Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to C Di Mario.
The diabetic patient requires a full armamentarium of proven and developing treatments in order to minimise periprocedural risk as well as improve long term outcome.
Visible distal embolization is a relatively rare complication during percutaneous coronary interventions but it may occur in 15-20% of angioplasties in saphenous vein grafts (SVG) and in thrombus containing lesions of native coronary arteries, especially in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Mechanical thrombectomy devices and distal protection devices have been introduced to reduce the incidence of distal embolisation. Angiojet thrombectomy has shown positive outcomes in thrombus containing lesions when compared with intracoronary thrombolysis but a randomised trial failed to show benefit in the context of AMI. The X-Sizer, Excimer LASER and various simple aspiration thrombectomy catheters show promise in treatment of AMI with improvement shown in surrogate end-points such as resolution of ST-elevation but there have been no randomised trials large enough to demonstrate changes in hard clinical end-points. Distal protection devices have come to be routinely used during SVG treatment and, after the results of the SAFER and FIRE trials; they became a treatment recommendation in the recently issued European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. For AMI, these devices showed great promise in early single-centre studies which have been offset by the lack of clinical benefit in the multi-centre EMERALD trial. Proximal occlusion devices may further decrease the incidence of distal embolisation, especially in the treatment of totally occluded SVGs or native arteries, by reversing the blood flow and offering protection at a very early stage of the procedure before wire passage. Despite continuous technical improvement and a growing number of miniaturised thrombectomy devices and filters, because of the paucity of controlled large studies, it remains unclear whether these devices will remain limited to niche' applications or will become a regular companion to balloons and stents in mainstream angioplasty procedures.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Drug eluting stents have been shown to reduce the rate of in-stent restenosis in cases where single lesions are treated. The performance of these stents, in patients with multivessel disease and complex lesions, however, remains unknown. Our experience with sirolimus eluting stents in such patients is presented. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: This study includes all consecutive patients treated at San Raffaele Hospital and EMO Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy treated with sirolimus eluting stents. RESULTS: Between April 2002 and March 2003, 486 patients with 1027 lesions were treated (437 males, 49 females) with a mean (SD) age of 62.2 (10.5) years. Of all patients studied, 19.1% had single vessel disease, 33.8% had two vessel disease, and 47.1% had three vessel disease. Of the whole study group, 20.3% of patients had diabetes mellitus. A mean (SD) of 2.3 (0.4) stents per patient and 1.1 (0.2) stents per lesion were implanted. The baseline mean reference diameter was 2.7 (0.6) mm with a mean minimal luminal diameter of 0.9 (0.5) mm. Post-stenting, the acute gain was 1.8 (0.6) mm. During hospital stay one patient died (0.2%) and 13 (2.7%) patients had in-hospital myocardial infarction (MI). One patient required urgent repeat percutaneous coronary intervention. Six months clinical follow up was performed in all 347 eligible patients. Six months mortality was 2.0% (n = 7) and acute MI occurred in 0.3% (n = 1). Target lesion revascularisation occurred in 9.5% (n = 33) of the patients and target vessel revascularisation (TVR) in 11.5% (n = 40) of the patients. Major adverse cardiac event rate was 13.8% (n = 48). TVR was 4.5% for single vessel disease and 13.2% for multivessel disease. Diabetes mellitus was the only significant predictor for TVR. CONCLUSION: The use of drug eluting stents in single and multivessel coronary disease produces good short and medium term results with a low rate of revascularisation. Longer term follow-up is required to confirm these observations.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions remained challenging in the stent era, with restenosis rates greater than 30% and no advantage from the routine use of kissing stents. Drug eluting stents (DES) have dramatically reduced the restenosis rates (RR) in the main vessel, but with conventional T-stenting double digits figures are still reported for the side-branch because of poor ostial coverage. The techniques of kissing stenting able to provide full lesion coverage (Culotte, V-stenting, Crush) have the potential to improve these results but the development of dedicated DES is probably needed to obtain consistently high procedural and long-term success.
