PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Borgioni

Publications and source records attributed to C Borgioni.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Prevalent influence of systolic over pulse pressure on left ventricular mass in essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Elevated pulse pressure, an index of increased large artery stiffness, has been associated with increased left ventricular mass. It is unknown whether this relation is independent or mediated by other blood pressure components. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined data in 2545 untreated hypertensive subjects (45% women) who underwent echocardiography and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Left ventricular mass increased with all blood pressure components and all associations were closer with ambulatory than with office blood pressure. In a multiple regression analysis, after adjustment for the significant association with age, gender, body weight and duration of hypertension, the proportion of variability of left ventricular mass explained by systolic blood pressure was greater than that explained by other blood pressure components. When different blood pressure components were forced into the same model, the same degree of left ventricular mass variability was accounted for by models including 24-h systolic blood pressure alone, or 24-h mean blood pressure plus 24-h pulse pressure, or 24-h diastolic blood pressure plus 24-h pulse pressure. When 24-h systolic blood pressure and 24-h pulse pressure were forced into the same model, 24-h pulse pressure lost statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The association between pulse pressure and left ventricular mass is explained by systolic blood pressure, which is the main pressure determinant of left ventricular mass in essential hypertension.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Left ventricular hypertrophy as an independent predictor of acute cerebrovascular events in essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) confers an increased risk for cerebrovascular disease in apparently healthy patients with essential hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2363 initially untreated hypertensive patients (mean age 51+/-12 years, 47% women) free of previous cardiovascular disease were followed up for up to 14 years (mean 5 years). At entry, all patients underwent diagnostic tests, including ECG, echocardiography, and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. At entry, the prevalence of LVH was 17.6% by ECG (Perugia score) and 23.7% by echocardiography (LVM >125 g/m(2)). Over the subsequent years, 105 patients experienced a first stroke or transient ischemic attack. The cerebrovascular event rate was higher among patients with LVH at entry, diagnosed by either ECG or echocardiography, than among those without hypertrophy (both P<0.01). After control for the significant influence of age, sex, diabetes, and 24-hour mean ambulatory BP, LVH by ECG conferred an increased risk for cerebrovascular events (relative risk [RR] 1.79; 95% CI 1.17 to 2.76). LVH by echocardiography also conferred a higher risk for cerebrovascular events (RR 1.64; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.68). For each increase in LV mass of 1 SD (29 g/m(2)), there was a significant independent increase in the risk for cerebrovascular events (RR 1.31; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.58). CONCLUSIONS: In apparently healthy patients with essential hypertension, LVH diagnosed by ECG or echocardiography confers an excess risk for stroke and transient ischemic attack independently of BP and other individual risk factors.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1999

Value of a simple echocardiographic linear predictor of left ventricular mass in systemic hypertension.

