Biomedical subjects

C F Paradis

Publications and source records attributed to C F Paradis.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1998

Long-term ECG changes in depressed elderly patients treated with nortriptyline. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation.

ECGs of 50 patients who completed a long-term nortriptyline (NT) study are presented at baseline, after 7 weeks on NT, and after 1 year. The ECGs of patients with preexisting cardiac disease were compared with non-cardiac patients. Significant ECG changes and increases in heart rate were observed by Week 7 and persisted at a mean of 55 weeks (range: 24-111) in patients who were continued on NT. No significant difference was found in long-term ECG effects in patients with preexisting cardiac disease; ECG changes reverted to baseline when placebo was substituted. Patients with known cardiac disease did not show significantly worse ECG changes on NT than non-cardiac patients.

Age Factors↗

PubMed1995

Does recruitment method make a difference? Effects on protocol retention and treatment outcome in elderly depressed patients.

The specific aim of this study was to contrast effects of recruitment method (solicited, referred) on demographic, psychosocial, medical, and treatment outcome measures in an ongoing clinical trial of maintenance therapies in late-life depression. Data from 125 elderly patients (56 solicited via media campaign, 69 clinically referred) with recurrent, unipolar major depression were available for analysis. Several statistical contrast procedures, including group t tests, chi 2 tests, survival analysis, and logistic regression, were used to assess differences in patient profiles related to method of recruitment. Referred patients included a higher proportion of African Americans and had a lower level of education, fewer economic resources, and higher chronic medical burden. Solicited patients had been in the index episode longer than the referred patients at the time of protocol entry and were 3.4 times more likely to have experienced a "provoking agent" (severe life event or chronic difficulty) during the 6 months that preceded the onset of depressive symptoms. In contrast to these demographic and illness history differences, there were no differences in treatment response rates or time to response related to recruitment method. Solicited patients had an overall treatment response rate of 71% versus 62% in the referred group. Median time to response was 14.3 weeks in the solicited group and 13.6 weeks in the referred group. These results suggest that the inclusion of solicited patients in geriatric depression clinical trials does not bias short-term treatment outcome.

Adjustment Disorders↗

PubMed1994

Metabolic and physiologic consequences of nortriptyline treatment in the elderly.

The challenge in the pharmacotherapy of affective disorders is shifting to maintenance treatment. Hence, there is a need for systematic data on the somatic effects of long-term medication use. Twenty-six depressed patients (age > 60 yr) treated with therapeutic concentrations of nortriptyline were evaluated after an average of 7 months for changes in lipoproteins and cardiovascular parameters. Twelve patients were tested for debrisoquine (P450 2D6) metabolic status and creatinine clearance at these same intervals. There was no significant change in cholesterol levels, but triglycerides and very-low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) were significantly increased. Heart rate was also elevated by a mean of 15 beats per minute, and there were modest but significant increases in cardiac conduction parameters. Creatinine clearance declined significantly (by 34%), and blood pressure was unchanged. Small decrements in P450 2D6 could be quantitated. Older patients treated with maintenance psychotropic medications should be evaluated at the regular intervals, particularly with regard to the age-related complications of multiple illness and medications.

Aged↗

PubMed1992

Rating chronic medical illness burden in geropsychiatric practice and research: application of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale.

Reliable quantitative ratings of chronic medical illness burden have proved to be difficult in geropsychiatric practice and research. Thus, the purpose of the study was to demonstrate the feasibility and reliability of a modified version of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS; Linn et al., 1968) in providing quantitative ratings of chronic illness burden. The modified CIRS was operationalized with a manual of guidelines geared toward the geriatric patient and for clarity was designated the CIRS(G). A total of 141 elderly outpatient subjects (two medical clinic groups of 20 each, 45 recurrent depressed subjects, 21 spousally bereaved subjects, and 35 healthy controls) received comprehensive physical examinations, reviews of symptoms, and laboratory testing. These data were then used by nurse practitioners, physician's assistants, and geriatric psychiatrists to compute CIRS(G) ratings of chronic illness burden. As hypothesized, analysis of variance demonstrated significant differences among groups with respect to total medical illness burden, which was highest among medical clinic patients and lowest in control subjects. Good interrater reliability (i.e., intraclass correlations of 0.78 and 0.88 in a subsample of 10 outpatients and a separate group of 10 inpatients, respectively) was achieved for CIRS(G) total scores. Among medical clinic patients, a significant correlation was found, as expected, between CIRS(G) chronic illness burden and capability as quantified by the Older Americans Activities of Daily Living Scale; and between CIRS(G) scores and physicians' global estimates of medical burden. Finally, with repeated measures of illness burden approximately 1 year from symptom baseline, significant rises were detected, as expected. The current data suggest that the CIRS(G) can be successfully applied in medically and psychiatrically impaired elderly subjects, with good interrater reliability and face validity (credibility).

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed1992

Nortriptyline and weight change in depressed patients over 60.

Weight change in pounds and body mass index was documented in 29 geriatric patients with recurrent depression successfully treated with nortriptyline over a 30-week period of acute and continuation therapy (925 patient-weeks of nortriptyline treatment). Weight before index episode as documented by physician records, and weight at three points (beginning of treatment, end of acute therapy, and end of continuation therapy) were recorded. Weight changes over the interval between these times and net weight change over the entire interval were then calculated. Only five patients (17.2%) gained a clinically significant (greater than 10 lb) amount of weight during treatment, ranging from 10 to 43 lb above premorbid weights. Seven of 29 patients (24.1%) showed a net weight loss below premorbid levels (maximum loss 12.5 lb), and 6 patients (20.7%) showed no weight change. The pattern of weight gain was variable; no correlations were found between initially high body mass index and weight gain over the entire interval. These data suggest that nortriptyline is apparently not a potent weight promoter in this group.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Longitudinal analysis of nortriptyline side effects in elderly depressed patients.

Forty-five depressed elderly patients were closely monitored in a research setting during treatment with nortriptyline and interpersonal psychotherapy for 7 consecutive months of acute and continuation treatment. Overall, nortriptyline was efficacious and well tolerated in this group. The frequency of somatic complaints measured by the Rating Scale for Side Effects declined by 50% during the acute phase of treatment, suggesting that many somatic complaints that may be attributed to side effects of nortriptyline are actually somatic symptoms of depression. The authors discuss the implications of these findings and offer practical advice for the treating clinician.

Aged↗