PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C F Wildsoet

Publications and source records attributed to C F Wildsoet.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Emmetropization in chicks uses optical vergence and relative distance cues to decode defocus.

When visual information is confined to one object plane, the emmetropization end-point is adjusted in accord with the corresponding incident optical vergence at the eye [Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Myopia (2000) 113]. We now report the effect of adding extra visual information beyond the target plane. Visual conditions were controlled using a cone-lens system: black Maltese cross targets on white opaque backgrounds (OMX) were attached to the open faces of 2.5 cm translucent cones fitted with either 0, +25 or +40 D imaging lenses. An alternative target (TMX) was made by substituting the opaque target background for a transparent background, which allowed access to visual information beyond the target plane. The imaging devices were applied to 7-day-old chicks and worn for 4 days. Prior to this treatment, on day 2, some chicks underwent ciliary nerve section (CNS) to preclude accommodation. All treatments were monocular. Refractive errors and axial ocular dimensions were measured using retinoscopy and A-scan ultrasonography under halothane anesthesia. Treatment effects were specified as mean ( +/-S.D.) interocular differences. Eyes with the OMX/+40 D lens combination remained emmetropic (+0.73 +/-3.57 D), consistent with the target plane being approximately conjugate with the retina. Switching to the TMX caused a hyperopic shift in refractive error (+3.78 +/-3.41 D). This relative shift towards hyperopia in switching from the OMX to the TMX target also occurred for the other two lens powers. Thus, the OMX/+25 D lens induced myopia (-7.00 +/-5.88 D), corresponding to the imposed hyperopic defocus (target plane now imaged behind the retina), and switching to the TMX resulted in a reduction in myopia (-1.73 +/-5.36 D). The OMX/0 D lens combination produced the largest myopic shift, and here, switching to the TMX condition almost eliminated the myopic response (-15.50 +/-6.62 D cf. -0.56 +/-1.24 D). This relative hyperopic shift associated with switching from the OMX to the TMX target was eliminated by CNS surgery. Thus, the two CNS/TMX groups were both more myopic than the equivalent no CNS/TMX groups (+40 D lens: -2.66 +/-2.34 D; +25 D lens: -7.97 +/-6.87 D). When the visual information is restricted to one plane, incident optical vergence appears to direct emmetropization. Adding visual information at other distances produces a shift in the end-point of emmetropization in the direction of the added information. That these effects are dependent on the integrity of the accommodation system implies that accommodation plays a role in emmetropization and represents the first reported evidence of this kind.

Accommodation, Ocular↗
PubMed2001

Endogenous rhythms in axial length and choroidal thickness in chicks: implications for ocular growth regulation.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the diurnal rhythms in axial length and choroidal thickness in the chick eye are endogenous circadian rhythms. METHODS: Six chickens, 14 days of age, were put into darkness for 4 days. Beginning on the 3rd day, ocular dimensions were measured using high-frequency A-scan ultrasonography, in darkness, at 6-hour intervals over 48 hours. Five age-matched chickens reared in a normal light/dark (L/D) cycle and measured at 6-hour intervals for 5 days were controls. RESULTS: The rhythms in axial length and choroidal thickness persist in constant darkness. The phases of these rhythms are approximately in antiphase to one another, similar to those of eyes in a L/D cycle; however, the peak of the rhythm in axial length occurs slightly earlier relative to that of eyes in L/D (12 PM versus 3 PM; P: < 0.05, one-tailed t-test). By the 3rd day in darkness, the rate of growth is significantly higher than that in L/D (117 versus 72 microm/24 hours; P: < 0.01), and the choroid becomes significantly thinner (159 versus 210 microm; P: < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The rhythms in axial length and choroid thickness are circadian rhythms, driven by an endogenous oscillator. The phase of the rhythm in axial length in constant darkness is slightly phase-advanced relative to eyes in L/D and thus is similar to eyes that are deprived of form vision. These findings suggest that in the absence of visual input, the eyes revert to a "default" growth state and that the similarities between the effects of constant darkness and of form deprivation suggest that deprivation may represent a type of "constant" condition.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Timolol lowers intraocular pressure but does not inhibit the development of experimental myopia in chick.

