PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Galletti

Publications and source records attributed to C Galletti.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

The cortical connections of area V6: an occipito-parietal network processing visual information.

The aim of this work was to study the cortical connections of area V6 by injecting neuronal tracers into different retinotopic representations of this area. To this purpose, we first functionally recognized V6 by recording from neurons of the parieto-occipital cortex in awake macaque monkeys. Penetrations with recording syringes were performed in the behaving animals in order to inject tracers exactly at the recording sites. The tracers were injected into the central or peripheral field representation of V6 in different hemispheres. Irrespective of whether injections were made in the centre or periphery, area V6 showed reciprocal connections with areas V1, V2, V3, V3A, V4T, the middle temporal area /V5 (MT/V5), the medial superior temporal area (MST), the medial intraparietal area (MIP), the ventral intraparietal area (VIP), the ventral part of the lateral intraparietal area and the ventral part of area V6A (V6AV). No labelled cells or terminals were found in the inferior temporal, mesial and frontal cortices. The connections of V6 with V1, and with all the retinotopically organized prestriate areas, were organized retinotopically. The connection of V6 with MIP suggests a visuotopic organization for this latter. Labelling in V6A and VIP after either central or peripheral V6 injections was very similar in location and extent, as expected on the basis of the nonretinotopic organization of these areas. We suggest that V6 plays a pivotal role in the dorsal visual stream, by distributing the visual information coming from the occipital lobe to the sensorimotor areas of the parietal cortex. Given the functional characteristics of the cells of this network, we suggest that it could perform the fast form and motion analyses needed for the visual guiding of arm movements as well as their coordination with the eyes and the head.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

'Arm-reaching' neurons in the parietal area V6A of the macaque monkey.

In previous experiments we have found that several cells of area V6A in the macaque superior parietal lobule were activated by small and stereotyped movements of the arms (C. Galletti, P. Fattori, D. F. Kutz & P. P. Battaglini, Eur. J. Neurosci., 1997, 9, 410). This behaviour was not accounted for by retinal information, nor by somatosensory inputs from the arms. We now want to investigate whether V6A neurons are modulated by purposeful movements aimed at reaching visual targets or targets located outside the field of view. V6A neuronal activity was collected while monkeys performed arm movements during an instructed-delay reaching task in darkness. The task required the animal to reach out for a visual target in the peripersonal space and to bring the hand back to its body. Quantitative analysis of neuronal activity carried out on 55 V6A neurons showed that: (i) the great majority of neurons (71%) was significantly modulated during the execution of arm movements; (ii) 30% of neurons were significantly modulated during preparation of reaching; and (iii) modulations during both execution and preparation of reaching occurred in the absence of any visual feedback and were not due to eye movements. V6A reach-related neurons could be useful in guiding the hand to reach its target with or without visual feedback.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1999

Brain location and visual topography of cortical area V6A in the macaque monkey.

The brain location, extent and functional organization of the cortical visual area V6A was investigated in macaque monkeys by using single cell recording techniques in awake, behaving animals. Six hemispheres of four animals were studied. Area V6A occupies a horseshoe-like region of cortex in the caudalmost part of the superior parietal lobule. It extends from the medial surface of the brain, through the anterior bank of the parieto-occipital sulcus, up to the most lateral part of the fundus of the same sulcus. Area V6A borders on areas V6 ventrally, PEc dorsally, PGm medially and MIP laterally. Of 1348 neurons recorded in V6A, 61% were visual and 39% non-visual in nature. The visual neurons were particularly sensitive to orientation and direction of movement of visual stimuli. The inferior contralateral quadrant was the most represented one. Visual receptive fields were also found in the inferior ipsilateral quadrant and in the upper visual field. Receptive fields were on average smaller in the lower visual field than in the upper one. Both central and peripheral parts of the visual field were represented. Large parts of the visual field were represented in small regions of area V6A, and the same regions of the visual field were re-represented many times in different parts of this area, without any apparent topographical order. The only reliable sign of retinotopic organization was the predominance of central representation dorsally and far periphery ventrally. The functional organization of area V6A is discussed in the view that this area could be involved in the control of reaching out and grasping objects.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

The cortical visual area V6: brain location and visual topography.