BACKGROUND: Lesions located at the ostium of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) are considered an ideal target for directional atherectomy (DCA), but few data are available about the value of using this strategy before stenting in comparison with stenting alone. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the immediate and mid term clinical and angiographic results of DCA followed by stent implantation for ostial LAD lesions. DESIGN: Retrospective comparison of the immediate and mid term angiographic and clinical results of a series of 117 consecutive patients with de novo lesions located at the ostium of the LAD. Of these, 46 underwent DCA before stenting and 71 were treated with stenting alone. RESULTS: Technical success in the two groups was similar at around 98%. DCA plus stenting provided a larger minimum lumen diameter at the end of the procedure than stenting alone (3.57 (0.59) mm v 3.33 (0.49) mm, p = 0.022). There were no differences for in-hospital major adverse events (MACE) (7.5% for atherectomy plus stenting, and 5.3% for stenting alone; p = 0.41). All patients had clinical follow up at a mean of 7.9 (2.7) months. Angiographic follow up was done in 89 patients (76%) at a mean of 5.9 (2.2) months. The atherectomy plus stenting group had a larger minimum lumen diameter than the stenting group (2.79 (0.64) mm v 2.26 (0.85) mm, p = 0.004) and a lower binary restenosis rate (13.8% v 33.3%, p = 0.031). Six month MACE were reduced in the atherectomy plus stenting group (8.7% v 23.9%, p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Debulking before stenting in de novo lesions located at the ostium of the LAD is safe and is associated with a high rate of technical success. Follow up data show that DCA plus stenting results in a significantly larger minimum lumen diameter and a lower incidence of restenosis than stenting alone.
AIMS: This study was conducted to analyse flow velocity parameters and predictors of a suboptimal coronary flow reserve (<2.5) following balloon angioplasty. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-five patients underwent sequential intracoronary Doppler as part of the DEBATE I study. Of these, 183, with complete angiography and Doppler at the 6-month follow-up, were included. Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of post-procedural suboptimal coronary flow reserve, defined as coronary flow reserve <2.5. RESULTS: Forty-eight per cent (n=88) of the patients achieved a suboptimal coronary flow reserve. These patients had higher baseline velocities (cm.s(-1)) before balloon angioplasty (18+/-9 vs 14+/-6, P=0.004), after balloon angioplasty (22+/-11 vs 14+/-5, P<0.001) and at follow-up (19+/-9 vs 16+/-6, P=0.011) than the optimal coronary flow reserve group. Although the suboptimal group had lower hyperaemic velocities (cm.s(-1)) after balloon angioplasty than the optimal group (42+/-17 vs 49+/-16, P=0.008), these velocities became similar at follow-up. Increasing age (odds ratio, OR 1.071, P=0.0002), female gender (OR 2.52, P=0.014) and increasing pre-procedural baseline average peak velocities (OR 1.056, P<0.001) were found to be independent predictors of a suboptimal coronary flow reserve following balloon angioplasty. CONCLUSION: A suboptimal coronary flow reserve was associated with (1) a chronically elevated baseline average peak velocity (2) a transient deficit in the hyperaemic average peak velocity (3) the elderly, and female gender.
