PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Chiarello

Publications and source records attributed to C Chiarello.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Does global context modulate cerebral asymmetries? A review and new evidence on word imageability effects.

In this article we examine whether the distribution of function across the right and left cerebral hemispheres for lexical processing is influenced by the global context within which words are presented. A review of previously published studies indicates that the ubiquitous right visual field (RVF)/left hemisphere advantage for word recognition may be reduced or eliminated for nouns, content words, or high image words, but only when such items are presented along with verbs, function words, or low image words. However, paradoxically, when the former items are presented in more homogeneous contexts, the RVF advantage is uniformly observed. We propose that the processing efficiency of a hemisphere for a given stimulus depends on that item's relation to the other stimuli provided, that is, the global context. This was examined in a visual half-field experiment that varied whether high and low image nouns were presented in homogeneous (blocked lists) or heterogeneous (mixed lists) contexts. An unvarying RVF advantage was observed for high image words in homogeneous contexts, but this advantage was eliminated when the same items were presented in heterogeneous contexts. We suggest that stimulus heterogeneity maximizes reliance on differing, but complementary, computational biases across hemispheres. Hence, the extent to which the left and right hemispheres are recruited for the recognition of individual word types can vary dynamically with variation in the stimulus environment.

Adult↗

Bihemispheric sensitivity to sentence anomaly.

This study investigated cerebral asymmetries in sensitivity to sentence-level semantic anomaly. To separate the effects of anomalous message processing from those attributable to low sentence constraint, low-constraint sentence-fragment primes were followed by target words presented to the left or right visual fields. When completed by the target word, the sentences represented either normal or anomalous messages; in addition, one-half of the sentence primes contained a word strongly related to the target. Targets presented to both the left and right visual fields were advantaged by the presence of a related word, and disadvantaged by the presence of a semantically anomalous message. Contrary to some previous claims, this result implies that the right hemisphere can construct some message-level interpretations from sentences, such that semantic anomaly is registered, even if finer gradations of sentence constraint are not. This rudimentary integration of word meanings in sentences may provide a scaffolding for right hemisphere discourse processing. In light of these findings, we propose a revised view of left/right hemisphere differences in the processes used to interpret sentence meaning.

Adult↗

Hemispheric sensitivity to grammatical cues: evidence for bilateral processing of number agreement in noun phrases.

The present experiment employed a grammatical priming task to explore the possible contributions of the left and right cerebral hemispheres to the processing of grammatical agreement. Stimuli were three-word noun phrases, with the prime centered above the fixation point and the target presented laterally to one visual field after a 600-ms stimulus onset asynchrony. Number agreement between primes and targets was varied such that the article of the prime could be consistent (i.e., each narrow shoe or all narrow shoes), inconsistent (i.e., all narrow shoe or each narrow shoes) or neutral (i.e., the narrow shoe(s)) with respect to the inflection of the target. Half of the subjects provided lexical decision responses and the other half pronunciation. The bilateral priming effect, obtained only in lexical decision, suggests that both the left and the right hemispheres are sensitive to certain grammatical cues. In addition to the task difference in priming, the inclusion of a neutral condition and of pseudo-inflected nonwords allowed these effects to be attributed to postlexical mechanisms.

Brain↗

Orthographic and phonological facilitation from unattended words: evidence for bilateral processing.

This study investigated hemisphere differences in sensitivity to orthographic and phonological similarity using a task that did not require deliberate metalinguistic comparisons between words. Two experiments investigated the influence of an unattended distractor item on the pronunciation of target words in the right visual field (RVF) and left visual field (LVF) in neurologically intact persons. Word and pseudoword distractors that were both orthographically and phonologically similar to the target word produced equivalent facilitation across visual fields (Exp. 1). When orthographic and phonological influences were separated in Exp. 2, each dimension produced reliable facilitation, and to the same extent in each visual field. These results, and others in the literature, are difficult to reconcile with the view that the intact right hemisphere is completely unable to access phonology from print. If subsequent research confirms these findings, it would suggest that passive activation of phonology in reading can be dissociated from articulatory mechanisms, and that left hemisphere superiority in some phonological judgements may depend more on the availability of articulatory rehearsal than on privileged access to phonological codes.

Journal Article↗

Imageability and distributional typicality measures of nouns and verbs in contemporary English.

Dissociations between noun and verb processing are not uncommon after brain injury; yet, precise psycholinguistic comparisons of nouns and verbs are hampered by the underrepresentation of verbs in published semantic word norms and by the absence of contemporary estimates for part-of-speech usage. We report herein imageability ratings and rating response times (RTs) for 1,197 words previously categorized as pure nouns, pure verbs, or words of balanced noun-verb usage on the basis of the Francis and Kucera (1982) norms. Nouns and verbs differed in rated imageability, and there was a stronger correspondence between imageability rating and RT for nouns than for verbs. For all word types, the image-rating-RT function implied that subjects employed an image generation process to assign ratings. We also report a new measure of noun-verb typicality that used the Hyperspace Analog to Language (HAL; Lund & Burgess, 1996) context vectors (derived from a large sample of Usenet text) to compute the mean context distance between each word and all of the pure nouns and pure verbs. For a subset of the items, the resulting HAL noun-verb difference score was compared with part-of-speech usage in a representative sample of the Usenet corpus. It is concluded that this score can be used to estimate the extent to which a given word occurs in typical noun or verb sentence contexts in informal contemporary English discourse. The item statistics given in Appendix B will enable experimenters to select representative examples of nouns and verbs or to compare typical with atypical nouns (or verbs), while holding constant or covarying rated imageability.

