PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

C E Arbesman

Publications and source records attributed to C E Arbesman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Local intranasal immunotherapy for grass-allergic rhinitis.

In a double-blind controlled study, local intranasal immunotherapy was evaluated for the treatment of grass pollenosis. On the basis of serum grass-specific IgE levels, 50 grass-allergic patients were randomly divided into three groups and treated with either an aqueous solution of mixed-grass extract, a formaldehyde-modified mixed-grass extract (allergoid), or a histamine solution (placebo). Intranasal solutions were administered in gradually increasing doses over a preseasonal 10 wk period, adverse local reactions from the aqueous grass extract were frequent during treatment. Few adverse reactions occurred from the allergoid or histamine solutions. During the pollen season, patients receiving both grass extracts had much lower symptom/medication scores than patients receiving placebo. The severity of eye symptoms was the same in all groups. After treatment, serum grass-specific IgE rose in patients receiving aqueous and allergoid extract; no change was noted in patients receiving placebo therapy. Grass nasal secretory-specific IgA titers in each group did not change during the study. The results of this study suggest that local intranasal immunotherapy with either aqueous or allergoid grass extracts is clinically effective for the treatment of grass pollenosis. Adverse reactions associated with the aqueous extract may limit its usefulness. No correlation was present between the secretory immune response and clinical benefit.

Administration, Intranasal

Modified rapid venom desensitization.

The clinical and immunologic response to a modified rapid (r) regimen of venom immunotherapy was evaluated and compared to a traditional (t) therapeutic regimen. Nineteen patients in the r group received a starting dose of 0.01 microgram and reached a maintenance dose of 50 micrograms in 7 weeks. Twelve patients in the t group received an average of twenty-one injections on a weekly basis, reaching the same maintenance dose. The age and sex distribution and pre-treatment venom-specific IgE titres (RAST) of both groups were comparable. There were thirteen local reactions to venom therapy in both groups and no systemic reactions. Following therapy, most patients developed a rising titre of serum venom-specific IgG (V-IgG). Serum venom-specific IgE (V-IgE) changes were similar in the two groups; over half of the patients had a falling titre when on maintenance dose. Twelve patients were re-stung after reaching maintenance dose. Only one developed a mild systemic reaction, an individual who failed to show a V-IgG response with rapid therapy. Five of nine patients did not have an anamnestic V-IgE response. This rapid method of venom immunotherapy appears to be safe, clinically effective, and comparable to traditional dosing without additional adverse reaction.

Adolescent

Effect of prolonged venom immunotherapy on serum venom-specific IgE and IgG.

Serum venom-specific IgE and IgG were monitored in twenty-three patients receiving venom immunotherapy for more than 3 years. Two response patterns of IgE antibody were found. Following initiation of therapy, seven patients had a rise in serum venom-specific IgE, peaking at one year, then decreasing. Sixteen patients had a persistent fall in IgE antibody titres following initiation of therapy. At the end of 3 years, levels of serum venom-specific IgE in both groups were comparable. The presence of atopy may have influenced the rising IgE antibody response. Serum venom-specific IgG either rose or remained elevated if the pretreatment titres were high. After several years of therapy, there was generally a decrease in serum venom-specific IgG.

Adolescent

Local nasal immunotherapy for ragweed-allergic rhinitis. III. A second year of treatment.

In 1979, pre-seasonal local nasal immunotherapy (LNIT) was found to be an effective treatment for ragweed hay fever. In 1980, this study was continued to evaluate the clinical and immunologic responses of a second year of LNIT. Patients received either pre-seasonal treatment with an unmodified ragweed extract (RW) or a polymerized ragweed extract (PRW), or no treatment. The results of the second year of treatment were the same as the first year. Adverse reactions were significantly higher in the RW-treated group than in the PRW-treated group (P less than 0.001). Symptom/medication scores (SMS) in the RW-treated group were significantly lower than in the control group (P less than 0.005). Although SMS in the PRW-treated group were lower than in the control group, this difference was not significant. The immunologic response was evaluated by measurements of serum (S) RW-specific IgE and IgG and nasal secretory (NS) RW-specific IgE, IgG, and IgA. After treatment, serum IgE titres and secretory IgA titres rose in the RW-treated patients. Nasal secretory-IgG and NS-IgA titres increased with PRW treatment. The only immunologic response observed in the control group was a rise in S-IgE titres after the ragweed season. There was no substantial difference in immunologic measurements observed in the 1979 and 1980 seasons, except that the pre-treatment NS-IgE level was higher in 1980 (P less than 0.02). No significant correlations were found between antibody response and SMS. This study supports the efficacy of LNIT but does not support the protective role for NS-ragweed-specific IgA or IgG.

Adult

Comparison of the allergenicity and antigenicity of yellow jacket and hornet venoms.

