PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Gaillard

Publications and source records attributed to C Gaillard.

134 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Searching for genetic markers for hereditary diseases in cattle by means of DNA fingerprinting.

Losses caused by inherited diseases affect not only the breeder's income but also the breeding programs themselves. In Switzerland the cardiomyopathy of cattle and the syndrome of arachnomelia and arthrogryposis are currently being investigated in order to find genetic markers for these diseases. It seems that DNA fingerprinting with multilocus probes is the most efficient approach available at present. Microsatellites analyzed with the polymerase chain reaction technique will provide a usable marker map within the next ten years and will therefore provide a perfect tool to find markers for hereditary diseases.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Value of phenotyping methods as an initial screening of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in epidemiologic studies.

When studying the epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, determination of the similarity of isolates is crucial. In the present study the distinctive capacity of four phenotyping methods (antibiotic susceptibility patterns, serotyping, phage-typing and outer membrane protein [OMP] profile analysis) was determined and compared to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of enzyme restricted chromosomal DNA. In all, 91 isolates of P. aeruginosa were cultured from ten patients. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns were concordant for all isolates. Serotyping yielded five, phage-typing eight, OMP profile analysis nine and PFGE seven distinct types of P. aeruginosa. Compared to PFGE, the distinctive capacities were 89% (81/91) for serotyping, 87% (79/91) for phage-typing, and 90% (82/91) for OMP profile analysis. When serotyping results were different, PFGE types also were different (exclusiveness 100%). However, isolates with the same serotype may have various PFGE patterns. In contrast, isolates with similar PFGE patterns could have different phage-types or OMP types. For the study of isolates of P. aeruginosa, serotyping provides a good initial selection to reduce the number of isolates that need to be genotyped.

Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A partial african ancestry for the creole cattle populations of the Caribbean.

Seventy-eight cattle samples from three Creole Caribbean islands and one Brazilian breed were analyzed for sequence variation in the hypervariable segment of the mitochondrial DNA control region. Seventy-three samples displayed Bos taurus haplotypes, and five samples exhibited haplotypes that were of Bos indicus ancestry. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that all sampled B. taurus sequences fell into two distinct clusters with separate African and European origins. European sequences were encountered in each population; however, the distribution of African haplotypes was uneven, with the highest proportion of African influence found in the Guadeloupe Creole. The reduced levels of African haplotypic variation within the Caribbean and Brazilian are consistent with prior founder effects. Additionally, genetic variation at three microsatellite loci illustrated African influence uniquely in the Guadeloupe Creole. Collectively, the data suggest that this African influence is, at least in part, attributable to the historical importation of African cattle to the Americas. Furthermore, alleles of B. indicus ancestry were detected at appreciable frequencies in all Caribbean Creole populations and may reflect zebu introgressions from either West Africa or the Indian subcontinent.

Africa↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Differentiation of the Italian wolf and the domestic dog based on microsatellite analysis.

The Italian wolf is in the process of regaining the Alpine region which comes into conflict with the extensive sheep keeping practiced in Switzerland during the summer. As in Switzerland, the wolf is a protected species, the government reimburses losses caused by wolves. Therefore we wanted to know whether the Italian wolf could be distinguished from the domestic dog by microsatellite analysis if DNA samples of the predators could be secured. The evaluation of combined genotypes for the microsatellites CanBern6, CPH4, CPH7, CPH9, CPH12, CPH22 and ZuBeCa1 made it possible to identify an individual as either a domestic dog or an Italian wolf. The assignment of an individual to either one of the two populations is based on the logarithm of the likelihood ratio of an individual being an Italian wolf rather than a domestic dog, given a specific combined genotype. The distribution of the Italian wolf combined genotypes (n=42) is clearly distinct from the distribution of the domestic dog combined genotypes (n=90). The likelihood ratio for the "worst" Italian wolf combined genotype was 2.3 E+5 and for the "worst" domestic dog combined genotype was 3.8 E-5.

Journal Article↗