Biomedical subjects
C D Mulrow
Publications and source records attributed to C D Mulrow.
Accuracy and reliability of apical S3 gallop detection.
This study assessed physician performance in detecting the apical S3 gallop using a cardiology patient simulator. Six physicians (two cardiology fellows, two medicine residents, and two attending physicians) performed two sets of 24 cardiac examinations that included the presence or absence of an apical S3 gallop. All the examiners were able to significantly alter the prior odds of an apical S3 gallop's being present, but the cardiology fellows had higher sensitivities. Sensitivity was lower for detecting soft S3 gallops, and specificity was lower when a diastolic murmur was also present. Physician performance in detecting apical S3 gallops is variable, but can be excellent.
Making sense of complex interventions.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Incidence and hospital stay for cardiac and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery.
OBJECTIVE: Internists frequently evaluate preoperative cardiopulmonary risk and co-manage cardiac and pulmonary complications, but the comparative incidence and clinical importance of these complications are not clearly delineated. This study evaluated incidence and length of stay for both cardiac and pulmonary complications after elective laparotomy. DESIGN: Nested case-control. SETTING: University-affiliated Department of Veterans Affairs Hospital. PATIENTS: Computerized registry of all 2,291 patients undergoing elective abdominal operations from 1982 to 1991. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Strategy for ascertainment and verification of complications was systematic and explicit. The charts of all 116 patients identified by the registry as having complications and 412 (19%) randomly selected from 2,175 remaining patients were reviewed to verify presence or absence of cardiac or pulmonary complications, using explicit criteria and independent abstraction of pre- and postoperative components of charts. From these 528 validated cases and controls (23% of the cohort), 96 cases and 96 controls were matched by operation type and age within ten years. Hospital and intensive care unit stays were significantly longer (p < 0.0001) for the cases than for the controls (24.1 vs 10.3 and 5.6 vs 1.5 days, respectively). All 19 deaths occurred among the cases. Among the cases, pulmonary complications occurred significantly more often than cardiac complications (p < 0.00001) and were associated with significantly longer hospital stays (22.7 vs 10.4 days, p = 0.001). Combined cardiopulmonary complications occurred among 28% of the cases. Misclassification-corrected incidence rates for the entire cohort were 9.6% (95% CI 7.2-12.0) for pulmonary and 5.7% (95% CI 3.6-7.7) for cardiac complications. CONCLUSIONS: For noncardiac surgery, previous research has focused on cardiac risk. In this study, pulmonary complications were more frequent, were associated with longer hospital stay, and occurred in combination with cardiac complications in a substantial proportion of cases. These results suggest that further research is needed to fully characterize the clinical epidemiology of postoperative cardiac and pulmonary complications and better guide preoperative risk assessment.
Classifying change with the Sickness Impact Profile for Nursing Homes (SIP-NH).
The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the concordance of the Sickness Impact Profile for Nursing Homes (SIP-NH) and Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) in classifying change. Subjects consisted of 194 consecutive long-stay nursing home residents at one academic department of the V.A. and in 8 community proprietary nursing homes in San Antonio, Texas. They were to have more than 3 months residency; to be > or = 61 years; and to be dependent in at least 2 ADLs with an MMSE score of > or = 15. Subjects were administered a 128-item SIP and a reduced 66-item SIP-NH at baseline and 4, 8, and 12-month follow-up. At each follow-up, subjects were classified into 3 mutually exclusive change categories using a change score of > or = 5 points. Concordance of the classification of subjects by the SIP-NH and SIP was evaluated. The misclassification rate as well as its direction was also assessed. Both instruments classified a little over one-quarter of the subjects as better, over a third as being unchanged, and another third as being worse at the four-month follow-up. More subjects were classified as worse by both instruments at 8 and 12 months. All kappas ranged from 0.52 to 0.78, indicating good to excellent agreement. Overall, the SIP-NH characterized persons as changed more often than the SIP with no systematic directional bias. In conclusion, the SIP-NH was concordant with the SIP in classifying change in subjects. However, we cannot say which of the two is better for detecting change. Future research must focus on defining a change score which has clinical meaning, and evaluate responsiveness to change.