The brain location and topographical organization of the cortical visual area V6 was studied in five hemispheres of four awake macaque monkeys. Area V6 is located in the caudal aspect of the superior parietal lobule (SPL). It occupies a 'C'-shaped belt of cortex whose upper branch is in the depth of the parieto-occipital sulcus (POS) and lower one is in the depth of the medial parieto-occipital sulcus (POM), with the medial surface of the brain as a zone of junction between the two branches. Area V6 contains a topographically organized representation of the contralateral visual field up to an eccentricity of at least 80 degrees. The lower visual field representation is located dorsally, in the ventral part of POS, and the upper field ventrally, in the dorsal wall of POM. The representation of the horizontal meridian forms the posterior border of V6. It is adjacent to area V3 in POS as well as in the caudal part of POM, on the ventral convexity of the brain. The lower vertical meridian forms the anterior border of V6, adjacent to area V6A. The upper vertical meridian is in the depth of POM. The representation of the central visual field is not magnified relative to that of the periphery. The central visual field (below 20-30 degrees of eccentricity) is represented in the medial-most aspect of the annectant gyrus, in the lateral part of the posterior bank of POS. The visuotopic organization of area V6 suggests a role in the analysis of the flow field resulting from self-motion, in selecting targets during visual searching as well as in the control of arm-reaching movements towards non-foveated targets.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Superior area 6 afferents from the superior parietal lobule in the macaque monkey.

Superior area 6 of the macaque monkey frontal cortex is formed by two cytoarchitectonic areas: F2 and F7. In the present experiment, we studied the input from the superior parietal lobule (SPL) to these areas by injecting retrograde neural tracers into restricted parts of F2 and F7. Additional injections of retrograde tracers were made into the spinal cord to define the origin of corticospinal projections from the SPL. The results are as follows: 1) The part of F2 located around the superior precentral dimple (F2 dimple region) receives its main input from areas PEc and PEip (PE intraparietal, the rostral part of area PEa of Pandya and Seltzer, [1982] J. Comp. Neurol. 204:196-210). Area PEip was defined as that part of area PEa that is the source of corticospinal projections. 2) The ventrorostral part of F2 is the target of strong projections from the medial intraparietal area (area MIP) and from the dorsal part of the anterior wall of the parietooccipital sulcus (area V6A). 3) The ventral and caudal parts of F7 receive their main parietal input from the cytoarchitectonic area PGm of the SPL and from the posterior cingulate cortex. 4) The dorsorostral part of F7, which is also known as the supplementary eye field, is not a target of the SPL, but it receives mostly afferents from the inferior parietal lobule and from the temporal cortex. It is concluded that at least three separate parietofrontal circuits link the superior parietal lobule with the superior area 6. Considering the functional properties of the areas that form these circuits, it is proposed that the PEc/PEip-F2 dimple region circuit is involved in controlling movements on the basis of somatosensory information, which is the traditional role proposed for the whole dorsal premotor cortex. The two remaining circuits appear to be involved in different aspects of visuomotor transformations.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Arm movement-related neurons in the visual area V6A of the macaque superior parietal lobule.

Area V6A is a cortical visual area located in the posterior face of the superior parietal lobule in the macaque monkey. It contains visual neurons as well as neurons not activated by any kind of visual stimulation. The aim of this study was to look for possible features able to activate these latter neurons. We tested 70 non-visual V6A neurons. Forty-three of them showed an arm movement-related neural discharge due to somatosensory stimulation and/or skeletomotor activity of the upper limbs of the animal. The arm movement-related neural discharge started before the onset of arm movement, often before the earliest electromyographic activity. Thus, although the discharge is probably supported by proprioceptive and tactile inputs it is not fully dependent on them. Arm movement-related neurons of area V6A seem to be well equipped for integrating motor signals related to arm movements with somatosensory signals evoked by those movements. Taking into account also the visual characteristics of V6A neurons, it seems likely that area V6A as a whole is involved in the visual guiding of reaching.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Cortical mechanisms for visual perception of object motion and position in space.

The present review is aimed at analyzing and discussing some of the cortical mechanisms possibly involved in the perception of object motion and object localization in the visual field. A comprehensive approach to these topics would be beyond the scope of this work. The highest priority, therefore, will be given to the cortical machinery involved in these processes, while very little (or nothing at all) will be said on the possible role played by subcortical structures such as the lateral geniculate nucleus and the superior colliculus which, albeit not directly involved in perception, might contribute to it.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Functional demarcation of a border between areas V6 and V6A in the superior parietal gyrus of the macaque monkey.