Reports of intraocular pressure (IOP) being higher in myopes than emmetropes and of myopes being over-represented in glaucoma statistics, are consistent with a role of IOP in the excessive eye growth typically associated with myopia. We tested the hypothesis, based on these observations, that ocular hypotensive drugs would slow myopia progression using the chick as an animal model and timolol as an example of such a drug. To induce myopia, chicks (n = 56) were fitted with either monocular translucent diffusers or -15 D spectacle lenses from day 8. The drug treatment protocol comprised topical applications of 0.4% benoxinate, a local anaesthetic (to improve drug absorption), followed either by 0.5% timolol or distilled water (control), either daily (1000 hr) or twice daily (1000, 1600 hr). Refractive errors and ocular dimensions were measured on days 12 and 17. We also verified the ocular hypotensive effect of timolol in both normal (n = 8) and myopic (n = 12 diffusers; n = 12-15 D lenses) chicks. Here, we took baseline IOP measurements, instilled timolol and then monitored IOP over a further 5-9 hr. We found no difference in the amount of myopia produced in the timolol and control groups at either measurement time point (e.g. day 17, once per day application, diffusers: -26.9 +/- 3.3 D vs -22.7 +/- 9.1 D; lenses: -14.9 +/- 3.8 D vs -14.9 +/- 3.6 D). This was in spite of the fact that timolol did lower IOP in both normal and myopic chicks (27 and 18% reduction, respectively) While timolol does have an ocular hypotensive effect in the chick, it does not inhibit the development of myopia in this animal model.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2000

Optical correction of form deprivation myopia inhibits refractive recovery in chick eyes with intact or sectioned optic nerves.

The finding that the eyes of young chicks recover quickly from form deprivation myopia (FDM) has been interpreted as indirect evidence for active emmetropization. More direct evidence would be the demonstration that correction of FDM with spectacle lenses, thereby removing the defocus signal, prevents recovery. We investigated this issue in eyes with intact and sectioned (ONS) optic nerves. Previous studies suggest that an intact optic nerve is necessary for accurate emmetropization. Seventy day-old male chicks were monocularly deprived using velcro-mounted diffusers, which were removed after 5-6 days and in some (n=51), but not all cases, replaced by spectacle lenses (-5, -10 or -15 D). Approximately half (n=34) of the chicks also underwent ONS on day 1. Refractive errors and axial ocular dimensions were measured when the diffusers were first removed and thereafter at 2-4 day intervals over the following 1-2 weeks. In one case, measurements were continued at less regular intervals to 33 days. Lens powers were selected to either approximately correct or under-correct the refractive errors present when the diffusers were removed. Form deprivation in normal chicks produced large myopic shifts in refraction (means for groups range from -9.20 to -16.07 D). When the deprivation treatment was terminated, the myopia quickly decreased to negligible levels unless optically corrected. Correcting lenses stabilized the myopia to a level consistent with the lens power used. Interocular differences in axial length were consistent with an axial origin to the refractive changes. Results for the ONS groups exhibited similar trends although there was increased variability in the data. The findings support the interpretation that recovery from FDM is a product of active emmetropization. That ONS increased the variability of such responses implies that an intact optic nerve is required for accurate emmetropization.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Albinism: its implications for refractive development.

PURPOSE: Albinism involves the mutation of one or more of the genes associated with melanin synthesis and has many ramifications for vision. This study focuses on the refractive implications of albinism in the context of emmetropization. METHODS: Refractive, biometric, and visual acuity data were collected for a group of 25 albino individuals that included the following: 18 oculocutaneous (13 tyrosine positive, 5 tyrosine negative); 7 ocular (2 autosomal recessive, 5 sex-linked recessive). Their age range was 3 to 51 years. All exhibited horizontal pendular nystagmus. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences relating to albino subtype for any of the measured parameters. All the subjects had reduced visual acuity (mean: 0.90, logMAR) and overall, there was a bias toward hyperopia in their refractive errors (mean: + 1.07 D). However the refractive errors of the group covered a broad range (SD: 4.67 D) and included both high myopia and high hyperopia. An axial origin to the refractive errors is implied by the high correlation between refractive errors and axial lengths. Refractive astigmatism averaged 2.37 D and was consistently with-the-rule and highly correlated with corneal astigmatism, which was also with-the-rule. Meridional analysis of the refractive data indicated that the vertical meridian for hyperopic subjects was consistently nearer emmetropia compared to their horizontal meridian. Myopic subjects showed the opposite trend. CONCLUSIONS: The overall refractive profile of the subjects is consistent with emmetropization being impaired in albinism. However, the refractive errors of hyperopic subjects also can be explained in terms of "meridional emmetropization." The contrasting refractive profiles of myopic subjects may reflect operational constraints of the emmetropization process.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Choroidal thickness changes during altered eye growth and refractive state in a primate.

