Biomedical subjects

C F Rutherfoord

Publications and source records attributed to C F Rutherfoord.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1988

The effect of tracheal intubation and surgical stimulation on median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials during anaesthesia.

This study was designed to determine whether alterations in the median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials occur during the stimuli of tracheal intubation and skin incision. Twenty-two patients scheduled for elective surgery and who required tracheal intubation were studied. Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials were recorded, analysed and stored approximately every 40 seconds. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone and vecuronium used for neuromuscular blockade; the trachea was intubated 2 minutes after induction. Fentanyl 1.5 micrograms/kg was administered subsequently. Evoked potential monitoring was continued until at least 2 minutes after surgical incision. Induction of anaesthesia was associated with an increase in evoked potential latency of 0.8 msec and reduction in amplitude of 1.7 microV. Small, statistically insignificant changes occurred between induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation. Surgical incision was accompanied by a statistically significant mean decrease in evoked potential latency of 0.5 msec and a statistically significant increase in evoked potential amplitude of 0.6 microV. The fact that surgical stimulation produced an activating effect on evoked potentials suggests that they may be used as a measure of the neurophysiological effects of anaesthesia.

Anesthesia, General↗

PubMed1987

Evoked potentials following diazepam or fentanyl.

The effects of fentanyl or diazepam on somatosensory, visual and brainstem auditory evoked potentials were studied in 13 healthy patients scheduled for elective surgery. Following control recordings of evoked potentials, either diazepam 20 mg or fentanyl 200 micrograms was administered intravenously. Evoked potentials were then recorded twice in the subsequent hour. No significant changes occurred in the latency or amplitude of somatosensory, visual or brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Although dose-related changes in evoked potential latencies and amplitudes have been demonstrated with both the inhalational and intravenous anaesthetics, these changes did not occur with diazepam or fentanyl used alone. An anaesthetic technique based on these two drugs would be suitable when intra-operative evoked potential monitoring is required to assess ischaemia and preservation of evoked responses.

Adult↗

PubMed1986

Evoked potentials during isoflurane anaesthesia.

Somatosensory, visual and brainstem auditory evoked potentials were recorded in 10 unpremedicated patients anaesthetized with isoflurane in oxygen. Recordings were made at 0.5%, 1.1% and 1.65% (six patients) end-tidal isoflurane concentration. There were statistically significant increases in the latencies of the somatosensory (N20), visual and brainstem auditory potentials (waves III and V) with increasing concentrations of isoflurane. The central conduction time was prolonged. Amplitudes of the somatosensory and visual potentials were reduced with increasing concentrations of isoflurane. The effects of isoflurane on evoked potentials are similar to those of halothane and enflurane. It is possible that changes in evoked potential measurements may be useful as a neurophysiological indicator of anaesthetic depth.

Anesthesia, Inhalation↗

PubMed1985

A comparison between isoflurane and alfentanil supplemented anaesthesia for short procedures.

Sixty unpremedicated patients undergoing short urological and gynaecological procedures were randomly allocated to three groups to receive either methohexitone, alfentanil, nitrous oxide and oxygen, methohexitone, isoflurane and oxygen or methohexitone, isoflurane, nitrous oxide and oxygen. The group receiving methohexitone, isoflurane and oxygen was abandoned after 11 patients had been studied, due to poor conditions during induction of anaesthesia. Therefore, data from only 51 patients are presented. Early recovery was assessed by time to opening eyes, giving correct name and date of birth; later, recovery was assessed by using the postbox test and deletion of 'p's. During anaesthesia and surgery, there was a high incidence of coughing and laryngospasm in the isoflurane groups. The patients in the alfentanil group opened their eyes and gave their names and dates of birth significantly faster postoperatively (p less than 0.01) than those in the isoflurane groups. However, there were no significant differences between the three groups regarding the later tests of recovery. The late recovery after isoflurane was equal to that obtained using an intravenous technique with alfentanil, although the peroperative complication rate was higher.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