added to the well to increase the cell density. Under these conditions, we find that the number of spots is linearly proportional to the number of primed cells plated, even if these are well below a million cells/well. Experiments with MHC congenic mice indicate that the high density of spleen cells required to obtain optimal spot formation reflects a requirement for an MHC restricted function, probably efficient antigen presentation to T cells. The formation of IFNgamma spots is antigen dependent and abrogated by depleting the antigen primed cells of T cells. We conclude that this linear assay can be used to efficiently detect ex vivo antigen-specific IFNgamma-producing T cells.

Animals↗

Chemokine receptors and their role in leukocyte activation.

Chemokines were originally isolated based on their abilities to selectively attract and recruit leukocyte populations. Over the last few years there has been an explosion in the number of new chemokines identified, and as a result many receptors previously considered to be orphans have now been paired up with their ligands. Here we review some of the latest results in this area, illustrating with data from our laboratory. The central question from a drug discovery perspective, is to show whether inhibiting chemokine receptors leads to a change in disease status. Although we are still a long way from having candidate molecules to take into the clinic, a flavour of what may be possible can be inferred from mutant chemokines with antagonistic properties. We discuss recent data using two of these proteins, Met-RANTES which has anti-inflammatory properties, and AOP-RANTES which has been shown to prevent infection of macrophages and T-cells by M-tropic HIV strains.

Animals↗

Enhancement of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection by the CC-chemokine RANTES is independent of the mechanism of virus-cell fusion.

We have studied the effects of CC-chemokines on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, focusing on the infectivity enhancement caused by RANTES. High RANTES concentrations increase the infectivity of HIV-1 isolates that use CXC-chemokine receptor 4 for entry. However, RANTES can have a similar enhancing effect on macrophagetropic viruses that enter via CC-chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5), despite binding to the same receptor as the virus. Furthermore, RANTES enhances the infectivity of HIV-1 pseudotyped with the envelope glycoprotein of murine leukemia virus or vesicular stomatitis virus, showing that the mechanism of enhancement is independent of the route of virus-cell fusion. The enhancing effects of RANTES are not mediated via CCR5 or other known chemokine receptors and are not mimicked by MIP-1alpha or MIP-1beta. The N-terminally modified derivative aminooxypentane RANTES (AOP-RANTES) efficiently inhibits HIV-1 infection via CCR5 but otherwise mimics RANTES by enhancing viral infectivity. There are two mechanisms of enhancement: one apparent when target cells are pretreated with RANTES (or AOP-RANTES) for several hours, and the other apparent when RANTES (or AOP-RANTES) is added during virus-cell absorption. We believe that the first mechanism is related to cellular activation by RANTES, whereas the second is an increase in virion attachment to target cells.

CD4 Antigens↗