Biomedical subjects

C Cuppernell

Publications and source records attributed to C Cuppernell.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1996

Context-specific multi-site cingulate cortical, limbic thalamic, and hippocampal neuronal activity during concurrent discriminative approach and avoidance training in rabbits.

This study assessed the context specificity of learning-related neuronal activity: whether the same physical stimuli would elicit different neuronal responses depending on the learning situation. Neuronal activity was recorded simultaneously in six limbic areas as rabbits learned to approach a spout for water reinforcement after a tone (CS+) and to ignore the spout after a different tone (CS-). The rabbits then received avoidance training in which they learned to prevent a foot-shock by stepping in an activity wheel after one tone (CS+) and to ignore a different tone (CS-). Avoidance training sessions were alternated (1 session daily) with sessions in the well learned approach task. The tone assigned as the CS+ for approach training was the CS- for avoidance training and vice versa. The neuronal records of the anterior ventral and medial dorsal thalamic nuclei and the anterior and posterior cingulate cortices showed neuronal discrimination appropriate to the approach task during pretraining in the avoidance training apparatus with unpaired presentations of the tones and foot-shock. This finding demonstrated that the discriminative neuronal activity for approach learning was unaffected by a change in context in the pretraining session. However, context-appropriate discrimination occurred in both tasks thereafter, with the exception that medial dorsal thalamic neurons no longer showed discrimination during overtraining in the approach task. Hippocampal area CA1 neurons showed entirely context-appropriate discrimination in both tasks, with no carryover of the approach-relevant discrimination to the avoidance training apparatus. Avoidance training stage-specific peaks of training-induced excitation in different brain areas were not elicited by the same physical stimuli during concurrent approach training sessions. The results are consistent with an involvement of limbic-circuit neuronal activity in the use of context cues for mnemonic retrieval. Differential persistence of the approach-related neuronal discrimination in anterior and posterior cingulate cortex confirmed the previously hypothesized distinct mnemonic functions of these areas.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Limbic thalamic, cingulate cortical and hippocampal neuronal correlates of discriminative approach learning in rabbits.

Previous research employing lesions and recording of neuronal activity has implicated cingulothalamic and hippocampal circuitry in the mediation of discriminative instrumental avoidance learning in rabbits. This study was directed at the question of whether the cingulothalamic circuitry is specialized for avoidance learning, or whether it is also involved in appetitively motivated learning. Multi-unit neuronal recordings in the aforementioned areas were obtained as adult New-Zealand white rabbits learned to approach and orally contact a drinking spout for water reward after a tone conditional stimulus (CS+), and to ignore the spout after a different, non-predictive tone conditional stimulus (CS-). As during avoidance learning, excitatory and discriminative training-induced neuronal activity (TIA) developed during the course of approach learning. Discriminative TIA refers to development of greater neuronal firing response to the CS+ than to the CS-. Excitatory TIA refers to increased neuronal discharge magnitude during training compared to the activity elicited before training, when CS presentations were unpaired with foot-shock presentations. As during avoidance learning, TIA in anterior cingulate cortical and interconnected mediodorsal (MD) thalamic neuronal records preceded TIA in posterior cingulate cortical and interconnected anterior ventral thalamic records. Delayed changes also occurred in area CA1 of the hippocampus in parallel with changes in the posterior cingulate cortex and the anterior thalamic nuclei. In contrast to the avoidance-related activity, the changes in the thalamic areas preceded or occurred concurrently with changes in the related cingulate cortical areas. This difference is hypothesized to be due to a reduced or absent contribution of amygdaloid efferents to the approach learning-related TIA. The overall magnitude of the elicited training-induced neuronal responses was reduced, relative to the discharges during avoidance conditioning. The discharge magnitude differences suggested a greater recruitment of limbic circuit functions during avoidance learning, possibly due to the aversiveness and high arousal associated with the avoidance task. In general, the results indicate that the circuitry formed by interconnected cingulate cortical, limbic thalamic and hippocampal neurons has fundamentally similar functions in both approach and avoidance learning.

Animals↗

PubMed1995

Mamillothalamic tract transection blocks anterior thalamic training-induced neuronal plasticity and impairs discriminative offidance behavior in rabbits.

Rabbits with bilateral transecting lesions of the mamillothalamic tract, control (tract-sparing and sham) lesions, or no lesions, and chronic, fixed-position anterior ventral (AV) and medial dorsal (MD) thalamic and posterodorsal subicular complex unit recording electrodes were trained to step in an activity wheel in response to a 0.5 sec tone (CS+) in order to avoid a brief foot shock. The rabbits also learned to ignore a different tone (CS-) not predictive of shock. Behavioral acquisition was significantly retarded in rabbits with mamillothalamic tract transection compared to controls. When trained, transected rabbits failed to avoid the shock more often than controls. Mamillothalamic tract transection abolished and control lesions attenuated AV thalamic discriminative training-induced activity (i.e., development with training of greater discharges in response to the CS+ than to the CS-). Transection and control lesions attenuated AV thalamic excitatory training-induced activity (greater elicited activity during training than during unpaired tone-shock presentations before training) as well as AV thalamic "spontaneous" baseline unit activity. CS-elicited discharge magnitude was reduced by control lesions and it was further reduced by tract transecting lesions. Significant lesion-related changes were not found in the subicular or MD thalamic neuronal receptor. Mamillothalamic tract afferent information flow is thus essential for AV thalamic discriminative training-induced activity, excitatory training-induced activity, tone-elicited discharges and maintenance of conditioned avoidance responses. The effects of the control lesions suggested that afferents which course in parallel with and near the mamillothalamic tract may contribute to AV thalamic spontaneous activity and excitatory training-induced activity.

Animals↗