ATP-dependent potassium channel openers and preconditioning.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adenosine Triphosphate↗
Biomedical subjects
C F Toombs
Publications and source records attributed to C F Toombs.
Limitation of infarct size in the rabbit by ischaemic preconditioning is reversible with glibenclamide.
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine whether ischaemic preconditioning occurs through the actions of ATP sensitive potassium (KATP) channels during ischaemia and whether pharmacological antagonism of these channels can reverse the protective effect of preconditioning. METHODS: 31 New Zealand White rabbits were instrumented for coronary occlusion and reperfusion. Control animals were subjected to ischaemia (30 min) and reperfusion (120 min) only. Study animals were divided into three experimental groups: (1) those receiving intravenous glibenclamide (0.3 mg.kg-1) prior to the 30 min ischaemia; (2) those receiving 5 min preconditioning ischaemia and 10 min reperfusion prior to the 30 min ischaemia; or (3) those receiving preconditioning in the presence of glibenclamide prior to the 30 min ischaemia. The resulting infarct and myocardium at risk were visualised with Indian ink and tetrazolium staining and quantified using computer assisted planimetry. RESULTS: Rabbits which were preconditioned showed a 63% reduction in infarct size [14.8(SEM 2.2)% of risk region] in comparison to non-preconditioned controls [39.8(2.1)%]. When rabbits were preconditioned in the presence of glibenclamide the protection was reversed [31.3(5.1)%] using a dose of glibenclamide which by itself did not alter necrosis [37.7(5.4)%]. CONCLUSIONS: Infarct size reduction in the rabbit via ischaemic preconditioning is reversible with the coadministration of glibenclamide.
Animals↗
Protection from ischaemic-reperfusion injury with adenosine pretreatment is reversed by inhibition of ATP sensitive potassium channels.
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to test the hypothesis that the cardioprotective effects against ischaemic-reperfusion injury of pretreatment with adenosine are mediated in part by activation of ATP sensitive potassium channels (K+ATP channels). METHODS: 42 anaesthetised New Zealand White rabbits underwent 30 min coronary occlusion, followed by 2 h reperfusion. Half the animals received a 5 min infusion of 140 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 of adenosine as pretreatment. The remainder of the animals received a 5 min infusion of saline alone as pretreatment. Animals pretreated with adenosine received either a low dose of the K+ATP channel blocker glibenclamide (0.3 mg.kg-1), high dose glibenclamide (3.0 mg.kg-1), or vehicle immediately prior to ischaemia to test whether glibenclamide can reverse the protective effects of adenosine, thus allowing the adenosine effect but antagonising K(+)ATP channel activation during ischaemia. Animals which received saline pretreatment also received low dose glibenclamide, high dose glibenclamide, or vehicle (controls) to evaluate the effect of glibenclamide alone. Infarct size was determined with tetrazolium and Unisperse Blue stains, and transmural blood flow was measured using radioactive microspheres. RESULTS: Although there were no differences in collateral myocardial blood flow during ischaemia or in risk area among the groups, infarct size was reduced by adenosine pretreatment to 8 (SEM 3)% v 36(4)% in controls (p < 0.05). K(+)ATP channel blockade with low dose glibenclamide in saline pretreated animals did not by itself extend the degree of necrosis [33(4)%], whereas low dose glibenclamide prevented the protective effects of adenosine pretreatment [38(3)%]. High dose glibenclamide reversed adenosine protection as well [54(3)%], but at a dose which increased infarct size in saline pretreated animals [52(3)%]. CONCLUSIONS: While adenosine pretreatment protects against necrosis in the rabbit, (1) the expression of this protection depends at least in part upon the actions of K(+)ATP channels during ischaemia, and (2) glibenclamide at higher doses increases infarct size, suggesting either that the K(+)ATP channel is endogenously protective during ischaemia, or that the higher dose has other infarct extending effects.
Adenosine↗
Receptor-mediated cardioprotective effects of endogenous adenosine are exerted primarily during reperfusion after coronary occlusion in the rabbit.
BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that: (1) endogenous adenosine released during ischemia/reperfusion reduces infarct size and preserves postischemic myocardial blood flow by receptor-mediated mechanisms and (2) this cardioprotection is exerted predominantly during reperfusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-one anesthetized open-chest rabbits subjected to 30 minutes of coronary occlusion and 120 minutes of reperfusion were randomized to six groups: group 1, saline (Vehicle) (n = 10) to allow receptor interaction of endogenous adenosine (Ado) during ischemia/reperfusion; group 2, Ado-receptor blockade during both ischemia and reperfusion with intravenous 8-p-sulfophenyltheophyl-line (10 mg/kg) (SPTIR, n = 10); group 3, Ado-receptor blockade in multiple doses during both ischemia and reperfusion (MSPTIR, n = 11); group 4, blockade during reperfusion (SPTR, n = 10); group 5, blockade during reperfusion with PD115,199 (6 mg/kg) (PDR, n = 10); and group 6, blockade after 30 minutes of reperfusion (SPT30R, n = 10) to allow adenosine receptor interaction during early reperfusion. Transmural myocardial blood flow in the area at risk (Ar) (15-microns radiolabeled microspheres) was reduced by 96.7% in all groups, from 137.9 +/- 15.5 to 4.5 +/- 1.4 mL.min-1 x 100 g-1 (P < .001). MSPTIR, SPTIR, and SPTR significantly attenuated reactive hyperemia at 15 minutes of reperfusion (144 +/- 18, 141 +/- 22, and 144 +/- 20 mL.min-1 x 100 g-1, respectively) compared with Vehicle (257 +/- 40 mL.min-1 x 100 g-1, P < .05). This attenuation was more pronounced in the necrotic zone than in the nonnecrotic zone. Reactive hyperemia at 15 minutes of reperfusion in SPT30R group was comparable to the Vehicle group. At 120 minutes of reperfusion, blood flow in Ar was significantly less in MSPTIR (77 +/- 10), SPTIR (82 +/- 9), and SPTR (80 +/- 11) compared with Vehicle (140 +/- 12) and SPT30R (105 +/- 24 mL.min-1 x 100 g-1). Infarct size (by triphenyltetrazolium chloride), expressed as a percent of Ar, was largest in the multiple-dose group with blockade during both ischemia and reperfusion (MSPTIR, 51.9 +/- 2.3%) and was significantly increased also in single-dose SPTIR (39.1 +/- 2.2%) compared with 25.7 +/- 1.7% in the Vehicle group (P < .05). Ado-receptor blockade only during reperfusion was associated with 14% smaller infarct size in the SPTR group than the MSPTIR group (P < .05). In contrast, Ado-receptor blockade after 30 minutes of reperfusion (SPT30R) did not increase infarct size (27.9 +/- 2.2%), which was comparable to infarct size in the Vehicle group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that: (1) endogenous adenosine released from the myocardium during ischemia/reperfusion reduces infarct size by receptor-mediated mechanisms and (2) Ado-mediated cardioprotection is most pronounced during the early phase of reperfusion.
Adenosine↗
Ischemic preconditioning fails to limit infarct size in reserpinized rabbit myocardium. Implication of norepinephrine release in the preconditioning effect.
