PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C G Moertel

Publications and source records attributed to C G Moertel.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Clinical and pharmacokinetic studies of high-dose levamisole in combination with 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and activity of levamisole administered concurrently with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in a standard 5-day course. To determine the pharmacokinetics of levamisole during the course of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Levamisole was administered to 38 patients orally three times a day for 5 days concurrently with a course of 5-FU administered daily by rapid intravenous injection for 5 days. Toxicity was evaluated in 20 patients who received escalating doses of levamisole. The activity of the combination was evaluated in 18 patients who received levamisole at the MTD with 5-FU. The pharmacokinetics of levamisole were characterized in ten patients at the MTD level. RESULTS: Intractable vomiting, confusion and vertigo were the major dose-limiting toxicities. The MTD of oral levamisole was 100 mg/m2 administered three times a day concurrently with 450 mg/m2 per day intravenous 5-FU for 5 consecutive days. Partial responses lasting 5 and 11 months were observed in 2/18 patients with measurable disease at the MTD. Peak plasma concentrations of 1 microg/ml (range 0.6-1.3 microg/ml) were achieved 90 min (range 60-360 min) after an oral dose of 100 mg/m2 levamisole with a 3.5-fold accumulation noted following 4 days of administration. Peak plasma concentrations of p-hydroxylevamisole were about 5% of parent drug. Little parent drug (2-5%) was detected in urine. CONCLUSIONS: Levamisole may be administered safely with 5-FU at doses which are up to four to five times greater than those presently given in conventional regimens. The recommended dose of levamisole combined with 5-FU for future research protocols is 75 mg/m2 t.i.d for 5 days.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Prospectively randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk colon cancer.

PURPOSE: This study had two major goals: (1) to assess the effectiveness of a regimen of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus levamisole plus leucovorin as postoperative surgical adjuvant therapy for patients with high-risk colon cancer, and (2) to evaluate 6 months versus 12 months of chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with poor-prognosis stage II or III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with either intensive-course 5-FU and leucovorin combined with levamisole, or a standard regimen of 5-FU plus levamisole. Patients were also randomly assigned to receive either 12 months or 6 months of chemotherapy, which resulted in four treatment groups. RESULTS: Eight hundred ninety-one of 915 patients entered (97.4%) were eligible. The median follow-up duration is 5.1 years for patients still alive. There was a difference among the four treatment groups with respect to patient survival, and a significant duration-by-regimen interaction was observed. Specifically, standard 5-FU plus levamisole was inferior to 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole when treatment was given for 6 months (5-year survival rate, 60% v 70%; P < .01). CONCLUSION: There was no significant improvement in patient survival when chemotherapy was given for 12 months compared with 6 months. When chemotherapy was given for 6 months, standard 5-FU plus levamisole was associated with inferior patient survival compared with intensive-course 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole. These data suggest that 5-FU plus levamisole for 6 months should not be used in clinical practice, whereas 6 months of treatment with 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole is effective.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in severe chemotherapy-induced afebrile neutropenia.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials of colony-stimulating factors in febrile patients with neutropenia after chemotherapy have not consistently shown clinical benefit. Nevertheless, the use of colony-stimulating factors to treat patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is widespread. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in afebrile outpatients with severe chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. We measured the number of days of neutropenia, rate of hospitalization, number of days in the hospital, number of days the patient received parenteral antibiotics, and number of culture-positive infections. RESULTS: We randomly assigned 138 patients to receive G-CSF (n=71) or placebo (n=67). The median time to an absolute neutrophil count of at least 500 per cubic millimeter was significantly shorter for patients who received G-CSF (two days, vs. four days for the patients given placebo). However, there was no effect on the rate of hospitalization, number of days in the hospital, duration of treatment with parenteral antibiotics, or number of culture-positive infections. CONCLUSIONS: Routine therapeutic application of G-CSF in afebrile patients with severe neutropenia can reduce the duration of neutropenia, but this does not appear to provide practical clinical benefit.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Incidence and morbidity of cholelithiasis in patients receiving chronic octreotide for metastatic carcinoid and malignant islet cell tumors.

