Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to C Cedzich.
In summary, our results suggest that flash VEP monitoring is not specific for visual acuity and has not proved helpful as an intraoperative warning system. The future challenge will be to devise a method which activates only those fibers specific to visual acuity and which provides reproducible and reliable information quickly enough that adjustments in patient management can be made.
An 11-month-old boy was admitted for evaluation of drowsiness, vomiting, and convulsions. Computerized tomography showed subarachnoid blood in the left sylvian fissure and a small intracerebral hematoma in the temporal lobe. Angiography revealed several aneurysms of the left middle cerebral artery (MCA). During surgery, 13 aneurysms were found arising from one main branch of the left MCA, and this segment of the MCA was trapped. Somatosensory evoked potentials did not show any change during surgery. The diseased arterial segment was examined histologically and the pathogenetic aspects of the case are discussed. Control angiography 6 months later excluded systemic disease or other aneurysms. The rarity of such lesions in childhood and their successful surgical treatment are discussed briefly.
Changes in vestibulospinal evoked potentials (VsEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEP) were examined in 10 cats before and after two different weight-dropping spinal cord injuries. In six animals somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) were also monitored. The recordings were done from epidural spinal cord electrodes. Before and after severe and light weight-dropping spinal cord injuries all 3 modalities were recorded at the same time intervals till the end of 4th hour postinjury. According to a scoring system, evoked potential changes below and above the level of injury were monitored, and compared with each other. This study showed that the different motor stimulation methods use different descending spinal tracts, and both can be useful as a monitoring tool. Both descending tracts carrying VsEP and MEP had similarly remarkable changes after severe spinal cord injury. These consisted of major deformation, development of an evoked injury potential and complete potential loss. During the 4 hour monitoring period, no case showed EP recovery in the severe injury group. Light spinal cord injury caused somewhat more deterioration in MEPs than VsEP. The higher numbers of severe potential alterations in the lightly injured animals suggest that MEP is a more sensitive method for spinal cord monitoring compared to VsEP and also to SEP. On the other hand, this sensitivity might be a disadvantage during intraoperative monitoring, if MEP alone were used.
68 infants and children with proven tumours along the visual pathway visually evoked potentials with pattern reversal and flash were investigated. Subdivided in 5 locational groups (orbital, optic nerve, chiasmatic, retrochiasmatic and occipital lobe) best results were obtained by stimulation with pattern reversal using variable checksizes (91.2%) versus 61.8% by using flash evoked responses. Furthermore, using patterned stimuli not only latency shifts are best detected but also hints for visual function correlating to visual acuity could be given also in nonverbal or disabled children. For long term follow-up studies in known space-occupying lesions along the visual pathway, the use of pattern VEP is extraordinary because of its high sensitivity and complete harmlessness. Pattern VEP are even more sensitive than visual acuity testing in cooperative patients. The close interdisciplinary follow-up controls in these children between pediatric neurophysiologists and neurosurgeons are, therefore, strongly recommended.
Flash-evoked visual potentials (VEPs) recorded from the scalp were used in a series of 35 patients with tumors along the visual pathway: 3 orbital tumors, 25 perisellar tumors, 4 intraventricular tumors, and 3 occipital lesions. Preoperatively, various combinations of impaired visual fields and visual acuity were observed in over 90% of the patients. A postoperative decrease in visual function was observed in 3 cases. Of the 25 perisellar lesions, 13 were operated through a standard frontotemporal craniotomy and 12 were operated through a transnasal-transsphenoidal approach. VEPs were highly susceptible to volatile anesthetics, and there was a significant incidence of spontaneous latency increases and amplitude decreases in a large number of patients. There was an unacceptably high number of cases with significant VEP alteration occurring without concomitant visual function change. During trepanation or the transnasal approach, a reversible potential loss was observed in 11 patients, a profoundly altered wave form was seen in 8 cases, and a loss of single peaks was observed in 15 patients. During dissection of the tumor, a reversible potential loss or a potential with unidentifiable peaks was found in 25 cases; however, the VEPs recovered during closure or in the recovery room. There was no correlation between intraoperative VEP changes and the postoperative changes in visual function. In only 1 patient with an insignificant postoperative decrease in visual acuity from 0.4 to 0.3 was there a concomitant intraoperative potential loss. The major conclusion of our findings is that light-emitting diode flash-evoked VEPs demonstrate intraoperative changes that appear too early and too prominently to be caused solely by manipulation of the optic pathways.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
A study was conducted comparing the incidence with which the N2/P2/N3 was obtained after flash VEP in 3 groups: anterior visual pathway lesions, non-tumor craniotomies and non-cranial surgery. These groups allowed evaluation of the effects of anesthesia, visual pathway lesions and craniotomy on the stability of the flash VEP. It was found that the latency was not significantly affected in the 3 groups, whereas the incidence of obtainable peaks and the amplitudes were adversely affected by anesthesia, cranial surgical manipulation and especially by the presence of a visual pathway lesion. These adverse effects were so marked that the application of flash VEP for intraoperative monitoring seems of little use.