Relationship between physical performance and self-perceived physical function.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare two methods of measuring physical function in subjects with a broad range of abilities and to evaluate the effects of cognitive, social, educational, and age factors on the relationship between the two methods. DESIGN: Multiple regression analysis was used to compare self-perceived (dependent variables) with performance measures (independent variables). Covariates included age, gender, Mini-Mental State Exam score, education, living status, and depression score. SETTING: Five community-dwelling and two nursing home sites. PARTICIPANTS: 417 community-dwelling subjects and 200 nursing home residents aged 62-98 years. MEASUREMENTS: Self-perceived physical function was assessed with the physical dimension summary score of the Sickness Impact Profile, which comprises three subscales: ambulation, mobility, and body care and movement. Physical performance was evaluated by self-selected gait speed, chair-stand time, maximal grip strength, and a balance score. RESULTS: Nursing home residents and community-dwellers were significantly different (P < .0001) in all variables except age and gender. Self-perceived and performance-based measures were moderately correlated, with a range from r = -.194 to r = -.625 (P < .05). Gait speed was the strongest independent predictor of self-perceived physical function in both groups. Symptoms of depression were also an independent predictor of self-perceived function in nursing home residents; subjects who had such symptoms report more self-perceived dysfunction than would be predicted based on performance tests. CONCLUSIONS: Self-selected gait speed is a global indicator of self-perceived physical function over a broad range of abilities. External determinants (depressive symptoms, cognitive function, marital status, etc.) affect self-perceived function in both groups, but gait speed is the greatest single predictor of self-perceived function. In nursing home residents depressive symptomatology is related to self-perceived.
Hypertension in the elderly. Implications and generalizability of randomized trials.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate morbidity and mortality benefits of drug therapy for hypertensive elderly subjects, compare these benefits with effects in younger subjects, and provide a framework for generalizing results derived from trials to actual patients. DATA SOURCES: A literature search using MEDLINE from 1966 to 1993, references from reviews and trial articles, and experts. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized trials lasting at least 1 year that evaluated effects of drug treatment on morbidity and mortality outcomes in hypertensive persons. DATA EXTRACTION: Four independent reviewers appraised protocol characteristics and quality of selected trials. DATA SYNTHESIS: There were 13 trials involving 16,564 elderly persons (age 60 years and older). The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and competing comorbid diseases was lower among trial participants than the general population of hypertensive elderly persons. When the six large high-quality trials were combined, trial results showed 43 subjects (95% confidence interval [CI], 31 to 69) and 61 subjects (95% CI, 39 to 141) needed to be treated for 5 years to prevent one cerebrovascular event and one coronary heart disease event, respectively. Including the other seven trials did not change the results significantly. Only 18 subjects (95% CI, 14 to 25) needed to be treated to prevent one cardiovascular event (cerebrovascular or cardiac). Twelve trials in primarily younger and middle-aged adults involved approximately 33,000 persons. For all outcomes except cardiac mortality, two to four times as many of the younger subjects as the older subjects needed to be treated for 5 years to prevent morbid and mortal events. No significant effect on cardiac mortality was seen among younger subjects, while 78 older subjects (95% CI, 50 to 180) needed to be treated to prevent a fatal cardiac event. CONCLUSIONS: Randomized trials demonstrate that treating healthy older persons with hypertension is highly efficacious. Five-year morbidity and mortality benefits derived from trials are greater for older than younger subjects. Extrapolating benefits from trials to individual patients is difficult, but should take into account multiple issues including the patient's risk factors, preexisting cardiovascular disease, and competing comorbid illnesses.
Rationale for systematic reviews.
