PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C D Saur

Publications and source records attributed to C D Saur.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Depressive symptoms and outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms are an independent risk factor for outcome in patients with cardiac disease, but their effect on outcome among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting is not well understood. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether or not clinical variables including length of stay, readmission rates, and mortality are related to patients' level of depressive symptoms before and after coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: An observational, longitudinal design was used. The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form health survey was used to collect data on depressive symptoms in 416 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. The distribution of depressive symptoms was correlated with length of stay after the procedure, readmission, and mortality. RESULTS: The level of depressive symptoms before coronary artery bypass grafting correlated with the level of depressive symptoms at 6 weeks follow-up, both for the individual items "feeling down in the dumps" (r = 0.24, P = .009) and "feeling downhearted" (r = 0.36, P < .001) and for the overall score on the Mental Health scale (r = 0.40, P < .001). Feeling down in the dumps (P = .007) and overall scores on the Mental Health scale (P = .02) were significantly related to readmission within 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of depressive symptoms before coronary artery bypass grafting are related to higher hospital readmission rates 6 months after the procedure. Nurses can play a pivotal role in determining which patients require evaluation, educating patients, and initiating effective treatment, which may prevent readmission related to depressive symptoms.

Aged↗

Screening for trauma history on an inpatient affective-disorders unit: a pilot study.

Psychiatric inpatients (N = 343) admitted to an affective-disorders unit were administered a self-rating Trauma Questionnaire (TQ) to evaluate life history of traumatic experiences. Eighty four percent of the sample identified at least one traumatic-event category (M = 2.27 categories/patient). Symptoms consistent with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), were highly prevalent. However, only six patients received a chart diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder. Female patients evidenced more PTSD symptoms than males, in contrast to an equal number of event categories identified by the two sexes. Age correlated negatively with number of symptoms endorsed. Implications for trauma screening in affective-disorder patients are discussed.

Adolescent↗

Quality, cost-effective psychiatric treatment: A CNS--MD collaborative practice model.

Health care reform presents an opportunity to design alternative health care delivery models. Psychiatric clinical nurse specialists and psychiatrists are particularly well positioned to work together as full and equal partners, to complement each other's practice and to provide cost-effective care with improved patient outcomes. In this case study, we show that, with the addition of psychotherapy provided by a CNS, the cost of care for the patient decreased from over $40,000 (average hospital cost only) to less than $4,000 per year. In addition, the patient attained competent self-care and an enhanced quality of life. Characteristics of effective collaboration are described. Replication of this design by psychiatric clinical nurse specialists is recommended.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

Safeguarding the public's trust through the self-governance of peer review.

1. Nurses must monitor the quality of professional practice in order to safeguard the public's trust in nursing as a professional discipline and to ensure that nursing is self-regulating, accountable, and autonomous. 2. A peer review process indicates self-governance and advances the profession of nursing. 3. A peer review committee is responsible for gathering information, evaluating nursing practice, and reporting the findings to the nurse and the initiator of the review. Any deliberate or negligent acts or omissions of the nurse under review are reported to the state board of nursing.

Humans↗