PURPOSE: In the chick, compensation for experimentally induced defocus involves changes in the thickness of the choroid. The choroid thickens in response to imposed myopic defocus and thins in response to imposed hyperopic defocus. This study was undertaken to determine whether similar choroidal changes occur in the primate eye with induced refractive errors. METHODS: Thirty-three common marmosets were used. Eyes in 26 monkeys served as untreated control eyes, and eyes in 7 received 3 weeks of monocular lid suture to induce changes in eye growth and refractive state. Refractive errors were measured using refractometry and retinoscopy, and axial ocular dimensions, including choroidal thickness, were measured using high-frequency A-scan ultrasonography. Eyes were measured before the lids were sutured and at frequent intervals after lid opening. RESULTS: In the marmoset, choroidal thickness ranges from 88 to 150 microm and increases significantly during the first year of life. Monocular lid suture initially results in short, hyperopic eyes that then become elongated and myopic. In these animals the choroids of both the experimental and the fellow control eyes also increase in thickness with age but additionally show interocular differences that vary significantly with the relative changes in vitreous chamber depth and refraction. In eyes that are shorter and more hyperopic than control eyes the choroids are thicker, and in eyes that are longer and more myopic than control eyes the choroids are thinner. CONCLUSIONS: In marmosets, the thickness of the choroid increases during postnatal eye growth. Superimposed on this developmental increase in choroidal thickness there are changes in thickness that are correlated with the induced changes in eye size. These changes are small (<50 microm) in comparison with those observed in the chick, contributing to less than a diopter change in refractive error.

Aging↗
PubMed2000

Form deprivation myopia in mature common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

PURPOSE: Experimental manipulations of visual experience are known to affect the growth of the eye and the development of refractive state in a variety of species including human and nonhuman primates. For example, it is well established that visual form deprivation causes elongation of the eye and myopia. The effects of such manipulations have generally been examined in neonatal or juvenile animals. Whether adolescent common marmosets (a new world primate) are susceptible to form deprivation myopia was studied. METHODS: Five adolescent marmosets were used in this study. Monocular form deprivation was induced by lid closure for 12 to 20 weeks, starting between 299 and 315 days of age. The effects of deprivation were assessed with keratometry, A-scan ultrasonography, and cycloplegic refractions. Both eyes (treated and fellow control) were measured before lid-closure, at the end of the deprivation period, and several times over the following 8 to 12 weeks. RESULTS: Adolescent marmosets are susceptible to visual form deprivation myopia. The experimental eyes showed significant axial elongation and myopia relative to the fellow control eyes. These changes were smaller, however, than those observed in younger eyes deprived for comparable periods. Like juvenile animals, the adolescent marmosets did not show recovery from myopia over the period monitored. CONCLUSIONS: The period for susceptibility to form deprivation myopia in the marmoset monkey extends beyond the early developmental period when ocular growth is rapid and emmetropization normally takes place. Visual form deprivation in adolescent marmosets with adult-sized eyes results in increased ocular growth and myopia. These data suggest that visual factors may influence the growth and refractive development of the human eye after puberty and may be involved in late-onset myopia.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Imposed retinal image size changes--do they provide a cue to the sign of lens-induced defocus in chick?

BACKGROUND: Young chicks can adjust their eye growth to compensate for both imposed hyperopia and myopia (using negative and positive spectacle lenses); the rate of eye elongation increases in the former and slows in the latter case. This emmetropizing behavior implies that the eye can distinguish the sign and magnitude of defocus, although the identity of the cue(s) involved is unknown. As the spectacle lenses used in these studies generally introduce significant retinal image size differences that are in opposite directions for negative and positive lenses (minification vs. magnification), we asked whether retinal image size might provide the required sign information. METHODS: This question was addressed by manipulating retinal image size while keeping lens power constant. We also investigated the effect of eliminating other potential cues, accommodation and chromatic aberration, under these conditions. Three negative "size" lenses of approximately -11 D optical power were used, with 2 of the lenses producing magnification rather than minification as typical of negative lenses (i.e. +1.9% and +6.9% compared to -2.9%). The lenses were fitted monocularly to 7-day-old chicks, which were subsequently measured at 9 and 11 days of age (refractive error and axial dimensions). The same lens-wearing schedule was applied to two other groups of chicks that had monocular ciliary nerve section surgery to prevent accommodation 2 days posthatching; one of these groups was reared under monochromatic yellow light instead of white light. RESULTS: Near-perfect refractive compensation was seen by the end of the treatment period with all three lenses, for all three treatment groups, and there was also little difference in the rate of compensation among the various groups. In all cases, the typical responses of axial (mainly vitreous chamber) elongation and myopia were observed. CONCLUSIONS: That manipulations to retinal image size, which either decrease or reverse the usual effects of negative lenses, did not disrupt compensation to the imposed hyperopic defocus, even in the absence of accommodation and chromatic aberration cues, argues against imposed retinal image size changes being the directional cue to defocus in experimental emmetropization.