BACKGROUND: Infarct size reduction by ischemic preconditioning is believed to be mediated by adenosine; however, whether adenosine is the factor responsible for the initiation of this protection remains unknown. It is possible that during preconditioning, adenosine stimulates receptors on presynaptic nerve terminals and retards the release of norepinephrine (NE) during the prolonged ischemia or that NE release during preconditioning augments adenosine production. METHODS AND RESULTS: To test whether the release of NE is involved in the preconditioning phenomenon, rabbits were pretreated with reserpine (5 mg/kg sc, 24 hours before) to deplete presynaptic nerve terminals of NE stores. On the day of the experiment, the rabbits were anesthetized with ketamine-xylazine and instrumented for coronary occlusion. Nonreserpinized animals were used as controls. The control group (n = 7) was subjected to 30 minutes of coronary occlusion and 120 minutes of reperfusion (ischemia-reperfusion) only. The preconditioned group (n = 10) received 5 minutes of preconditioning ischemia and 10 minutes of reperfusion before the prolonged ischemia-reperfusion. Of the reserpinized animals, half (n = 7) received preconditioning before ischemia-reperfusion and the remaining animals (n = 7) did not. At termination of the experiment, an intravenous tyramine challenge (1 mg/kg) was used to confirm NE depletion in reserpinized rabbits. The resulting infarcts were measured with tetrazolium and planimetry. With comparable hemodynamics and areas at risk, infarct size in control animals was 39.8 +/- 2.1% of the risk region. Preconditioned animals showed an expected reduction of infarct size to 14.8 +/- 2.2% of risk region (P < .05 vs control). Of the reserpinized animals, those that received reserpine alone had infarcts that were 38.5 +/- 4.5% of risk region, and those that were preconditioned had infarcts that were 41.4 +/- 3.6% of risk region, which was not significantly different than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that preconditioning fails to protect ischemic-reperfused myocardium in reserpinized rabbit myocardium, indicating that the release of NE during either preconditioning or prolonged ischemia is critical to preconditioning mediated protection.
Animals↗
Myocardial protective effects of adenosine. Infarct size reduction with pretreatment and continued receptor stimulation during ischemia.
BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that 1) endogenous adenosine released during ischemia conferred an inherent cardioprotection, and 2) a pretreatment dose of adenosine before ischemia would provide additional protection independent of hemodynamic effects. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-six anesthetized New Zealand White rabbits underwent 30 minutes of regional ischemia produced by coronary occlusion followed by 2 hours of reperfusion. The adenosine group (ADO, n = 9) received a 5-minute pretreatment infusion of 140 micrograms/kg/min of adenosine before ischemia. A control group (SAL, n = 9) received saline before ischemia. To separate the effects of adenosine used as a pretreatment versus the effects during ischemia, a third group (ADO+SPT, n = 9) received adenosine as pretreatment followed by 10 mg/kg 8-p-sulfophenyl theophylline (8-SPT), an A1/A2-receptor antagonist given before ischemia, thus allowing pretreatment with adenosine but antagonizing its effects during ischemia. To preclude any protection from endogenous adenosine released during ischemia, the fourth group (SAL+SPT, n = 9) received saline as pretreatment and 8-SPT before ischemia. Area of necrosis within the area at risk (infarct size) was determined with tetrazolium and Evans blue stains, and transmural blood flow was measured using radioactive microspheres. Collateral blood flow in the area at risk was similar in all groups, as was the size of the area at risk. Infarct size was reduced by adenosine pretreatment (ADO, 8.4 +/- 7.2%) in contrast to saline vehicle (SAL, 27.8 +/- 6.3%; p less than 0.05 versus ADO). alpha 1/alpha 2-Receptor blockade after adenosine pretreatment abolished the ischemic protection provided by pretreatment adenosine (ADO+SPT, 42.7 +/- 8.3%; p less than 0.05 versus ADO). Finally, receptor blockade of endogenously released adenosine without adenosine pretreatment increased infarct size by 24% over the nonpretreated saline group (SAL+SPT, 51.5 +/- 9.0%; p less than 0.05 versus SAL). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that 1) endogenous adenosine building up during ischemia is cardioprotective, and 2) pretreatment with adenosine confers cardioprotection independent of hemodynamic effects. Whether pretreatment effects of adenosine subsequently modulate the effects of endogenous adenosine (through alterations in receptor population or sensitivity) or endogenous and exogenous adenosine represent additive compartments is unclear.
Adenosine↗
Limitation of myocardial injury with the potassium channel opener cromakalim and the nonvasoactive analog U-89,232: vascular vs. cardiac actions in vitro and in vivo.
