PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C D Hepler

Publications and source records attributed to C D Hepler.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Preventing drug-related morbidity--determining valid indicators.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the process that is being undertaken to validate a series of indicators for preventable drug-related morbidity - originally developed in the US - for application in the UK health care system. DESIGN: A two-round Delphi questionnaire survey after a preliminary validation of the indicators within the University of Manchester School of Pharmacy. SETTING: A primary care study set in the UK. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: A purposively selected sample of general practitioners with a specific responsibility for prescribing-related issues (n = 6) and pharmacists actively involved in medication review in primary care (n = 10). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The establishment of consensus among the participants that an indicator reflected preventable drug-related morbidity in primary care. RESULTS: After preliminary validation, 37 of the original 57 US indicators were retained. The Delphi panel generated 16 additional new indicators in the first round. At the end of the second round, the pre-defined level of consensus was reached for 29 indicators (19 of the US generated indicators; 10 generated by the panel in the first round). CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi results highlighted differences in both the clinical perspective and, possibly, philosophical viewpoints of health professionals practising in the UK and US health care systems. Further work, located in both primary and secondary care, is now in progress to operationalize the indicators. This process will form a key part of the refining, and hence further validation, of the indicators. The future development of prospective medical-record-based indicators should facilitate a reduction in the human, clinical, and economic burden of drug-related morbidity.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

[Quality assurance of drug therapy for patients with asthma. Health economic analysis].

The cost-effectiveness of a community pharmacy based programme for therapeutic outcomes monitoring of asthma patients' drug therapy is evaluated. Five hundred asthma patients, aged 16-60 and treated in primary care, with moderate to severe asthma, 31 community pharmacies and 139 general practitioners participated in the study. The total programme costs, costs of drugs, health care resource costs and indirect costs were evaluated together with the effects of the programme on: asthma symptoms status, days of sickness, quality of life, satisfaction with health care, peak-flow (PEF), inhalation technique and knowledge. The evaluation of the programme shows it to be cost-effective with cost-effectiveness ratios between 0.18 and 0.56. The pay off time for the programme is 23 months (range 9-64 months in the sensitivity analysis). It is concluded that the community pharmacist can contribute to identify and solve drug-related problems in a cost-effective way with positive impact on asthma patients health, clinical and psycho-social outcomes, even though the program is time consuming and intensive.

Adolescent↗

The Pharmacists' Implementation of Pharmaceutical Care (PIPC) model.

PURPOSE: Study purpose was to develop a theoretical framework that will explain pharmacists' behavior relative to the provision of pharmaceutical care. The model was developed from four attitude models by testing their predictive validity relative to pharmaceutical care implementation. Four hypotheses and one research question were investigated to identify determinants of behavioral intention and behavior. METHODS: 617 community pharmacists in the state of Florida, U.S.A., were surveyed twice using mail survey methodology to collect data. The first survey assessed community pharmacists' attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, past behavior recency, self-efficacies, instrumental beliefs and affect. The second survey assessed pharmacists' behavior relative to the implementation of pharmaceutical care. After establishing reliability and validity of measures, regression analysis was used to test hypotheses and research question investigated. RESULTS: The Pharmacists' Implementation of Pharmaceutical Care (PIPC) model developed postulates that (i) behavior is directly determined by past behavior recency, behavioral intention and perceived behavioral control; (ii) psychological appraisal processes-instrumental beliefs, self-efficacies, and affect toward means-influence behavior through past behavior recency; and (iii) behavioral intention is determined by attitude, social norm and perceived behavioral control. CONCLUSIONS: The PIPC model provides a formal scientifically validated theoretical framework which can be used to design successful intervention for pharmaceutical care implementation.

Community Pharmacy Services↗

Pharmaceutical care.

Drug-treatment failures can be prevented by applying a Pharmaceutical Care system. Therapeutic outcome monitoring is such a system, which can be applied to the (drug) treatment of several diseases like asthma, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Pharmaceutical Care is an outcome oriented, cooperative, systematic approach to providing drug therapy directed at the improvement of all dimensions of health related quality of life.

Drug Monitoring↗

Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care.

Pharmacy's opportunity to mature as a profession by accepting its social responsibility to reduce preventable drug-related morbidity and mortality is explored. Pharmacy has shed the apothecary role but has not yet been restored to its erst-while importance in medical care. It is not enough to dispense the correct drug or to provide sophisticated pharmaceutical services; nor will it be sufficient to devise new technical functions. Pharmacists and their institutions must stop looking inward and start redirecting their energies to the greater social good. Some 12,000 deaths and 15,000 hospitalizations due to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported to the FDA in 1987, and many went unreported. Drug-related morbidity and mortality are often preventable, and pharmaceutical services can reduce the number of ADRs, the length of hospital stays, and the cost of care. Pharmacists must abandon factionalism and adopt patient-centered pharmaceutical care as their philosophy of practice. Changing the focus of practice from products and biological systems to ensuring the best drug therapy and patient safety will raise pharmacy's level of responsibility and require philosophical, organizational, and functional changes. It will be necessary to set new practice standards, establish cooperative relationships with other health-care professions, and determine strategies for marketing pharmaceutical care. Pharmacy's reprofessionalization will be completed only when all pharmacists accept their social mandate to ensure the safe and effective drug therapy of the individual patient.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

Unresolved issues in the future of pharmacy.