The need for calculations limits the clinical use of left ventricular (LV) mass. Because LV mass is strictly dependent on wall thickness for every given value of LV external dimension, we tested the clinical value of the sum of LV external dimension plus ventricular septal thickness plus posterior wall thickness as predictors of standard LV mass. We studied 295 healthy normotensive subjects and 1,686 subjects with systemic hypertension, followed up for 1 to 9 years. In the normotensive group, the predictor of LV mass showed a very close association with standard LV mass according to an allometric model (LV mass [g] = 0.230 x LV mass predictor [cm]3.01), with 99.7% of LV mass variability explained by the model. Also, in the hypertensive group, the LV mass predictor showed a very close allometric relation to standard LV mass (R2 = 0.998). During follow-up there were 154 cardiovascular morbid events and 50 deaths from all causes. The risk of cardiovascular morbid events and that of death increased to a similar extent with LV mass normalized by body surface area, height or height2.7, as well as with the LV mass predictor. The risk estimates for cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality provided by models including either LV mass predictor or LV mass uncorrected or corrected by height, body surface area, or height2.7 did not show any statistical differences between the different models. In conclusion, the sum of LV external dimension plus ventricular septum thickness plus posterior wall thickness, easily measurable from the M-mode echocardiographic tracing, very closely predicts standard LV mass in adult hypertensive subjects. The prognostic value of this measure does not differ from that of standard LV mass.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Circulating insulin and insulin growth factor-1 are independent determinants of left ventricular mass and geometry in essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) are independent determinants of left ventricular (LV) mass in essential hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 101 never-treated nondiabetic subjects with essential hypertension. All had 24-hour noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring and a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. We determined fasting glucose, insulin, and IGF-1 and postload glucose and insulin 2 hours after glucose. Insulin resistance was estimated by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA(IR)) formula. LV mass showed an association with body mass index (BMI) (r=0.47; P<0.01), postload insulin (r=0.54; P<0.01), HOMA(IR) (r=0.39; P<0.01), and IGF-1 (r=0. 43; P<0.01) and a weaker association with average 24-hour systolic and diastolic ABPs (r=0.29 and r=0.26; P<0.05) and basal insulin (r=0.31; P<0.05). Relative wall thickness was positively related to IGF-1 (r=0.39; P<0.01) but not to fasting or 2-hour postload insulin, HOMA(IR), and glucose. In a multiple regression analysis, the final LV mass model (R(2)=0.64) included IGF-1, postload insulin, average 24-hour systolic ABP, sex, and BMI. IGF-1 and postload insulin accounted for >40% of variability of LV mass. The final model (R(2)=0.36) for relative wall thickness included IGF-1 (16% total explained variability), average 24-hour systolic ABP, sex, BMI, and age but not insulin and HOMA(IR). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that insulin and IGF-1 are powerful independent determinants of LV mass and geometry in untreated subjects with essential hypertension and normal glucose tolerance.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Calcium antagonists and cardiovascular risk in patients with hypertension and Type 2 diabetes mellitus: evidence from the PIUMA Study. Progetto Ipertensione Umbria Monitoraggio Ambulatoriale.

We conducted a retrospective analysis of all subjects with essential hypertension and Type 2 diabetes mellitus enrolled in the PIUMA (Progetto Ipertensione Umbria Monitoraggio Ambulatoriale) registry, in order to evaluate whether the use of calcium antagonists is associated with an increase in cardiovascular risk in these subjects. One hundred and sixty-four consecutive subjects with no previous cardiovascular morbid events and coexistence of essential hypertension and Type 2 diabetes mellitus were studied before therapy and followed for up to 12 years (mean 5). There were periodical contacts with family doctors and patients in order to ascertain the occurrence of major cardiovascular events. The use of calcium antagonists that preceded the event was considered for classification. None of the patients was lost to follow-up. At entry, the patients who were subsequently given calcium antagonists (n=50) had a higher clinical (174/98 vs 161/92 mmHg, both p<0.01) and 24-hr ambulatory blood pressure (150/90 vs 141/84 mmHg, both p<0.01) than those who were not. During follow-up there were 53 major cardiovascular morbid events (6.46 per 100 person-years). The rate of total cardiovascular events [5.6 vs 6.8 events per 100 person-years, relative risk 0.88 (95% CI: 0.47-1.61)] and that of cardiac events [4.0 vs 3.3 events per 100 person-years, relative risk 1.33 (95% CI: 0.62-2.89)] did not differ between users of calcium antagonists and non-users. The use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (n=66) was unrelated to the risk of cardiovascular events (relative risk 1.24, 95% CI: 0.71-2.16). In a Cox multivariate analysis, only age (p=0.002) and 24-hr pulse pressure (p=0.04) were independent predictors of cardiovascular events. In conclusion, this cohort study does not support the hypothesis that use of calcium antagonists is associated with an excess risk of adverse cardiovascular events in uncomplicated subjects with essential hypertension and Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Prognostic value of a new electrocardiographic method for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: We tested the prognostic value of a new electrocardiographic (ECG) method (Perugia score) for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in essential hypertension and compared it with five standard methods (Cornell voltage, Framingham criterion, Romhilt-Estes point score, left ventricular strain, Sokolow-Lyon voltage). BACKGROUND: Several standard ECG methods for assessment of LVH are used in the clinical setting, but a comparative prognostic assessment is lacking. METHODS: A total of 1,717 white hypertensive subjects (mean age 52 years; 51% men) were prospectively followed up for up to 10 years (mean 3.3). RESULTS: At entry, the prevalence of LVH was 17.8% (Perugia score), 9.1% (Cornell), 3.9% (Framingham), 5.2% (Romhilt-Estes), 6.4% (strain) and 13.1% (Sokolow-Lyon). During follow-up there were 159 major cardiovascular morbid events (33 fatal). The event rate was higher in the subjects with than in those without LVH (all p < 0.001) according to all methods except the Sokolow-Lyon method. By multivariate analysis, an independent association between LVH and cardiovascular disease risk was maintained by the Perugia score (hazard ratio [HR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 2.8) and the Framingham (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.2), Romhilt-Estes (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.7 to 4.1) and strain methods (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.2). The Perugia score showed the highest population-attributable risk for cardiovascular events, accounting for 15.6% of all cases, whereas the Framingham, Romhilt-Estes and strain methods accounted for 3.0%, 7.4% and 6.8% of all events, respectively. LVH diagnosed by the Perugia score was also associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR 4.21, 95% CI 2.1 to 8.7), with a population-attributable risk of 37.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The Perugia score carried the highest population-attributable risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared with classic methods for detection of LVH. Traditional interpretation of standard electrocardiography maintains an important role for cardiovascular risk stratification in essential hypertension.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1998