BACKGROUND: Octreotide, a long-acting somatostatin analogue, has demonstrated clinical utility in patients with carcinoid syndrome and malignant islet cell tumors of the pancreas. Prior studies have reported a greater than expected incidence of cholelithiasis in patients treated with octreotide for acromegaly. This study attempted to determine the incidence and morbidity of cholelithiasis in a group of patients with metastatic carcinoid or malignant pancreatic islet cell tumors who were receiving chronic therapy with octreotide. METHODS: Forty-four of 55 patients on investigational protocols with octreotide were eligible for chart review; 10 patients were excluded due to prior cholecystectomy and 1 patient due to asymptomatic cholelithiasis at presentation. Patients fell into three treatment groups. The low dose (LD) group was comprised of 17 patients receiving 150 microg of subcutaneous octreotide 3 times a day. Twenty-one patients received high dose (HD) therapy comprised of 500 microg given 3 times a day. The low dose-high dose (LD-HD) group was comprised of 6 patients who had their dose escalated from 150 microg to 225-500 microg of octreotide 3 times a day. RESULTS: The overall incidence of cholelithiasis and/or gallbladder sludge was found to be 52.3% in all 3 treatment groups. Three of the 44 patients (6.8%) had symptomatic disease requiring emergency cholecystectomy. Five other patients underwent elective or incidental gallbladder surgery. The incidence of cholelithiasis in the LD, LD-HD, and HD groups was 35.3%, 66.6%, and 61.9%, respectively. The incidence of acute cholecystitis in the three groups was 11.8%, 0%, and 4.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although greater than 50% of patients receiving octreotide developed cholelithiasis, a much smaller percentage of patients had symptomatic gallbladder disease. Patients receiving chronic octreotide treatment require monitoring for the development of gallstones. However, prophylactic cholecystectomy is not indicated, unless it is performed in conjunction with bowel resection or cytoreductive hepatic surgery.

Adenoma, Islet Cell↗
PubMed1997

Prospectively randomized North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial of intensive-course fluorouracil combined with the l-isomer of intravenous leucovorin, oral leucovorin, or intravenous leucovorin for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: A three-arm randomized phase III trial in advanced colorectal cancer patients was designed to test whether substitution of an equivalent dose of (1) l-leucovorin or (2) oral leucovorin would more effectively potentiate fluorouracil (5-FU) than standard intravenous (I.V.) (d,l)-leucovorin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 926 chemotherapy-naive patients participated. Patients received one of three treatments: (A) intensive-course 5-FU plus l-leucovorin with I.V. leucovorin (Immunex Corp, Seattle, WA) at 100 mg/m2 and I.V. 5-FU at 370 mg/m2; (B) intensive-course 5-FU plus oral (d,l)-leucovorin with oral leucovarin at 125 mg/m2 on hours 0, 1, 2, and 3 (total dose, 500 mg/m2) followed by 5-FU 370 mg/m2 on hour 4; or (C) intensive-course 5-FU plus I.V. (d,l)-leucovorin with I.V. leucovorin 200 mg/m2 and 5-FU 370 mg/m2. Drugs were administered daily for 5 consecutive days. Courses were repeated at 4 and 8 weeks, and every 5 weeks thereafter. Dosage was reduced for neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, stomatitis, and dermatitis. RESULTS: Of 926 eligible patients, 756 have died. The overall response rate for patients with measurable disease was 32% (165 of 514). There were no differences between regimens in response rates (arm A, 28% [47 of 140]; arm B, 34% [60 of 174]; and arm C, 34% [58 of 170]) or in survival. There have been nine possible chemotherapy-related fatalities. Grade III to IV toxic effects did not differ appreciably by arm and included stomatitis (12% to 14%), diarrhea (15% to 19%), nausea (7% to 9%), and vomiting (6% to 8%). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in response, survival, or toxicity between these three different leucovorin formulations combined with 5-FU.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

