PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Couteau

Publications and source records attributed to C Couteau.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Influence of excipients on moisturizing effect of urea.

Water is the most important molecule contained in the skin and is bound to the intracellular hygroscopic substances called natural moisturizing factors (NMF). The clinical characteristic of xerosis is rough and/or coarse skin. This anaesthetic alteration necessitates cosmetic products application. In this study, we tested the efficiency of urea incorporated into six different emulsions (O/W) and 10 different gels. Skin of 10 healthy women (20 to 45 years) was treated using 50 mg of emulsion or gel containing 5% of urea. A skin surface of 16 cm(2) was chosen in the area of the forearm. The gain in moisturizing was performed measuring the skin electrical capacity using a corneometer (Courage & Khazaka, model CM 825), one hour after treatment. Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose gel has the least moisturizing effect. On the other hand, the mixture of polyacrylamide and C13-14 isoparaffin polysorbate 85 can be a good vehicle in the treatment of skin dehydration. Adding various oils (6%) or collagen in aqueous solution does not improve the efficiency of the tested products. Moisturizing effect of gels (polyacrylamine with C13-14 isoparaffin polysorbate 85) is higher than the one of emulsions (L/H).

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed2005

Sequential two-line strategy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: docetaxel-cisplatin versus vinorelbine-cisplatin followed by cross-over to single-agent docetaxel or vinorelbine at progression: final results of a randomised phase II study.

BACKGROUND: This phase II trial compared docetaxel-cisplatin (DC) with vinorelbine-cisplatin (VC), both as first-line therapy followed by cross-over at progression to single-agent vinorelbine or docetaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Overall, 115 patients received DC (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) both on day 1, every 3 weeks, arm A1) and 118 VC (vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2)/week on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 3 weeks, arm B1) for six cycles, and subsequently maintained by monotherapy with docetaxel (A1) or vinorelbine (B1) with cross-over on disease progression to vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 (A2), or docetaxel 100 mg/m(2), day 1, both every 3 weeks (B2). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Patient characteristics were balanced; median follow-up was 8.8 months. First-line response rate was 33.9% with DC and 26.3% with VC (P=0.20). In arms A1 and B1, respectively: duration of response was similar (8.2 versus 8.4 months); median time to progression was 5 months in both; median survival was 8 versus 9 months (P=0.38); 1-, 2- and 3-year survival was 36% versus 35%, 17% versus 10% and 13% versus 6% (P not significant). However, with a low number of long-term survivors, statistical significance was not reached. Overall, almost half of the patients crossed over to second-line therapy; there were no response with vinorelbine and 6 (11.2%) partial responses with docetaxel. Considering the safety profile, the occurrence of febrile neutropenia was 9.6% with DC and 26.3% with VC. Treatment-related mortality was 2.5% with DC and 8.5% with VC. CONCLUSIONS: The trend in favour of the DC arm in ORR, even though statistical significance was not reached, is consistent with previous reports. This study suggests an activity of first-line DC in advanced NSCLC, and that second-line vinorelbine does not provide additional clinical benefit. As already shown in other studies, the use of DC in first-line should provide a better percentage of long-term survivors, despite the absence of efficacy of the second-line in our study.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

High-dose, single-agent irinotecan as first-line therapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The efficacy and safety of single-agent, high-dose irinotecan (CPT-11, Campto) 500 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks were investigated as first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled into the study to receive a first cycle of therapy with irinotecan at a dose of 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, which could be escalated to 500 mg/m(2) for the second and subsequent cycles depending on toxicity. Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics were determined in the intent to treat (ITT) population and the high-dose population (i.e. patients who had received at least three cycles of irinotecan, the second and third at 500 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: Of 49 patients enrolled into the study (ITT population), 31 (63%) received at least three cycles of treatment with cycles 2 and 3 at an irinotecan dose of 500 mg/m(2) (the high-dose population). The response rates (RR) for the ITT and high-dose populations were 24.5% and 35.5%, respectively. The main grade 3/4 toxicities per cycle in the ITT and high-dose populations were neutropenia 22% and 17%, febrile neutropenia 5% and 3%, and diarrhoea 12% and 7%, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 were investigated in 31 patients in cycle 1 and 22 patients in cycle 2. Irinotecan clearance and SN-38 exposure were not sufficiently correlated with toxicity in cycle 1 to identify patients for dose increase in subsequent cycles. The exposure to irinotecan and SN-38 increased in proportion to dose from 350 to 500 mg/m(2). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that high-dose irinotecan can be safely administered as first-line monotherapy to approximately two-thirds of patients who present with advanced CRC following a selective first cycle.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

