PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C D Ericsson

Publications and source records attributed to C D Ericsson.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Contaminated stethoscopes revisited.

BACKGROUND: Because of their universal use by medical professionals, stethoscopes can be a source of nosocomial infections. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of contamination of stethoscopes with bacteria and fungi. METHODS: Cultures were obtained from 200 stethoscopes from four area hospitals and outpatient clinics in Houston, Tex. The frequency of stethoscope contamination in different groups of hospital personnel and medical settings was determined. We also measured the frequency of antimicrobial resistance of the staphylococcal strains that were isolated. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine (80%) of the 200 stethoscopes surveyed were contaminated with microorganisms. The majority of organisms that were isolated were gram-positive bacteria, primarily Staphylococcus species. Fifty-eight percent of the Staphylococcus species that were isolated, including four (17%) of 24 Staphylococcus aureus isolates, were resistant to methicillin. Physicians' stethoscopes were contaminated more often than those of other medical personnel groups (P = .02). Stethoscopes used only in designated areas were contaminated less frequently than stethoscopes belonging to individual medical personnel (P = .01). Although stethoscopes were contaminated in all areas, stethoscopes from the pediatric medical setting were contaminated less frequently than those from other hospital areas (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Stethoscope use may be important in the spread of infectious agents, including antimicrobial-resistant strains, and strategies to reduce the contamination of stethoscopes should be developed. We recommend disinfection of stethoscopes or regular use of disposable stethoscope covers.

Auscultation↗

Occult blood versus fecal leukocytes in the diagnosis of bacterial diarrhea: a study of U.S. travelers to Mexico and Mexican children.

A study was done to test the effectiveness of fecal occult blood as a screening test for invasive bacterial pathogens and as a substitute for the fecal leukocyte examination in adult and pediatric cases of acute diarrhea. United States citizens studying in Mexico and Mexican children, both with acute diarrhea had their stools cultured, examined for fecal leukocytes, and tested for occult blood. Using culture results as the criterion standard for detection of bacterial agents, and fecal leukocytes for diarrhea associated with diffuse colonic inflammation, occult blood was tested for its sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value using 2 x 2 tables. Analysis of the data found that occult blood negative samples were reliable indicators of a lack of invasive bacteria in both adult and pediatric patients (negative predictive values of 87% and 96%, respectively). Positive results for either test were not reliably predictive as indicators of invasive bacteria among adults. A positive occult blood test result was significantly more sensitive than a positive fecal leukocyte test result (79% versus 42%) in detecting invasive bacteria in the pediatric patients; however, the positive predictive value was only 24%. The fecal occult blood test is an uncomplicated, low-cost test that was reliable when giving a negative result in detecting a lack of invasive bacteria in adult and pediatric patients with diarrhea. In children, a positive result on a fecal occult blood test is sensitive but not specific in detecting invasive bacterial enteropathogens. These data also indicate that a commercially available test for occult blood represents a suitable alternative to microscopic examination of fecal samples for leukocytes obtained from patients with acute diarrhea.

Acute Disease↗

Nosocomial outbreak caused by a multiresistant clone of Acinetobacter baumannii: results of the case-control and molecular epidemiologic investigations.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a nosocomial outbreak caused by multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii. DESIGN: Descriptive and case-control study. Antibiotic susceptibilities and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of genomic DNA digested with SfiI and also with ApaI were used as markers of strain identity. SETTING: A large medical school-affiliated hospital in the city of Houston, Texas. RESULTS: During a 10-week period, A baumannii was isolated from 25 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The attack rate was 14.3 per 100 ICU admissions. Case patients were intubated more frequently and for longer periods, and had longer ICU and hospital stays (P < 0.05 for each of these characteristics). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the length of ICU stay and the use of third-generation cephalosporins as associated with the acquisition of A baumannii. Patients infected with A baumannii had a higher mortality rate than colonized patients and control patients (P < 0.01). Sixteen isolates recovered from these 25 patients were susceptible only to imipenem/cilastatin, and PFGE confirmed that a single clone was the cause of this outbreak. Nine isolates of A baumannii from patients infected or colonized in two other hospitals in Houston during the same period, differed from the outbreak isolates by their susceptibility to ciprofloxacin. However, PFGE results were identical, indicating unsuscepted genetic relatedness among isolates from three different hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: A baumannii is an important nosocomial opportunistic pathogen and can adversely affect the outcome of ICU patients who acquire this organism. This outbreak was caused by a single clone that was isolated concurrently from three hospitals.

