PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Buschsieweke

Publications and source records attributed to C Buschsieweke.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

[Quantification of pulmonary emphysema in multislice-CT using different software tools].

PURPOSE: The data records of thin-section MSCT of the lung with approx. 300 images are difficult to use in manual evaluation. A computer-assisted pre-diagnosis can help with reporting. Furthermore, post-processing techniques, for instance, for quantification of emphysema on the basis of three-dimensional anatomical information might be improved and the workflow might be further automated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The results of 4 programs (Pulmo, Volume, YACTA and PulmoFUNC) for the quantitative analysis of emphysema (lung and emphysema volume, mean lung density and emphysema index) of 30 consecutive thin-section MSCT datasets with different emphysema severity levels were compared. The classification result of the YACTA program for different types of emphysema was also analyzed. RESULTS: Pulmo and Volume have a median operating time of 105 and 59 minutes respectively due to the necessity for extensive manual correction of the lung segmentation. The programs PulmoFUNC and YACTA, which are automated to a large extent, have a median runtime of 26 and 16 minutes, respectively. The evaluation with Pulmo and Volume using 2 different datasets resulted in implausible values. PulmoFUNC crashed with 2 other datasets in a reproducible manner. Only with YACTA could all graphic datasets be evaluated. The lung volume, emphysema volume, emphysema index and mean lung density determined by YACTA and PulmoFUNC are significantly larger than the corresponding values of Volume and Pulmo (differences: Volume: 119 cm(3)/65 cm(3)/1 %/17 HU, Pulmo: 60 cm(3)/96 cm(3)/1 %/37 HU). Classification of the emphysema type was in agreement with that of the radiologist in 26 panlobular cases, in 22 paraseptalen cases and in 15 centrilobular emphysema cases. CONCLUSION: The substantial expenditure of time obstructs the employment of quantitative emphysema analysis in the clinical routine. The results of YACTA and PulmoFUNC are affected by the dedicated exclusion of the tracheobronchial system. These fully automatic tools enable not only fast quantification without manual interaction, but also a reproducible measurement without user dependence.

Adolescent↗

[Does HRCT-emphysema index represent the entire lung?].

PURPOSE: : Comparison of emphysema index derived of thin section MD-CT of the entire lung volume and HRCT, simulated by calculation of every twentieth image of the whole data-set. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pulmonary emphysema was quantified by semiautomatic, segmentation of lung borders and assessment of lung volume and emphysema volume within these borders. The emphysema index (pixel index) was calculated. Statistical analysis was done by the sign-test and Bland-Altman-analysis. RESULTS: Median lung volume, emphysema volume and emphysema index are significantly higher in simulated HRCT. Median lung volume (emphysema volume) calculated by HRCT is 5118 ml (407 ml) and 5040 ml (367 ml) calculated by the entire MD-CT data-set, representing differences of 1 and 8 % related to the median lung and emphysema volumes. Emphysema index is 0.09 (HRCT) and 0.08 (MD-CT). CONCLUSION: HRCT overrates emphysema index compared to thin section MD-CT of the entire lung volume.

Adolescent↗

[Fully automatic detection and quantification of emphysema on thin section MD-CT of the chest by a new and dedicated software].

PURPOSE: Introduction of a novel software tool (YACTA -- yet another CT analyzer) for detection and quantification of pulmonary emphysema in thin-slice chest MDCT data sets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consisting of grey-level threshold-based algorithms (e. g., region-growing), expert rules and morphological image postprocessing YACTA segments the tracheobronchial tree prior to the detection and quantification of pulmonary emphysema. In addition to general parameters, such as the mean lung density (MLD) and the emphysema index (EI -- also described as pixel index PI), the previously described bullae index (BI) is transformed into a three-dimensional parameter for a morphological description of emphysema. A first evaluation of chest MDCT data sets of 11 patients was performed as well as a comparison of MLD, lung volume (LV), emphysema volume (EV) and PI calculated with two established commercial tools of Siemens Medical Solutions (Volume and Pulmo). Furthermore, the BI was calculated with YACTA. RESULTS: YACTA processed the image data without manual interaction and demonstrated more user-comfort than Volume and Pulmo software, which require manual correction especially for lung segmentation at the hilar regions to separate central airways from lung parenchyma. MLD, LV, and EV values calculated with YACTA were systematically higher (Pulmo: + 50 HU/+ 597 ml/+ 159 ml; Volume: + 32 HU/+ 110 ml/+ 155 ml). Different segmentation algorithms are responsible for this: YACTA includes areas not assessed by mere threshold-based techniques. Constantly lowered LV values of Pulmo are caused by a missing dilatation algorithm. The error correction as a special feature of YACTA results in increased emphysema volumes and indices. The segmentation of the tracheobronchial tree lowers the part of airways falsely classified as emphysema. CONCLUSION: The new developed software shows higher user comfort as established by semi-automated tools. RESULTS: of LV, EV, MLD and PI are comparable or moderately different. Automatic calculation of a BI is possible, providing information about bullous morphology of pulmonary emphysema. Further studies are necessary to correlate data with clinical or pathological parameters.

Adult↗