Stripping method to quantify absorption of two sunscreens in human.

With the aim to know the remanence of two sunscreens, PEG-25 PABA and benzophenone, two cases have been considered: the application of aqueous solution of two filters studied for the application of oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions containing the same two filters on the skin of 21 voluntary women. In order to determine the quantity of filter remaining in the stratum corneum after times of application, which vary from 1 to 7 h, a series of six strippings have been carried out. The sunscreen agents were assessed by HPLC. With this study, it has been possible to emphasize the best remanence of benzophenone 4. Moreover, the incorporation of photo-protective agents in a O/W emulsion promotes their penetration, and this is particularly due to benzophenone 4.

4-Aminobenzoic Acid↗
PubMed2000

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and the dose at which at least 50% of the patients experienced a DLT during the first cycle, and to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with only one prior chemotherapy treatment (without taxanes or topoisomerase I inhibitors) for advanced disease were included in the study. Docetaxel was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion after premedication with corticosteroids followed immediately by irinotecan as a 90-minute IV infusion, every 3 weeks. No hematologic growth factors were allowed. RESULTS: Forty patients were entered through the following seven dose levels (docetaxel/irinotecan): 40/140 mg/m(2), 50/175 mg/m(2), 60/210 mg/m(2), 60/250 mg/m(2), 60/275 mg/m(2), 60/300 mg/m(2), and 70/250 mg/m(2). Two hundred cycles were administered. Two MTDs were determined, 70/250 mg/m(2) and 60/300 mg/m(2); the DLTs were febrile neutropenia and diarrhea. Neutropenia was the main hematologic toxicity, with 85% of patients experiencing grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities in patients included late diarrhea (7.5%), asthenia (15.0%), febrile neutropenia (22.5%), infection (7.5%), and nausea (5.0%). Pharmacokinetics of both docetaxel and irinotecan were not modified with the administration schedule of this study. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan is 60/275 mg/m(2), respectively. At this dose level, the safety profile is manageable. The activity of this combination should be evaluated in phase II studies in different tumor types.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Photostability determination of arbutin, a vegetable whitening agent.

The target of this research was to evaluate the photostability at various pH values of 1.20 x 10(-4) M aqueous solution of arbutin (lambda max = 267 nm; epsilon = 7500 M-1.cm-1). This photodegradation appeared to follow first-order kinetics whatever the pH. The degradation rate constant was calculated to be 5.5 x 10(-4), 7.0 x 10(-4) and 24.1 x 10(-4) min-1, respectively at pH 5, 7 and 9.

