Arsenic in drinking water and bladder cancer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to C Hopenhayn-Rich.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Studies in Taiwan have found dose-response relations between arsenic ingestion from drinking water and cancers of the skin, bladder, lung, kidney and liver. To investigate these associations in another population, we conducted a study in Córdoba, Argentina, which has a well-documented history of arsenic exposure from drinking water. METHODS: Mortality from lung, kidney, liver and skin cancers during the period 1986-1991 in Córdoba's 26 counties was investigated, expanding the authors' previous analysis of bladder cancer in the province. Counties were grouped a priori into low, medium and high arsenic exposure categories based on available data. Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated using all of Argentina as the reference population. RESULTS: We found increasing trends for kidney and lung cancer mortality with arsenic exposure, with the following SMR, for men and women respectively: kidney cancer, 0.87, 1.33, 1.57 and 1.00, 1.36, 1.81; lung cancer, 0.92, 1.54, 1.77 and 1.24, 1.34, 2.16 (in all cases, P < 0.001 in trend test), similar to the previously reported bladder cancer results (0.80, 1.28, 2.14 for men, 1.22, 1.39, 1.81 for women). There was a small positive trend for liver cancer but mortality was increased in all three exposure groups. Skin cancer mortality was elevated for women only in the high exposure group, while men showed a puzzling increase in mortality in the low exposure group. CONCLUSIONS: The results add to the evidence that arsenic ingestion increases the risk of lung and kidney cancers. In this study, the association between arsenic and mortality from liver and skin cancers was not clear.
The purpose of this study was to investigate methods for ascertaining arsenic exposure for use in biomarker studies. Urinary arsenic concentration is considered a good measure of recent arsenic exposure and is commonly used to monitor exposure in environmental and occupational settings. However, measurements reflect exposure only in the last few days. To cover longer time periods exposure can be estimated using arsenic intake data, calculated by combining measures of environmental arsenic and inhalation/ingestion rates. We compared these different exposure assessment approaches in a population chronically exposed to arsenic in drinking water in northern Chile. The study group consisted of 232 people, some drinking water low in arsenic (15 micrograms/l) and others drinking water with high arsenic concentrations (up to 670 micrograms/l). First morning urine samples and questionnaire data, including fluid intake information, were collected from all participants. Exfoliated bladder cells were collected from male participants for the bladder cell micronuclei assay. Eight different indices of exposure were generated, six based on urinary arsenic (microgram As/l urine; microgram As/g creatinine; microgram InAs/l urine; microgram MMA/l urine; microgram DMA/l urine; microgram As/h, excreted), and two on fluid intake data (microgram As/day, ingested; microgram As/l fluid ingested-day). The relationship between the different exposure indices was explored using correlation analysis. In men, exposure indices were also related to a biomarker of effect, bladder cell micronuclei. While creatinine-adjusted urinary arsenic concentrations had the strongest correlations with the two intake estimates (r = 0.76, r = 0.81), unadjusted urinary arsenic showed the strongest relationship with bladder cell micronuclei. These data suggest that, in the case of the bladder, unadjusted urinary arsenic concentrations better reflect the effective target organ dose compared to other exposure measures for biomarker studies.