Lack of association between blood pressure variability and left ventricular mass in essential hypertension.

Blood pressure (BP) variability could induce detrimental effects on left ventricular (LV) structure in hypertension. We investigated the association between short-term BP variability, assessed with 24-h noninvasive ambulatory BP monitoring, and LV mass at echocardiography in 1822 untreated subjects (953 men, 869 women) with essential hypertension (EH). The standard deviation (SD) of daytime and night-time systolic BP (SBP, r = 0.13/0.10; both P < .001), but not of diastolic BP, showed a weak correlation with LV mass. Because the SD of daytime SBP showed a direct association with average 24-h SBP (r = 0.27), subjects were ranked into quartiles of the distribution of 24-h SBP. For each quartile, the subjects with SD of daytime (and night-time) SBP below or above the median were classified at low or high BP variability. In both genders, subjects with high daytime SBP variability were older than those at low variability (both P < .01). Within each quartile, LV mass did not differ between the groups at low v those at high SBP variability. Overall, age-adjusted LV mass index was 115 and 115 g/m2 in men at low and high daytime SBP variability (P = .84), and 116 and 114 g/m2 in men at low and high nighttime SBP variability (P = .31). The corresponding values in women were 98 and 99 g/m2 (P = .53) and 98 and 99 g/m2 (P = .64). In conclusion, when the effects of age, gender, and average 24-h BP are taken into account, short-term BP variability assessed with noninvasive monitoring is unrelated to LV mass in subjects with EH.

Aging↗
PubMed1998

Adverse prognostic value of a blunted circadian rhythm of heart rate in essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies revealed a direct association between resting heart rate and risk of mortality in essential hypertension. However, resting heart rate is a highly variable measure since it is affected by the alerting reaction to the visit. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the heart rate values recorded during the 24 h of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring are independent predictors of survival of uncomplicated subjects with essential hypertension. METHODS: We followed up 1942 initially untreated and uncomplicated subjects with essential hypertension (mean age 51.7 years, 52% men) for an average of 3.6 years (range 0-10 years). All subjects underwent baseline procedures including 24 h non-invasive blood pressure monitoring with simultaneous assessment of heart rate, one reading every 15 min for 24 h. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. RESULTS: During follow-up there were 74 deaths from all causes (1.06 per 100 person-years) and 182 total (fatal plus non-fatal) cardiovascular morbid events (2.66 per 100 person-years). Clinic, average 24 h, daytime and night-time heart rates exhibited no association with total mortality. However, the subjects who subsequently died had had a blunted reduction of heart rate on going from day to night during the baseline examination. After adjustment for age (P < 0.001), diabetes (P < 0.001) and average 24 h systolic blood pressure (SBP, P= 0.002) in a Cox model, for each 10% less reduction in the heart rate from day to night the relative risk of mortality was 1.30 (95% confidence interval 1.02-1.65, P = 0.04). Rates of death were 0.38, 0.71, 0.94 and 2.0 per 100 person-years among subjects in the four quartiles of the distribution of the percentage reduction in heart rate from day to night The baseline day-night changes in the heart rate exhibited an inverse correlation to age and to clinic and ambulatory SBP and a direct association with the day-night changes in blood pressure. The degree of reduction of heart rate from day to night also had an independent inverse association with total cardiovascular morbidity after adjustment for age, diabetes and left ventricular hypertrophy, but this association did not remain significant when average 24 h SBP and the degree of day-night reduction in SBP were entered into the equation. CONCLUSIONS: A flattened diurnal rhythm of heart rate in uncomplicated subjects with essential hypertension is a marker of risk for subsequent all-cause mortality and this association persists after adjustment for several risk factors. For assessing these subjects, a limited and uniformly distributed period of ambulatory heart rate recording during the 24 h is clinically valuable.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Early cardiac changes after menopause.

