Helicobacter pylori and surgery. Authors should not extrapolate findings into unresearched areas.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to C D Roseveare.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To compare modified Gianturco metal stents with plastic Atkinson tubes in the palliation of malignant dysphagia. DESIGN: Patient single-blind, multi-centre prospective, randomized trial. SETTING: Three district general hospitals in the Wessex region. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty one consecutive patients with inoperable malignant oesophageal stenosis causing dysphagia and suitable for treatment with an endoprosthesis. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either a modified Gianturco metal stent or a plastic Atkinson tube. Sedation was similar and patients were given identical dietary advice. Data were collected after insertion until the patients' death. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Procedural mortality/morbidity; hospital stay; weight loss; quality of life (Nottingham Health Profile, Spitzer QL index and specific questions about dysphagia and enjoyment of food); duration of survival after insertion; cost effectiveness of each intervention. RESULTS: Overall complication rates were similar in the two groups. Compared with Atkinson tubes, patients with Gianturco stents had better palliation of dysphagia (median dysphagia score 1 vs 2, P = 0.04), maintained their weight longer (median percent weight loss 0.66 vs 6.51, P = 0.007), enjoyed food more (enjoyment score 2 vs 1, P = 0.03) and survived longer (log rank P < 0.025). Patients with metal stents were discharged from hospital earlier (Gianturco 4 days, Atkinson 10 days, P = 0.001), and initial treatment cost was lower if the cost of hospital stay exceeded pound sterling 120 per day. CONCLUSION: Gianturco stents are superior to Atkinson tubes in the palliation of malignant oesophageal stenosis.
A variety of mechanisms are responsible for the gastric and duodenal mucosal injury known to result from the consumption of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Many of these mechanisms may be influenced by coexistent infection with Helicobacter pylori. However, evidence of increased risk from NSAIDs in patients with this bacterium is contradictory. While some authors have reported that symptoms, severity and prevalence of mucosal damage are higher in H. pylori-positive individuals taking NSAIDs than in those who are H. pylori negative, others have noted no significant difference. Reasons for this conflict may include the age of the subjects studied, duration of treatment, toxicity of the NSAID employed and pathogenicity factors related to different strains of H. pylori.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.