We have compared physiological data recorded from three alert macaque monkeys with separate observations of local connectivity, to locate and characterize the functional border between two related but distinct visual areas on the caudal face of the superior parietal gyrus. We refer to these areas as V6 and V6A. The occupy almost the entire extent of the anterior bank of the parieto-occipital sulcus, V6A being the more dorsal. These two areas are strongly interconnected. Anatomically, we have defined the border as the point at which labelled axon terminals first adopt a recognizably 'descending' pattern in their laminar characteristics, after injections of wheatgerm agglutinin-horseradish peroxidase into the dorsal half of the gyrus (in presumptive V6A). A similar principle was used to recognize the same border by the pattern of input from area V5, except that in this case the relevant transition in laminar characteristics is that between an 'intermediate' pattern (in V6) and an 'ascending' pattern (in V6A). V6A was found to be distinct from V6 in a number of its physiological properties. Unlike V6, it contains visually unresponsive cells as well as units with craniotopic receptive fields ('real-position' cells), units tuned to very slow stimulus speeds, units with complex visual selectivities and units with activity related to attention. V6A was also found to have a larger mean receptive field size and scatter than V6. By contrast, response properties related to the basic orientation and direction of moving bar stimuli were indistinguishable between V6 and V6A, as was the influence of gaze direction on cell activity in the two areas. Two-dimensional maps of the recording sites allowed reconstruction of the V6/V6A border. For comparison, the anatomical results were rendered on two-dimensional maps of identical format to those used to summarize the physiological data. After normalizing for relative size, the physiological and connectional estimates of the border between V6 and V6A were found to coincide, at least within the range of individual variation between hemispheres. An architectonic map in the same format was also made from a hemisphere stained for myelin and Nissl substance. Area PO, defined by its general density of myelination was not distinct in this material, but several architectural features were traceable and one of these was also found to approximate the V6/V6A border. The particular criteria that distinguish V6 from V6A differ from a recent description of areas PO and POd in the Cebus monkey; we believe it most likely that PO and POd together may correspond to V6.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1995

Eye position influence on the parieto-occipital area PO (V6) of the macaque monkey.

The aim of this work was to study the effect of eye position on the activity of neurons of area PO (V6), a cortical region located in the most posterior part of the superior parietal lobule. Experiments were carried out on three awake macaque monkeys. Animals sat in a primate chair in front of a large screen, and fixated a small spot of light projected in different screen locations while the activity of single neurons was extracellularly recorded. Both visual and non-visual neurons were found. About 48% of visual and 32% of non-visual neurons showed eye position-related activity in total darkness, while in approximately 61% of visual response was modulated by eye position in the orbit. Eye position fields and/or gain fields were different from cell to cell, going from large and quite planar fields up to peak-shaped fields localized in more or less restricted regions of the animal's field of view. The spatial distribution of fixation point locations evoking peak activity in the eye position-sensitive population did not show any evident laterality effect, or significant top/bottom asymmetry. Moreover, the cortical distribution of eye position-sensitive neurons was quite uniform all over the cortical region studied, suggesting the absence of segregation for this property within area PO (V6). In the great majority of visual neurons, the receptive field 'moved' with gaze according to eye displacements, remaining at the same retinotopic coordinates, as is usual for visual neurons. In some cases, the receptive field did not move with gaze, remaining anchored to the same spatial location regardless of eye movements ('real-position cells'). A model is proposed suggesting how eye position-sensitive visual neurons might build up real-position cells in local networks within area PO (V6). The presence in area PO (V6) of real-position cells together with a high percentage of eye position-sensitive neurons, most of them visual in nature, suggests that this cortical area is engaged in the spatial encoding of extrapersonal visual space. Since lesions of the superior parietal lobule in humans produce deficits in visual localization of targets as well as in arm-reaching for them, and taking into account that the monkey's area PO (V6) is reported to be connected with the premotor area 6, we suggest that area PO (V6) supplies the premotor cortex with the visuo-spatial information required for the visual control of arm-reaching movements.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Immunoactivity of pidotimod against episodes of recurrent tonsillitis in childhood.