Systematic literature reviews including meta-analyses are invaluable scientific activities. The rationale for such reviews is well established. Health care providers, researchers, and policy makers are inundated with unmanageable amounts of information; they need systematic reviews to efficiently integrate existing information and provide data for rational decision making. Systematic reviews establish whether scientific findings are consistent and can be generalised across populations, settings, and treatment variations, or whether findings vary significantly by particular subsets. Meta-analyses in particular can increase power and precision of estimates of treatment effects and exposure risks. Finally, explicit methods used in systematic reviews limit bias and, hopefully, will improve reliability and accuracy of conclusions.
A randomized trial of physical rehabilitation for very frail nursing home residents.
BACKGROUND: Past studies suggest multidisciplinary interventions that include physical therapy (PT) can improve function of nursing home residents. This trial specifically evaluates effects of PT for frail long-stay nursing home residents. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: One academic nursing home and eight community nursing homes. PATIENTS: A total of 194 elderly nursing home residents dependent in at least two activities of daily living residing in the nursing home for at least 3 months. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to individually tailored one-on-one PT sessions or friendly visits (FVs) three times a week for 4 months. Physical therapy included range-of-motion, strength, balance, transfer, and mobility exercises. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Performance-based physical function assessed by the Physical Disability Index; self-perceived health status assessed with the Sickness Impact Profile; observer-reported activities of daily living; and falls. RESULTS: Eighty-nine percent and 92% of PT and FV sessions, respectively, were attended; 5% and 9% of subjects dropped out in the PT group and FV group, respectively. Compared with the FV group, the PT group experienced no significant improvements in overall Physical Disability Index, Sickness Impact Profile, or activities of daily living scores. A 15.5% improvement in the mobility subscale of the Physical Disability Index was seen (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.4% to 24.7%); no benefits in range-of-motion, strength, or balance subscales were found. Compared with the FV group, the PT group used assistive devices for bed mobility tasks less often (P = .06) and were less likely to use assistive devices and wheelchairs for locomotion (P < .005). There were 79 falls in the PT group vs 60 falls in the FV group (P = .11). Charge for the 4-month PT program was $1220 per subject (95% CI, $412 to $1832). CONCLUSION: This standardized physical therapy program provided modest mobility benefits for very frail long-stay nursing home residents with physical disability due to multiple comorbid conditions.
The Sickness Impact Profile for nursing homes (SIP-NH)
BACKGROUND: Valid, feasible measures of functional status are needed to evaluate the expanding nursing home population. This study attempts to increase relevance and reduce respondent burden of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) for nursing home residents while maintaining internal consistency and validity. METHODS: 231 residents from one academic and four community nursing homes, aged > or = 60 with a Mini-Mental State Exam score > or = 11, were study participants. Nominal group process was used to identify items and/or categories for removal. Candidate items were those that: represented restrictions of the nursing home environment, had weak item-total score correlations, and/or made minimal contribution to category internal consistency. Reduction was constrained by: minimum correlation of r = .90 between SIP and Sickness Impact Profile for Nursing Homes (SIP-NH) scores, coefficients alpha that fell within 95% confidence regions about predicted alpha. Convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated with the Katz Activities of Daily Living, Physical Disability Index, Geriatric Depression Scale, and Folstein Mini-Mental State Exam. RESULTS: The SIP-NH contains 66 items, a 51.5% reduction. Correlations between the SIP-NH and SIP were: total score r = .98, Physical dimension r = .97, and Psychosocial dimension r = .97. Alpha coefficients all fell within the 95% confidence regions. The SIP and the SIP-NH did not differ in correlations with validating instruments. CONCLUSIONS: The SIP-NH reduces respondent burden and has acceptable internal consistency and external validity. Potentially useful for discriminatory and predictive purposes, responsiveness to change will require longitudinal evaluation.
Methods for screening for hearing loss in older adults.
