Biomedical subjects

C H Chesnut

Publications and source records attributed to C H Chesnut.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1997

Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen monitors therapeutic effect and predicts response of bone mineral density.

PURPOSE: To assess the ability of the urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) to monitor and predict therapeutic effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To assess the relationship between baseline or change in NTx (predictive variable), and change in lumbar and hip bone mineral density (BMD; outcome variable), we conducted a 2-year randomized controlled study at academic university and private practice medical centers in 236 healthy women 1 to 3 years postmenopausal; 227 women completed the study. Women received estrogen plus progesterone plus calcium (treated group) or calcium alone (control group). RESULTS: In the treated group NTx significantly (P < 0.0001) decreased, and spine and hip BMD significantly (P < 0.00001 and P < 0.005, respectively) increased; in the control group NTx did not change but BMD decreased significantly (P < 0.01). Subjects in the highest quartiles for baseline NTx (67 to 188 units) or decreasing NTx (-66% to -87%) through 6 months demonstrated the greatest gain in BMD in response to HRT (P < 0.05 and P < 0.005). For every increase of 30 units in baseline NTx the odds of gain in BMD in response to HRT increased by a factor of 5.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9 to 13.3); for every 30% decrease in NTx through 6 months, the odds of gaining BMD in response to HRT increased by a factor of 2.6 (95% CI 1.6 to 4.4). In the control group an increase of 30 units in mean NTx across the study indicated a higher odds of losing BMD by a factor of 3.2 (95% CI 1.6 to 6.5). A high baseline NTx (> 67 units) indicated a 17.3 times higher risk of BMD loss if not treated with HRT. CONCLUSION: These data support the clinical utility of NTx to monitor the antiresorptive effect of HRT in recently postmenopausal women, and to predict changes in BMD in response to HRT.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed1997

Increments in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and hip and suppression of bone turnover are maintained after discontinuation of alendronate in postmenopausal women.

PURPOSE: Previously we have reported a significant increase in bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and the hip and reductions in biochemical indices of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with alendronate at various doses over 1 to 2 years. We have followed BMD and biochemical parameters in these patients for 1 or 2 years after discontinuation of alendronate to determine resolution of alendronate effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants received daily oral doses of placebo, 5 or 10 mg of alendronate for 2 years, or 20 or 40 mg of alendronate for 1 year followed by 1 year of placebo. No treatment was given in the third year of study. RESULTS: Lumbar spine BMD changes in the 5- and 10-mg groups (-1.4 and -0.4%) were similar to those in the placebo group (-1.2%) 1 year after discontinuation of drug and lumbar spine BMD changes in the 20- and 40-mg groups (-1.2% and 0.8%) were similar to those in the placebo group (-0.9%) 2 years after discontinuation of drug. BMD of the total hip followed the same pattern of resolution. The difference in BMD between alendronate and placebo groups at the end of alendronate treatment was maintained up to 2 years. Residual reductions in the bone resorption markers urinary deoxypyridinoline (D-Pyr) and collagen type 1 cross-linked N telopeptides and the bone formation markers serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin remained for 1 year after discontinuation of 5 and 10 mg of alendronate and for 2 years after discontinuation of 20 and 40 mg of alendronate, other than return of D-Pyr to baseline 1 year after cessation of treatment with the 5- and 10-mg doses. CONCLUSIONS: A residual decrease in bone turnover may be found up to 2 years after discontinuation of alendronate. Accelerated bone loss is not observed when treatment is discontinued. However, continuous therapy with alendronate is required to achieve a continuous gain in BMD.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Cyclical etidronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: efficacy and safety after seven years of treatment.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of cyclical etidronate for up to 7 years in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and to examine the effects of discontinuing treatment after 2 or 5 years of therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized at entry into the original study in 1986 to blinded treatment for 2 years with either a calcium (placebo) or an intermittent cyclical etidronate regimen, which most patients continued for a third year. Following this phase of the study, patients were enrolled into an open-label, follow-up study (years 4 and 5), during which all patients received cyclical etidronate treatment. In the present double-blind study (years 6 and 7), patients were rerandomized to receive intermittent cyclical therapy with either etidronate or placebo; all patients received calcium. The treatment regimen consisted of 400 mg/day etidronate or placebo for 14 days, followed by 76 days of elemental calcium (500 mg/day); this cycle was repeated approximately 4 times in each year. Of the 193 patients who continued in years 6 and 7 of the study, 93 were randomized to receive cyclical etidronate and 100 were randomized to receive calcium only. For purposes of efficacy analyses, patients were categorized by their total years of cumulative etidronate treatment (7, 5, 4, or 2 years). There were 51, 46, 42, and 54 patients in the 7-, 5-, 4-, and 2-year groups, respectively. Annual assessments included lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), as measured by densitometry, and vertebral radiographs. RESULTS: The groups receiving cyclical etidronate during this 2-year study period (7- and 4-year groups) had statistically significant mean percent increases in spinal BMD of 1.8% and 2.2%, respectively (P < 0.05) at the week 104 observation time. The 5- and 2-year groups, which did not receive etidronate during this period, had mean values of 1.4% and 0.2%, respectively (not significant) at week 104. In the 7-, 5-, 4-, and 2-year groups, the increases in spinal BMD at the end of 7 years were 7.6%, 8.6%, 8.1%, and 3.9%, respectively; these values were statistically significant for all groups compared with original baseline (year 0) (P < 0.05). BMD of the femur and wrist was maintained throughout the 7-year period. The incidence and rate of vertebral fractures were lowest in patients with the longest exposure to etidronate. Etidronate was well tolerated during the study, with low incidences of gastrointestinal side effects and nonvertebral fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term cyclical etidronate is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone mass is maintained for at least 2 years after treatment with etidronate is stopped; however, further gains in spinal bone mass are seen in patients who continue therapy.