Accommodation, Ocular↗
PubMed1998

Assessment of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in the chick using an optokinetic nystagmus paradigm.

While the chick is one of the widely used animal models for eye growth studies very little is known about its visual spatial resolution performance. Using optokinetic nystagmus responses as an indicator of stimulus visibility, we estimated the visual acuity of young chicks to be between 6.0 and 7.7 cycles deg-1 at 2 and 4 days of age and slightly higher, between 7.7 and 8.6 cycle deg-1, at 8 days. Contrast sensitivity measured using the same experimental paradigm was greatest at around 1.2 cycle deg-1, for which the contrast threshold lay between 4% and 11%. Sensitivity became progressively poorer for frequencies both higher and lower than this. These data suggest that the visual performance of the chick is slightly poorer than that of the pigeon which has a similar eye size and exhibits similar foraging behaviour.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Sharp vision: a prerequisite for compensation to myopic defocus in the chick?

PURPOSE: Compensatory responses to focusing errors imposed by spectacle lenses in chicks, tree shrews and primates leave little doubt that active emmetropization can occur, and debate is now centered on whether this process is uni-directional or bi-directional in nature. To provide further insight into this emmetropization process, the studies reported in this paper addressed the question of whether access to sharp vision is necessary for compensation to myopic defocus in the chick. METHODS: Two different experimental paradigms were used to address the above question: (A) Myopic defocus was imposed, either with +15 or +40 d lenses alone or with +15 D lenses on eyes made myopic by 7 days of form deprivation; these treatments result in a shift in the plane of focus of the eye (far point) to 6.67, 2.5 cm and approximately 3.5 cm resp., with only objects at or closer than these planes being in focus. The addition to the lenses of stand-off cones, either 2.5 or 5 cm in length, further limited access to (or precluded) sharp vision by controlling how closely the chicks could approach objects. One group that had sharp vision precluded also underwent optic nerve section. (B) A range of positive lenses (+15 to +65 D) were used on their own to impose myopic defocus; for the high power lenses, access to sharp vision was very restricted because of the close proximity of the new far point (1.54 cm for +65 D lens). Refractive errors and axial ocular dimensions were measured in all experiments. RESULTS: In the first study (A), preclusion of sharp vision not only prevented compensation but resulted in increased eye growth and myopia. This myopia, like form-deprivation myopia, was unaltered by optic nerve section surgery. Limiting but not precluding sharp vision resulted in partial compensation. In the second study (B), good compensation was observed with the +15 D lens but compensation progressively declined for higher powers, with the +50 D lens having no apparent effect on eye growth and refraction and the +65 D lens inducing myopia instead of hyperopia. CONCLUSIONS: Together these results argue that some sharp vision is fundamental to compensation to impose myopia. The significance of this new finding in relation to the processes underlying active emmetropization is discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Development and validation of a visual acuity chart for Australian Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders.