The mechanisms underlying the increased cardiovascular risk after menopause are incompletely known. To investigate whether menopause may induce left ventricular structural and functional adaptations in normotensive and hypertensive women, we compared in a case-control setting (1) 76 untreated hypertensive premenopausal women with 76 postmenopausal women and (2) 30 normotensive premenopausal women with 30 postmenopausal women. Subjects were individually matched by age (+/-5 years; range, 45 to 55), clinic systolic blood pressure (+/-5 mm Hg), and body mass index (+/-2 kgxm-2). All subjects underwent 24-hour blood pressure monitoring and M-mode echocardiography. Age, clinic and daytime blood pressure, body mass index, and smoking habits did not differ between the paired groups. After menopause, blood pressure fall from day to night was lower in both normotensives (10/15% versus 16/21%) and hypertensives (12/17% versus 16/21%) (all P<0.01). Menopause was also associated with a greater left ventricular relative wall thickness (38.8% versus 35.1% in normotensives, 40.2% versus 37.5% in hypertensives) and a reduced midwall fractional shortening (17.3% versus 18.6% in normotensives, 16.6% versus 17.9% in hypertensives) (all P<0.05). We conclude that menopause is associated with blunted day-night blood pressure reduction, impaired left ventricular systolic performance, and concentric left ventricular geometric pattern. These finding are independent of presence or absence of high blood pressure.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1998

Ambulatory pulse pressure: a potent predictor of total cardiovascular risk in hypertension.

A wide pulse pressure (PP) is a marker of increased artery stiffness and high cardiovascular (CV) risk. To investigate the prognostic value of ambulatory PP, which is currently unknown, we studied 2010 initially untreated subjects with uncomplicated essential hypertension (mean age, 51.7 years; 52% men). All subjects underwent baseline procedures including 24-hour noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.8 years (range, 0 to 11 years), and CV morbidity and mortality were the outcome measures. There were 200 major CV events (2.61 per 100 person-years), 36 of which were fatal (0.47 per 100 person-years). In the 3 tertiles of the distribution of office PP, the rate of total CV events (per 100 persons per year) was 1.38, 2. 12, and 4.34, respectively, and that of fatal events was 0.12, 0.30, and 1.07 (log-rank test, both P<0.01). In the 3 tertiles of the distribution of average 24-hour PP, the rate of total CV events was 1.19, 1.81, and 4.92, and that of fatal events was 0.11, 0.17, and 1. 23 (log-rank test, both P<0.01). After controlling for several independent risk markers including white coat hypertension and nondipper status, we found that ambulatory PP was associated with the biggest reduction in the -2 log likelihood statistics for CV morbidity (P<0.05 versus office PP). In each of the 3 tertiles of office PP, CV morbidity and mortality increased from the first to the third tertile of average 24-hour ambulatory PP (log-rank test, all P<0.01). Age, left ventricular hypertrophy, and nondipper status were independent predictors of CV mortality, and the further predictive effect of ambulatory PP (P<0.001) was marginally but not significantly superior to that of office PP and average 24-hour systolic BP. We conclude that ambulatory PP is a potent risk marker in essential hypertension. CV morbidity is more closely predicted by ambulatory than by office PP even after control for multiple risk factors.

Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory↗
PubMed1998

White-coat hypertension: not guilty when correctly defined.

