PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C C Chung

Publications and source records attributed to C C Chung.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection revisited: are there any health-related benefits? A comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colectomy is associated with less overall morbidity and improved survival for patients with colonic cancers. There are unfortunately limited clinical reports on laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. We therefore designed this study to compare laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with conventional open surgery, with emphasis on health-related issues from the patients' perspective in order to justify its role in the management of low rectal or anal canal tumours. METHODS: We carried out a non-randomized, prospective comparative study on a cohort of patients who underwent either laparoscopic or open abdominoperineal resection between March 1994 and December 2003. Patient demographics, tumour characteristics, operative morbidity and mortality, as well as overall survival were considered. The standard endpoints of last follow-up date and deaths were used. Data was analyzed according to intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were recruited: 31 patients underwent conventional open abdominoperineal resection (OAPR) and 71 patients were treated laparoscopically. Patient demographics, median follow-up period, as well as tumour characteristics were similar between groups. The median operating time was similar among groups (145 min in laparoscopic group vs. 156 min in open group; p=0.62). Patients in the laparoscopic group had significantly less blood loss (p=0.01) and fewer requirements for blood transfusion (p=0.01). Despite similar overall morbidity, the laparoscopic group had a reduced incidence of abdominal wound infections (p=0.01) and chest infections (p=0.01). Overall survival was significantly better in the laparoscopic group (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection confers definite health-related benefits the over open approach in terms of reduced septic complications and fewer requirements for blood transfusion. It should be considered the procedure of choice for patients with low rectal or anal canal tumour in whom sphincter excision proved inevitable.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2006

Improvement in colonoscopy performance with adjunctive magnetic endoscope imaging: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Although magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI) has been reported to improve the performance of colonoscopy, so far only a few randomized controlled studies have been published supporting its adjunctive role. This randomized study was designed to evaluate the role of MEI on the overall performance of colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted for elective colonoscopy were recruited. They were randomly allocated into two groups, either with an MEI view (study group) or without (control group). Examinations were performed by one of the two designated, trained endoscopists. The primary end point was intubation time. Other outcome measures included completion rate, pain score graded by patients, and ease of procedure as reflected by the number of attempts at straightening the scope, the number of times of hand pressure was applied abdominally, and the need to change the patient's position. Endoscopists were also asked to score the ease of procedure. Finally, in the MEI group, endoscopists were asked to comment on whether MEI helped to locate colonic lesions during endoscopy. RESULTS: In a 12-month period, 120 patients were recruited, with 60 patients in each group. The two groups were matched for age, gender distribution, and indications for colonoscopy. No complication occurred in either group. No significant difference was observed in the intubation time and colonoscopy completion rate. Other measures of ease of procedure and pain score were also similar. However, MEI was reported by endoscopists to be helpful in locating colonic lesions in 32 % of examinations with positive findings. CONCLUSION: For trained endoscopists, the device confers no benefit in terms of performance improvement. The only identified benefit is in locating lesions. Thus, while the routine use of MEI cannot be recommended, the device could be selectively offered to patients for follow-up examination after local treatment, or to patients with small colorectal tumors in whom laparoscopic surgery is planned.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision with colonic J-pouch reconstruction: five-year results.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the oncologic and functional outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) with colonic J-pouch reconstruction. BACKGROUND: TME is considered the established gold standard in rectal cancer surgery. However, data on laparoscopic sphincter-preserving TME are limited. METHODS: Patients with mid or low rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic TME with colonic J-pouch reconstruction by a single surgical team. Clinical and oncologic data were prospectively recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: From March 1999 to September 2004, 105 patients underwent laparoscopic TME with colonic J-pouch reconstruction. The mean operating time was 170.4 minutes and mean blood loss was 91.5 mL. The mean anastomotic distance from the anal verge was 3.9 cm. Conversion was required in 2 cases. The mean circumferential and distal margins were 17.1 mm and 3.4 cm, respectively. There was 1 case of microscopic circumferential margin involvement and 1 case of microscopic distal margin involvement. There was no 30-day mortality, and 6 patients underwent reoperation for major complications. There was no port-site metastasis. The mean follow-up time was 26.9 months (range, 1.3-65.6 months). The actuarial 5-year cancer-specific survival and local recurrence rates were 81.3% and 8.9%, respectively. Erectile dysfunction occurred in 13.6% of males, while 2 patients developed incomplete bladder denervation. Bowel function after ileostomy closure was satisfactory, with an average bowel motion of less than 3 times per day at 2 years after ileostomy closure. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic TME with colonic J-pouch reconstruction is a safe procedure with reasonable operating time and does not appear to pose any threat to the oncologic and functional outcomes.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

Colonic amoebic abscess mimicking carcinoma of the colon.