Aged↗

PubMed1997

The predictive value of biochemical markers of bone turnover for bone mineral density in early postmenopausal women treated with hormone replacement or calcium supplementation.

To compare the relative sensitivity and specificity of bone turnover indexes for bone loss or gain in early postmenopausal women, we performed a multicenter trial in 236 menopausal women (mean age, 51 yr), who were randomized to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or calcium supplementation (CS; 500 mg/day) for 1 yr. Two markers of bone formation, osteocalcin (OC) and bone alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), and two markers of bone resorption, urinary N-telopeptide (NTx) and urinary free deoxypyridinoline (fDpd), as well as spine and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) were measured at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. Women receiving HRT (n = 105) showed a significant increase in spine BMD (+2.5%; P < 0.0001) and hip BMD (+1.0%; P = 0.02) compared to women receiving CS, who showed a decline at both sites (-1.1%; P < 0.01). All four markers showed time-dependent decreases in women receiving HRT (P < 0.001) and no change in women receiving CS alone. When baseline indexes of turnover were stratified by quartile, there was a significantly greater increase in BMD among those with the highest NTx, OC, and BSAP levels compared to that in those with the lowest NTx, OC, and BSAP levels (P < 0.05). The highest quartile for percent change from baseline to 6 months in fDpd, BSAP, and NTx was also associated with the greatest change in spine BMD at 1 yr. Receiver operator characteristic curves for percent change from baseline to 6 months in an individual marker to 1 yr change in BMD during HRT revealed that the percent change in NTx provided the greatest discrimination between gain and loss of BMD. When subjects receiving HRT were compared by their positive or negative skeletal response at 1 yr and their baseline turnover marker, initial NTx values were significantly higher in those that gained bone than in those that lost bone (P = 0.0002). CS women in the highest quartile for NTx at baseline had significantly greater decreases in spine BMD than subjects with the lowest NTx values (P < 0.005), although this was not true for fDpd (P < 0.20). In conclusion, for early postmenopausal women there are differential responses of biochemical markers to HRT and CS. Baseline urinary NTx and serum OC were the most sensitive predictors of change in spine BMD after 1 yr of either HRT or CS. Similarly, the percent change in NTx and OC from baseline to 6 months best predicted bone gain or loss. We conclude that markers of bone formation and resorption can be used clinically to predict future BMD in early postmenopausal women.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Fractures attributable to osteoporosis: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation.