Acinetobacter↗

Zaldaride maleate (a new calmodulin antagonist) versus loperamide in the treatment of traveler's diarrhea: randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

The present study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of a new calmodulin antagonist, zaldaride maleate, with that of placebo or loperamide in persons with traveler's diarrhea. One hundred seventy-nine patients were randomized to receive loperamide (4 mg followed by 2 mg after each unformed stool), zaldaride maleate (20 mg four times per day), or placebo. During the initial 48 hours of therapy, zaldaride maleate decreased the number of unformed stools by 30% and the duration of illness by 23% when compared with placebo. Loperamide was superior to both zaldaride maleate and placebo during the initial hours of treatment. However, after 48 hours of treatment, loperamide and zaldaride maleate were equally efficacious, decreasing by > 50% the number of unformed stools passed in a 24-hour interval (P, not significant), and were both superior when compared with placebo (P < .0001 and P = .0048, respectively). The apparent superiority of loperamide early in the course of therapy appeared to be related to a loading-dose effect and not to any differences in antidiarrheal properties.

Acute Disease↗

Shigella sonnei strains isolated from U.S. summer students in Guadalajara, Mexico, from 1986 to 1992.

Plasmid DNA analysis and antibiotic susceptibilities were used to study strains of Shigella sonnei isolated from U.S. travelers to Guadalajara, Mexico, over a period of seven years (1986 to 1992). One hundred sixty-one isolates were analyzed. By the use of cluster analysis, eight different plasmid profiles were identified during this interval. At any point in time, three to seven different plasmid profiles were present in this population. The introduction of strains that carried a new plasmid with a molecular mass of 5.1 MDa was coincidental with an increase in isolation of S. sonnei in 1988. This new plasmid was present in 87.5% of the isolates that were resistant to chloramphenicol. Shigellosis in Guadalajara follows a pattern of hyperendemic transmission with transient peaks of high-frequency isolation of S. sonnei. This pattern results from the concurrent presence of a heterogeneous group of strains as opposed to the widespread transmission of one or a few clones.

Diarrhea↗

Zaldaride maleate, an intestinal calmodulin inhibitor, in the therapy of travelers' diarrhea.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic value of zaldaride maleate (Zm), an intestinal calmodulin inhibitor, was examined in patients with travelers' diarrhea, known to be caused by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) and other bacterial agents. METHODS: One hundred seventy-six American students acquiring diarrhea in Mexico during the summer of 1991 were given Zm in doses of 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg, or a matching placebo, four times a day for 48 hours. RESULTS: The duration of diarrhea was reduced by 53% in the group given the 20-mg Zm dose (overall P < 0.01). Curative antibiotics were required post-treatment only in the placebo and 5-mg Zm groups (P < 0.01). The number of unformed stools passed during 0-48 hours of therapy with the highest Zm dose was reduced compared with placebo by 36% for all subjects (P < 0.05), by 39% for ETEC diarrhea (NS), by 45% for those with any bacterial agents (NS), and by 38% for those without an identifiable bacterial agent (NS). CONCLUSIONS: The fact that a calmodulin inhibitor decreases the severity and duration of travelers' diarrhea has therapeutic implications and suggests that calmodulin and intracellular calcium may serve as mediators of diarrhea in bacterial enteric infection.

Adolescent↗

Oral aztreonam, a poorly absorbed yet effective therapy for bacterial diarrhea in US travelers to Mexico.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a poorly absorbed antimicrobial with in vitro activity against all major bacterial enteropathogens in oral therapy for bacterial diarrhea. DESIGN: One hundred ninety-one US students with diarrhea acquired in Mexico received 100 mg of aztreonam or matching placebo three times a day for 5 days. Stools were cultured for bacterial enteropathogens before and after therapy. SETTING: We studied US students who acquired diarrhea in Mexico (travelers' diarrhea) in view of the high frequency of bacterial agents in this setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We examined time of clinical recovery, treatment failures, adverse experiences, and microbiologic eradication from stool of the etiologic agent in subjects randomized to receive aztreonam or placebo. RESULTS: Aztreonam reduced the average duration of diarrhea compared with the placebo: for all cases, by 40 hours (P much less than .01); for those with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli diarrhea, by 50 hours (P less than .01); for those with shigellosis, by 90 hours (P, not significant [small sample size]); for all bacterial agents, by 57 hours (P much less than .01). Clinical failures during the 5 days of therapy were seen in six patients (6%) receiving aztreonam and 25 (27%) receiving placebo (P less than .01). Pathogen eradication occurred in 95% of those receiving aztreonam and in 70% of those receiving the placebo (P less than .01). All bacterial enteropathogens were susceptible in vitro to aztreonam. The drug was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Oral aztreonam, which is poorly absorbed, was well tolerated and was an effective therapy for bacterial diarrhea in US adults in Mexico.