Olsalazine is contraindicated during pelvic radiation therapy: results of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: A randomized clinical trial from Great Britain suggested a possible beneficial effect of acetylsalicylate in the prevention of radiation-induced bowel toxicity. Olsalazine is an orally administered drug designed to deliver 5-aminosalicylate to the large bowel with minimal systemic absorption. A randomized clinical trial was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of olsalazine in preventing acute diarrhea in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy were randomized, in double-blind fashion, to olsalazine 250 mg, two capsules twice daily, or an identical appearing placebo, two capsules twice daily. Patients were then evaluated weekly during radiation therapy for the primary study endpoint, diarrhea, as well as rectal bleeding, abdominal cramping, and tenesmus. RESULTS: The study was closed early, after entry of 58 evaluable patients, when a preliminary analysis showed excessive diarrhea in patients randomized to olsalazine. The incidence and severity of diarrhea were worse in patients randomized to olsalazine (p = 0.0036). Sixty percent of the patients randomized to olsalazine experienced Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea compared to only 14% randomized to placebo. There was also a trend toward higher incidence and greater severity of abdominal cramping in patients who were randomized to olsalazine (p = 0.084). CONCLUSION: Administration of olsalazine during pelvic radiation therapy resulted in an increased incidence and severity of diarrhea. Olsalazine is contraindicated in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

A phase III evaluation of a somatostatin analogue (octreotide) in the treatment of patients with asymptomatic advanced colon carcinoma. North Central Cancer Treatment Group and the Mayo Clinic.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine by randomized, controlled, double-blind evaluation whether therapy with the somatostatin analogue, octreotide, would delay tumor progression and improve survival of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinomas who were ambulatory with no significant symptoms. METHODS: Two hundred sixty patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and without symptoms related to colon cancer were randomized to receive 150 micrograms of octreotide subcutaneously three times daily or, initially, no treatment. After 91 patients were entered in the double-blind study, saline placebo injections were used for patients in the control arm. RESULTS: The randomization culminated in balanced assignment of patients with respect to disease site(s), presence or absence of measurable or evaluable disease, and interval from diagnosis of metastasis to protocol entry. Steatorrhea and diarrhea, usually mildly severe, resulted more often from treatment than from the placebo. The major end points were time to progression and survival. Curves for both parameters overlapped in the blind and open trial segments. CONCLUSION: Octreotide at a dose of 150 micrograms given three times daily is not effective therapy for patients with advanced asymptomatic colon carcinoma.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Fluorouracil plus levamisole as effective adjuvant therapy after resection of stage III colon carcinoma: a final report.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of two adjuvant therapy regimens in improving surgical cure rates in stage III (Dukes stage C) colon cancer. DESIGN: Randomized, concurrently controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Major cancer centers, universities, and community clinics affiliated with the North Cancer Treatment Group, the Southwest Oncology Group, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. PATIENTS: Those who had had curative-intent resections of stage III colon cancer in the previous 1 to 5 weeks. INTERVENTION: Patients were assigned to observation only, to levamisole alone (50 mg orally three times/d for 3 days, repeated every 2 weeks for 1 year), or to this regimen of levamisole plus fluorouracil (450 mg/m2 body surface area intravenously daily for 5 days and then, beginning at 28 days, weekly for 48 weeks). MEASUREMENTS: Rates of cancer recurrence and death. Early- and late-treatment side effects. RESULTS: With all 929 eligible patients able to be followed for 5 years or more (median follow-up, 6.5 years), fluorouracil plus levamisole reduced the recurrence rate by 40% (P < 0.0001) and the death rate by 33% (P = 0.0007). Levamisole reduced the recurrence rate by only 2% and the death rate by only 6%. With few exceptions, toxicity was mild and patient compliance was excellent. No evidence of late side effects was seen. CONCLUSION: Fluorouracil plus levamisole is tolerable adjuvant therapy to surgery; it has been confirmed to substantially increase cure rates for patients with high-risk (stage III) colon cancer. It should be considered standard treatment for all such patients not entered into clinical trials.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1995