Arbutin↗
PubMed1999

Phase II trial of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, epirubicin, and cisplatin for patients with locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent undifferentiated carcinoma of the nasopharyngeal type.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of the combination of 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, epirubicin, and cisplatin (FBEC) in the treatment of patients with undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type (UCNT). The study included patients with metastatic or recurrent disease (Group A) and previously untreated patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic disease (T >/= 3 or any T, N >/= 2, M0, according to 1987 criteria of the International Union Against Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (Group B). METHODS: From January 1992 to November 1996, 49 patients with histologically proven UCNT were treated with intravenous (i.v.) 5-fluorouracil (700 mg/m(2)/day by continuous infusion for 4 days), epirubicin (70 mg/m(2) i.v. on Day 1), Bleomycin (10 mg i.v. bolus on Day 1 followed by 12 mg/m(2)/day by continuous infusion for 4 days), and cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) on Day 5); this regimen was repeated every 21 days. Six cycles were given to Group A (26 patients), with bleomycin omitted during the last 3 cycles. In Group B (23 patients), only 3 cycles were given, followed by conventional radiotherapy (70 gray for 7 weeks). RESULTS: Of the 26 patients entered in Group A, 23 were evaluable for response. Nine complete responses (CRs) and 9 partial responses (PRs) were assessed, for a 78% objective response rate (ORR) (95% CI: 56-92). Three patients are alive with no evidence of disease after 43, 61, and 73 months, respectively. These patients achieved a CR with chemotherapy followed by consolidating radiotherapy to their target lesions. In Group B, the ORR was 91.5%, with 5 CRs (22%) and 16 PRs (69.5%) assessed in the 23 patients. Three months after the end of radiotherapy, the ORR was 87% (20 patients). After a median follow-up of 51 months (range, 24-67 months), 15 patients (65%) are alive without evidence of disease. Forty percent of cycles (51% in Group A, 25% in Group B) resulted in Grade 4 neutropenia, with fever and/or sepsis in 9.5%. Mucositis was seen in 42% of pretreated patients. There were 3 treatment-related deaths (2 from complications of infection and 1 bleomycin fibrosis at a total dose of 160 mg/m(2)), all of them in Group A. CONCLUSIONS: The FBEC regimen has good activity, with durable responses in patients with locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent UCNT. This regimen is safe for patients with locally advanced disease, but close follow-up and supportive measures are needed when it is used to treat those with metastatic or recurrent disease.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

CPT-11 (irinotecan) addition to bimonthly, high-dose leucovorin and bolus and continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. GERCOR.

CPT-11 (irinotecan) has shown activity in patients with advanced colorectal cancer resistant to leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In this study, the simplified bimonthly LV-5-FU regimen was combined with CPT-11 (FOLFIRI) as third-line therapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Continuous infusion of 5-FU was administered with disposable pumps as outpatient therapy. FOLFIRI consisted of CPT-11 180 mg/m2 as a 90-min infusion day 1; LV 400 mg/m2 as a 2-h infusion during CPT-11, immediately followed by 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m2 and 46-h continuous infusion of 2.4-3 g/m2 every 2 weeks. Among the 33 patients treated, 2 had partial responses for an overall response rate of 6%; 20 patients were stabilised (61%) and 11 had disease progression (33%). From the start of FOLFIRI, median progression-free survival was 18 weeks and median survival was 43 weeks. For the 242 cycles analysed, NCI-CTC toxicities grade 3-4 per patient were nausea 15%, diarrhoea 12% and neutropenia 15%. Overall, 10 patients (30%) experienced grade 3-4 toxicity. 7 patients (21%) had grade 2 alopecia. FOLFIRI generated activity and acceptable toxicity, in heavily pretreated patients, with limited diarrhoea, mostly asymptomatic neutropenia and manageable nausea and relatively uncommon alopecia. This regimen is suitable for studies in chemotherapy-naïve patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A phase II study of docetaxel in patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

