PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Hiesse

Publications and source records attributed to C Hiesse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Retrospective follow-up of transplantation of kidneys from 'marginal' donors.

The organ shortage has led to extend the procurement to kidneys from 'marginal' donors. As a result, an increasing number of kidneys are discarded, but an extended analysis of the validity of the clinical decision to accept or decline a marginal graft remains to be determined. We have retrospectively analyzed the outcome of 170 kidney transplantations, performed in eight renal transplantation centers between 1992 and 1998. Study group included transplantation from donors accepted after refusal for poor donor or graft quality by at least two centers. Control group included 170 paired recipients from kidneys unanimously accepted by all centers. Main causes of kidney refusal included impaired donor hemodynamics (28%), abnormal pre-harvesting serum creatinine (22%), advanced age in donors (15%), and donor atheroma (14%). The 5-year patient survival (88.2% in the study group and 88.9% in controls) and graft survival (70.4% in the study group and 76.7% in controls, P=0.129) were not significantly different. Delayed graft function occurred significantly more often in the study group patients than in controls patients (63 vs 32%, P<0.0001). Primary non-functioning kidneys were significantly more frequently observed in study patients than in controls (7.7 vs 1.8%, P=0.01). Mean creatinine clearance was significantly lower in the study group patients compared with controls during the post-transplant course. Our results suggest that these initially discarded kidneys provide satisfactory survival rates despite their impaired early functional recovery and poorer long-term renal function, and therefore might be considered acceptable for transplantation in the context of organ shortage.

Adult↗

Single-center experience with cyclosporine therapy for kidney transplantation: analysis of a twenty-year period in 1200 patients.

Since the introduction of cyclosporine (CyA) in our center in February 1983, 1267 kidney transplant patients have received an immunosuppressive regimen based on CyA, usually in association with azathioprine and steroids and following an induction therapy in three quarters of patients. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze our 20-year experience with CyA and examine the evolution of therapy during this period. Induction treatment has been less commonly used during the past 5 years. Even in the early years of our experience, CyA doses were low (under 6 mg/kg per day at 3 months after transplantation). Acute tubular necrosis was observed in 39.4% of patients. The incidence of acute rejection episodes has dramatically decreased since 1984, but the frequency of steroid-resistant rejection has remained constant (around 20%). The first year of transplantation, 32.7% of patients had arterial hypertension. De novo diabetes mellitus occurred in 2.5% of patients. An incidence of 11.8% of malignancies was observed. Skin cancer and lymphomas accounted for 50% and 12% of neoplasms. Five-year graft and patient survivals were 70% and 87%, respectively. Renal function remained remarkably constant during the first 10 years of follow-up with a mean creatinine of 150 micromol/L. Chronic allograft nephropathy resulted in 43% graft losses. In conclusion, CyA has been well tolerated in our patients. However, the occurrence of chronic allograft nephropathy was a major concern in our cohort.

Adult↗

[Inequalities to the access of renal transplantation for French patients living in the overseas French territories].

This study explored the access to the French national renal transplantation waiting list and the waiting time before transplantation for the patients with ESRD on dialysis living in the FOT. Overseas health authorities gave data on ESRD incidence and prevalence. Data on patients registered between 1997 and 2000 were extracted from the French national waiting list (390 patients from the FOT and 9378 from continental France). Registered prevalence of ESRD in FOT (726 to 1418 per million population (pmp)) were higher than continental France (580 pmp). The yearly incidence of registration on the national French waiting list was 36 pmp. The same figure was observed in the FAT (French Guyana and Caribbean's islands: 36.8 to 43 pmp), very low in New Caledonia and Tahiti (7.7 and 18.1 pmp), and very high in the Reunion Island, where a renal transplantation unit is available (77.5 pmp). Median waiting times before transplantation varied significantly, FAT: 35.4 months, Reunion Island: 9.9 months, Pacific Territories: 8.8 months and the Metropolitan territory: 12.2 months. After adjustment on risk factors known to be associated with the waiting times before transplantation, we still observed a longer waiting time for patients from FAT (RR = 1,4, p < 0.05) and a lower waiting time for patients from Reunion Island (RR = 0.6, p < 0.001) compared to waiting time observed in patients from continental France. Consequently, transplantation teams in FAT must be developed.