Intergroup study of fluorouracil plus levamisole as adjuvant therapy for stage II/Dukes' B2 colon cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of fluorouracil plus levamisole administered postoperatively to patients with resected stage II (Dukes' B2) colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled clinical trial (INT-0035) was performed by National Cancer Institute-sponsored cancer clinical trials cooperative groups. Patients were assigned to observation only or to fluorouracil (450 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] daily for 5 days and, beginning at 28 days, weekly for 48 weeks) plus levamisole (50 mg orally three times daily for 3 days repeated every 2 weeks for 1 year). Cancer recurrence, survival, and treatment side effects were assessed. RESULTS: Three hundred eighteen eligible patients were analyzed with a median follow-up time of 7 years. Fluorouracil plus levamisole reduced the recurrence rate by 31%, although this trend was not statistically significant (P = .10). A total of 87 patients died: 43 on observation and 44 on fluorouracil plus levamisole. Disparity between effects on recurrence rate and overall survival is partially explained by a higher rate of non-colon cancer-related deaths on fluorouracil plus levamisole (15 v seven) and by the effects of salvage surgery with curative intent. Of seven patients with recurrence who were rendered disease-free by salvage surgery, six were on the observation arm. As was observed in patients treated with fluorouracil plus levamisole for stage III disease, toxicity was acceptable and compliance was excellent. CONCLUSION: Fluorouracil plus levamisole is tolerable and accepted as standard surgical adjuvant therapy for patients with stage III colon cancer, but the data from this study in stage II patients suggest a decreased relapse rate without a significant improvement in survival.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1995

Perioperative blood transfusions do not affect disease recurrence of patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal carcinoma: a Mayo/North Central Cancer Treatment Group study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of perioperative blood transfusions on colorectal cancer recurrence and patient survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,051 patients treated with curative surgery for stage II or III colorectal adenocarcinoma were retrospectively studied for the effect of perioperative blood transfusions on disease recurrence and patient survival. Forty-two percent of patients received perioperative blood components. RESULTS: Perioperative transfusions had no effect on disease progression in univariate or multivariate analysis. Tumor stage (P = .0001), locally advanced tumor characteristics (adherence, involvement of adjacent structure, or perforation; P = .0001), location (rectal v colon; P = .0002), grade (P < .001), and cell kinetic profile (nondiploid or high percent synthetic phase [%S]+ percent gap 2 mitosis phase [%G2M]; P = .0003) were the most powerful independent predictors of tumor recurrence. Use of transfusions was associated with an adverse effect on overall survival (P < .004) using multivariate analysis, as well as tumor stage (P = .0001), location (P = .004), grade (P = .001), patient age (P = .0001), sex (P < .04), and cell kinetic profile (P = .0001). In further evaluation of the prognostic effects of transfusions, there was no increased risk of disease recurrence after whole-blood transfusion (P = .14) as compared with packed RBC or no transfusions, although the disease-specific survival for patients who received whole blood was lower than for nontransfused patients (P < .0005) patients who received other blood components (P < .03). CONCLUSION: With transfusion practices that use blood components, most commonly RBCs, medically indicated transfusions to patients with colorectal carcinoma seem to have no impact on disease recurrence. The adverse impact of transfusions on cancer patient survival is more likely due to other unevaluated tumor variables or underlying illness rather than tumor recurrence enhancement by immunosuppression induced by transfusion of blood components.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1994