Administration, Oral↗

Travelers' diarrhea. Prevention and treatment.

Travelers' diarrhea affects almost half of all travelers from developed to developing nations. Its occurrence frequently alters planned activities. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and other bacterial pathogens endemic to the area visited account for the majority of pathogens isolated. Newer research technologies are assisting in defining virulence properties and epidemiologic characteristics. Prudence exercised during travel remains the preferred mode of prevention, reserving antimicrobial prophylaxis for specific situations. Oral rehydration and early pharmacologic intervention with antimicrobial and antimotility agents significantly decrease length of illness when diarrhea occurs.

Diarrhea↗

Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole remains active against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Shigella species in Guadalajara, Mexico.

Bacterial isolates obtained from fecal cultures of U.S. adults in Guadalajara, Mexico, with diarrhea developing during the summers of 1987, 1988, and 1989 were tested for in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility. No resistance was seen among 220 enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates nor among 89 Shigella strains to aztreonam, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, or furazolidone. High level (greater than 1000 micrograms/ml) resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) was found in 7% of E. coli and 3% of Shigella strains. Susceptibility patterns of 27 E. coli strains derived from fecal cultures of Mexican infants in Guadalajara with diarrhea during the same time period showed similar results, possibly reflecting the presence of a common microbial reservoir. The study serves as a baseline for newer antimicrobials (fluoroquinolones and aztreonam) where no resistance is currently seen and provides evidence of the continuing value of TMP/SMX for therapy of diarrhea among travelers to Gudalajara and perhaps other areas of Mexico.

Diarrhea↗

The pharmacokinetics of prophylactic antibiotics in trauma.

Despite prophylactic antibiotic use in abdominal trauma patients, infection rates remain high. A previous study from our institution indicated that higher doses of prophylactic antibiotics in trauma patients could significantly reduce subsequent infection rates. To determine if this resulted from altered pharmacokinetic profiles, we performed individualized pharmacokinetic analysis of the prophylactic amikacin regimens given to 28 trauma patients undergoing laparotomy. Patients were prospectively randomized to receive a standard regimen of 11 mg/kg of amikacin every 12 hours or to have their regimens adjusted based upon pharmacokinetic analysis. Repeated pharmacokinetic analyses were performed daily for the three-day prophylactic regimen. There was a significant expansion in the apparent volume of distribution for amikacin that correlated with fluid resuscitation. This, along with increased elimination rates, helps to explain the failure to achieve adequate amikacin levels using standard regimens in trauma patients. Such underdosing may contribute to relatively high infection rates following major abdominal injury.

Abdominal Injuries↗

Five versus three days of ofloxacin therapy for traveler's diarrhea: a placebo-controlled study.

In this double-blind study with 232 patients, 300 mg of ofloxacin given orally twice daily for 5 or 3 days was compared with placebo for the treatment of acute diarrhea in U.S. students visiting Guadalajara, Mexico. The 3-day regimen of ofloxacin was found to be as effective as the 5-day regimen in producing a clinical and microbiologic cure. Clinical cures for patients who received ofloxacin for 5 days occurred in 59 of 66 (89%) subjects, whereas clinical cure occurred in 77 of 81 (95%) of those who received ofloxacin for 3 days and in 56 of 79 (71%) of those who took placebo (P = 0.0001). When the duration of diarrhea after therapy was begun was compared in subgroups, a significant (P less than 0.05) shortening of posttreatment illness occurred in comparison with that in the placebo group for the following groups: for 5 days of ofloxacin, cases of shigellosis (32 versus 98 h); for 3 days of ofloxacin, all cases (28 versus 56 h), cases of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli diarrhea (26 versus 66 h), cases of shigellosis (24 versus 98 h), all cases of illnesses associated with a bacterial enteropathogen (28 versus 69 h), and cases of illnesses in which numerous leukocytes were found in stool by microscopy (22 versus 49 h). Microbiologic eradication rates were 75 of 78 (96%) for patients who received ofloxacin and 37 of 46 (80%) for patients who received placebo (P = 0.009). There was no significant difference in the number of adverse events reported by patients in either of the treatment groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗

Optimal dosing of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole when used with loperamide to treat traveler's diarrhea.