Inorganic arsenic is an established cause of lung and skin cancer. Epidemiological evidence from Taiwan suggests that arsenic causes more fatal internal cancers, with the highest relative risks reported for bladder cancer. We conducted a cross-sectional biomarker study in a Chilean male population chronically exposed to high (70 subjects) and low (55 subjects) arsenic levels in their drinking water (average concentrations, 600 and 15 micrograms As/liter, respectively). A fluorescent version of the exfoliated bladder cell micronucleus (MN) assay was used employing fluorescence in situ hybridization with a centromeric probe to identify the presence (MN+) or absence (MN-) of whole chromosomes within micronuclei, thereby determining the mechanism of arsenic-induced genotoxicity in vivo. We divided the study population into quintiles by urinary arsenic levels and found an exposure-dependent increase in micronucleated cell prevalence in quintiles 2-4 (urinary arsenic, 54-729 micrograms/liter). The largest increase appeared when quintile 4 was compared to quintile 1 [prevalence ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.9-4.6]. The prevalence of MN+ increased to 3.1-fold in quintile 4 (95% CI, 1.4-6.6), and the prevalence of MN-increased to 7.5-fold in quintile 3 (95% CI, 2.8-20.3), suggesting that chromosome breakage was the major cause of MN formation. Prevalences of total MN, MN+, and MN- returned to baseline levels in quintile 5 (urinary arsenic, 729-1894 micrograms/liter), perhaps due to cytostasis or cytotoxicity. These results add additional weight to the hypothesis that ingesting arsenic-contaminated water enhances bladder cancer risk and suggest that arsenic induces genetic damage to bladder cells at drinking water levels close to the current United States Maximum Contaminant Level of 50 micrograms/liter for arsenic.
Epidemiological studies performed in Taiwan, Argentina, and Chile suggest that ingestion of arsenic (As) may cause bladder cancer. Because of these findings, we previously investigated the relationship between As ingestion and genetic damage to the urothelium in two cross-sectional biomarker studies, one in Nevada and one in Chile. In both studies, we found that increased levels of micronucleated cells (MNCs) in exfoliated bladder cells were associated with elevated concentrations of As in drinking water, suggesting that As induces genetic damage to bladder cells. To further investigate this relationship, we conducted an intervention study in a subset of highly exposed men (n = 34) from the cross-sectional study in Chile. Subjects whose usual source of water contained about 600 micrograms/liter As were supplied with water lower in As (45 micrograms/liter) for 8 weeks, allowing ample opportunity for renewal and exfoliation of bladder epithelial cells. Mean urinary As levels decreased during the intervention from 742 to 225 micrograms/liter. Bladder MNC prevalence also decreased from 2.63 MNCs/1000 cells preintervention to 1.79 MNCs/1000 cells postintervention (P < 0.05). When the analysis was limited to individuals previously having subcytotoxic urinary As levels (< 700 micrograms/liter), the change between pre- and postintervention MNC was more pronounced: the level decreased from 3.54 to 1.47 MNCs/1000 cells, respectively (P = 0.002). Among smokers, MNC prevalences decreased from 4.45 MNCs/1000 cells preintervention to 1.44 MNCs/1000 cells postintervention (P = 0.002). Among nonsmokers, the decrease was much smaller: 2.04 MNCs/1000 cells preintervention to 1.90 MNCs/1000 cells postintervention (P = 0.25), suggesting that smoker's bladder cells could be more susceptible to genotoxic damage caused by As. The reduction in bladder MNC prevalence with reduction in As intake provides further evidence that As is genotoxic to bladder cells.
Inorganic arsenic (In-As) is known to be a human carcinogen, causing lung cancer by inhalation and skin cancer by ingestion. Ecologic studies in Taiwan have found a dose-response relation between ingestion of In-As from drinking water and bladder cancer, but questions have been raised concerning the validity and generalizability of the findings. Several areas of Argentina have had high exposures to arsenic from naturally contaminated drinking water, particularly the eastern region of the province of Córdoba. In this study, we investigated bladder cancer mortality for the years 1986-1991 in Córdoba's 26 counties, using rates for all of Argentina as the standard for comparison. Bladder cancer standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were consistently higher in counties with documented arsenic exposure. We grouped counties into low-, medium-, and high-exposure categories; the corresponding SMRs [with 95% confidence intervals (CI)] were 0.80 (95% CI = 0.66-0.96), 1.42 (95% CI = 1.14-1.74), and 2.14 (95% CI = 1.78-2.53) for men, and 1.21 (95% CI = 0.85-1.64), 1.58 (95% CI = 1.01-2.35), and 1.82 (95% CI = 1.19-2.64) for women. The clear trends found in a population with different genetic composition and a high-protein diet support the findings in Taiwan.