The coexistence of persistently high office blood pressure with normal blood pressujre outside the medical setting is often referred to as 'white-coat', 'office' or 'isolated clinic' hypertension. The definition of normal blood pressure outside the medical setting is controversial. In our experience, not only the prevalence of white-coat hypertension, but also left ventricular mass measured echocardiographically and the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in this condition markedly vary on going from more restrictive (lower) to more liberal (higher) limits of ambulatory blood pressure normalcy over quite a narrow range. In a prospective study, cardiovascular morbidities of healthy normotensive controls and subjects with white-coat hypertension did not differ. A more recent analysis of our database supports the use of qujite a restrictive definition of white-coat hypertension (average daytime blood pressure < 130/80 mmHg) in order to identify the minority of subjects who have a low risk of cardiovascular morbid events during the subsequent years. A recent document published by the American Society of Hypertension suggests that slightly higher upper limits of ambulatory blood pressure normalcy (i.e. average daytime blood pressure < 135 mmHg systolic and 85 mmHg diastolic) should be used. In a follow-up study by our group, 37% of subjects with white-coat hypertension spontaneously evolved into cases of ambulatory hypertension, with accompanying increases in left ventricular mass. In that study, the probability of a subject developing ambulatory hypertension increased with the baseline values of ambulatory blood pressure and it was quite low (20%) for those with daytime blood pressures below 130/80 mmHg. In two recent controlled studies, the rate of development of ambulatory hypertension over time for untreated subjects did not differ between the normotensive control group and the group with white-coat hypertension. A final answer regarding the clinical significance of white-coat hypertension will come from very large surveys of the natural history of this condition in the long term. For now, we suggest a verdict of innocence for white-coat hypertension when low values of daytime ambulatory blood pressure (i.e. < 130/80 mmHg) and absence of organ lesions and other risk factors coexist.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1997

Prognostic significance of the white coat effect.

The difference between clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) has been used to quantify the pressure reactivity to the doctor's visit (white coat effect). We investigated the prognostic significance of the clinic-ambulatory BP difference in the setting of the Progetto Ipertensione Umbria Monitoraggio Ambulatoriale (PIUMA) study. A total of 1522 subjects contributed 6371 person-years of observation. All subjects had an initial off-therapy diagnostic workup including 24-hour noninvasive ambulatory BP monitoring. The predicted values of ambulatory BP progressively diverged from the identity line (white coat effect of 0 mm Hg) with increasing clinic BP, but the predicted values of clinic BP tended toward the identity line with increasing ambulatory BP. Hence, the clinic-ambulatory BP difference showed a direct association with clinic BP and an inverse association with ambulatory BP. Consequently, a high clinic-ambulatory BP difference predicted both a high clinic and a low ambulatory BP, whereas a low clinic-ambulatory BP difference predicted both a low clinic and a high ambulatory BP. The clinic-ambulatory BP difference showed also a direct association with age. During up to 9 years of follow-up (mean, 4.2 years), there were 157 major cardiovascular morbid events (125 nonfatal and 32 fatal). The rate of total cardiovascular morbid events did not differ (log-rank test) among the four quartiles of the distribution of the clinic-ambulatory BP difference (2.13, 2.92, 2.10, and 2.83 events per 100 patient-years for systolic BP and 2.94, 2.14, 2.58, and 2.16 events per 100 patient-years for diastolic BP). Also, the rate of fatal cardiovascular events did not differ among the four quartiles of the distribution of the clinic-ambulatory BP difference. The clinic-ambulatory BP difference, taken as a measure of the white coat effect, does not predict cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in subjects with essential hypertension.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed1997

