Treatment of oxygen-induced hypercapnia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to C D Gomersall.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aim of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of the normal recommended dose of ceftriaxone in critically ill patients and to establish whether the current daily dosing recommendation maintains plasma concentrations adequate for antibacterial efficacy. Ceftriaxone at a recommended dose of 2 g iv was administered od to 12 critically ill patients with severe sepsis and normal serum creatinine concentrations. Blood samples were taken at pre-determined intervals over the first 24 h and on day 3 for measurement of ceftriaxone concentrations. There was wide variability in drug disposition, explained by the presence of variable renal function and identified by the measurement of creatinine clearance. In nine patients with normal renal function, there was a high level of creatinine clearance (mean +/- S.D., 41 +/- 12 mL/min) and volume of distribution (20 +/- 3.3 L), which resulted in an elimination half-life of 6.4 +/- 1.1 h. In comparison with normal subjects, ceftriaxone clearance was increased 100%, volume of distribution increased 90% and the elimination half-life was similar. Three patients had substantially suboptimal plasma ceftriaxone concentrations. We confirm previous findings that ceftriaxone clearance in critically ill patients correlates with renal clearance by glomerular filtration. The elimination half-life is prolonged (21.4 +/- 9.8 h) in critically ill patients with renal failure when compared with previously published data in non-critically ill patients with renal failure. We conclude that in critically ill patients with normal renal function, inadequate plasma concentrations may result following od bolus dosing of ceftriaxone. Drug accumulation may occur in critically ill patients with renal failure.
INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, outcome from intensive care has focused on mortality. The cost of intensive care and the limited resources devoted to patients who have a poor prognosis also raises questions about the utilisation of such resources. There is increasing pressure for outcome evaluation of intensive care to incorporate assessment of long-term survival and the quality of life in survivors. The principal objectives of this article were to examine current methods of assessing quality of life measures in critically ill patients surviving intensive care and to determine the quality of life of these survivors. METHODS: Direct and computerised search of published research articles. RESULTS: Measurement of quality of life after intensive care is not common practice. There is a lack of consensus concerning appropriate measuring instruments to be used and how best to interpret results. Despite the availability of general outcome tools and disease specific instruments, there is a paucity of studies in the literature which include assessments of quality of life following intensive care unit (ICU) care. Generic health indices suggest that the quality of life in ICU survivors is acceptable though in certain sub-groups, e.g. adult respiratory distress syndrome and sepsis, quality of life may be moderately impaired. ICU survivors appear to suffer less disability than chronic physical disease patients. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of outcome after intensive care should include health related quality of life measurements. A unifying framework is required to enhance communication between clinicians, administrators and investigators of quality of life research and also to enable more rational and effective decision making at the bedside. Patients who survive intensive care appear to enjoy a reasonable standard of quality of life. While their health status may not be as good, subjectively patients find this acceptable.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether additional therapy aimed at correcting low gastric intramucosal pH (pHi) improves outcome in conventionally resuscitated, critically ill patients. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: General intensive care unit (ICU) of a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 210 adult patients, with a median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 24 (range, 8-51). INTERVENTIONS: All patients were resuscitated according to standard guidelines. After resuscitation, those patients in the intervention group with a pHi of <7.35 were treated with additional colloid and then dobutamine (5 microg/kg/min then 10 microg/kg min) until 24 hrs after enrollment. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were no significant differences (p > .05) in ICU mortality (39.6% in the control group vs. 38.5% in the intervention group), hospital mortality (45.3% in the control group vs. 42.3% in the intervention group), and 30-day mortality (43.7% in the control group vs. 40.2 in the intervention group); survival curves; median modified maximal multiorgan dysfunction score (10 points in the control group vs. 13 points in the intervention group); median modified duration of ICU stay (12 days in the control group vs. 11.5 days in the intervention group); or median modified duration of hospital stay (60 days in the control group vs. 42 days in the intervention group). A subgroup analysis of those patients with gastric mucosal pH of > or =7.35 at admission revealed no difference in ICU mortality (10.3% in the control group vs. 14.8% in the intervention group), hospital mortality (13.8% in the control group vs. 29.6% in the intervention group), or 30-day mortality (10.3% in the control group vs. 26.9% in the intervention group). CONCLUSIONS: The routine use of treatment titrated against pHi in the management of critically ill patients cannot be supported. Failure to improve outcome may be caused by an inability to produce a clinically significant change in pHi or because pHi is simply a marker of disease rather than a factor in the pathogenesis of multiorgan failure.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of and potential risk factors for catheter-related deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in critically ill adult patients. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, observational cohort study. SETTING: A mixed medical and surgical ICU in a university hospital. PATIENTS: All adult patients undergoing femoral vein catheterization. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: ICU diagnosis, underlying disease, demographic data, type of catheter, complications during cannulation, use of anticoagulants, coagulation status, medications infused, and duration of catheterization were recorded. Compression and duplex Doppler ultrasound studies of both femoral veins were performed prior to insertion, at 12 h after insertion, and daily until catheter removal. Follow-up investigation was performed at 24 h and 1 week after removal. RESULTS: Of 140 cases entered into the study, 124 were evaluated. Fourteen patients developed iliofemoral vein DVTs. Two were clinically obvious. Twelve (9.6%) were line related (uncannulated leg normal) and two (1.6%) occurred only in the uncannulated leg (p = 0.011; relative risk, 6.0; confidence interval, 1.5 to 23.5). Line-related DVT can occur any time from the day after insertion to 1 week after removal. The incidence of catheter-related DVT was unrelated to number of insertion attempts, arterial puncture or hematoma, duration of catheterization, coagulation status, or type of infused medications. No other predisposing or protective factors were identified. Three of the 12 patients with catheter-related DVT died. In no patient was clinical pulmonary embolus suspected. CONCLUSION: Although the femoral route is convenient and has potential advantages, the use of femoral lines increases the risk of iliofemoral DVT. Catheter-related DVT may occur as soon as 1 day after cannulation and is usually asymptomatic. This increased risk should be carefully considered when the femoral route of cannulation is chosen.
