Biomedical subjects

C B Kuo

Publications and source records attributed to C B Kuo.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

A molecular mimic of phosphorylated prolactin markedly reduced tumor incidence and size when DU145 human prostate cancer cells were grown in nude mice.

Others have demonstrated the presence of an autocrine prolactin (PRL) growth loop in the normal human prostate. In this study we have used three human prostate cancer cell lines but have focused on the androgen-independent human prostate cancer cell line, DU145, to ask: (a) whether this autocrine growth loop is maintained beyond the loss of androgen sensitivity in the progression of prostate cancer; and (b) whether interruption of this growth loop by a PRL receptor antagonist, an S179D mutant PRL, could inhibit the formation of DU145-derived tumors. The autocrine loop was examined in most detail in the DU145 cell line but was demonstrated to be functional in all three of the lines by the reversible inhibition of growth in vitro by the S179D PRL receptor antagonist. To investigate the effect of S179D PRL on the growth of DU145 tumors in nude mice two sets of experiments were performed. In the first set, Alzet minipumps containing no PRL, wild-type (WT) PRL, or the S179D PRL (the last two delivering 4.56 microg/24 h and 4.26 microg/24 h, respectively), were implanted s.c. on day 1. On day 4, 5 x 10(6) DU145 cells were injected s.c. in the hindquarter. On day 22, the animals were killed, tumors were removed, measured, and subsequently fixed and processed for histological confirmation of tumor formation. The incidence of tumors in the no-PRL control group was 9/11 animals (82%). In the animals treated with WT PRL, the incidence was 8/10 (80%), whereas in the animals treated with the S179D PRL, the incidence was markedly reduced to 3/11 (27%). Although WT PRL had no effect on the incidence of tumors, the average size of the tumors increased from 25.8 +/- 5.99 mm(3) in controls to 66.66 +/- 18.06 mm(3) in WT PRL-treated animals. In the second set of experiments, 5 x 10(6) DU145 cells were injected on day 1. On day 18, Alzet minipumps containing no PRL, WT PRL, or S179D PRL were implanted. On day 42, the animals were killed and the tumors processed as before. S179D PRL caused a reduction in tumor size from 1731 +/- 283 mm(3) in the no-PRL controls to 1031 +/- 295 mm(3), whereas WT PRL slightly increased the size to 2118 +/- 630 mm(3). We conclude that PRL is used as an autocrine growth factor by human prostate cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo and that interruption of this growth loop in vivo inhibits tumor initiation and the growth of well-established tumors.

Androgens↗

PubMed2001

Administration of unmodified prolactin (U-PRL) and a molecular mimic of phosphorylated prolactin (PP-PRL) during rat pregnancy provides evidence that the U-PRL:PP-PRL ratio is crucial to the normal development of pup tissues.

During rat pregnancy initial high concentrations of prolactin (PRL) decline by about day 9, concomitant with an increase in the ratio of unmodified to phosphorylated PRL. The physiological significance of both the decline in total PRL and the change in ratio of the two PRLs is unknown. To test the importance of each, either unmodified PRL (U-PRL) or a molecular mimic of phosphorylated PRL (PP-PRL) were continuously administered to rats throughout pregnancy. A dose of 6 microg/24 h resulted in circulating concentrations of 50 ng/ml of each administered PRL and had little effect on the pregnancy itself. After birth, pups were killed and various tissues examined. In the pup lungs, exposure to additional PP-PRL caused a reduction in epithelial integrity and an increase in apoptosis, whereas exposure to additional U-PRL had beneficial, anti-apoptotic effects. In the heart, PP-PRL caused an apparent developmental delay, whereas U-PRL promoted tissue compaction. In the blood, U-PRL increased the number of mature red blood cells at the expense of white blood cell production. Within the white blood cell population, myelopoiesis was favored at the expense of lymphopoiesis. PP-PRL, in contrast, had a less dramatic influence on the hematopoietic compartment by promoting red blood cell maturation and granulocyte production. In the thymus, exposure to PP-PRL caused accumulation of apoptotic thymocytes in enlarged glands, whereas exposure to U-PRL resulted in smaller thymi. In the spleen, exposure to U-PRL increased cellularity, with the majority of cells belonging to the erythroid series - a finding consistent with increased red blood cells in the circulation. Exposure to PP-PRL was without discernible effect. In all of these tissues, the contrasting effects of the two PRLs indicate that the absolute concentration of PRL is not crucial, but that the ratio of U-PRL to PP-PRL has a profound effect on tissue development. In brown fat, both PRL preparations decreased the number of lipid droplets. This result is therefore probably a consequence of the increase in total PRL. The results of this study attest to the importance of the U-PRL:PP-PRL ratio normally present during pregnancy and have provided clues as to the possible pathogenesis of a variety of neonatal problems.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Effects of prolactin on osteoblast alkaline phosphatase and bone formation in the developing rat.

The purpose of the current study was to determine whether maternal prolactin (PRL) had any effects on bone formation in the developing rat pup. Because the most prevalent forms of PRL in rats are unmodified and phosphorylated PRL, both recombinant PRL and a molecular mimic of phosphorylated PRL (PP-PRL) were administered to pregnant animals. Blood samples from the dams showed normal estrogen and progesterone and no effect of extra PRL on parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium, or alkaline phosphatase (AP). In newborn pups, however, there was a 30% decrease in blood AP in both PRL-treated groups, whereas PTH and calcium levels were not different from controls. When primary rat osteoblasts were exposed to both PRLs, AP activity was reduced, with PP-PRL being the more potent form of the hormone. Histological examination of pup bone formation showed reduced calvarial bone and reduced endochondral ossification in pups exposed to PP-PRL. These results are the first to show a direct inhibitory effect of PRL on osteoblast function.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗

PubMed1999

Dissociation of Janus kinase 2 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 activation after treatment of Nb2 cells with a molecular mimic of phosphorylated prolactin.