France↗

Induction versus noninduction in renal transplant recipients with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of induction treatment with antithymocyte globulins (ATG) followed by tacrolimus therapy with immediate tacrolimus therapy in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: This 12-month, open, prospective study was conducted in 15 centers in France and 1 center in Belgium; 309 patients were randomized to receive either induction therapy with ATG (n=151) followed by initiation of tacrolimus on day 9 or immediate tacrolimus-based triple therapy (n=158). In both study arms, the initial daily tacrolimus dose was 0.2 mg/kg. Steroid boluses were given in the first 2 days and tapered thereafter from 20 mg/day to 5 mg/day. Azathioprine was administered at 1-2 mg/kg per day. RESULTS: At month 12, biopsy-confirmed acute rejections were reported for 15.2% (induction) and 30.4% (noninduction) of patients (P=0.001). The incidence of steroid-sensitive acute rejections was 7.9% (induction) and 22.2% (noninduction)(P=0.001). Steroid-resistant acute rejections were reported for 8.6% (induction) and 8.9% (noninduction) of patients. A total of nine patients died. Patient survival and graft survival at month 12 was similar in both treatment groups (97.4% vs. 96.8% and 92.1% vs. 91.1%, respectively). Statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events were found for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (induction, 32.5% vs. noninduction, 19.0%, P=0.009), leukopenia (37.3% vs. 9.5%, P<0.001), fever (25.2% vs. 10.1%, P=0.001), herpes simplex (17.9% vs. 5.7%, P=0.001), and thrombocytopenia (11.3% vs. 3.2%, P=0.007). In the induction group, serum sickness was observed in 10.6% of patients. The incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus was 3.4% (induction) and 4.5% (noninduction). CONCLUSION: Low incidences of acute rejection were found in both treatment arms. Induction treatment with ATG has the advantage of a lower incidence of acute rejection, but it significantly increases adverse events, particularly CMV infection.

Adult↗

Multicenter trial of one HLA-DR-matched or mismatched blood transfusion prior to cadaveric renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effect of blood transfusions before cadaveric renal transplantation on allograft survival, although previously well documented, has become controversial in light of their adverse effects. Recently, it has been suggested that their clinical benefits are due to HLA-DR sharing between the blood donor and recipient. METHODS: In this prospective study, 144 naive patients were randomly assigned to receive one unit of blood matched for one-HLA-DR antigen (N = 49), or one unit of mismatched blood (N = 48), or to remain untransfused (N = 47). Graft survival and acute rejection rate were analyzed in 106 cadaveric renal allograft recipients receiving the same immunosuppressive protocol. RESULTS: Graft survival was similar in the three groups at one and five years: 91.7 and 80% in untransfused patients, 90.3 and 79.3% in patients transfused with one DR-antigen-matched unit, and 92.3 and 83.7% in patients transfused with HLA-mismatched blood. The difference in the incidence of six-month post-transplant acute rejections was not statistically significant in the three groups: 12 out of 36, 33.3% in nontransfused patients; 6 out of 31, 19.4% in patients transfused with one DR-matched blood; and 13 out of 39, 33.3% in patients transfused with mismatched blood. CONCLUSION: The results of our prospective randomized trial showed that in a population of naive patients, one transfusion mismatched or matched for one HLA-DR antigen given prior to renal transplantation had no significant effect on the incidence and severity of acute rejection, and did not influence overall long-term graft outcome. Considering the potentially deleterious adverse effects of blood transfusions, the costs, and the considerable logistical efforts required to select and type blood donors, such a procedure cannot be recommended in a routine practice for patients awaiting cadaveric kidney transplantation.

Acute Disease↗

Hemolytic uremic syndrome. Recurrence after renal transplantation. Groupe Coopératif de l'Ile-de-France (GCIF).