We randomized 18 critically ill patients to receive ceftazidime 6 g/day by continuous infusion or bolus dosing (2 g 8 hourly), each with a loading dose of 12 mg/kg ceftazidime. During the first 8 h, plasma ceftazidime concentration fell below 40 mg/L in only one patient (trough 38 mg/L) from the infusion group, compared with eight from the bolus group (2-33 mg/L) for periods ranging from 73 to 369 min. Thereafter all infusion patients remained above 40 mg/L for 40 h of study versus 20-30% of bolus patients. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of ceftazidime suggest that continuous infusions should be clinically investigated in outcome studies.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Near-infrared spectroscopy is a technique used for non-invasive measurement of cerebral oxygenation and a number of commercial devices are currently available for use. We compared measurements of cerebral oxygenation made with two near-infrared spectrophotometers--the Somanetics Invos 3100 cerebral oximeter and the Hamamatsu NIRO-500 near-infrared spectrophotometer. Hypoxia was induced in six healthy male volunteers with and without occlusion of scalp blood flow. Oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide tension, regional cerebral oxygen saturation, change in regional cerebral oxyhaemoglobin concentration and change in regional cerebral total haemoglobin concentration were measured. The INVOS 3100 displays cerebral oxygen saturation directly. The NIRO-500 displays change in total haemoglobin concentration and oxyhaemoglobin concentration, and the cerebral oxygen saturation was calculated offline. Statistical analysis disproved the assumption that the INVOS 3100 and the NIRO-500 were measuring the same changes in cerebral oxygenation. Neither machine can be confirmed for reliability against a gold standard and operational difficulties mean that neither can be recommended for routine clinical use.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Ceftazidime is frequently used in critically ill patients, particularly for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. The recommended dosing regimen is based on pharmacokinetic data obtained in healthy volunteers and may not be appropriate in the critically ill. We administered ceftazidime in the maximum recommended dose (2 g i.v. every 8 h) to ten critically ill patients with normal plasma creatinine. Eighteen arterial blood samples were taken from each patient over the first 8 h for measurement of ceftazidime concentrations and subsequent compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. An additional trough sample was taken from each patient on day 3. Although mean pharmacokinetic variables did not differ from previously reported data in normal volunteers there was wide variability in plasma drug concentrations. Three of our patients had plasma ceftazidime concentrations less than the MIC for P. aeruginosa (8 mg/L) and nine had concentrations less than 5 x MIC, which has been recommended to ensure efficacy. On day 3 trough ceftazidime concentrations were less than the MIC in four out of the seven patients in whom measurements were made and less than 5 x MIC in the remaining three. There was no clinical predictor of which patients would have low plasma concentrations. Our results show that plasma concentrations of ceftazidime are very variable when the recommended intermittent bolus dosing regimen is used and may result in inadequate plasma concentrations of drug in critical infections. This may result in treatment failure and the emergence of antibiotic resistance. A loading dose followed by continuous infusion should overcome these problems but this awaits in-vivo evaluation.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of the neuromuscular blocking agent vecuronium on oxygen delivery (DO2), oxygen consumption (VO2), oxygen extraction ratio, and gastric intramucosal pH in heavily sedated patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. SETTING: University hospital intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Eighteen mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: All patients were heavily sedated. After baseline measurement, a computer-controlled, closed-loop infusion of either vecuronium or saline was initiated and further measurements were made at 40 and 60 mins. The procedure was repeated with the alternative agent after return of neuromuscular function. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: DO2, VO2, intramucosal pH were monitored using pulmonary artery catheters, a gas exchange monitor, and gastric tonometers. Changes from baseline were compared (paired t-test, p = .05). The vecuronium closed-loop infusion achieved T1 between 5% and 15% at 40 mins. There was a significant difference in the changes from baseline for static respiratory compliance in the vecuronium closed-loop infusion group compared with the saline closed-loop infusion group. There was no significant difference in the change from baseline for systemic or pulmonary vascular resistance, DO2, VO2, oxygen extraction ratio, or intramucosal pH. CONCLUSIONS: In these patients, vecuronium infusion achieved the targeted level of paralysis and improved respiratory compliance but did not alter intramucosal pH, VO2, DO2, or oxygen extraction ratios. With deep sedation, neuromuscular blockade in severe sepsis/septic shock does not significantly influence oxygen flux and should be abandoned as a routine method of improving tissue oxygenation in these patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Dettol liquid is a commonly used household disinfectant and although it is labelled nonpoisonous, serious respiratory complications have been reported in up to 8% of cases of Dettol ingestion. We report a case in which the delayed onset of upper airway obstruction was treated with emergency awake, fibreoptic guided nasotracheal intubation. Based on information available in published cases and on our own experience, we suggest that patients who have ingested large volumes of Dettol, have a history of vomiting or unprotected lavage, or have evidence of ongoing oropharyngeal inflammation, are at high risk of this complication. They should be closely observed for at least 48 h after ingestion and the facilities and staff required for emergency airway management should be immediately available.