Adult↗

Constraints on sentence priming in the cerebral hemispheres: effects of intervening words in sentences and lists.

This study explored the role of syntactic organization on semantic facilitation for target words presented to the right (R) and left (L) visual fields (VFs). Sentence and unstructured list primes were contrasted and, in each condition, the effect of intervening unrelated words on the durability of priming within each VF/hemisphere was investigated. Each prime contained a critical word which occurred Near (one intervening word) or Far (six intervening words) from the target word and was semantically related to it or a neutral control. It was hypothesized that, for word lists, facilitation for RVF target words would decrease with increasing distance between the critical and target words. For sentences no decrease in facilitation was expected for RVF targets. However, for LVF targets, facilitation was expected to decrease with distance both for sentences and lists with no greater priming for sentences than for lists. The results supported these hypotheses. Priming effects that spanned several intervening items were found only when the primes were well-structured, normal sentences and the target words were presented to the RVF. These results suggest that while word-level priming processes are available to both hemispheres, the left hemisphere makes greater use of message-level syntactic and semantic mechanisms for sentence comprehension.

Adolescent↗

Sentence context and lexical ambiguity resolution by the two hemispheres.

A lexical decision experiment investigated hemisphere asymmetries in resolving lexical ambiguity within a sentence context. Sentences that biased a single meaning (either dominant or subordinate) of sentence-final ambiguous words were followed by a lateralized target related to the sentence-congruent or -incongruent meaning of the ambiguous word, or an unrelated word. In the RVF sentence-congruent targets were facilitated, while incongruent targets were not primed. In contrast, related targets were facilitated in the LVF, regardless of sentence context. This suggests that selecting the contextually appropriate word meaning requires the left hemisphere, and supports a right hemisphere role in maintaining alternate word senses.

Adult↗

Bihemispheric processing of redundant bilateral lexical information.

Cerebral asymmetries in lexical ambiguity resolution were studied. In 2 experiments, targets related to the dominant and subordinate meanings of ambiguous word primes were presented for lexical decision after a 750-ms stimulus onset asynchrony. Experiment 1 compared presentation of target words to the left visual field/right-hemisphere (LVF/RH), to the right visual field/left-hemisphere (RVF/LH), or after redundant bilateral visual field (BVF) presentation. Experiment 2 examined unilateral priming in the absence of a BVF condition. On unilateral trials, priming was observed for dominant meanings in both the LVF/RH and RVF/LH, whereas subordinate priming was obtained only in the RVF/LH. These results suggest a possible role of hemispheric interaction in the availability of ambiguous word meanings. BVF performance evidenced a bilateral redundancy gain and priming that resembled that obtained on RVF/LH trials. Additional BVF analyses were not consistent with a strict race model interpretation and appear to implicate hemispheric cooperation in the bihemisperic processing of lexical information.

Adult↗

Activation without selection: parallel right hemisphere roles in language and intentional movement?

Because language and praxis each require the activation and selection of knowledge structures in long-term memory (MacKay, 1985, 1987), it is reasonable to consider whether hemisphere asymmetries for such processes span both domains. Language and skilled movement are thought to be strongly lateralized to the left hemisphere in most individuals. Yet, although recent evidence suggests that the right hemisphere also contributes to language use in context, few similar arguments have been made for the right hemisphere's involvement in motor planning. In this paper, we review some of the evidence for a right hemisphere role in language and action processing and propose that within each domain the right hemisphere activates a range of relevant knowledge structures without selection.

Affect↗

Varieties of interhemispheric inhibition, or how to keep a good hemisphere down.

Recent views of cerebral laterality suggest that both hemispheres contribute to the performance of most cognitive tasks. This would appear to require regulatory mechanisms to coordinate, select, and integrate the processes subserved by each hemisphere. In this paper we consider whether interhemispheric inhibition is used to achieve unified performance from a bilateral system capable of producing simultaneous and potentially conflicting, outputs. We examine the theoretical bases and empirical support offered for three varieties of interhemispheric inhibition. Interhemispheric suppression refers to mechanisms that may permit one hemisphere to halt or prevent concurrent processing by the opposite hemisphere. Such inhibition may operate either in a reciprocal, or in a unidirectional, fashion. Interhemispheric isolation may require an inhibitory process that suspends information transfer to prevent potentially harmful interhemispheric intrusions. Finally, one hemisphere could impede processing within the other via interference, that is, by providing irrelevant or detrimental information. It is argued that, while such mechanisms are plausible, evidence supportive of each is not convincing. We consider why it has been difficult to obtain clear-cut support for interhemispheric inhibition and suggest some avenues for further research.

