Comparison of the effect of a 5-mg/kg and 10-mg/kg cyclosporine loading dose with single and multiple donor-specific transfusions on rat cardiac allograft survival.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to C B Davies.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The interactions of rapamycin (Rapa), CsA, and donor-specific transfusion (DST) were examined in an ACI to Lewis rat heterotopic cardiac allograft model. Survival data were truncated at 175 days for the purpose of statistical comparisons. Vehicle (Veh)-treated animals rejected at a mean of 7.3 +/- 0.2 days. Treatment with a DST on the day before transplantation (d-1) resulted in a decreased survival of 5.5 +/- 0.3 days (P < 0.05). An 8-day course of low-dose CsA (d-1 to d6) in Veh-treated animals prolonged allograft survival to 10.3 +/- 0.5 days (P < 0.05). The addition of a DST d-1 to the Veh/CsA-treated animals resulted in a synergistic prolongation of survival to 45.7 +/- 12.5 days (P < 0.05). Rapa proved to be a potent immunosuppressive agent in this model, with an 8-day course of Rapa (d-1 to d6) at 0.5 mg/kg/day (R1) or 1.5 mg/kg/day (R2), resulting in mean allograft survivals of 24.2 +/- 5.0 and 67.3 +/- 20.9 days, respectively (P < 0.05 vs. Veh or Veh/CsA). Rapa demonstrated synergy with CsA by further prolonging allograft survival to 115.9 +/- 27.9 days (R1/CsA, P < 0.05 vs. Veh/CsA, R1) and 164.6 +/- 10.4 days (R2/CsA, P < 0.05 vs. Veh/CsA). The extended graft survival using a combination of Rapa and DST, compared to Rapa alone, did not prove to be statistically significant. When all three treatments were combined (Rapa/DST/CsA), no significant benefit to survival was seen over Veh/DST/CsA (45.7 +/- 12.5 days vs. R1/DST/CsA, 81.9 +/- 18.4 days; R2/DST/CsA, 98.5 +/- 21.3 days; P > 0.05). If Rapa was withheld until postoperative day 1 (Rapa, 1.5 mg/kg/day on d1 to d6/DST/CsA), enhancement of the DST/CsA effect was seen with a mean survival of 170.2 +/- 4.8 days (P < 0.05). This suggests that the timing of Rapa administration may significantly impact its interaction with DST/CsA treatment and merits further investigation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The tolerogenic effects of immediate pretransplant donor-specific transfusion (DST) with cyclosporine (CsA) have been well described. The purpose of this study was to determine if these effects could be improved upon by the administration of post-transplant DSTs. When added to a 29-day course of CsA, a single DST given 24 hr pretransplant improved graft survival compared to CsA alone (84.9 +/- 12.3 vs 40.0 +/- 8.8 days; P less than 0.05). The administration of an additional DST on post-transplant Days 7, 14, and 21 further improved this survival to 152 +/- 28 days, with 45% of grafts surviving greater than 200 days, until sacrifice. The donor specificity of this effect was demonstrated by the increased survival of second ACI grafts transplanted into Lewis recipients with existing "tolerant" ACI allografts (long-term survivors, or LTS); third-party Buffalo rat hearts transplanted into LTS rats in a similar manner were rejected normally. Loss of graft antigenicity was not seen, as retransplanted ACI hearts obtained from LTS Lewis rats were rejected in a first-order manner. From this we conclude that (1) the addition of multiple post-transplant DSTs improve the enhancement seen with preoperative DST and CsA, (2) loss of graft antigenicity does not contribute to this improved enhancement, and (3) this effect appears to be donor antigen specific.
During the 7-year period from March 1984 to June 1991, 86 haploidentical living related kidney recipients were entered into one of three donor-specific transfusion (DST) and cyclosporine treatment protocols: (1) Multiple pretransplant DSTs with cyclosporine begun after transplant, n = 34; (2) Multiple pretransplant DSTs with cyclosporine begun pretransplant, n = 31; and (3) a single DST 24 to 48 hours before transplant with intravenous cyclosporine initiated after the transfusion, n = 21. Triple immunosuppression (prednisone, azathioprine, and cyclosporine) was continued in all groups after transplant. The 1-year patient (97%, 97%, and 93%, p = not significant) and graft (91%, 90%, and 87%, p = not significant) survival were similar for the three groups. No differences were seen in the incidence of rejection at 1 year (61%, 45%, and 60%, p = not significant) or in the incidence of infectious complications (26%, 42%, and 47%, p = not significant). It is concluded that a single DST given 24 to 48 hours before operation followed by pretransplant cyclosporine is as effective as classic DST conditioning of recipients using either pretransplant or post-transplant cyclosporine. The single DST protocol has the advantage of not eliminating any donors because of sensitization and was less costly and easier to administer.
A prospective randomized preliminary trial was performed in patients undergoing cadaveric renal transplantation to determine the potential benefits, disadvantages, and logistic problems associated with the administration of donor-specific transfusions and cyclosporine initiated 24 hr before transplantation. Ten patients received DST followed by continuous intravenous CsA approximately 24 hr before cadaveric renal transplantation from the same donor. Twelve patients receiving sequential therapy with Minnesota antilymphoblast globulin, azathioprine, and steroids with subsequent conversion to CsA served as controls. Patient demographics and the donor characteristics were evenly matched in the two groups. While the study group had longer cold ischemia time and more evidence of renal dysfunction within the first two weeks, subsequent renal function was identical in the groups and there were fewer episodes of severe rejection requiring treatment with OKT3 within the first six months in the DST group (5 vs. 0, P less than 0.05), which also had less reactivity in mixed lymphocyte cultures against preserved donor-specific lymphocytes than did the control group (stimulation index 9.0 +/- 3.0 vs. 25.3 +/- 6.0, respectively, P less than 0.05). The need for dialysis, incidence of infections and other complications, and subsequent immunosuppressive therapy were not different in the two groups. It is concluded that DSTs and intravenous CsA initiated 24 hr prior to transplantation are capable of inducing reduced immunologic responsiveness against the specific donor. Patients treated with this therapy should receive organs from "ideal" donors without risk factors and cold ischemia time should not exceed 30 hr. Further clinical studies of this approach are warranted.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.