To assess the cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent osteoporosis, it is necessary to estimate total health care expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures. Resources utilized for the treatment of many diseases can be estimated from secondary databases using relevant diagnosis codes, but such codes do not indicate which fractures are osteoporotic in nature. Therefore, a panel of experts was convened to make judgments about the probabilities that fractures of different types might be related to osteoporosis according to patient age, gender, and race. A three-round Delphi process was applied to estimate the proportion of fractures related to osteoporosis (i.e., the osteoporosis attribution probabilities) in 72 categories comprised of four specific fracture types (hip, spine, forearm, all other sites combined) stratified by three age groups (45-64 years, 65-84 years, 85 years and older), three racial groups (white, black, all others), and both genders (female, male). It was estimated that at least 90% of all hip and spine fractures among elderly white women should be attributed to osteoporosis. Much smaller proportions of the other fractures were attributed to osteoporosis. Regardless of fracture type, attribution probabilities were less for men than women and generally less for non-whites than whites. These probabilities will be used to estimate the total direct medical costs associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Bone density at multiple skeletal sites in amenorrheic athletes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a generalized loss of bone mass at multiple skeletal sites in amenorrheic athletes compared with a group of eumenorrheic athletes. DESIGN: A case-control study examining the differences in bone mineral density (BMD) between amenorrheic and eumenorrheic athletes. SETTING: Seattle, Wash, and surrounding communities. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-nine athletes, aged 17 to 39 years, were selected from those responding to advertisements in local sporting-goods stores and a track-and-field newsletter. Athletes were defined as amenorrheic if they had had fewer than 2 menstrual cycles in the last 12 months or none in the past 6 months, or eumenorrheic if they had had 10 to 13 cycles in the previous year. Only women who met these criteria, confirmed by tests for estradiol and progesterone levels, were enrolled in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bone mineral density measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: Amenorrheic athletes had significantly lower BMD (P < .01) at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, trochanter, Ward triangle, intertrochanteric region, femoral shaft, and tibia. No difference was noted at the fibula. Body weight combined with months of amenorrhea and age of menarche predicted the BMD of the lumbar spine for amenorrheic athletes. Duration of amenorrhea and body weight of amenorrheic athletes predicted BMD at the femoral neck, trochanter, intertrochanteric region, and tibia. Weight alone predicted BMD at the femoral shaft and tibia. Age plus weight predicted lumbar BMD of eumenorrheic women. CONCLUSION: Extended periods of amenorrhea may result in low bone density at multiple skeletal sites including those subjected to impact loading during exercise.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed1996

Urinary N-telopeptides to monitor bone resorption while on GnRH agonist therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the utility of urinary cross-linked N-telopeptides in monitoring bone resorption and predicting bone loss during GnRH agonist administration. METHODS: Ninety patients who were prescribed GnRH agonist therapy for 3-6 months for treatment of endometriosis, leiomyomas or other gynecologic disorders participated in this prospective multicenter study. N-telopeptides, serum estradiol (E2), and bone mineral density were monitored before, during and up to 3 months after the course of GnRH agonist therapy. RESULTS: N-telopeptide levels increased significantly throughout GnRH agonist therapy and returned to baseline levels by 3 months after treatment was completed. A significant negative correlation was seen between N-telopeptide and E2 measurements after 3 months (r=-0.23, P<.05), 4 months (r=-0.32, P < .05), and 5 months (r=-0.41, P<.005) of GnRH agonist therapy. The percent change in bone mineral density at L1-L4 at 6 months of GnRH agonist treatment correlated inversely with the percent change in N-telopeptides from baseline to 2,3,4, and 5 months of treatment; the percent change of bone mineral density at the femoral neck at 6 months correlated inversely with the percent change of N-telopeptides from baseline to month 4. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary N-telopeptide determinations provide a quantitative measure of bone resorption, due to GnRH agonist-induced hypoestrogenism. Increases in resorption as measured by N-telopeptides parallel decreases in in E2 levels. Increases in N-telopeptides on GnRH agonist therapy may provide a tool to predict decreases in bone mineral density.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Bone density loss during treatment of chronic GVHD.