AIMS: A small reference diameter may be the consequence of high plaque burden and diffuse disease. The reference vessel diameter in small coronary arteries may vary according to the method of measurement used. We endeavoured to confirm the difference between data from examinations conducted using angiography with that revealed by intravascular ultrasound. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between March 1993 and October 1999, 344 consecutive patients with 419 lesions in small vessels (< or =2.75 mm, Small group) and 953 patients with 1161 lesions in large vessels (Large group) underwent intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in our Institution. The mean difference between the intravascular ultrasound and the angiographic reference diameter (Delta(IVUS-Angio)) was 1.3+/-0.5 mm in the Small group and 1.0+/-0.6 mm in the Large group (P<0.001). There was a stronger correlation between plaque burden and Delta(IVUS-Angio)in the Small group (r=0.80, P<0.001) than in the Large group (r=0.59, P<0.001). An Delta(IVUS-Angio)> or =0.30 mm occurred in 99.5% of cases in the Small group and in 90% in the Large group (P<0.001). An Delta(IVUS-Angio)> or =0.50 mm occurred in 96% of case in the Small group and 80% in the Large group (P<0.001). Predictors of Delta(IVUS-Angio)> or =0.50 in the Small group were: proximal or middle lesion site, vessel type (left anterior descending artery, diagonal and obtuse marginal branches) and female sex. An Delta(IVUS-Angio)> or =1.0 mm occurred in 71% of cases in the Small group and in 49% in the Large group (P<0.001). Predictors of Delta(IVUS-Angio)> or =1.0 mm in the Small group were: proximal or middle lesion site, female sex, and lesion length. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of vessels measuring < or =2.75 mm are large vessels with a high plaque burden. This condition is particularly prevalent in females, with lesions in the proximal or middle left anterior descending artery, and in obtuse marginal and diagonal branches.
Aims To assess whether coronary flow velocity reserve following stent implantation is predictive of the subsequent need of target lesion revascularization. Methods and Results The outcome was examined of 417 patients enrolled in a multicentre prospective randomized study (DESTINI), who received a successful single vessel stent implantation in native coronary arteries and in whom coronary flow velocity reserve was measured. Logistic regression analysis and the receiver operator characteristic curve were used. When compared with 358 patients not requiring target lesion revascularization, 59 patients (14%) who underwent target lesion revascularization had a lower final coronary flow velocity reserve (2.33 +/- 0.87 vs 2.48+/- 0.80, P= 0.20) and smaller final minimal lumen diameter (2.62 +/- 0.66 mm vs 2.73+/- 0.60, P= 0.19); however, those differences were not statistically significant. Patients with a coronary flow velocity reserve of < 2.0 (n=109, 26%) exhibited a significantly higher target lesion revascularization rate than patients with a coronary flow velocity reserve of > or = 2.0 (22% vs 11%, P= 0.010). This difference remained significant (odds ratio=2.01, 95% CI=1.11 to 3.66) after adjustment for other variables that were also correlated with the incidence of target lesion revascularization. Conclusion The presence of a final coronary flow velocity reserve of < 2.0 is an independent predictor of the need for target lesion revascularization after stent implantation in native coronary artery lesions.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenting is now used as an alternative to surgical endarterectomy. The availability of cerebral protection systems has expanded the area of application of this procedure. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, safety, and immediate and late clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous carotid interventions. METHODS: Between January 1999 and December 2000, 100 consecutive patients with 102 carotid artery stenoses were treated (71 men, 29 women, mean (SD) age 67 (8) years): 49 had coronary artery disease, 28 had previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). On the basis of the Mayo Clinic carotid endarterectomy risk scale, 73 patients were grade III-IV and 13 grade VI. RESULTS: Baseline diameter stenosis was 78.8 (10)%, with a mean lesion length of 12.6 (5.8) mm. Angiographic success was obtained in 99 lesions (97.0%) with a final diameter stenosis of 2.4 (3.5)%. Procedural success was obtained in 96 patients (96%). Selective cannulation of three carotid arteries was impossible owing to severe vessel tortuosity. Carotid stenting was performed in 97 of the treated lesions, and protection devices were used in 67 lesions. In-hospital complications occurred in seven patients (six TIA, one (category 1) minor stroke). No major stroke or death occurred. All patients were discharged from the hospital after an average of 2.5 days. At 12 (6.2) months of follow up restenosis occurred in three patients (3.4%) (one patient with carotid occlusion had TIA). Six patients had died: two from cerebrovascular events (5 and 11 months after the procedure) and four from cardiovascular causes. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid stenting appears feasible and safe, with few major complications. Long term follow up is affected by a high incidence of cardiovascular mortality.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the approach of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with spot stenting (SS) for the treatment of long coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: Treating long coronary lesions with balloon angioplasty results in suboptimal short- and long-term outcomes. Full lesion coverage with traditional stenting (TS) has been associated with a high restenosis rate. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated a consecutive series of 130 long lesions (>15 mm) in 101 patients treated with IVUS-guided PTCA and SS. The results were compared with those of TS in a matched group of patients. Coronary angioplasty was performed with a balloon to vessel ratio of 1:1, according to the IVUS media-to-media diameter of the vessel at the lesion site, to achieve prespecified IVUS criteria: lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) > or =5.5 mm(2) or > or =50% of the vessel CSA at the lesion site. The stents were implanted only in the vessel segment where the criteria were not met. RESULTS: In the SS group, stents were implanted in 67 of 130 lesions, and the mean stent length was shorter than that of lesions in the matched TS group (10.4 +/- 13 mm vs. 32.4 +/- 13 mm, p < 0.005). The 30-day major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was similar (5%) for both groups. Angiographic restenosis was 25% with IVUS-guided SS, as compared with 39% in the TS group (p < 0.05). Follow-up MACE and target lesion revascularization rates were lower in the SS group than in the TS group (22% vs. 38% [p < 0.05] and 19% vs. 34% [p < 0.05], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular ultrasound-guided SS for the treatment of long coronary lesions is associated with good acute outcome. Angiographic restenosis and follow-up MACE rates were significantly lower than those with TS.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Distal embolization of debris during percutaneous carotid artery stenting may result in neurological deficit. Filter devices for cerebral protection potentially reduce the risk of embolization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Elective carotid stent implantation using 3 different types of distal filter protection devices was attempted in 88 consecutive lesions (84 patients) in the internal carotid artery that had >70% diameter stenosis (mean, 78.7+/-10.7%). Procedures were performed in 3 different centers. The mean age of the patients was 69+/-8 years, 75% were men, and 35.7% had neurological symptoms. In 86 lesions, a stent was successfully implanted (97.7%). In 83 of these 86 procedures (96.5%), it was possible to position a filter device. In 53% of filters, there was macroscopic evidence of debris. Collected material consisted of lipid-rich macrophages, fibrin material, and cholesterol clefts. Neurological complications during the procedure, in the hospital, and at 30 days of clinical follow-up occurred in only one patient (1.2%). This patient suffered a minor stroke that resolved within 1 week. Two major adverse cardiac events (2.3%) occurred during the 30 days of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Filter protection during carotid artery stenting seems feasible and safe. In the present series, the incidence of neurological complications was low.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of emergency stent implantation for the treatment of perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy has been proven safe and effective in reducing the risk of stroke in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with >60% carotid artery stenosis. However, perioperative stroke has been reported in 1.5% to 9% of CEA cases. The management of such a complication is challenging. Recently, percutaneous transluminal carotid angioplasty with stent deployment has emerged as a valuable and alternative strategy for the treatment of carotid artery disease. METHODS: Between April 1998 and February 2000, 18 of the 995 patients (1.8%) who had CEA in our institution experienced perioperative major or minor neurological complications. Of these, 13 patients underwent emergency carotid angiogram and eventual stent implantation, whereas the remaining five had surgery re-exploration. RESULTS: Carotid angiogram was performed within 20+/-10 min and revealed vessel flow-limiting dissection (five cases) or thrombosis (eight cases). Percutaneous transluminal carotid angioplasty with direct stenting (self-expandable stent) was performed in all 13 cases. Angiographic success was 100%. Complete remission of neurological symptoms occurred in 11 of the 13 patients treated by stent implantation and in one of the five patients treated by surgical re-exploration (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Stent implantation seems to be a safe and effective strategy in the treatment of perioperative stroke complicating CEA, especially when carotid dissection represents the main anatomic problem.