This study was designed to evaluate the activity, safety and tolerance of docetaxel (D) in a selected population with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Twenty-four patients with no prior palliative therapy were enrolled and received D 100 mg m(-2) by 1 h of infusion, every 3 weeks. All but two patients had been evaluated for efficacy on lung metastatic sites. No prophylactic administration of anti-emetics or growth factors was given. A pharmacokinetic study was performed in 22 patients. Twenty-one patients were assessable for response and 24 for toxicity. One hundred and four cycles were administered with a median of 4.5 (range 1-9) per patient. The median cumulative dose was 449 mg m(-2). Partial responses were achieved in five patients with a median duration of 18.7 weeks (range 13.1-50.3). The overall response rate was 20.8% with a median duration of 11.0 weeks (range 2.4-52.6). The most frequent side-effect was neutropenia (79.2% grade IV) but with a short duration (median 4 days) and no febrile neutropenia. The incidence of moderate/severe fluid retention was 29.2% with one treatment discontinuation. Other toxicities (all grades) were common (skin 75%, asthenia 50%, infection 29.2%, nausea 16.7%, diarrhoea 12.5%, stomatitis 16.7%, vomiting 8.3% and HSR 8.3%). A mean clearance of 19.6 l h(-1) m(-2) and an area under the curve of 6.00 microg ml(-1) h(-1) was found in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Docetaxel is active in this selected population with metastatic SCCHN, with a good tolerance.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

[Small cell lung carcinoma].

Small cell lung carcinoma represents less than twenty five percent of all lung cancers. Nevertheless, a lot of studies permitted to better define this cancer and to propose specific therapeutic approaches. Clinical symptoms, results and roles of chemotherapy, radiation therapy and surgery are discussed in this review.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1998

[Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Diagnosis and evaluation].

SYMPTOMS: Pain, jaundice, or weight loss are the presenting features of 90% of the cases. Patients with tumors of the body or the tail of the pancreas do not rapidly develop jaundice. Therefore, their diagnosis is delayed and metastasis are more frequently detected at diagnosis. RADIOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS: The diagnosis may be established by ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasonography and most importantly by CT scan with helicoidal continuous acquisition and contrast injection. However, these methods do not efficiently detect tumors smaller than 2 cm or with only superficial peritoneal involvement. Laparoscopy and angiography are used less and less frequently to evaluate resectability. The diagnostic work-up with CT scanning is able to anticipate resectability in 50 to 90% of the cases. PATHOLOGY: Histopathology must be obtained since 10% of the pancreatic carcinoma are not of the ductal type and not all pancreatic tumors are malignant. When a pathological specimen cannot be obtained during surgery, a cytology specimen may be obtained with a fine needle guided by CT scan. PROGNOSIS: Survival depends on the possibility of a complete resection of the tumor. If complete resection is obtained, the prognostic factors are in decreasing importance: tumor size, lymphatic and vascular involvement, and invasion of peri-pancreatic tissues.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

[Irinotecan-containing combinations in solid tumors, except colonic carcinomas].

Irinotecan is a new topoisomerase I inhibitor. It has demonstrated antitumor activity in solid tumors, independently of the histologic type, and in squamous cervical carcinoma. Its original mechanism of action offers the possibility to combine it with other drugs. In vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated synergistic activity between irinotecan, cisplatin and etoposide. This article reviews the main published phases I and II studies with irinotecan. The limiting toxicity of combination schedules in neutropenia. The best results were obtained with the association cisplatin-irinotecan in lung cancer. For the combination etoposide-irinotecan the best schedule of administration remains to be determined.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed1996

CPT-11. The European experience.

CPT-11 is a derivative of camptothecin, which has a broad spectrum of antitumor activity, both in vitro and in vivo. Like camptothecin, CPT-11 is a selective inhibitor of the DNA enzyme topoisomerase I. Phase I trials were conducted in Europe with the aim of determining the recommended CPT-11 dose and schedule for evaluation in phase II trials. The phase I trials assessed the toxicity of CPT-11 in 235 patients and tested three different administration schedules. CPT-11 was administered as a single infusion once every three weeks, as a weekly infusion for three weeks out of every four, and as a daily infusion for three consecutive days every three weeks. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 115 mg/m2 in the daily schedule and 145 mg/m2 in the weekly schedule. When the drug was administered once every three weeks, diarrhea became the dose-limiting toxicity at doses above 350 mg/m2. This schedule allowed the highest dose intensity to be obtained, was the best tolerated, and allowed ambulant treatment. Finally, using this schedule, a combination of CPT-11 with high doses of loperamide allowed the dose of CPT-11 to be increased to 750 mg/m2. An ongoing phase I trial is investigating the combination of CPT-11 and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in various solid tumors. Although the MTD has not yet been reached, preliminary results have not demonstrated any pharmacokinetic interaction between the two drugs, contrary to the findings of a previous Japanese study. Based on the results of the three phase I trials, CPT-11 administered at a dose of 350 mg/m2 as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once every three weeks has been recommended for assessment in phase II trials. The phase II trials started in Europe at the beginning of 1992. To date, CPT-11 has showed remarkable efficacy in colorectal cancer, even in patients resistant to 5-FU. Interesting results have also been obtained in pancreatic, cervical and lung cancer. Future trials will make it possible to assess whether there is a place for CPT-11 in combination with other cytotoxic agents or radiotherapy.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed1996