Altered circadian blood pressure profile and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: In a previous analysis of the Progetto Ipertensione Umbria Monitoraggio Ambulatoriale we found a higher rate of cardiovascular morbid events among hypertensive nondippers than we did among dippers (5.86 versus 1.18 events per 100 person-years, P = 0.0002) for women, whereas the difference between the two groups was smaller and not statistically significant for men (4.15 versus 2.48 events per 100 person-years). These differences held in a multivariate analysis after adjustment for several confounders including average 24 h ambulatory blood pressure. In another analysis, the rate of occurrence of cardiovascular end-points was higher among nondippers than it was among dippers regardless of the definition of day and night (0600-2200 h and 2200-0600 h, awake and asleep, and 1000-2000 h and 2400-0600 h) and of the dividing line between dippers and nondippers (10 versus 0% day-night difference in blood pressure). OBJECTIVE: To test in a subsequent analysis based on a larger sample and a longer follow-up period, for both sexes, the prognostic value of a blunted diurnal rhythm of blood pressure. METHOD: We used the night: day ratio of ambulatory blood pressure, a continuous and normally distributed variable. RESULTS: A night: day systolic blood pressure ratio > 0.899 for men and > 0.909 for women (upper tertiles of distributions) identified a subset of subjects with greater than normal cardiovascular risk for any level of concomitant risk factors, wherease the hight:day diastolic blood pressure ratio was not statistically significant as an independent predictor. The excess risk for subjects in the upper tertile of the night: day systolic blood pressure ratio held after adjustment for several risk markers, including average 24 h ambulatory blood pressure. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a blunted reduction in blood pressure from day to night predicts an increased cardiovascular morbidity at any level of concomitant risk factors including average 24 h ambulatory blood pressure. Nondippers can be defined in terms of a night: day ambulatory systolic blood pressure ratio > 0.899 for men and > 0.909 for women, regardless of the diastolic blood pressure profile.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

Prognostic value of left ventricular mass and geometry in systemic hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy.

To determine the independent prognostic significance of left ventricular (LV) mass and geometry (concentric vs eccentric pattern) in hypertensive subjects with LV hypertrophy at echocardiography, 274 subjects were followed for up to 8.7 years (mean 3.2). All patients had systemic hypertension and LV mass > or = 125 g/body surface area (BSA) and underwent ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and echocardiography before treatment. Eccentric and concentric hypertrophy were defined by the ratio between LV posterior wall thickness and LV radius at telediastole <0.45 and > or = 0.45, respectively. Age, sex ratio, body mass index, office BP and serum glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides did not differ between the groups with eccentric (n=145) and concentric (n=129) hypertrophy. Average 24-hour daytime, and nighttime systolic ambulatory BPs were higher in concentric than in eccentric hypertrophy (all p <0.01). LV mass was slightly greater in concentric than in eccentric hypertrophy (157 vs 149 g/BSA, p <0.05). Endocardial and midwall shortening fraction were lower in concentric than in eccentric hypertrophy (96.5% vs 106.0% of predicted and 71.4% vs 89.7% of predicted, respectively; both p <0.01). The rate of major cardiovascular morbid events was 2.20 and 3.34 per 100 patient-years in eccentric and concentric hypertrophy, respectively (log rank test, p=NS). Age >60 and LV mass above median (145 g/BSA) were significant adverse prognostic predictors, while LV geometry (eccentric vs concentric hypertrophy) and ambulatory BP were not. The event rates per 100 patient-years were 1.38 and 3.98, respectively, in the patients with LV mass below and above median (age-adjusted relative risk 2.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 6.63; p=0.015). In hypertensive subjects with established LV hypertrophy, LV mass, but not its geometric pattern, provides important prognostic information independent of conventional risk markers including office and ambulatory BP.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1996

Predictors of diurnal blood pressure changes in 2042 subjects with essential hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the independent predictors of day-night blood pressure changes in a large population of subjects with essential hypertension. METHODS: We studied 2042 white untreated subjects with essential hypertension (mean age 52 years, range 17-93, 1052 men) who underwent 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on an outpatient basis. Night-time workers were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: For both sexes, the changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressures from day to night decreased progressively with age and increased with the reported duration of sleep. The 1207 employed subjects who underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during a usual working day had greater day-night blood pressure differences than did those who did not work (16.2 versus 14.0%). By using multiple regression analysis we assessed the independent association of several variables with the diurnal blood pressure changes. Age and diabetes for both sexes, and clinic blood pressure in men, were inversely associated with the nocturnal fall in blood pressure. The duration of sleep and the occurrence of blood pressure monitoring during a normal work day predicted a greater day-night blood pressure difference for both sexes; smoking predicted a greater nocturnal fall in blood pressure for women. CONCLUSIONS: Age is associated with an important and progressive attenuation of the day-night blood pressure difference in untreated and unrestricted subjects with essential hypertension. Other factors influencing diurnal blood pressure variations include clinic blood pressure, diabetes, the reported duration of sleep, smoking habits and working activity during blood pressure monitoring. These factors should be treated as potential confounders in the analysis of the relationship between diurnal blood pressure changes and target organ damage or prognosis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Association between persistent pressure overload and ventricular arrhythmias in essential hypertension.