Nine adult patients 31-47 (median 39) years of age treated with prednisone and cyclosporin A (CsA) for chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were evaluated for biochemical factors associated with skeletal turnover at initiation of immunosuppressive therapy (3 months after marrow transplant) and 9 months later (follow-up). Absorptiometry studies of the wrist and lumbar spine were also performed. Serum levels of 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol (1,25(OH)2D) were decreased at enrollment, particularly in the six males. Values for all nine patients remained low at follow-up. Levels of serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25(OH)D), parathyroid hormone, and ionized calcium were normal at enrollment and follow-up. Mean urine hydroxyproline and calcium levels were elevated at enrollment, suggesting increased bone resorption; the mean values decreased to the high normal range at follow-up. Urine magnesium excretion was elevated in eight of nine patients at baseline and remained elevated at follow-up in three of eight evaluable patients. Single and dual photon absorptiometry of the wrist and spine, respectively, and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine, were utilized to evaluate bone mineral density over time. The precision of these tests was, respectively, +/- 3.5%, +/- 3.1% and +/- 1.0%. Results showed a significant ( > 2.5 times the precision) decrease over 9 months in bone mineral density in three of five evaluable males and all three females. The findings indicate increased collagen and bone turnover, increased urinary magnesium and calcium excretion and a significant risk of osteoporosis in patients receiving treatment for chronic GVHD. Preventive measures, including gonadal hormone replacement in females, should be initiated early after transplantation. Further studies are needed to identify patients at highest risk of bone loss and to monitor the effects of preventive therapy.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed1995

Ultrasound velocity, through bone predicts incident vertebral deformity.

We followed 130 postmenopausal women without evidence of vertebral deformity by lateral spine radiographs on entry into study for 2 years, and repeat spine radiographs were taken at the end of that time. Incident deformities occurring within this 2 year period were detected by two methods, a level-specific radiogrammetric approach and visual inspection by skilled clinicians. Fourteen incident deformities were detected by the radiogrammetric method, and 19 by the clinicians. Ultrasound transmission velocity was measured at the patella in each subject on entry. Values for ultrasound velocity were significantly correlated with incident fracture occurrence, with individuals having velocity values more than one standard deviation below the mean for the group exhibiting from 3.3 to 4.6 times the probability of incident fracture as individuals with velocity values more than one standard deviation above the mean. Thus, low values for ultrasound transmission velocity at the patella detect yet-unexpressed bony fragility at the spine and predict future fracture.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Tiludronate: development as an osteoporosis therapy.

The clinical development of tiludronate (tiludronic acid, disodium salt) for the treatment of Paget's disease of bone is now being complemented by another clinical trials program to investigate its use in osteoporosis. It is expected that osteoporosis will become a major indication for tiludronate, and this paper describes the trial design and treatment goals that will be employed in these new studies. In studies to assess the incidence of fracture, the primary efficacy end point is the occurrence of vertebral fractures after 3 years of therapy. Secondary end-points include changes in lumbar bone mineral density, spinal deformity index, and height. Changes in biochemical markers and quality of life will also be assessed. Safety evaluations include clinical laboratory parameters, adverse events and, in selected patients, histomorphometry of the iliac crest bone. For the nonfracture studies, the primary efficacy end-point is the effect on bone mineral density after 2 years of therapy. Secondary end-points include vertebral fracture rate, spinal deformity index, and height. Biochemical markers, quality of life, and safety (including bone biopsies in selected patients) will be evaluated as in the fracture studies. The studies are expected to be completed in early 1997, followed by worldwide regulatory applications in late 1997.

Animals↗

PubMed1995

Alendronate treatment of the postmenopausal osteoporotic woman: effect of multiple dosages on bone mass and bone remodeling.

BACKGROUND: The effects of the aminobisphosphonate alendronate sodium on bone mass and markers of bone remodeling were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-year study, 188 postmenopausal women, aged 42 to 75 years, with low bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 daily treatment groups: placebo for 2 years, alendronate 5 or 10 mg for 2 years, alendronate 20 or 40 mg for 1 year followed by placebo for 1 year, or alendronate 40 mg for 3 months followed by 2.5 mg for 21 months. All subjects were given 500 mg/d of elemental calcium as calcium carbonate. RESULTS: At each dose, alendronate produced significant reductions in markers of bone resorption and formation, and significantly increased bone mass at the lumbar spine, hip, and total body, as compared with decreases (significant at lumbar spine) in subjects receiving placebo. In the 10-mg group, mean urinary deoxypyridinoline/creatinine had declined by 47% at 3 months, and mean serum osteocalcin by 53% at 6 months. Mean changes in BMD over 24 months with 10 mg alendronate were +7.21% +/- 0.49% for the lumbar spine, +5.27% +/- 0.70% for total hip, and +2.53% +/- 0.68% for total body (each P < 0.01) compared to changes of -1.35% +/- 0.61%, -1.20% +/- 0.64% and -0.31% +/- 0.44% at these sites, respectively, with placebo treatment. Progressive increases in BMD of both lumbar spine and total hip were observed in the second year of treatment with 10 mg alendronate (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Alendronate, a potent inhibitor of bone resorption, reduces markers of bone remodeling and significantly increases BMD at the lumbar spine, hip, and total body, and is well tolerated at therapeutic doses (5 or 10 mg daily) in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Monitoring bone resorption in early postmenopausal women by an immunoassay for cross-linked collagen peptides in urine.