To explore the optimal dosing regimen for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) when used in combination with loperamide to treat traveler's diarrhea, 190 U.S. adults with acute diarrhea were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized trial in Guadalajara, Mexico. All patients received loperamide (4-mg loading dose; 2 mg after each loose stool, not to exceed 16 mg/day for 3 days) and were randomized to receive a 3-day course of TMP-SMX (160:800 mg twice daily for six doses) (group A), a single large dose of TMP-SMX (320:1,600 mg) (group B), or a large loading dose (320:1,600 mg) followed by standard doses for 3 days (160:800 mg twice daily for five doses) (group C). Patients in group C responded best (P < 0.01), with 75% of subjects recovered from diarrhea in 12 h compared with 34 h (group A) and 33 h (group B). Similar differences in favor of group C were noted in the subset of patients who presented with moderate to severe diarrhea. On average, patients in group C took significantly (P < 0.05) less loperamide (1.2 mg) after the 4-mg loading dose compared with patients in group A (2.4 mg) or group B (2.0 mg). We conclude that the most efficacious treatment of traveler's diarrhea in the interior of Mexico is to take loperamide in usual doses to control symptoms in combination with a single large dose of TMP-SMX, which should then be continued for 3 days in standard doses.

Acute Disease↗

Intestinal secretory immune response to infection with Aeromonas species and Plesiomonas shigelloides among students from the United States in Mexico.

Intestinal secretory IgA (sIgA) response or lack of response among adults in Mexico with diarrhea was used as an indicator of enteropathogenicity of Aeromonas species and Plesiomonas shigelloides. sIgA was extracted from stool specimens obtained at day of presentation and 5 days later. Total sIgA was standardized, and specific sIgA titer against the organism being shed by each patient was determined. Western blotting was used to determine which microbial antigens elicited an intestinal sIgA response. Of 12 subjects shedding Aeromonas sobria or Aeromonas hydrophila, 11 had a fourfold or greater sIgA titer rise against the infecting strain. Western blotting showed that somatic lipopolysaccharides were the immunodominant antigens. No sIgA titer rises were detected among two patients shedding Aeromonas caviae or in 14 shedding P. shigelloides. This study provides further evidence of the significance of A. sobria and A. hydrophila as pathogens in acute diarrhea but raises additional questions about the role of P. shigelloides, at least in US adults with travelers' diarrhea.

Adult↗

Acute diarrhea in developed countries. A rationale for self-treatment.

Acute diarrhea is a common, nonlethal condition that causes frequent inconvenience and economic loss. People rarely consult physicians for this problem. Epidemiologic studies among adults, hospitalized adults, children attending day care centers, homosexual men, and travelers indicate a wide spectrum of etiologic agents. The clinical presentation of acute diarrhea may lead clinicians to consider certain causative agents, but it is not diagnostic of any specific cause. Clinical laboratory studies can detect or isolate pathogens in only a minority of cases. By the time this information is available, patients have usually recovered. For these reasons, early self-treatment aimed at reducing symptoms of acute diarrhea is recommended.

Antidiarrheals↗

Safety and efficacy of loperamide.

Loperamide is a safe and effective antidiarrheal for the treatment of acute diarrhea. Efficacy data suggest that loperamide is more effective than the prescription drug diphenoxylate and an over-the-counter bismuth subsalicylate preparation. Loperamide is a safe drug, with few adverse reactions reported worldwide. It also lacks significant abuse potential. Loperamide may prove to be the antidiarrheal agent of choice when compared with currently available nonprescription treatments for acute diarrhea.

Acute Disease↗

Comparative efficacy of loperamide hydrochloride and bismuth subsalicylate in the management of acute diarrhea.

An open-label, parallel comparison of loperamide hydrochloride (Imodium A-D) and bismuth subsalicylate (Pepto-Bismol) was conducted using nonprescription dosages in adult students with acute diarrhea (three or more unformed stools in the preceding 24 hours plus at least one additional symptom of enteric infection). For the two-day study period, the daily dosage was limited to 8 mg (40 ml) for loperamide-treated subjects and to 4.9 g for bismuth subsalicylate-treated subjects. At these dosages, loperamide significantly reduced the average number of unformed bowel movements relative to bismuth subsalicylate. Following the initial dose of treatment, control of diarrhea was maintained significantly longer with loperamide than with bismuth subsalicylate. Time to last unformed stool was significantly shorter with loperamide than with bismuth subsalicylate. In providing overall subjective relief, subjects rated loperamide significantly better than bismuth subsalicylate at the end of the 24 hours. Both treatments were well tolerated, and none of the minor adverse effects reported resulted in discontinuation of therapy. It was concluded that loperamide is effective at a daily dosage limit of 8 mg (40 ml) for the treatment of acute nonspecific diarrhea and provides faster, more effective relief than bismuth subsalicylate.

Acute Disease↗