The management of patients with advanced carcinoid tumors and islet cell carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of hepatic artery occlusion alone and with sequenced chemotherapy for patients with hepatic-dominant metastases of islet cell carcinomas and carcinoid tumors. DESIGN: Nonrandomized, observational study with follow-up from 2.5 to 10 years. PATIENTS: 111 ambulatory patients referred to a multidisciplinary tertiary care center who had histologically proven islet cell carcinoma or carcinoid tumor and symptomatic measurable metastatic lesions in the liver or hormonal abnormalities or both. The patients were ambulatory but were having substantial symptoms because of their endocrine syndromes or their tumors. INTERVENTION: All patients had hepatic artery occlusion done surgically or by catheterization and embolization. After this procedure, 71 patients were selected for chemotherapy with alternating two-drug regimens of doxorubicin plus dacarbazine and streptozocin plus fluorouracil. Main outcome measures of response to therapy were rates of tumor regression, rates of improvement in endocrine abnormalities, symptomatic improvement, and duration of favorable response. RESULTS: Objective regressions were observed in 60% of patients treated with occlusion alone and in 80% with chemotherapy added. Regressions were associated with substantial or complete relief from the endocrine syndromes. With occlusion alone, the median duration of regression was 4.0 months and with chemotherapy added, it was 18.0 months. Any comparative inferences about the two treatment regimens must be guarded, because this was not a randomized trial and marked differences occurred in the distribution of prognostic factors between the patient groups. Side effects of arterial occlusion included fever, nausea, pain, and abnormalities in liver function. Side effects of chemotherapy included nausea, vomiting, leukopenia, and alopecia. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic arterial occlusion can frequently produce major regression of neuroendocrine tumors with relief from the hormonal syndromes. Sequential chemotherapy may improve the rate and duration of the regression.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Early evaluation of combined fluorouracil and leucovorin as a radiation enhancer for locally unresectable, residual, or recurrent gastrointestinal carcinoma. The North Central Cancer Treatment Group.

PURPOSE: To develop a tolerable regimen of fluorouracil (5-FU), low-dose leucovorin, and radiation, and to obtain an early estimate of therapeutic effectiveness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with locally unresectable or recurrent gastrointestinal carcinoma were studied (pancreas, n = 22; rectum and sigmoid, n = 10; gastric, n = 6; other, n = 2). Irradiation therapy was administered in 1.8-Gy fractions 5 days per week, with total doses ranging from 45 to 54 Gy. 5-FU 400 mg/m2/d plus leucovorin 20 mg/m2/d, both by rapid intravenous injection, were administered for 3 or 4 days during the first and fifth weeks of radiation. 5-FU 425 mg/m2/d plus leucovorin 20 mg/m2/d were administered for 4 days at 4 weeks following radiation and for 5 days at 9 weeks. RESULTS: Major toxicities with upper abdominal treatment were nausea, vomiting, weight loss, and leukopenia. A tolerable dosage regimen was radiation at 45 Gy with 4 days of 5-FU plus leucovorin during the first week and 3 days during the last week with postradiation chemotherapy. Major toxicities with pelvic radiation were diarrhea and leukopenia. A tolerable regimen was 54 Gy with 4 days of 5-FU plus leucovorin during the first and fifth week followed by the postradiation chemotherapy. Median survival durations for pancreatic and rectal/sigmoid carcinomas are 13 months and 31 months, respectively. Five patients have no evidence of disease from 38 to 50 months after the onset of therapy (rectal, n = 2; stomach, n = 2; pancreas, n = 1). CONCLUSION: We have developed patient-tolerable regimens for combined 5-FU plus leucovorin followed by radiation to the abdomen and to the pelvis. The favorable results observed in locally unresectable disease allow cautious optimism for possible effectiveness in the surgical adjuvant setting, a possibility currently being tested in national trials of rectal and gastric carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1994

Controlled evaluation of three drug combination regimens versus fluorouracil alone for the therapy of advanced gastric cancer. North Central Cancer Treatment Group.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, and methyl lomustine (CCNU) (FAMe), 5-FU, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (FAP), and FAMe alternating with triazinate (TZT) when compared with a standard therapy of 5-FU alone in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty-two eligible patients selected for study had proven locally unresectable and/or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. The majority had nonmeasureable disease. They were randomly assigned to receive one of the three drug combination regimens or to 5-FU alone administered by rapid injection in 5-day course. Survival was the primary study end point. RESULTS: None of the three drug combinations showed a significant advantage over 5-FU alone in improved performance score, weight gain, or patient survival. Each of the three combinations was more toxic than 5-FU alone. CONCLUSION: FAMe, FAP, or FAMe alternating with TZT cannot be recommended for the therapy of advanced gastric carcinoma. Therapy of this disease should remain an experimental endeavor. It would seem reasonable to prove the value of any new treatment approach by a randomized comparison to simple therapy with 5-FU alone.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1993