Amoebiasis is an uncommon disease in developed countries. Its clinical presentation can be variable and non-specific, and the diagnosis can be easily overlooked. We report a case of colonic amoebic abscess mimicking advanced colonic cancer with acute intestinal obstruction and liver metastasis. The presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of amoebiasis are also reviewed.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

A double-blind, randomized trial comparing Ligasure and Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy.

PURPOSE: The major problem after hemorrhoidectomy is postoperative pain. New techniques have been evolved to circumvent this problem. The present study was conducted to compare the outcomes of Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy and Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS: This study was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients with Grade 3 and 4 hemorrhoids admitted for hemorrhoidectomy were selected and randomized into two groups: 1) Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy or 2) Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy. The primary outcomes measured were the analgesic requirement and the postoperative pain score (assessed by an independent assessor). Secondary outcome criteria included the operating time, blood loss, hospital stay, patient satisfaction score, and early and late complications. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were randomized into two groups (LigaSure 24, Harmonic Scalpel 25). Two patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 47 patients (LigaSure 24, Harmonic Scalpel 23) available for final analysis. The age and gender distribution were comparable. The postoperative pain score (median 2.6 vs. 4.8, P < 0.001) and postoperative oral analgesic (Dologesic) requirement (median 5 vs. 13, P = 0.001) were significantly less in the LigaSure group. The operating time (median 11 vs. 18 minutes, P < 0.001) was significantly less in the LigaSure group. The hospital stay, patient satisfaction score, percentage of patients requiring pethidine injection, percentage of patients with first bowel movement on or before the first postoperative day, and complication rates were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy reduces the postoperative pain and operating time compared to the Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy. It is a safe, effective procedure for treating Grade 3 and 4 hemorrhoids.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized trial.

PURPOSE: A randomized trial was undertaken to evaluate and compare stapled hemorrhoidopexy with excisional hemorrhoidectomy in which the Harmonic Scalpel was used. METHODS: Patients with Grade III hemorrhoids who were employed during the trial period were recruited and randomized into two groups: (1) Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy, and (2) stapled hemorrhoidopexy. All operations were performed by a single surgeon. In the stapled group, the doughnut obtained was sent for histopathologic examination to determine whether smooth muscles were included in the specimen. Operative data and complications were recorded, and patients were followed up through a structured pro forma protocol. An independent assessor was assigned to obtain postoperative pain scores and satisfaction scores at six-month follow-up. Patients were also administered a simple questionnaire at follow-up to assess continence functions. RESULTS: Over a 20-month period, 88 patients were recruited. The two groups were matched for age and gender distribution. No significant difference was identified between the two groups in terms of operation time, blood loss, day of first bowel movement after surgery, and complication rates. Despite a similar parenteral and oral analgesic requirement, the stapled group had a significantly better pain score (P = 0.002); these patients also had a significantly shorter length of stay (P = 0.02), and on average resumed work nine days earlier than the group treated with the Harmonic Scalpel (6.7 vs. 15.6, P = 0.002). Although 88 percent of doughnuts obtained in the stapled group contained some smooth muscle fibers, no association was found between smooth muscle incorporation and postoperative continence function, and as a whole the continence outcomes of the stapled group were similar to those after Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy. Finally, at six-month follow-up, patients who underwent the stapled procedure had significantly better satisfaction scores (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a safe and effective procedure for Grade III hemorrhoidal disease. Patients derive greater short-term benefits of reduced pain, shorter length of stay, and earlier resumption to work. Long-term follow-up is necessary to determine whether these initial results are lasting.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed2005

Minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.