A new immunoassay using an ELISA approach for measuring urinary excretion of cross-linked N-telopeptides of type 1 collagen was evaluated as a specific measure of bone resorption. The assay was applied to 65 early postmenopausal women who participated in a placebo-controlled trial of the aminobisphosphonate, alendronate sodium. Eight blood and urine samples were collected over a 9 month interval. Baseline cross-linked peptide excretion varied from 26 to 216 pmol BCE (bone collagen/mumol Cr. Within-subject variability (CV) for cross-linked peptide excretion was 20.2% over the 9 months in placebo-treated subjects, substantially less than that observed for other biochemical markers of bone resorption: 45, 53, and 63% for fasting urinary calcium and hydroxyproline and 24 h urinary lysylpyridinoline (HPLC assay), respectively. Baseline cross-linked peptide excretion correlated significantly (p < 0.001) with baseline total urine lysylpyridinoline and serum osteocalcin, but not with the other biochemical markers. Initial peptide excretion also correlated inversely with lumbar spine bone mineral density at entry (r = -0.26, p < 0.05). Treatment for 6 weeks with alendronate produced a dose-dependent suppression of cross-linked peptide excretion (0 +/- 8, 29 +/- 6, 56 +/- 5, and 64 +/- 3% for 0, 5, 20, and 40 mg, respectively, p < 0.01 versus placebo for treatment effect), with a return toward pretreatment values during follow-up. Measurement of the urinary cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen by this new ELISA approach appears promising as a simple and reliable method to assess overall bone resorption.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Alendronate↗

PubMed1993

Bone mass and exercise.

The overall role of exercise as an integral part of osteoporosis prevention and treatment remains unclear and controversial. Comparatively well accepted are the facts that disuse results in bone mass loss, that sedentary individuals in general have less bone mass than exercising individuals (from cross-sectional study data), that exercise may produce a modest increase in bone mass (from longitudinal study data), and that exercise cannot compensate for estrogen loss. However, numerous questions regarding exercise and the skeleton remain to be answered, such as how the apparent osteogenic effect of exercise is mediated, what is the relationship of exercise in reducing fractures, how to reconcile the discrepancy between exercise-induced bone mass gain (lesser) and disuse bone loss (greater). At present, it seems reasonable to recommend avoidance of a sedentary existence, and participation in a moderate exercise program, for individuals seeking to prevent or treat osteoporosis, recognizing that much of the benefit may be in the resultant increase in muscle strength, in coordination, and in flexibility associated with such a program.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1993

Site of bone density measurement may affect therapy decision.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at the lumbar spine and femoral neck provided comparable information to women planning to use that knowledge to help them make a decision about hormone replacement therapy. Eighty-eight healthy Caucasian women, aged 44-59 and within 0 to 5 years of menopause, participated in the study. BMD measurements were performed at the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and the femoral neck by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Criteria suggested by the National Osteoporosis Foundation were used to categorize women as "at risk" for osteoporosis, bone density more than one standard deviation (SD) below the young adult mean, or as "low risk", bone density at or above this level. The results indicated that 46 women would be classified into the low risk category on the basis of spinal BMD alone. However, 28 of these 46 women would fall into the at risk category when the femoral neck BMD was measured. Sixty-one percent of women informed they were at low risk on the basis of spinal BMD would be considered at risk based on femoral neck BMD. When femoral neck BMD was used as the primary risk indicator, 14% of the women classified as low risk would be at risk if spinal BMD were added. These results suggest that both lumbar spine and proximal femur measurements should be made when women are using bone density measurements as an aid in deciding whether or not to use hormone therapy in their postmenopausal years.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed1993

Short-term effect of alendronate on bone mass and bone remodeling in postmenopausal women.