Cromakalim has been shown to have anti-ischemic properties, but it also produces profound hypotension upon systemic administration. We hypothesized that U-89,232, a cromakalim analog, would reduce infarct size in an ischemia-reperfusion injury model without hemodynamic alteration. Twenty-four anesthetized, open chest New Zealand White rabbits were instrumented for occlusion of a marginal branch of the left coronary artery. All animals were subjected to coronary artery occlusion (30 min) and reperfusion (2 hr). Study animals received either cromakalim (20 micrograms/kg, i.v.) or U-89,232 (20 micrograms/kg, i.v.), which was given as a pretreatment 30 min before occlusion. Control animals (n = 10) received vehicle (10% dimethyl sulfoxide). At termination of the experiment, the necrotic area and the area at risk were determined with tetrazolium and India ink staining, and infarct size was calculated using planimetry. Treatment with cromakalim produced profound hypotension (greater than 30% decrease in mean arterial pressure), whereas U-89,232 had no such hemodynamic effect. With comparable areas at risk, infarct size (as a percent of risk area) in the control animals was 46.8 +/- 3.4%. Treatment with cromakalim or U-89,232 reduced infarct size to 33.1 +/- 4.4 and 24.4 +/- 4.0%, respectively (P < .05, both compared to control). In vitro studies demonstrate that although both of these compounds shorten the duration of the cardiac action potential, only cromakalim is active in vascular smooth muscle. We conclude that U-89,232 exhibits myoprotection without hypotension, and that its mechanism of action is most likely due to ability to affect cardiac electrophysiology.
Animals↗
Nonlinearity of indexes of left ventricular performance: effects on estimation of slope and diameter axis intercepts.
The slope and diameter axis intercept (D0) of the linear indexes end-systolic pressure-diameter relation (ESPDR), maximum of the first derivative of left ventricular pressure (dP/dtmax)-end-diastolic diameter relation (dP/dtmax-Ded), and dimensional preload-recruitable stroke work relation (PRDSW) are used to describe left ventricular performance. We tested the hypothesis that nonlinearity in these indexes would preclude accurate estimation of slope and D0. In nine pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs, right heart bypass was used to obtain a wide range of pressure-minor axis diameter (sonomicrometry) points from which the three indexes were derived. For ESPDR and dP/dtmax-Ded, a nonlinear fit (y = ax2 + bx + c) approximated the data better than a linear fit, with significant nonlinearity toward the diameter axis (a = -10.28 +/- 3.42 and -111.2 +/- 26.2, respectively, P less than 0.05). Although linear D0 was significantly less than nonlinear D0, this difference was overcome by the diameter intercept at a midrange value of end-systolic pressure or dP/dtmax. PRDSW demonstrated no significant nonlinearity (a = -4.40 +/- 3.53, P = 0.86) but extrapolation to D0 demonstrated linear and nonlinear differences. We conclude that 1) ESPDR and dP/dtmax-Ded demonstrate significant nonlinearity, while PRDSW is well-approximated by a linear fit over a large range of data points; and 2) extrapolation of D0 is inaccurate in all three indexes, while a midrange intercept is independent of the model used to fit the data. Left ventricular performance may be more accurately described by linear slope and midrange diameter intercept over comparable ranges of data.
Animals↗
Alfimeprase: pharmacology of a novel fibrinolytic metalloproteinase for thrombolysis.
Alfimeprase is a recombinantly produced, truncated form of fibrolase, a known directly fibrinolytic zinc metalloproteinase that was first isolated from the venom of the southern copperhead snake (Agkistrodon contortrix contortrix). Both fibrolase and alfimeprase have been shown to have direct proteolytic activity against the fibrinogen Aalpha chain. In vivo pharmacology studies have shown that thrombolysis with alfimeprase is up to 6 times more rapid than with plasminogen activators. Alfimeprase can be bound and neutralized by serum alpha(2)-macroglobulin, a prevalent mammalian protease inhibitor which is capable of forming a macromolecular complex with alfimeprase. As a result, systemic bleeding complications have been greatly reduced due to the inhibitory effects of alpha(2)-macroglobulin. This article reviews the biochemical in vitro and in vivo characteristics of this novel acting thrombolytic.
Animals↗