Brain↗

Depth of associated activation in the cerebral hemispheres: mediated versus direct priming.

This study investigated the depth of associative activation in the cerebral hemispheres. Semantic priming was assessed for direct (WATER-DRINK) and indirect (mediated: SOAP-DRINK) associates presented to the left and right visual fields across stimulus-onset-asychronies (SOAs) of 50, 250 and 750 msec. Priming for both the direct and indirect associates was found in both visual fields at all SOAs. Our results imply that activation via associated relations in semantic memory is early and extensive in both hemispheres. We relate our findings to the previous suggestion [5, 9, 14] that meaning activation is more narrow in the left hemisphere (LH) than in the right hemisphere (RH).

Adolescent↗

Activation of lexical codes for simultaneously presented words: modulation by attention and pathway strength.

Horizontal and vertical stings were presented in a "crosswords" format within left or right visual fields. Distractor strings were varied to examine the extent to which prelexical, orthographic-phonological, and semantic codes are activated for words not focally attended. The results supported 2 predictions of the pathway strength model of attentional modulation (JD Cohen, K Dunbar & JL McClelland, 1990). First, distractor influences were greater when participants attended to the weaker (ie, vertical) item and ignored the stronger (ie, horizontal) string, than vice versa. Second, distractors similar to the target facilitated, whereas dissimilar distractors interfered with, pronunciation responses. It is concluded that spatial attention can modulate word recognition processes, and that some interesting questions emerge when one abandons the assumptions of serial, noninteractive word recognition processes.

Analysis of Variance↗

Another look at categorical priming in the cerebral hemispheres.

This study investigated the effect of exemplar dominance on semantic priming in the left and right visual fields for words that are members of the same category, but not strongly associated. A low proportion of related primes was employed in lexical decision and word pronunciation tasks to assess the automatic activation of word meanings in each cerebral hemisphere. Priming was reliably obtained only in the LVF/right hemisphere. In addition, this effect did not vary with category dominance of the prime:equivalent LVF priming was observed for ROBIN-CROW (high dominant) and DUCK-CROW (low dominant) pairs. These findings support the view that a broader range of related meanings is activated during word recognition in the right, than in the left, hemisphere.

Adult↗

Semantic additivity and semantic inhibition: dissociable processes in the cerebral hemispheres?

We report the results of two visual half-field semantic priming experiments using a high proportion of related trials to examine hemisphere asymmetries for semantic processes beyond those attributable to automatic meaning activation. Contrary to previous investigations, we obtained inhibition for unrelated trials in both visual fields. However, priming was additive (being greater for words related via category membership and association than for either single dimension) only when words were presented to the RVF/left hemisphere. A third experiment, using centrally presented stimuli, implied that semantic additivity should be attributed to post-access meaning comparisons and inhibition to the generation of semantic expectancies. These results suggest (1) that inhibition and additivity are potentially dissociable "controlled" semantic processes and (2) that the left hemisphere predominates for meaning integration across successively presented words. The availability of finely tuned meaning integration processes in the left hemisphere may contribute to its superiority in language processing, despite right hemisphere competence for some semantic operations.

Adult↗

Typicality effects in artificial categories: is there a hemisphere difference?

In category classification tasks, typicality effects are usually found: accuracy and reaction time depend upon distance from a prototype. In this study, subjects learned either verbal or nonverbal dot pattern categories, followed by a lateralized classification task. Comparable typicality effects were found in both reaction time and accuracy across visual fields for both verbal and nonverbal categories. Both hemispheres appeared to use a similarity-to-prototype matching strategy in classification. This indicates that merely having a verbal label does not differentiate classification in the two hemispheres.

Adult↗

Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: some words do, some words don't ... sometimes, some places.

This study investigated spreading activation for words presented to the left and right hemispheres using an automatic semantic priming paradigm. Three types of semantic relations were used: similar-only (Deer-Pony), associated-only (Bee-Honey), and similar + associated (Doctor-Nurse). Priming of lexical decisions was symmetrical over visual fields for all semantic relations when prime words were centrally presented. However, when primes and targets were lateralized to the same visual field, similar-only priming was greater in the LVF than in the RVF, no priming was obtained for associated-only words, and priming was equivalent over visual fields for similar + associated words. Similar results were found using a naming task. These findings suggest that it is important to lateralize both prime and target information to assess hemisphere-specific spreading activation processes. Further, while spreading activation occurs in either hemisphere for the most highly related words (those related by category membership and association), our findings suggest that automatic access to semantic category relatedness occurs primarily in the right cerebral hemisphere. These results imply a unique role for the right hemisphere in the processing of word meanings. We relate our results to our previous proposal (Burgess & Simpson, 1988a; Chiarello, 1988c) that there is rapid selection of one meaning and suppression of other candidates in the left hemisphere, while activation spreads more diffusely in the right hemisphere. We also outline a new proposal that activation spreads in a different manner for associated words than for words related by semantic similarity.

Adult↗