Two common screening tools for detecting hearing loss, the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening Version (HHIE-S) and Audioscope, are compared. One hundred eighty-five consecutive patients over age 60 at a primary care clinic received both screening tests followed by pure tone audiometry. Three criteria for hearing loss was considered: Speech Frequency Pure Tone Average > or = 25 dB; High Frequency Pure Tone Average > or = 25 dB; and Ventry and Weinstein's criteria of a 40 dB loss at 1.0 or 2.0 kHz. Ranges of respective operating characteristics for the Audioscope versus the HHIE-S were: sensitivities 0.64 to 0.96 versus 0.29 to 0.63; specificities 0.80 to 0.91 versus 0.75 to 0.93; and positive likelihood ratios 4.86 to 7.52 versus 2.42 to 4.27. Most patients preferred screening with the Audioscope (60%) over the HHIE-S (13%). The Audioscope is preferred by patients, and outperforms the HHIE-S using a variety of reference standard definitions.
Functional status of Mexican American nursing home residents.
OBJECTIVE: To compare sociodemographic characteristics, physical function, and cognition of Mexican American and non-Hispanic white nursing home residents. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional survey of residents in eight proprietary nursing homes and one Veterans Affairs nursing home in San Antonio, Texas. SUBJECTS: Residents with lengths of stay greater than or equal to 90 days. MEASUREMENTS: Sociodemographic characteristics, residence prior to admission, and dependency in activities of daily living (ADL) were abstracted from the medical record. The Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was administered in the resident's self-selected language to a subset of residents. MAIN RESULTS: There were 1160 participants, 261 Mexican American (23%) and 899 non-Hispanic white residents (77%). Mexican Americans were younger (77.1 vs 80.7 years), more often men (44% vs 30%), less educated (6.2 vs 10.8 years), and more often dependent on Medicaid funding (66% vs 40%) than non-Hispanic whites. Mexican Americans were less independent in feeding (34% vs 49%), transfers (18% vs 30%), toileting (19% vs 29%), and dressing (12% vs 19%). Mean MMSE scores were different in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites (8.93 vs 11.85), and this difference remained significant after adjustment for age and education (P = 0.04). ADL function was strongly associated with MMSE (P = 0.0001) and less strongly associated with ethnicity (P = 0.056) in multiple regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the strongest evidence to date that Mexican American nursing home residents are more cognitively and functionally impaired than non-Hispanic white residents. Further studies should explore whether medical conditions, selection and referral patterns or cultural factors explain functional differences between Mexican American and non-Hispanic white nursing home residents.
Performance of case-finding tools for depression in the nursing home: influence of clinical and functional characteristics and selection of optimal threshold scores.
OBJECTIVE: To compare case-finding tools for depression in the nursing home setting and to evaluate effects of subject function, cognition, and disease number on test performance. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: One academic and four community homes. SUBJECTS: One hundred thirty-four randomly selected, mildly cognitively impaired, functionally dependent residents. METHODS AND MEASURES: The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Short Geriatric Depression Scale (SGDS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and Brief Carrol Depression Rating Scale (BCDRS) were administered. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R diagnoses was administered independently,. Operating characteristics and the effects of subject characteristics on test performance were evaluated using McNemar's test and logistic regression. Selection of "optimal" threshold scores was guided by Kraemer's quality indices and clinical judgment. RESULTS: Thirty-five subjects (26%) had major depression. No differences were found among the instruments in sensitivity (range 0.74-0.89), specificity (range 0.62-0.77), or area under the receiver operating curve (ROC) (range 0.85-0.91). Resident characteristics did not affect test performance. Quality indices showed the GDS and BCDRS met criteria for moderate to substantial agreement with the criterion standard, whereas the SGDS and the CES-D achieved only fair agreement. No change in threshold scores was warranted. CONCLUSIONS: The GDS and BCDRS performed well in the nursing home. As the GDS can serve as a both a case-finding and severity instrument, it is preferred. Use of brief, interviewer-administered tools may improve detection of depression in the nursing home.
The relationship between disease and function and perceived health in very frail elders.