The therapeutic efficacy of the synthetic immunostimulant pidotimod ((R)-3-[(S)-(5-oxo-2-pyrrolidinyl) carbonyl]-thiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid, PGT/1A, CAS 121808-62-6) was evaluated in a double-blind placebo-controlled study in parallel groups in the management of recurrences in 235 children with recurrent tonsillitis. The ambulant study provided for 15 days of treatment with two oral vials of pidotimod 400 mg or placebo daily, in accordance with a randomisation list, 60 days of treatment with one oral vial of pidotimod 400 mg or placebo daily, and a 90-day follow-up period. The total trial period was 165 days. In addition to evaluating the number of tonsillitis recurrences which occurred during the 75 days of treatment and the 90-day follow-up period, the number of days on which the principal symptoms of the illness were present and on which drugs such as antibiotics or anti-inflammatory agents were used concomitantly, as well as the number of days' absence from school, were analyzed. The findings showed that, taking the treatment phase and the three-month follow-up period together, pidotimod significantly reduces the incidence of inflammatory upper airways episodes. The very low incidence of adverse effects, which was the same as that in the placebo group, confirmed the excellent safety of the product.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed1994

[TNM system: presentation of graphic classification of T laryngeal cancer].

Using the most recent TNM revision as a basic framework to build upon, the Authors set up a graphic representation of the larynx on the basis of data gathered using clinical-instrumental examination. This graph, which allows automatic extrapolation of the degree of T, represents various sites and subsites of the larynx (including the pre-epiglottic area, the retro-cricoid area and the piriform sinus) which are divided by different coloured lines. This simple graphic representation of cancerous tumours, whose various colours indicate tumor extension in depth (data had with CT and RM), allows for automatic T classification of larynx cancer on the basis of T extension as well as on that of the degree of vocal cord impairment. Particularly useful for students in memorizing TNM classification, this graph, furthermore, groves to be a means of facilitating under standing the disease as well as opinion exchange among members of the medical staff. As furthermore proves of utmost value in patient management in that it may be fed into computerized management programmes containing individual patient's records thereby permitting a more rapid classification of the tumor. Moreover, the data easily stored in the programme are readily accessible for eventual statistical elaboration. The Authors conclude with a proposal of the eventual use of a similar graph of other sites in the body which may be adapted in the event of future TNM revisions.

Glottis↗
PubMed1993

Parietal neurons encoding spatial locations in craniotopic coordinates.

The receptive fields of visual neurons are known to be retinotopically arranged, and in awake animals they "move" with gaze, maintaining the same retinotopic location regardless of eye position. Here, we report the existence in the monkey parietal cortex of cells (called "real-position" cells) whose receptive field does not systematically move with gaze. These cells respond to the visual stimulation of the same spatial location regardless of eye position and therefore directly encode visual space in craniotopic instead of retinotopic coordinates.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Functional properties of neurons in area V1 of awake macaque monkeys: peripheral versus central visual field representation.

The region of the striate cortex where the visual field is represented up to 52 degrees from the fovea was explored in awake, behaving monkeys. Extracellular recordings were made from 241 neurons. On the basis of their receptive field position in the visual field, they were subdivided into a central (within 10 degrees from the fovea) and a peripheral (beyond 10 degrees) group. Sensitivity to orientation, length, direction and velocity of movement of conventional light stimuli was tested and compared in the two samples. Besides the well-known increase of receptive field size with eccentricity, gross differences were found only for the sensitivity to the velocity of stimulus movement. The great majority of neurons in the central sample preferred slow velocities and showed no sensitivity to velocities above 100 degrees/sec. In contrast, many peripheral neurons were poorly sensitive to slow speeds of movement and well responsive to high velocities, above 100 degrees/sec. Cells that showed a better response to an actual stimulus movement in the visual field than to a retinal image movement self-induced by an eye-movement ("real-motion" cells) were also searched for in the two samples. They were found in the 13% of the central neurons and in the 25% of the peripheral neurons. Present data extend to the awake, behaving animal what already known from paralysed animal, indicating that in physiological conditions central and peripheral vision have a different functional role in the analysis of motion within the visual field.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Parietal neurons encoding visual space in a head-frame of reference.

Neurons of the visual system are known to have receptive fields organized in retinotopic coordinates. We wanted to test whether visual neurons existed whose receptive fields were organized in spatial coordinates. Extracellular recordings from single cells were carried out in one area of the posterior parietal cortex (area V6) of a behaving macaque monkey. Among a great majority of retinotopically organized visual cells, neurons whose visual receptive field did not shift with gaze were also found. These cells responded to the visual stimulation of the same spatial position independently of the animal's direction of gaze, that is, their receptive field was anchored to an absolute spatial location. We suggest that these neurons directly encode visual space and are involved in programming visually-guided motor actions in space.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

[Pressure changes in the middle ear during nitrous oxide anesthesia].