[Taxotere (docetaxel) and CPT 11 (irinotecan): phase I trials].

Two new drugs from two new chemotherapy compound families were developed concomitantly: Taxoter (docetaxel), a taxane derivate and CPT 11 (irinotecan) a topoisomerase inhibitor. Six phase I trials of Taxoter were performed. The limiting toxicity is neutropenia. The recommended dosage for phase II trial is 100 mg/m2 administered in 1 hour perfusion, every 21 days. Neutropenic fever is unfrequent. Other toxicities are mucositis, skin toxicity, hypersensibility reaction, weight gain and oedema. None of these toxicities were limiting. Six phase I studies were conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose of CPT 11 (irinotecan). Two different schedules were studied: the weekly 30-90 minutes infusion and an infusion administered every three weeks in one day or daily over three or five consecutive days. The limiting toxicity of the weekly schedule is diarrhea. Therefore the recommended dosage is 100-150 mg/m2/week. While dose limiting toxicities in the three week schedule are diarrhea as well as neutropenia. The recommended dose is 350 mg/m2. Since diarrhea appeared to be the major problem in achieving high dose intensity with CPT 11, a dose escalation trial with drug support against diarrhea was performed. A recommended dosage of 500 mg/m2 is therefore described. These two drugs are under evaluation in a large spectrum of tumors. Their original mechanism of action suggests interesting therapeutic properties. Clinical studies in combination with other drugs are in progress to define the role of topoisomerase I inhibitors and taxane in cancer therapy.

Antidiarrheals↗
PubMed1996

CPT-11: the European clinical development.

CPT-11 is a camptothecin derivative with a broad spectrum of antitumor activity, both in vitro and in vivo. Like camptothecin, CPT-11 is a selective DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor. Phase I trials were conducted in Europe to determine the dose and schedule for phase II trials. These phase I trials assessed the toxicity of CPT-11 in 235 patients and tested three administration schedules: a single infusion once every 3 weeks; a weekly infusion for 3 out of 4 weeks; and a daily infusion for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 115 mg/m2 in the daily schedule and 145 mg/m2 in the weekly schedule. When the drug was administered once every 3 weeks, diarrhea became the dose-limiting toxicity at doses above 350 mg/m2. This schedule offered the highest dose intensity and the best tolerability profile, and was the most convenient for outpatient treatment. Finally, using this schedule, concomitant administration of high-dose loperamide allowed the dose of CPT-11 to be increased to 750 mg/m2. An ongoing phase I trial is investigating the combination of CPT-11 and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in various solid tumors. Although the MTD has not yet been reached, preliminary results show no pharmacokinetic interaction between the two drugs, contrary to a previous Japanese study. Based on the results of the three phase I trials, CPT-11 350 mg/m2 as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once every 3 weeks was recommended for phase II trials, which started in Europe in 1992. To date, CPT-11 has shown remarkable efficacy in colorectal cancer, even in patients resistant to 5-FU. Interesting results have also been obtained in pancreatic, cervical and lung cancers. Future trials will explore the place of CPT-11 in combination with other cytotoxic agents or radiotherapy.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