OBJECTIVE: To study associations between disease and observed function and self-perceived health in very frail elders. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional survey of nine nursing homes in San Antonio, TX. PARTICIPANTS: 194 elderly long-stay nursing home residents dependent in at least two ADLs and without severe cognitive impairment. MEASURES: Burden of disease (BOD) was chart abstracted using a standardized protocol that assessed types and severities of 59 categorizations of chronic and acute medical conditions. Observed function and self-perceived health status were assessed independently by the Katz Activities of Daily Living scale (ADL) and the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), respectively. RESULTS: Summary BOD scores had a low, but statistically significant, univariate correlation with ADL scores (r = 0.21, P = 0.003) and no significant correlation with SIP scores (R = -0.008). Multiple linear regression analyses, including the 24 most frequent disease categories, showed that disease explained significant amounts of ADL (r2 = 0.25, P = 0.001) and borderline significant amounts of SIP (r2 = 0.16, P = 0.11). Models including both disease and sociodemographic, cognitive, and affective variables showed disease added significant incremental explantation beyond the other factors to ADL (incremental r2 = 0.14, P = 0.04), but not to SIP (incremental r2 = 0.08, P > 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Disease, observed function, and self-perceived health status are separate, but interrelated entities, with disease having a stronger relationship to observed function than self-perceived health. Comprehensive assessment of frail elders may need to include all three areas, and studies that focus on one area should take into account the other two as potential important covariates.
Problems in interpreting cost effectiveness in clinical trials. Experimental versus implementation costs.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the difficulty of estimating cost effectiveness of alternative implementation strategies using clinical trial data. DESIGN: Two examples drawn from a hearing-aid intervention trial and a physical-therapy trial for frail elderly are used to demonstrate how alternative implementation strategies may affect cost effectiveness. Sensitivity analysis is used to document a range of possible economic outcomes for each example and show how assumptions based on trials may bias implementation decisions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs and cost-effectiveness ratios are estimated for alternative implementation strategies and compared with trial results. MAIN RESULTS: Staffing and equipment substitutions, reconfigurations, and economies of scale can reduce the cost of trial interventions substantially. Such resource alterations as well as protocol and target group modifications may also have an impact on effectiveness. In both examples effectiveness can be reduced by as much as 50% and under certain conditions alternative implementation strategies will still be cost effective. CONCLUSIONS: Cost effectiveness of implementations can differ substantially from a trial when different resources or target populations are incorporated. Institutions must conduct preimplementation studies which consider alternative resource configurations before adopting an intervention based on trial results.
Discriminating causes of dyspnea through clinical examination.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Development and validation of a physical performance instrument for the functionally impaired elderly: the Physical Disability Index (PDI).
Article describes development of the Physical Disability Index (PDI), an observer-administered, performance-based instrument measuring physical disability in frail-elderly persons without severe cognitive impairment. Sixty-five items in four subscales encompassing Range of Motion (ROM), Strength (STR), Balance (BAL), and Mobility (MOB) were measured. Subjects were randomly selected frail nursing home residents (N = 103) with a Folstein Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score of > or = 11. Using correlation matrices, cluster analysis, and regression techniques, the scale was reduced to 54 items. All individual item values were standardized and aggregated into subscale and summary PDI scores, each with a range of 0-100. Test-retest and interrater reliability were evaluated. Discriminant and convergent validity were established using MMSE, Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (PSMS), and Sickness Impact Profile-Physical Dimension (SIP-PD). PDI is a performance-based instrument that appears to discriminate among frail individuals with differing levels of physical function. Further testing is warranted in other populations of frail-elderly persons to ascertain its applicability and generalizability.
Development of the common data base for the FICSIT trials.
The eight FICSIT (Frailty and Injuries: Cooperative Studies of Intervention Techniques) sites test different intervention strategies in selected target groups of older adults. To compare the relative potential of these interventions to reduce frailty and fall-related injuries, all sites share certain descriptive (risk-adjustment) measures and outcome measures. This article describes the shared measures, which are referred to as the FICSIT Common Data Base (CDB). The description is divided into four sections according to the four FICSIT committees responsible for the CDB: (1) psychosocial health and demographic measures; (2) physical health measures; (3) fall-related measures; and (4) cost and cost-effectiveness measures. Because the structure of the FICSIT trial is unusual, the CDB should expedite secondary analyses of various research questions dealing with frailty and falls.