BACKGROUND: A new visual acuity chart was designed for use with Australia's indigenous population to overcome perceived inadequacies of conventional English letter charts for this group. This chart, which incorporates a black and white turtle icon, is described, and validation data are presented. METHODS: The chart is based on logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) principles and incorporates a turtle symbol modified from the design of an indigenous artist. The task is one of discrimination, with subjects being required to distinguish the split tail of the turtle from its head, which has the same overall shape and average luminance; the body of the turtle provides no directional cues which might assist in this judgment. The chart was validated in two ways: Experiment I. Performance was compared with the Bailey-Lovie and Konig bar charts in terms of unaided visual acuity data for 90 subjects (mean age: 38.3 +/- 20.3 years) and Experiment II. Data were obtained for 10 young subjects for these 3 charts and an Illiterate E chart, with refractive blur imposed with trial lenses over habitual distance corrections (spherical: +0.50, +1.00, +2.00, and +4.00 D; cylindrical: +1.00 and +2.00 D, axes 45, 90, and 180 degrees). To avoid cultural and literacy issues as possible sources of differences in performance between the charts in this validation study, subjects were selected from the wider Australian population rather than specifically from its indigenous segment. RESULTS: Experiment I: The Turtle chart performed most like the Konig Bar chart for this component of the validation exercise. Nonetheless, results for the Turtle chart correlated highly with those for the Bailey-Lovie chart as well as the Konig Bar chart, although there were subtle differences between charts in the rate of decline of visual acuity as visual performance decreased. Experiment II: The turtle chart behaved most like the Illiterate E chart with imposed spherical focusing errors, with the Bailey-Lovie chart showing a faster decline and the Konig Bar chart showing a slower decline in performance, with increasing defocus. All 4 charts showed similar directional biases with astigmatic defocus, being most affected by oblique (45 degrees) astigmatism. CONCLUSION: The Turtle chart met the criteria set for its validation as a visual acuity chart in that it gave comparable results to the other commonly used visual acuity charts, both in the case of unaided vision and when refractive blur was imposed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Natural and imposed astigmatism and their relation to emmetropization in the chick.

This study investigated the ocular response of young chicks to astigmatic errors imposed by spectacle lenses and as a related issue, we examined the nature and prevalence of astigmatism in young chicks, and its relation to corneal development and natural emmetropization. Normal hatchling chicks exhibited significant against-the-rule refractive astigmatism (approx. 8 D) of which 60-90% was corneal. Both types of astigmatism decreased in magnitude with normal corneal development as part of emmetropization. The apparent association with corneal growth is consistent with two further observations: (1) that smaller corneas, induced by constant light rearing, had higher than normal astigmatism (1.5 D greater at 15 days), (ii) that enlarged corneas, due to form deprivation, had reduced astigmatism (2.4 D less). When astigmatism was artificially imposed with (+/-10 DC spectacle lenses), altered ocular growth patterns were observed, although the changes were not consistent with the chicks having emmetropized to the imposed astigmatism. Irrespective of the axis setting used in positioning the lenses (45 degrees, 90 degrees, 180 degrees), eyes became hyperopic with +10 DC lenses (+8.8 +/- 1.3 D), and became slightly myopic with 10 DC lenses (-1.8 +/- 1.9 D). These refractive changes are consistent with the chicks having emmetropized to the more myopic meridian rather than the equivalent mean spherical error imposed (responses of control groups to +5 D and -5 D spherical lenses were +5.2 +/- 1.0 D and -5.1 +/- 0.8 D resp.). The same was true for chicks first prevented from accommodating by prior ciliary nerve section, except for one group wearing the 10 DC lens at 45 degrees axis where astigmatic changes consistent with partial compensation were seen, although this may represent an artefact of the surgery. These results argue against 'astigmatic emmetropization' as a normal phenomenon. Also consistent with this finding was the lack of significant astigmatic changes with accommodation-stimulating and inhibiting drugs (nicotine and vercuronium resp.), for normal chicks. These results imply that accommodation, while the most likely mechanism for astigmatic emmetropization, has little capacity to compensate for imposed astigmatic focussing errors.

Accommodation, Ocular↗
PubMed1997

Contrast and spatial-frequency requirements for emmetropization in chicks.

This study examined the contrast and spatial-frequency requirements for emmetropization in chicks. Chicks were form deprived from hatching either constantly or had this treatment interrupted with 20 min of "visual stimulation" each day. Visual stimulation comprised exposure to either a normal cage environment (i.e., normal vision) or environments that were restricted in either their spatial contrast or spatial-frequency composition. Constant form deprivation resulted in high myopia (e.g. -11.8 D after 5 days), with refractive changes being much smaller in chicks allowed 20 min of normal vision each day (e.g. -3.4D). The restricted contrast environments (contrast range: 9-78%) were generally only slightly less effective than the normal cage environment in preventing form-deprivation myopia. However, in the case of restricted spatial-frequency environments, both the intermediate (0.86 cycles deg-1) and mixed spatial-frequency environments significantly reduced the form deprivation response, while both the high (4.3 cycles deg-1) and low spatial-frequency (0.086 cycles deg-1) stimuli, as well as the composites of these, were less effective in preventing form-deprivation myopia. This spatial-frequency dependence did not vary when, instead of white light, monochromatic illumination was used to eliminate chromatic aberration, although all groups showed more myopia under this condition. It is assumed that the observed inhibitory effects on form-deprivation myopia reflect the adequacy of the visual information presented during the period of visual stimulation for emmetropization in chicks. In this context, the data imply a mid-spatial-frequency tuning in the current study and a low contrast threshold which was not reached for this emmetropization process. Finally, the data hint that chromatic aberration may have some role as a cue to defocus in emmetropization.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Hard contact lenses alter accommodative gain but do not prevent refractive adaptation in chicks.