An evaluation of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) test for monitoring patients with resected colon cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) monitoring in detecting surgically curable recurrence of colon cancer. DESIGN: Clinical data were collected from a national surgical adjuvant trial in which CEA monitoring was elective. SETTING: Cancer centers, universities, and community clinics. PATIENTS: A total of 1216 patients with resected colon cancer, 1017 (84%) of whom had CEA monitoring. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity of CEA testing for cancer recurrence and CEA-motivated diagnostic and surgical interventions and their end results. RESULTS: Among 417 monitored patients with recurrence, 59% had a preceding elevation of CEA concentration. Sixteen percent of 600 patients without recurrence showed a false-positive test result. Carcinoembryonic antigen testing was most sensitive for hepatic or retroperitoneal metastasis and relatively insensitive for local, pulmonary, or peritoneal involvement. Surgical explorations were performed in 115 patients with CEA elevations, and 47 recurrences, usually hepatic, were resected with curative intent. On the other hand, 38 patients with normal CEA concentrations and 23 patients not monitored also underwent such resections--usually for pulmonary or local recurrence. Of all CEA-monitored patients, 2.3% are alive and disease free more than 1 year after salvage surgery (2.9% of those with CEA elevations and 1.9% of those with no elevations). Of patients with no CEA monitoring, 2.0% are also alive and disease free more than 1 year after salvage surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer cures attributable to CEA monitoring are, at best, infrequent. It is questionable whether this small gain justifies the substantial cost in dollars and physical and emotional stress that this intervention may cause for patients.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed1993

Combined doxorubicin and alpha-interferon therapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Modest activity for doxorubicin has been detected repeatedly for the therapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Variable activity in this disease also has been documented for alpha-interferon. Preclinical data indicated the possibility that alpha-interferon could enhance or add to the cytotoxic effect of doxorubicin. METHODS: The authors evaluated the use of alpha-interferon at a dose of 12 x 10(6) units/m2/day for 5 days given by intramuscular injection plus doxorubicin 25-40 mg/m2 given intravenously on day 3 (both repeated every 4 weeks) for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. RESULTS: Among 31 eligible patients treated, there was only one instance of objective tumor regression. The median survival for all patients was 10 months. Both hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity were significant but tolerable to the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The 3% response rate indicated that, by the method used, the addition of alpha-interferon to doxorubicin does not improve the clinical effectiveness. This combination cannot be recommended for further study.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Accuracy of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal neoplasia. A prospective study using Hemoccult and HemoQuant tests.

OBJECTIVES: To define the validity of fecal blood as a marker for colorectal neoplasia in the screening setting and to compare yields by Hemoccult and HemoQuant fecal occult blood screening tests. DESIGN: A multicenter masked comparison of fecal blood test results against structural colorectal evaluations and longitudinal follow-up, serving as criterion standards, in nonreferred subjects at risk for colorectal neoplasia. SETTING: Communities, primary care centers, referral centers. PARTICIPANTS: Two groups: (1) 1217 patients aged at least 18 years undergoing routine structural surveillance evaluations following curative resection of a colorectal tumor and (2) 12312 relatives of colorectal cancer patients aged at least 50 years. INTERVENTIONS: Blinded Hemoccult II and HemoQuant testing on three mailed-in stool samples per subject. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Sensitivity of fecal blood tests for colorectal neoplasia. RESULTS: In the postresection group, surveillance evaluations revealed 46 malignant colorectal neoplasms and 402 polyps. At matched specificity, sensitivity of either test for cancer was 26% (95% confidence interval, 13% to 39%). Hemoccult was positive in 21% of intraluminal recurrences, 33% of all new primary tumors, and 29% of Dukes A or B cancers; HemoQuant was elevated in 24%, 28%, and 29%, respectively. Sensitivity for polyps 1.0 cm or larger was 13% by Hemoccult and 11% by HemoQuant. In the group of relatives, estimated sensitivity for cancer at 1 to 3 years of follow-up was 25% to 33% by Hemoccult, not significantly different from the 29% to 43% by HemoQuant. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our observations in the screening setting, fecal blood appears to be a poor marker for colorectal neoplasia. Most cancers and the vast majority of polyps will be missed. Hemoccult and HemoQuant are similarly insensitive.

Adult↗