We studied middle ear pressure variations in 17 patients with mild upper airways or middle ear diseases, during nitrous oxide anaesthesia. We observed a significant increase in middle ear pressure during the administration of nitrous oxide, and a significant decrease after nitrous oxide was discontinued. Nine patients showed periodical reductions of the middle ear pressure during the inhalation of nitrous oxide, due to passive openings of the eustachian tube. In the remaining 8 patients (47%) this mechanism has not been effective. A comparison between these two groups shows significantly higher levels of middle ear pressure in the group of patients with abnormal function of the eustachian tube, both during and after the administration of nitrous oxide. Our results demonstrate that patients with mild upper airways or middle ear diseases are likely to show an impaired tubal function. Therefore, nitrous oxide should be used with caution in the presence of such diseases. Moreover, nitrous oxide is generally controindicated in middle ear surgery, as the pressure gradients between middle and external ear can jeopardize the success of the operation.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

'Real-motion' cells in area V3A of macaque visual cortex.

The stability of visual perception despite eye movements suggests the existence, in the visual system, of neural elements able to recognize whether a movement of an image occurring in a particular part of the retina is the consequence of an actual movement that occurred in the visual field, or self-induced by an ocular movement while the object was still in the field of view. Recordings from single neurons in area V3A of awake macaque monkeys were made to check the existence of such a type of neurons (called 'real-motion' cells; see Galletti et al. 1984, 1988) in this prestriate area of the visual cortex. A total of 119 neurons were recorded from area V3A. They were highly sensitive to the orientation of the visual stimuli, being on average more sensitive than V1 and V2 neurons. Almost all of them were sensitive to a large range of velocities of stimulus movement and about one half to the direction of it. In order to assess whether they gave different responses to the movement of a stimulus and to that of its retinal image alone (self-induced by an eye movement while the stimulus was still), a comparison was made between neuronal responses obtained when a moving stimulus swept a stationary receptive field (during steady fixation) and when a moving receptive field swept a stationary stimulus (during tracking eye movement). The receptive field stimulation at retinal level was physically the same in both cases, but only in the first was there actual movement of the visual stimulus. Control trials, where the monkeys performed tracking eye movements without any intentional receptive field stimulation, were also carried out. For a number of neurons, the test was repeated in darkness and against a textured visual background. Eighty-seven neurons were fully studied to assess whether they were real-motion cells. About 48% of them (42/87) showed significant differences between responses to stimulus versus eye movement. The great majority of these cells (36/42) were real-motion cells, in that they showed a weaker response to visual stimulation during tracking than to the actual stimulus movement during steady fixation. On average, the reduction in visual response during eye movement was 64.0 +/- 15.7% (SD).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Gaze-dependent visual neurons in area V3A of monkey prestriate cortex.

Extracellular recordings from single neurons of the prestriate area V3A were carried out in awake, behaving monkeys, to test the influence of the direction of gaze on cellular activity. The responsiveness to visual stimulation of about half of the studied neurons (88/187) was influenced by the animal's direction of gaze: physically identical visual stimuli delivered to identical retinotopic positions (on the receptive field) evoked different responses, depending upon the direction of gaze. Control experiments discount the possibility that the observed phenomenon was due to changes in visual background or in depth, depending on the direction in which the animal was looking. The gaze effect modulated cell excitability with different strengths for different gaze directions. The majority of these neurons were more responsive when the animal looked contralaterally with respect to the hemisphere they were recorded from. Gaze-dependent neurons seem to be segregated in restricted cortical regions, within area V3A, without mixing with non-gaze-dependent cells of the same cortical area. The most reliable differences between V3A gaze-dependent neurons and the same type of cells previously described in area 7a (Andersen and Mountcastle, 1983) concern the small receptive field size, the laterality of gaze effect, and the lack of straight-ahead facilitated or inhibited neurons in area V3A. Since the present results show that V3A gaze-dependent neurons combine information about the position of the eye in the orbit with that of a restricted retinal locus (their receptive field), we suggest that they might directly encode spatial locations of the animal's field of view in a head frame of reference. These cells might be involved in the construction of an internal map of the visual environment in which the topographical position of the objects reflects their objective position in space instead of reflecting the retinotopic position of their images. Such an objective map of the visual world might allow the stability of visual perception despite eye movement.

Animals↗