PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C H Brunia

Publications and source records attributed to C H Brunia.

74 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Surface EMG and Achilles tendon reflexes during a foot movement in a reaction time task.

A forewarned simple visual reaction time (RT) experiment was conducted to study the relation between surface EMG of the soleus muscle and Achilles tendon reflex amplitudes during the initiation of a voluntary plantar flexion of the right foot. In two conditions the tension of the response-involved soleus muscle was manipulated: (1) gradual isometric contraction towards the end of the foreperiod (FP) and (2) complete relaxation during the FP. Gradual contraction of the involved soleus muscle produced faster RTs. It was found in both conditions that reflex amplitudes and EMG of the involved soleus muscle were equally informative about the growing motor excitation during the execution of the response. In the tension condition reflex amplitudes in the involved leg were smaller than the reflex amplitudes in the non-involved leg prior to the initiation of the movement, 0-50 msec after the expiration of the FP. The EMG, however, showed a reversed involved/non-involved difference in this condition. In the relaxation condition, neither the EMG nor the reflex amplitudes showed a significant involved/non-involved difference. It was concluded from these results that changes in Achilles tendon reflex amplitudes should only cautiously be interpreted as an indication of motor preparation.

Achilles Tendon↗

Event-related potential correlates of non-motor anticipation.

A slow negative shift called "stimulus-preceding negativity" (SPN) has been observed preceding feedback. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether the SPN is related to perceptual or conceptual anticipation. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in an S1-S2-S3 sequence with intervals of 3 s. S1 was an auditory warning signal; the task stimulus presented at S2 consisted of two digits on which subjects (n = 8) performed an arithmetic task. They had to match their solution with a probe stimulus presented at S3. Perceptual anticipation was manipulated by varying the discriminability of S2 (intact vs. degraded). Conceptual anticipation was manipulated by varying the amount of information processing required at S2 (easy vs. difficult arithmetic). Motor preparation was varied by requiring a speeded versus a delayed response. No negativity was found before the task stimulus (S2), whereas the probe stimulus (S3) was always preceded by a negative shift. The amplitude of this negative shift was larger under the speed than under the delayed instruction. Its amplitude showed a left-hemisphere preponderance and was larger for the difficult than for the easy condition. ERPs preceding task stimuli seem to reflect functionally different processes from ERPs preceding probe and feedback stimuli. The difference is explained in terms of motivational factors that come into play with feedback and probably play a role in the anticipation of the probe stimulus.

Acoustic Stimulation↗