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is an uncommon cause of end-stage renal failure in adults, and few data are available concerning the outcome of renal transplantation in these patients. We conducted this retrospective multicentric study to appreciate the outcome of adult renal transplant recipients whose primary disease was HUS. Sixteen patients, transplanted between 1975 and 1995, were included in the study. In each case, initial diagnosis of HUS was documented by a kidney biopsy. These 16 patients received a total of 25 allografts: 1 graft for 9 patients, 2 grafts for 5 patients, and 3 grafts for 2 patients. Nine patients (56%) developed definite clinical and pathologic evidence of recurrence on at least 1 graft. Four additional patients (25%) demonstrated only some clinical or pathologic evidence of recurrence which could not be distinguished from acute vascular rejection. Three patients had no sign of recurrence of the initial disease. The 1-year graft survival rate was 63% and the 5-year graft survival rate was 18.5%. In the group of patients with proven or possible recurrence (n = 13), the 1-year and 5-year graft survival rates were 49% and less than 10%, respectively. The recurrence was an early event, occurring before the end of the first month after transplantation in half the cases. The recurrence rate was 92% in non-nephrectomized patients and 50% in patients with bilateral nephrectomy. In the literature, 71 adult patients with primary HUS had received a total of 90 kidney grafts. Among them, 54% had a recurrence on their graft, which was diagnosed in 52% of the kidney transplants. It is note-worthy that when data from the literature are pooled with our results, the rate of recurrence appears to be significantly lower in binephrectomized patients than in patients with their native kidneys at the time of transplantation (5 of 14 versus 27 of 35 patients, respectively, p = 0.0155). By univariate analysis, no other risk factor for recurrence could be identified. Treatment with cyclosporine A did not influence the recurrence rate. We conclude that recurrence of HUS after renal transplantation is a frequent, early, and severe complication, leading rapidly to graft loss. Prospective studies are needed to confirm that bilateral nephrectomy prior to transplantation decreases the rate of recurrence.

Actuarial Analysis↗

Human herpes virus-8 and other risk factors for Kaposi's sarcoma in kidney transplant recipients. Groupe Cooperatif de Transplantation d' Ile de France (GCIF).

BACKGROUND: The exact reasons for the high incidence of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) after kidney transplantation are still unknown. Immunosuppression is classically considered as the main risk factor, but the relative risk contributed by the patient's geographic origin and by human herpes virus (HHV)-8 infection still has to be determined. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective and a prospective study among kidney transplant recipients (TP) to identify the risk factors for posttransplantation KS. Each of 30 KS patients was matched with two controls to investigate the association with geographic origin, immunosuppressive regimen, HHV-8 antibodies before and after transplantation, and other infections. Among TP with new onset of KS, we prospectively evaluated HHV-8 serology and viremia in response to decreased immunosuppression. RESULTS: African and Middle East origins, past infection with hepatitis B, hemoglobin level <12 g/dl, lymphocyte count <750/mm3 at the time of diagnosis and initial use of polyclonal antilymphocyte sera were risk factors for KS. After multivariate analysis, origin in Africa or Middle East and use of antilymphocyte sera for induction remained as independent risk factors. Sixty-eight percent (17/25) of TP with HHV-8 antibodies before or after transplantation developed KS compared with 3% (1/33) of seronegative TP (P<0.00001). HHV-8 DNA was detectable in seven of nine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and in six of six KS lesions at diagnosis; it became negative in PBMC in three of five patients in parallel with tumor regression. CONCLUSION: African and Middle East geographic origins, HHV-8 infection before and after kidney transplantation, and initial use of polyclonal antilymphocyte sera were independent risk factors for KS. The presence of HHV-8 antibodies before or after transplantation was highly predictive of the emergence of posttransplantation KS and conferred a 28-fold increased risk of KS (odds ratio=28.4; 95% confidence interval: 4.9-279). Detection of HHV-8 DNA within PBMC and KS lesions seems related to tumor burden and evolution.

Adult↗