The present scarcity of literature on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery makes it premature to determine whether laparoscopic surgery should be the standard of care for rectal cancer. Notwithstanding that, the available evidence proves its safety and adequate oncological clearance. Moreover, current data do not suggest any detrimental effect on the postoperative and early oncological outcomes. On the contrary, there is level three evidence showing that laparoscopic technique results in less blood loss, shorter length of stay, and reduced abdominal wound disorders and pulmonary complications, albeit the overall morbidity remains similar to that of open surgery. Long-term survival outcomes remain largely unclear, however. Hence, it is high time that laparoscopic technique should be further evaluated, preferably by means of large-scale randomized trials, to define its exact role in the treatment of rectal cancer.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of needlescopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Laparoscopic appendectomy has been shown to improve postoperative recovery when compared with open appendectomy. The present randomized trial was conducted to evaluate any further difference in outcome between needlescopic appendectomy (NA) and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) in the management of acute appendicitis. Patients with the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis were randomized to either NA (instrument size < or = 3 mm) or CLA (instrument size > or = 5 mm). Standardized anesthetic technique and perioperative management were adopted. The primary end point was length of postoperative hospital stay. Other parameters such as conversion rate, postoperative pain score and analgesic requirement, return of bowel function, resumption of normal activities, complication rate, and length of the final scars were also assessed and compared. A total of 363 patients (NA: 174, CLA: 189) were recruited. Both approaches could accurately arrive at the diagnosis (NA: 98.3%; CLA: 100%). Compared with CLA, NA resulted in a significantly longer operation time (P = 0.015) and a higher conversion rate (P < 0.001). The final scars of the NA group were significantly shorter when compared with the CLA group (P < 0.001). Otherwise, there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups in terms of complication rate, postoperative pain score, length of postoperative stay, and other recovery parameters. NA resulted in a longer operation time and higher conversion rate. Except for a smaller scar, the present study was unable to demonstrate any other short-term benefits. Thus, the technique cannot be routinely recommended.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with colonic J-pouch reconstruction for mid and low rectal cancers.

BACKGROUND: Results of laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision and colonic J-pouch reconstruction are few. The aim of this study was to examine outcomes after this procedure. METHODS: Patients with mid or low rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with construction of a colonic J pouch, performed by a single surgeon. The patients were evaluated prospectively. RESULTS: From March 1999 to January 2002, 44 patients underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with colonic J-pouch reconstruction. There were 21 men and 23 women of median age 65.5 years. The median operating time was 180 min and median blood loss 80 ml. There was no conversion to an open procedure. The median distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge was 4 cm. No procedure-related death occurred. Four patients developed significant complications that required reoperation. With a median follow-up period of 15 months, no port-site recurrence was noted. Five patients developed distant metastases, and two had local recurrence in the pelvis. Bowel function was satisfactory at 6, 12 and 18 months after ileostomy closure. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with colonic J-pouch reconstruction is safe, with a reasonable operating time. Early results suggest satisfactory oncological control and functional outcomes.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Laparoscopy and its current role in the management of colorectal disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the current place of laparoscopy in the management of colorectal disease. METHOD: A literature search was undertaken on Medline between the period 1991 and 2002. RESULTS: From the literature there is good evidence that the laparoscopic approach is associated with at least some short-term advantages. Improved cosmesis and better patient's satisfaction are also evident. Because of this laparoscopy has been widely employed in various benign conditions. Among others, laparoscopic stoma formation, laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease and Crohn's disease, laparoscopic rectopexy, as well as laparoscopic assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure were commonly reported. As port site recurrence and oncological safety are of less concern, there have been increasing reports on laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Although long-term follow up data is still limited, results of large prospective studies as well as various randomized trials show that recurrence and survival rates of the laparoscopic approach were at least comparable to open surgery. As experience and confidence accumulates, there are also increasing reports on technically demanding, laparoscopic sphincter-saving rectal excision. Articles on functional aspects following this type of resection also start to appear, which might be one of the future directions. CONCLUSION: The applicability of laparoscopy to colorectal disease continues to expand. Laparoscopic approach should be considered for patients with benign conditions. For colorectal cancer, results from randomized trials so far have been favourable. Hence, the authors suggest the utility of laparoscopy in potentially curable cancer can also be judiciously relaxed.

Colonic Diseases↗
PubMed2002

Double-blind, randomized trial comparing Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy, bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy, and scissors excision: ligation technique.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients receiving hemorrhoidectomy using Harmonic Scalpel, bipolar scissors, and the conventional scissors excision-ligation technique. METHODS: Eighty-six patients with irreducible prolapsing piles were randomly assigned to receive 1) Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy using scissors excision-ligation technique or 2) bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy and Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy. Neither the patient nor the independent assessor were aware of the technique used at operation. Patients were followed up at 4 and 12 weeks after operation. The measured outcomes included 1) operation time; 2) blood loss; 3) postoperative hospital stay; 4) pain score; 5) pain expectation score; 6) date of first bowel movement; 7) number of pethidine injections; 8) number of dologesic tablets taken; 9) time off work or normal activity; 10) wound healing; 11) satisfaction score; and 12) postoperative complications, including anal stenosis and fecal or flatus incontinence. RESULTS: There was no difference among the three groups in the operation time, hospital stay, pain expectation score, day of first bowel movement, number of dologesic tablets taken, time off work or normal activity, wound healing, and satisfaction score. The complication rate also did not differ in the three groups. Both Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy and bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy were superior to Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in terms of reduced blood loss. Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy had the best pain score when compared with bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, and patients required significantly less pethidine injection after Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy than after Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Although the time required to return to work or normal activity remained similar, patients after Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy had the best satisfaction score among the three groups. CONCLUSION: The study shows that Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy is as good as bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy in terms of reduced blood loss but is superior because it is associated with less postoperative pain and hence, better patient satisfaction. However, these observed benefits are small, and the time off work or normal activity remains similar.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2001