The effect of the major forces shaping pharmacy's future--technology, economics, and social values--is discussed. Pharmacy can best respond to these forces by expanding the informational component of pharmacy practice and by returning to its fundamental relationship with society--that is, by accepting responsibility for drug-use control. To accomplish this, pharmacy must go through a process of occupational reconstruction and self-renewal. Technological forces shaping pharmacy practice include computers and robotics, communications, and therapeutics. Regarding economic changes, medical-care decisions are shifting away from individuals toward "third parties." This factor, combined with output-based payment systems, may lead to a consolidation of service providers. Marketing pharmaceutical services and organizing pharmacy's internal structure will become important. Some of the social forces affecting pharmacy's future include the aging population, the weakening of professional authority, and pharmacy's public image. Just as society goes through the "information revolution," pharmacy will need to undergo a "reprofessionalization." Pharmacy's societal function should involve "pharmaceutical care," a concept that includes both drug-product control and clinical pharmacy services. Pharmacy should return to its preindustrial origins in valued, complex, specific, and committed public service if it wishes a happy postindustrial future.

Pharmacy↗

Economic consequences of two drug-use control systems in a teaching hospital.

Length of stay (LOS), total cost per admission (TCA), and pharmacy cost per admission (DCA) were determined for two drug-use control systems in a 1058-bed university hospital; a centralized unit dose drug distribution system served as a control. The two study systems were (1) pharmacist monitoring of drug therapy in the patient-care area and (2) centralized pharmacist monitoring of computerized patient profiles. LOS data were collected retrospectively for 659 patients admitted during a seven-month control interval. LOS, TCA, and DCA data were collected prospectively for 496 patients admitted during a five-month experimental interval. Each study system was assigned to one of three teams making rounds among intact patient groups. LOS differences were compared between intervals and by month. After corrections were made for differences in patient mix, the drug-use control system in which pharmacists were assigned to the patient-care area yielded a 1.5-day-shorter average LOS, $1293 lower average TCA (p less than 0.05), and $155 lower average DCA than under the unit dose system. The drug-use control system in which pharmacists were assigned to monitor patients' drug therapy from a central location was associated with a 0.13-day-shorter average LOS, $235 lower average TCA, and $55.13 lower average DCA than under the unit dose system. No systematic differences between teams, other than drug-use control system, appeared to explain the differences in LOS, TCA, and DCA. A drug-use control system based in a patient-care area, overseen by clinically experienced pharmacists, may result in shorter LOSs and lower total costs than centralized systems for general-medical inpatients of teaching hospitals.

Contraceptives, Oral, Combined↗

Career patterns of pioneer clinical pharmacists.

The career paths of some early clinical pharmacists from their first positions during the years 1965-1974 to their current positions were studied. In August 1985 a group of pharmacists was surveyed to determine (1) the extent to which they had maintained a clinical practice (defined as direct patient contact, including evaluating and planning drug regimens), (2) the number of job-function changes, and (3) the degree of the pharmacists' commitment to public service, as measured by Hall's Belief in Public Service and Allport-Vernon-Lindzey Personality Values. The response rate for the 337 questionnaires was 73.5%. The average age of the group was 40 years; 83% were men, and 79% possessed Doctor of Pharmacy degrees. The respondents had changed job functions an average of 2.1 +/- 1.5 times over the last 13 years since the highest professional degree. The percentage in the job functions of hospital pharmacist and pharmacy faculty declined over time while those in hospital pharmacy administration, academic administration, and the pharmaceutical industry increased. Clinical-practice activity declined over time, with a twofold net increase in those reporting no direct patient-care responsibilities. Male respondents with fewer years after their highest professional degree, a greater belief in public service, higher theoretical values, and no residency experience were more likely to be currently involved in direct patient care than others. Although attrition among pioneer clinical pharmacists is not excessive for those who began their careers with a relatively small percentage of their time devoted to clinical practice, most pharmacists who began with substantial clinical commitments have reduced or eliminated clinical activities over time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Career Mobility↗

Economic aspects of clinical decision making: evaluating clinical programs.

The importance of program evaluation is discussed, and issues to consider when designing and conducting program evaluations in the restructuring health-care environment are identified. Program evaluation is carried out for the purpose of supporting specific decisions for individual organizations. Unlike scientific research, program evaluation accepts time as a constraint, and its audience is composed of managers. Considering the likelihood of being fixed-dollar contractors or employees in an era of managed care, professionals must try to understand the cost objectives of management; similarly, managers must understand the patient-care objectives of professionals. Program evaluation can help provide the necessary documentation of a program's impact on the outcome of health care, which influences the total cost of care. Successful program evaluation requires careful planning, and issues related to six steps in the planning process are described: defining the objective of the evaluation, choosing and defining the program to be evaluated, choosing indicator variables, designing the evaluation, presenting the results, and planning follow-through. While program evaluation is too often understood in negative terms, particularly as something done because of external pressure, it is as much a part of management as is directing day-to-day operations or developing a long-range plan.

Decision Making↗