The short-term dose-response relationship between treatment with the bisphosphonate alendronate, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and changes in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) over 9 months was assessed using a double-masked controlled study design in 65 postmenopausal women (mean age 51.6 years, mean 1.5 years since last menses) receiving 5, 20, 40 mg of alendronate or placebo for 6 weeks. After 6 weeks of alendronate, serum calcium phosphate and osteocalcin decreased, and intact parathyroid hormone increased significantly in dose-dependent fashions in the alendronate-treated groups (T) compared with placebo (P). Generally similar changes (decreases) were noted in 24-h urinary calcium and pyridinoline (deoxy- and hydroxylysl pyridoline); by 30 weeks post-treatment no significant changes from baseline or between T and P were noted. Lumbar BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry demonstrated a dose-dependent response over 9 months (median % change +/- SD: -1.2 +/- 0.9 for 5 mg T, +0.7 +/- 0.8 for 20 mg T*, +1.2 +/- 1.1 for 40 mg T*;*p < 0.01 vs P). Alendronate was generally well tolerated over all dosages. These data demonstrate that short-term (6 weeks) oral alendronate treatment (5-40 mg daily) is well tolerated and effective in (reversibly) decreasing biochemical markers of bone turnover in early postmenopausal women, and in stabilizing spinal BMD over 9 months. Longer-term treatment with larger clinical populations is indicated to define more fully the potential efficacy and safety of chronic alendronate therapy.

Alendronate↗

PubMed1993

Four-year study of intermittent cyclic etidronate treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: three years of blinded therapy followed by one year of open therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of long-term intermittent cyclic etidronate treatment on spinal bone density and vertebral fracture rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal osteoporotic women (n = 423) were randomized initially into a 2-year, double-blind, multicenter study; it was extended to a third year of blinded treatment followed by open-label treatment: 357 patients continued treatment in Year 3 (305 receiving blinded therapy and 52 receiving calcium supplementation) and 277 in Year 4. During Years 1 through 3, patients received double-blind treatment with phosphate (1.0 g) or placebo twice daily for 3 days, etidronate (400 mg) or placebo daily for 14 days, and calcium (500 mg) daily for the remainder of each 91-day treatment cycle. During Year 4, open-label intermittent cyclic etidronate therapy (without preceding phosphate) was administered to all patients. Spinal bone density and vertebral fracture rates were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: During Year 3, etidronate therapy maintained the significant increases in spinal bone mineral density of the first 2 years. Over the 3-year period, proximal femur bone density increased in etidronate-treated patients. Etidronate therapy for 3 years significantly decreased the vertebral fracture rate in patients at higher risk for fracture (low spinal bone density and three or more vertebral fractures at study entry), as compared with nonetidronate treatment (228 versus 412 fractures per 1,000 patient-years, respectively; p < 0.05). After 1 year of open-label treatment, patients previously treated with etidronate maintained bone mass, and vertebral fracture rates in all groups were lower than in any other study period. There were no apparent serious adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Three years of intermittent cyclic etidronate therapy produced significant increases in spinal and hip bone density, with a significant reduction in vertebral fracture rates in patients at higher fracture risk. Maintenance of bone mass and low fracture rate were observed when etidronate was continued for an additional year.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1993

The effect of short term treatment with alendronate on vertebral density and biochemical markers of bone remodeling in early postmenopausal women.

The effects of oral alendronate treatment on spinal bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover were assessed in women in the early postmenopausal period. Sixty-five women were treated with placebo or 5, 20, or 40 mg alendronate daily for 6 weeks in a double blind study. Treatment with alendronate decreased both urinary markers of bone resorption (pyridinolines, hydroxyproline, and calcium) and serum markers of bone formation (osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase) in a dose-dependent fashion. This short term treatment with alendronate also produced a dose-dependent increase in lumbar bone mineral density measured 7.5 months after the completion of therapy. Median percent changes in integral spinal bone mineral density, as assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry, were -2.3, -1.2, +0.7, and +1.2 after treatment with placebo and 5, 20, and 40 mg alendronate, respectively. Treatment with alendronate was well tolerated and produced no fever; gastrointestinal intolerance was no more common than with placebo treatment. Short term alendronate treatment in early postmenopausal women decreased bone turnover and increased vertebral density.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Systemic osteoporosis and oral bone loss: evidence shows increased risk factors.

Aging is associated with a loss of bone mass and an increased risk of oral and systemic bone loss. Systemic osteoporosis can result in bone fractures, especially of the spine and hip, with the characteristic spinal curvature and loss of height often seen in osteoporotic postmenopausal women. Loss of teeth and ridge resorption can occur in the mouth.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