We have previously demonstrated that phosphorylated PRL acts as an antagonist to the Nb2 proliferative activities of unmodified PRL. A molecular mimic of phosphorylated PRL, which substitutes an aspartate residue for the normally phosphorylated serine (serine 179), has the same properties. Because it takes less than one fourth the amount of phosphorylated hormone, or the aspartate mutant, to block the proliferative activity of unmodified hormone, we have investigated whether the high potency of the aspartate mutant is achieved by the production of an alternate and interfering intracellular signal cascade. Nb2 cells were exposed to 5 or 500 ng/ml human NIDDK PRL, wild-type recombinant PRL (unmodified PRL), or aspartate mutant PRL (pseudophosphorylated PRL) for 1, 5, or 10 min at 37 C. At 5 ng/ml and 10 min, wild-type recombinant PRL showed greater activation of Janus kinase 2 (JAK 2) than the NIDDK preparation. This is consistent with a previous report of higher proliferative activity for the wild-type hormone and is primarily a reflection of the presence of some phosphorylated hormone in the NIDDK preparation. At 500 ng/ml and 10 min, saturation eliminated any differences between responses to the two preparations. JAK 2 activation was not seen in response to the aspartate mutant at either concentration. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT 5) activation was, however, just as robust for the aspartate-treated cells as for the other two groups. Time course experiments eliminated the possibility that STAT 5 phosphorylation in response to the aspartate mutant was the result of JAK 2 activation at earlier time points. Experiments in the present study also interestingly showed preassociation of JAK 2 and STAT 5 in the absence of PRL and the absence of detectable phosphorylation of either JAK 2 or STAT 5. Like JAK 2, receptor phosphorylation was absent with the aspartate mutant. A comparison between STAT 5a and STAT 5b activation showed a marked reduction in STAT 5b phosphorylation in response to the aspartate mutant, with concomitant reduction in STAT 5a-STAT 5b heterodimers. STAT 5a activation, however, was indistinguishable between the wild-type and aspartate mutant. We conclude that the nonproliferative aspartate mutant signals and activates STAT 5 without, or with minimal, use of JAK 2 or receptor phosphorylation. The wild-type proliferative PRL, on the other hand, uses receptor phosphorylation and JAK 2 activation.

Aspartic Acid↗

PubMed1998

Development of recombinant human prolactin receptor antagonists by molecular mimicry of the phosphorylated hormone.

Previous studies have demonstrated that naturally phosphorylated PRL antagonizes the growth-promoting effects of unmodified PRL in two different PRL-responsive cell lines. In this study our aim was to produce a molecular mimic of phosphorylated PRL by substituting a fairly bulky, negatively charged amino acid (glutamate or aspartate) for the normally phosphorylated serine [serine 179 in human PRL (hPRL)]. In addition, because of the marked effect of phosphorylation on biological activity, we investigated the importance of the unmodified serine in the growth-promoting activity of PRL. hPRL complementary DNA was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and subcloned into pT7-SCII after site-directed mutagenesis using the deoxyuridine approach. Proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) and were primarily found in inclusion bodies. Agonist and antagonist activities of each serine 179 mutant were assessed using the Nb2 bioassay. Compared with standard hPRL, the recombinant wild-type was more active in the Nb2 assay, attesting to both the absence, or low level, of endotoxin contamination in preparations from these cells and the appropriate folding of the molecule. The aspartate and glutamate mutants had no intrinsic agonist activity, but both antagonized the growth-promoting activity of wild-type PRL, with the aspartate mutant proving to be a very effective antagonist. Two hundred picograms per ml of the aspartate mutant negated 75% of the growth response to 400 pg/ml wild-type PRL. When serine 179 was mutated to alanine or valine, mutant PRLs with 0% and 14% of the biological activity of wild-type PRL, respectively, were produced. These results demonstrate 1) that molecular mimicry of the phosphorylated hormone does produce a PRL antagonist, and 2) that the serine at position 179 is crucial to the growth-promoting activity of PRL. The aspartate mutant can now be used to study many aspects of the physiology of PRL.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1998

Prolactin receptor antagonists.

Most prolactin (PRL) in the circulation is produced by the pituitary. However, a wide variety of traditional target tissues of the hormone have also been shown to produce their own prolactin. The amount produced per cell is low, but may well be sufficient for autocrine/paracrine activity. Although dopamine agonists allow one to study the target tissue effects of pituitary PRL, other agents, such as PRL receptor (PRLR) antagonists, are needed to analyze autocrine/paracrine loops. With PRLR antagonists, it should be possible to dissect out the role of extrapituitary prolactin in both the normal physiology, and the pathophysiology of various tissues. In tissues where the locally produced PRL may promote disease, such antagonists have the potential to be important therapeutics. This article briefly, but critically, reviews current understanding of PRL-receptor interactions and initial signaling, and describes the development of both growth hormone (GH) and PRL antagonists within that context. In the final section, results with a very potent PRL antagonist further one theme of the article, which is whether the simple receptor dimerization model explains all signal transduction following PRLR binding.

Animals↗