PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Holligan

Publications and source records attributed to C Holligan.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

The functions of phonology in the acquisition of reading: lexical and sentence processing.

It has been claimed (V. Coltheart, Laxon, Rickard, & Elton, 1988) that learners as well as skilled readers use phonology for multiple functions in reading-for-meaning tasks. This claim was examined using lexical decision and sentence evaluation tasks. It was found in the first experiment that the type of instruction learners had received determined whether there was prelexical use of phonology in responding to items out of sentence context. Type of instruction had no effect when the items were in context. In the second experiment, performances on a homophone sentence evaluation task and a homophone semantic decision task, which excluded sentence processing, were examined. The results suggest that phonology served the function of access to lexical meanings in addition to any function in postlexical sentence processing. The obtained relationships between relative frequencies of the presented and unpresented homophone mates and item accuracy on these tasks were inconsistent with exclusive use of "direct access" but consistent with access of lexical meaning via phonology and application of a "spelling-check" procedure when multiple homophonic meanings are activated.

Attention↗

Perceptual dysfunction in poor readers: evidence for visual and auditory segmentation problems in a sub-group of poor readers.

The purpose of this study was to consider reading disorders in children within the context of their general perceptual development. A review of the literature suggested that visual and auditory perceptual skills advance from a holistic to an analytical approach, and that reading skills also show this progression. It was proposed that poor readers might show impairments in visual and auditory segmentation tasks, if these skills are important factors in reading development. This hypothesis was tested on a sample (N = 20) of poor readers in the primary age range who were assessed against reading age and chronological age control groups. The hypothesis was partially borne out, a quarter of the sample performing very poorly on both types of tasks. It was argued that segmentation problems in perceptual tasks may underlie reading failure in some children, although the direction of the causation has yet to be determined.

Auditory Perceptual Disorders↗