This study compared the compensatory response to hyperopic defocus imposed on chicks in two different ways: (1) with-10 D spectacle lenses, and (2) with plano hard contact lens. The hyperopia seen with the contact lenses in situ was a consequence of their flat profile relative to the chick cornea, resulting in a negative fluid lens of approximately 16 D at day 2 and 9 D by day 10. This decrease with age reflects the corneal flattening that accompanies normal eye growth. By optically neutralizing the cornea, the contact lenses also had two other important effects: (1) a reduction in refractive astigmatism to almost negligible levels, and (2) a reduction in accommodative gain. The latter effect reflects the loss of the corneal component of the chick's accommodation and was estimated to be of the order of 40 to 57%, based on measurements made using topically applied nicotine to stimulate accommodation. Thus any estimate of the imposed hyperopic defocus based on accommodative effort required to overcome such errors will be too large. Chicks wearing either lens type on a continuous basis from hatching to 10 days only partially compensated for the imposed hyperopia through an increase in vitreous chamber growth. However, the effects were smaller in the spectacle lens group (e.g., a mean myopic shift of -4.1 +/- 2.3 D compared to -6.3 +/- 2.4 D for the contact lens group at day 10), although both groups experienced similar amounts of hyperopic defocus around day 10 (effective power of -10 D spectacle lens: -9.4 D). The changes seen in the spectacle lens group thus represent poorer compensation, i.e., 44 vs. 71% of the imposed error. However, overcompensation is the predicted effect, if any, of the accommodative deficit imposed on the contact lens group, and this was not seen. That compensation, albeit incomplete, occurred with the contact lens as well as the spectacle lens, suggests that neither accommodation nor astigmatism are fundamental cues for emmetropization as modeled here.

Accommodation, Ocular↗
PubMed1997

The sensitivity of the chick eye to refractive defocus.

The chick is commonly used as an animal model for human myopia and emmetropization. However one criticism of this model has been the very large refractive errors that are usually induced, either by visual deprivation or through the use of lenses to first impose focussing errors. This study sought to determine the threshold for compensatory responses to imposed defocus. We observed compensation in chick eyes fitted at hatching with +1D and -1D lenses (one over each eye). Consistent with the 2D interocular difference in refraction imposed, an average of 2.13D (SD 1.0D) of anisometropia and a 0.09 mm (SD 0.05 mm) interocular difference in vitreous chamber depth were recorded after five days of lens wear. The 1 D focusing errors imposed on individual eyes are not much greater in magnitude than the estimated depth of focus of the chick eye. The significance of these results for emmetropization are discussed.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1997

Inter-ocular temporal asynchrony (IOTA): psychophysical measurement of inter-ocular asymmetry of visual latency.

Ocular pathology can be associated with inter-ocular asymmetry of conduction latency. We describe a relatively low-cost psychophysical method of quantifying this asymmetry of delay, an 'inter-ocular temporal asynchrony' (IOTA) system. Testing of 28 visually normal young adults gave IOTA results with a mean of 0.11 ms (SD +/- 2.4 ms). These results correspond to 95% confidence limits of -4.6 ms and +4.8 ms. Inter-ocular differences in retinal illumination, induced by using monocular neutral density filters in visually normal subjects, significantly affected IOTA in accord with an imposed perceptual delay in the 'filtered eye'. This demonstration that the IOTA technique is capable of detecting induced asymmetry of perceptual delay in visually normal subjects, along with the small measured confidence limits reported above, suggests that the apparatus should be capable of detecting inter-ocular asymmetries in response latencies with ocular disease, which have been previously measured by other techniques.

Adolescent↗