The immunologic properties of yellow jacket and hornet venoms were compared by measuring their reaction with rabbit antisera and human IgE and IgG antibodies. Anti-hornet venom rabbit serum showed precipitin bands unique to hornet venom and several bands crossreacting with yellow jacket venom. Anti-yellow jacket venom rabbit serum reacted with yellow jacket venom but failed to react with the hornet venoms. Most sera from patients who had had allergic reactions after vespid stings reacted with yellow jacket and hornet venoms in RAST analysis. A few sera reacted with only one of the venoms. RAST inhibition studies confirmed the crossreactivity of these IgE antibodies. The IgG antibody response of 14 patients was measured after yellow jacket venom immunotherapy. All had rising titers of yellow jacket venom-specific IgG. There was also an increase in the IgG antibody response measured with hornet venom in the majority of patients. The rise was significant with yellow hornet venom (p less than 0.02) but failed to reach significance with bald-faced hornet venom (p greater than 0.05). In IgG radioimmunoassay inhibition studies using yellow jacket venom-coupled discs, yellow jacket venom was considerably more potent than hornet venom. These studies indicate major crossreactivity between yellow jacket and hornet venoms. In this group of patients, yellow jacket venom appeared to be the primary allergen.

Allergens

Local intranasal immunotherapy for ragweed allergic rhinitis. I. Clinical response.

Local nasal immunotherapy (LNIT) of ragweed allergic rhinitis was studied in a double-blind controlled trial. Sixty-seven subjects were divided into three groups. Twenty-one received unmodified ragweed extract (RW), 24 received a glutaraldehyde polymer of ragweed extract (PRW), and 22 received placebo. Mean symptom/medication scores during the season were 2.12, 2.76, and 3.93 for the RW, PRW, and placebo groups, respectively. Both RW- and the PRW-treated group scores were significantly lower than those of the placebo group (p less than 0.01, and p less than 0.025, respectively). The results of the patients' self-evaluations indicated that therapy was effective in 71%, 59%, and 41% for the RW-, PRW-, and placebo-treated groups, respectively. Adverse reactions to treatment were limited to the upper respiratory tract and were noted by all patients. They were significantly more severe in the RW-treated patients than those in the PRW- or placebo-treated groups. We conclude that LNIT is an effective therapy for ragweed allergic rhinitis. The use of a PRW decreased adverse reactions significantly while slightly decreasing the therapeutic benefit.

Administration, Intranasal

Local intranasal immunotherapy for ragweed allergic rhinitis. II. Immunologic response.

Local nasal immunotherapy (LNIT) was administered in a double-blind study to 67 subjects. Twenty-three received an unmodified ragweed extract (RW), 24 received a glutaraldehyde polymer of ragweed extract (PRW), and 21 received placebo. Serum ragweed-specific IgE (S-IgE), ragweed-specific nasal secretory (NS-) IgE, secretory IgA (SIgA) and IgG, and NS-albumin were measured. RW therapy caused a significant increase in ragweed-specific S-IgE (p less than 0.005) and NS-SIgA (p less than 0.05). PRW therapy caused a significant rise in ragweed-specific NS-SIgA (p less than 0.001). NS-IgE (p less than 0.05), and NS-IgG (p less than 0.01). Ragweed-specific S-IgG was not affected by any of the treatments. There was no consistent correlation between NS-antibody levels and symptom/medication scores.

Administration, Intranasal

Clinical and immunologic studies of patients with large local reactions following insect stings.

During the summer of 1978, 22 patients who had large local reactions following insect stings were evaluated for the development of potential systemic sensitivity. Approximately half the patients had venom IgE antibodies, detected by either the immediate skin test or radioallergosorbent test (RAST). A control group of 26 patients experiencing normal sting reactions had only a 15% incidence of venom-specific IgE. No correlations could be found between the presence of venom-specific IgE and age, sex, sting location, atopic history, or prior stings. IgE antibodies were found in 13 of 17 patients who had experienced local reactions lasting more than 48 hr. Serum venom-specific IgG was detected in only three of 19 patients. These results suggest that following large local reactions from insect stings patients must be individually assessed for the presence of venom-specific IgE and consideration for specific immunotherapy.

Adolescent

Comparison of the venom immunogenicity of various species of yellow jackets (genus Vespula).

Venoms from various yellow jacket species were examined by two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography (TDTLC), double-diffusion gel precipitation (DDGP) using rabbit antisera, and the radioallergosorbent test (RAST). Comparison of representative venoms by the TDTLC showed that the venoms of V. vulgaris and V. maculifrons have a larger number of Ninhydrin (triketohydrindene hydrate)-positive substances than the venom of V. squamosa. The results of the DDGP confirmed the differences; venoms of V. vulgaris, V. maculifrons, V. flavopilosa, and V. germanica have one or more major components with immunogenic identity. The venom of V. squamosa has a species-specific major component and some minor components immunologically identical to the other venoms examined. Sera from 21 patients with a history of anaphylaxis following yellow jacket stings were examined by the RAST. Using the venoms of V. maculifrons, V. vulgaris, V. flavopilosa, and V. germanica as coupling antigens, most sera reacted similarly. The sera did not react with V. squamosa. These results suggest that the major component in venom obtained from the four yellow jacket species has immunogenic identity. Venom of V. squamosa differs from the remaining venoms. As a practical corollary, with the exception of venom from V. squamosa, common sensitivity appears to exist among the yellow jacket venoms examined.