Laparoscopic-assisted total mesorectal excision and colonic J pouch reconstruction in the treatment of rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Total mesorectal excision (TME) and colonic J pouch reconstruction has been widely practiced for mid- or low-rectal cancer. However, the laparoscopic version of TME has never been described. METHODS: Five patients suffering from newly diagnosed mid- to low-rectal cancer were seen between March and July 1999. These five patients were selected for laparoscopic TME and colonic J pouch reconstruction because preoperative investigations revealed resectable tumor without extrarectal disease. RESULTS: There were three men and two women with a mean age of 61 years. The average body weight was 69 kg (range, 57-80). None of the patients had had previous abdominal operations. In all five patients, the tumor was located within 9 cm from anal verge. The average size of the main incision was 5 cm. All patients had a covering ileostomy at the end of the procedure. The mean operating time was 208 min; average blood loss was 158 ml; and mean hospital stay was 10.6 days. Three patients had Dukes' B disease and two had Dukes' C disease. The resection margins (proximal, circumferential, and distal) were all clear. There were no deaths or major complications. Two patients suffered from transient urinary retention. After ileostomy closure, the median frequency of bowel motion was twice per day at 6-month follow-up. Neither incontinence nor nocturnal soiling was reported. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first published series of such an operation. With good patient selection, laparoscopic-assisted TME and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis is safe and feasible.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal lesions is feasible, but most reported series are heterogeneous and noncomparative. The aim of this study was to investigate whether laparoscopic-assisted resection was better than open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Twenty-five (study group) of 59 consecutive patients who were considered suitable were selected for laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection based on the availability of informed consent, laparoscopic instruments, and experienced surgeons. The results in these patients were compared with the other 34 patients operated on by the open method (control group). RESULTS: The median follow-up times for the study and control groups were 30.1 and 28.3 months, respectively. The operation time was significantly longer (t-test, p < 0.001), while operative blood loss (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.02), postoperative analgesic requirement (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.02), time to resume normal diet (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.04), and total hospital stay (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.02) were significantly less in the study than in the control group. The oncological clearance, complication rate, disease-free interval, and survival were comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection allowed earlier postoperative recovery, with equal oncological clearance, morbidity, mortality, disease-free interval, and survival.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Evacuation of the pleural cavity with an infant feeding catheter following en bloc resection of hepatocellular carcinoma and involved diaphragm--an institutional experience.

En block resection of hepatocellular carcinoma and the involved diaphragm will, towards the end of operation, require evacuation of the pleural cavity, usually with a chest drain. We describe our method and experience of evacuating the pleural cavity, at the time of diaphragmatic repair, with an infant feeding catheter without the need of a chest drain. We have found the method safe and efficacious.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular↗
PubMed1997

Laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma. Immediate and medium-term results.

BACKGROUND: The technique of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma has been established. However, whether such a procedure is beneficial to patients is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To review the immediate and medium-term results of laparoscopic-assisted resection in patients with rectosigmoid carcinoma. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: We attempted laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy or anterior resection in 50 patients with rectosigmoid carcinoma (ie, the study group). The results were compared with those of 50 matched patients who underwent conventional open resection in the immediate prelaparoscopic era (ie, the control group). RESULTS: The median follow-up times for the study and control groups were 32.8 and 39.1 months, respectively. The operating time was significantly longer (P < .001, Student t test), while the analgesic requirement was significantly less (P < .001, Mann-Whitney U test) and the duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter (P = .001, Mann-Whitney U test), in the study group than in the control group. The oncological clearance (ie, the number of lymph nodes removed and the distal resection margin), the complication rate, the disease-free rate, and the survival rate were comparable in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The immediate and medium-term results of laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma are promising.

Aged↗