Splanchnic ischaemia is thought to be of central importance in the development of multi-organ failure and hence death in critically ill patients. It has been suggested that the arterial to gastric intramucosal pH gradient and the difference in partial pressure of carbon dioxide between gastric mucosa and arterial blood are more sensitive markers of splanchnic ischaemia than gastric intramucosal pH itself and thus should be predictors of mortality in the critically ill. We studied 62 critically ill patients within 6 h of admission to the intensive care unit and found no significant difference at 0, 12 or 24 h after admission to the study in either the arterial to gastric intramucosal pH gradient or the difference in partial pressure of carbon dioxide between gastric mucosa and arterial blood between survivors and nonsurvivors. We conclude that in contrast to gastric intramucosal pH neither the arterial to gastric intramucosal pH gradient nor the difference in partial pressure of carbon dioxide between gastric mucosa and arterial blood distinguish survivors from nonsurvivors.
We prospectively investigated the effect of conventional resuscitation on gastric intramucosal pH and lactate over 5 days in a group of patients with newly diagnosed severe sepsis. Lactate and gastric intramucosal pH were measured on entry into the study, as soon as resuscitation end points were met, eight hourly for 48 h and daily for 5 days. Sixteen of 18 patients had a low gastric intramucosal pH (mean (SD) 7.17 (0.12)) at the time of diagnosis of severe sepsis. At no time did gastric intramucosal pH or lactate distinguish between shocked and nonshocked patients. Lactate distinguished survivors from nonsurvivors over time (p = 0.02). Gastric intramucosal pH did not distinguish survivors from nonsurvivors over time (p = 0.72). At 48 h lactate was lower in survivors (p < 0.01) and gastric intramucosal pH higher in survivors (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curves at this time indicate that lactate is a better predictor of survival. It is likely, based on the inability of gastric intramucosal pH to distinguish survivors from nonsurvivors until 48 h, that it is not possible to use this measurement to guide resuscitation in patients who are severely ill and who have gastric intramucosal acidosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Complications can arise from standard intrathoracic central venous pressure (CVP) measurements in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. We have assessed the feasibility of catheterisation by the femoral route to measure CVP in the abdomen (ACVP). We compared measurements by the standard jugular or subclavian route (TCVP) with simultaneous ACVP measurements by the femoral route. METHODS: Between June, 1994 and May, 1995, we recruited 20 critically ill adult patients with various disorders; all patients already had a TCVP line in situ. We placed a femoral catheter in the inferior vena cava close to the right atrium under electrocardiographic guidance. The catheter position was confirmed (and corrected if necessary) by chest radiography. CVP was measured from both sites hourly for 6 h. Positive end-expiratory pressure, mean airway pressure, and intra-abdominal pressure were recorded simultaneously. FINDINGS: One patient was excluded because radiography showed that the catheter position was incorrect. For 133 paired measurements of ACVP and TCVP in the remaining 19 patients, the mean difference was 0.45 mm Hg (SD 0.89: 95% Cl 0.30-0.60); the limits of agreement were -1.33 to 2.23 mm Hg (-1.63 to 2.53). We found a small tendency for the difference between ACVP and TCVP to increase as positive end-expiratory pressure and mean airway pressure increased; the difference was statistically, but not clinically, significant. INTERPRETATION: Our study showed that for clinical purposes CVP can be measured by a femoral catheter placed in the abdominal inferior vena cava near the right atrium. This approach can replace standard TCVP measurements in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients.