PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

C Chisnell

Publications and source records attributed to C Chisnell.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Determining educational needs for the biomedical library customer: an analysis of end-user searching in MEDLINE.

The analysis of CD Plus usage logs provides an opportunity to determine specific areas where searchers are "missing opportunities" by misusing, or failing to use, system specific features. This paper describes a methodology, based on transaction log analysis, to provide automated, continuous analysis of end-user searching. The data collected in this process can then be used to enhance and provide insight into the educational needs of users.

CD-ROM

A quantitative method for measuring clinical user journal needs: a pilot study using CD Plus MEDLINE usage statistics.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a quantitative method for measuring clinical user journal needs based on an analysis of bibliographic search results. DESIGN: Retrospective bibliometric comparison of citation selections generated by clinical users on shared workstations throughout the Medical Center. MEASURES: Number of times each journal was identified by clinical users during multiple bibliographic search sessions. RESULTS: Clinical users identified 2,078 journal articles. The top 200 journal titles accounted for 55% of the clinical users' journal needs. Of the 901 unique journal titles identified, 489 (54%) were identified only once. CONCLUSION: Our pilot study demonstrates that analysis of bibliographic search results can be used to identify clinical user journal needs. Such a method could also be used to estimate user requirements for on-line, full-text medical journals.

CD-ROM

A quantitative method for measuring library user journal needs: a pilot study using CD plus MEDLINE usage statistics.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a quantitative method for measuring library user journal needs based on an analysis of bibliographic search results. DESIGN: Retrospective bibliometric comparison of citation selections generated by users in the library. MEASURES: Number of times each journal was identified by library users during multiple bibliographic search sessions. RESULTS: Library users identified 4907 journal titles. The top 200 journal titles accounted for 55% of the library user journal needs. Of the 1380 unique titles identified, 652 were selected once. CONCLUSION: Our pilot study demonstrated that analysis of bibliographic search results can be used to identify library user journal needs. Such a method could also be used to estimate user requirements for online, full-text scientific journals.

Bibliometrics