Hypertension is a risk factor for sudden cardiac death, and some data indicate that frequent and complex ventricular arrhythmias may be additional risk markers in hypertensive individuals. We investigated the relation between ventricular arrhythmias and the persistence of increased blood pressure levels over 24 hours in subjects with essential hypertension. We studied 126 never-treated subjects with essential hypertension (83 men) who underwent 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and echocardiography. Premature ventricular beats were detected in 71% of the subjects. Compared with subjects in Lown class 0-1, subjects with frequent or complex ventricular arrhythmias (Lown class > or = 2) were older (54 versus 45 years) and had a longer duration of hypertension (5.4 versus 2.8 years), a greater left ventricular mass (147 versus 127 g.m-2), and a blunted nocturnal reduction in ambulatory blood pressure (7%/12% versus 12%/16%). The number of premature ventricular beats over 24 hours was associated with age (r = .25), left ventricular mass (r = .24), and pulse pressure (r = .18) and inversely associated with the present reduction in blood pressure from day to night (r = -.29 for systolic and -.25 for diastolic pressures). In a multiple logistic regression analysis, frequent or complex ventricular arrhythmias (Lown class > or = 2) were predicted by an age > or = 60 years (odds ratio, 10.4 95% confidence interval, 2.4-44.8), left ventricular hypertrophy at echocardiography (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-11.6), and a < 10% reduction in blood pressure from day to night ("nondipping" pattern; odds ratio, 2.9;95% confidence interval, 1.2-7.0). We conclude that in addition to the strong effect of age and left ventricular hypertrophy at echocardiography, the persistence of high blood pressure levels over the 24 hours ("nondipping" pattern) is an independent predictor of the frequency and complexity of ventricular arrhythmias in never treated subjects with essential hypertension.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1996

Prognostic significance of blood pressure variability in essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure variability is a determinant of target organ damage in essential hypertension, but its independent prognostic significance has not yet been assessed in prospective studies of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between blood pressure variability, assessed non-invasively using 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and subsequent incidence of cardiovascular morbid events in persons with essential hypertension. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We followed for up to 8.6 years (mean 2.92) 1372 individuals with essential hypertension whose initial off-therapy diagnostic work-up included 24 h non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Those with a standard deviation of daytime or night-time blood pressure below or above the group mean were classified as having low or high blood pressure variability, respectively. One hundred and eighty-two participants underwent repeated ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiography during follow-up, 2.7 years later. RESULTS: Target organ damage score was greater in the participants with high variability of daytime (P = 0.004) and night-time (P = 0.011) systolic blood pressure than in those with low blood pressure variability. In those who underwent repeated echocardiography, for every quartile of baseline ambulatory blood pressure, left ventricular mass at follow-up was greater (all P < 0.05) in those with high baseline blood pressure variability than in those with low baseline variability. During follow-up there were 106 major cardiovascular morbid events. Event rate was 1.99 and 3.26 events per 100 patient-years, respectively, in participants with low and high variability of daytime systolic pressure and 1.98 and 3.38 events per 100 patient-years, respectively, in those with low and high variability of night-time systolic pressure (log-rank test: both P < 0.05). However, in a Cox multivariate analysis, the variability score for daytime and night-time systolic pressure failed to enter the model (age, diabetes mellitus, previous cardiovascular events and average night-time systolic pressure were independently associated with cardiovascular events). CONCLUSION: Increased blood pressure variability, assessed with non-invasive monitoring, is associated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular morbid complications of hypertension, but also with a higher blood pressure, older age and a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus. Because of the relevant predictive effect of these associated factors, the adverse prognostic significance of increased blood pressure variability is no longer detectable in multivariate analysis.

Journal Article↗