Animals

Immunologic and biochemical evaluation of the potency of whole insect body extracts.

Recent studies have indicated that currently available whole body extracts have little potency and are ineffective for diagnosis and treatment of stinging insect allergy. Pure venom is a potent effective allergen but is difficult to obtain in sufficient quantities from all Hymenoptera species. In these studies, an attempt was made to prepare a potent whole body extract. Whole bee body extracts were prepared with different extraction periods and at cold and room temperatures. Potency was examined biochemically by measurements of phospholipase A (PLA) activity and immunologically by PLA and bee venom radioallergosorbent test (RAST) inhibition experiments and gel diffusion studies with the use of rabbit antisera. All extracts prepared in the laboratory had some potency, indicating that it is possible to make a whole body extract containing small quantities of PLA or bee venom. However, the potency of these extracts was minimal as compared with bee venom. Three commercial extracts were almost devoid of detectable immunologic activity. While further attempts may be made to prepare a potent whole body insect extract, these results suggest that it is necessary to obtain venom in relatively pure form for the diagnosis and treatment of stinging insect allergy.

Animals

Sensitization to nonvenom contaminants in a venom preparation.

An individual is described who appeared to be sensitive to nonvenom contaminants in a venom preparation. His IgE antibodies, measured by the immediate direct skin test and the radioallergosorbent test (RAST), reacted with a yellow jacket venom preparation obtained by "washing" of venom sacs. With yellow jacket venom obtained by electriral stimulation, there was a skin test reaction of equivocal significance and no serum antibodies were detected by the RAST. Moderate reactions were also found with yellow jacket body extracts. In contrast, sera obtained from patients with yellow jacket sting anaphylaxis showed strong reactions with the electrically stimulated venom preparation and only a few reacted with the body extract. In additional studies, the patient's serum reacted with yellow jacket extracts devoid of venom and a variety of hornet and wasp extracts. Analyses of the two yellow jacket venoms by gel diffusion using rabbit antisera showed the presence of body proteins in the venom obtained by venom sac "washing." Subsequent history revealed the presence of insect nests in the roof of the patient's bedroom, perhaps the source of inhalant exposure and sensitivity. This case history demonstrates the need for venom extracts that do not contain potentially sensitizing extraneous material.

Adolescent

A solid-phase radioimmunoassay for detection of human antibodies. I. Measurement of IgG antibody to bee venom antigens.

A solid-phase radioimmunoassay (SPRA) has been developed to measure IgG antibodies to bee venom (BV) and phospholipiase A2 (PLA) in human sera. The principle of the test is similar to that of the radioallergosorbent test (RAST) measuring IgE antibody. Cyanogen-bromide-activated paper discs coupled with BV or PLA followed by supplementary coupling with human serum albumin were incubated with standard or test sera, washed, and incubated with 125I-labeled anti IgG. The serum levels of the IgG antibody have been temporarily expressed in arbitrary units. the reaction between the antigen and antibody was specific and the results were reproducible. Sera from 19 beekeepers, 42 beesting-sensitive patients and 20 blood donors (controls) were assayed by the SPRA. IgG antibodies to BV and PLA could not be detected (less than 4 U/ml) in all control sera, in 25 of the 42 patients and in one beekeeper. The IgG antibodies in 17 patients ranged between 5 to 58 U/ml (mean 7.6 U/ml), and in the 18 beekeepers ranged between 8 to 160 U/ml (mean 59 U/ml).

Animals

Prostaglandin E and mitogenic stimulation of human lymphocytes in serum-free medium.

Sera used in cell cultures contain significant ammounts of prostaglandins (PGs). In order to avoid any effects of contaminating PGs, the present study employed a serum-free culture medium and confirmed the inhibitory effect of prostaglandin E (PGE) on the human lymphocyte activation which had been observed previously employing a serum-containing medium. PGE1 displayed a significantly stronger inhibitory effect on the cells than previously shown. Furthermore, reported enhancement of PGE synthesis by mitogen-activated lymphocytes could not be reproduced.

Cells, Cultured

Plasma prostaglandin concentrations in allergic bronchial asthma.

Prostaglandin (PG) E plasma levels, measured by radioimmunoassay using anti-PGB1 antibody, were higher in asthmatic patients than in normal subjects. PGF levels measured with anti-PGF2alpha antibody, were not significantly different between normals and asthmatics. Plasma PGE/F ratios were elevated in the asthmatic patients. The results fail to support the hypothesis of decreased PGE or increased PGF production as an etiological factor in asthma.

Adolescent

Prostaglandin E in the secretions of allergic rhinitis.

Prostaglandin (PG) was extracted from nasal secretions of individuals with hay fever and from nasal washings of normal subjects. The extract was chromatographed in a silicic acid column and the purified PGE fraction was converted to PGB by alkaline dehydration. The PGB was then measured by a competitive radioimmunoassay with tritiated PGB1 and anti-PGB1 antibody, employing the double antibody technique. PGE was detected in the secretions of 6 of 12 hay fever patients and in the pooled normal nasal washings.

Adolescent