Inorganic arsenic (In-As), an occupational and environmental human carcinogen, undergoes biomethylation to monomethylarsonate (MMA) and dimethylarsinate (DMA). It has been proposed that saturation of methylation capacity at high exposure levels may lead to a threshold for the carcinogenicity of In-As. The relative distribution of urinary In-As, MMA, and DMA is used as a measure of human methylation capacity. The most common pathway for elevated environmental exposure to In-As worldwide is through drinking water. We conducted a biomarker study in northern Chile of a population chronically exposed to water naturally contaminated with high arsenic content (600 micrograms/l). In this paper we present the results of a prospective follow-up of 73 exposed individuals, who were provided with water of lower arsenic content (45 micrograms/l) for 2 months. The proportions of In-As, MMA, and DMA in urine were compared before and after intervention, and the effect of other factors on the distribution of arsenic metabolites was also analyzed. The findings of this study indicate that the decrease in arsenic exposure was associated with a small decrease in the percent In-As in urine (from 17.8% to 14.6%) and in the MMA/DMA ratio (from 0.23 to 0.18). Other factors such as smoking, gender, age, years of residence, and ethnicity were associated mainly with changes in the MMA/DMA ratio, with smoking having the strongest effect. Nevertheless, the factors investigated accounted for only about 20% of the large interindividual variability observed. Genetic polymorphisms in As-methylating enzymes and other co-factors are likely to contribute to some of the unexplained variation. The changes observed in the percent In-As and in the MMA/DMA ratio do not support an exposure-based threshold for arsenic methylation in humans.
Methylation is considered the detoxification pathway for inorganic arsenic (InAs), an established human carcinogen. Urinary speciation analysis is used to assess the distribution of metabolites [monomethylarsonate (MMA), dimethylarsinate (DMA), and unmethylated arsenic (InAs)], as indicators of methylation capacity. We conducted a large biomarker study in northern Chile of a population chronically exposed to high levels of arsenic in drinking water. We report the results of the methylation study, which focused on the effects of exposure and other variables on the percent InAs, MMA, DMA, and the ratio of MMA to DMA in urine. The study consisted of 122 people in a town with arsenic water levels around 600 micrograms/l and 98 participants in a neighboring town with arsenic levels in water of about 15 micrograms/l. The corresponding mean urinary arsenic levels were 580 micrograms/l and 60 micrograms/l, of which 18.4% and 14.9% were InAs, respectively. The main differences were found for MMA:DMA; exposure, smoking, and being male were associated with higher MMA:DMA, while longer residence, Atacameño ethnicity, and being female were associated with lower MMA:DMA. Together, these variables explained about 30% of the variability in MMA:DMA. Overall, there was no evidence of a threshold for methylation capacity, even at very high exposures, and the interindividual differences were within a much wider range than those attributed to the variables investigated. The differences in percent InAs were small and within the ranges of other studies of background exposure levels. The biological significance of MMA:DMA, which was more than 1.5 times greater in the exposed group, and its relationship to sex, length of exposure, and ethnicity need further investigation because its relevance to health risk is not clear.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Inorganic arsenic (In-As) is an established human carcinogen. Methylation to monomethylarsonate (MMA) and dimethylarsinate (DMA) is believed to be the detoxification mechanism for In-As. Urinary measurement of In-As, MMA, and DMA is considered a good biological marker of internal dose to In-As, since it excludes other ingested forms of arsenic which are much less toxic, and because urinary excretion is the main form of elimination of In-As. A methylation threshold hypothesis for In-As has been proposed, stating that after exposure to In-As reaches a certain level or threshold, methylation capacity begins to decline, thus increasing the toxic effects of In-As. We investigated the validity of this hypothesis by analyzing the data from studies which measured urinary In-As, MMA, and DMA in different populations, ranging from background to high occupational and environmental exposure groups. We also present data from our study of a highly exposed population in California. Our analysis focused on the proportion of urinary In-As remaining in the unmethylated form [In-As/(In-As + MMA + DMA)]. The results indicate that epidemiological and experimental human data do not support the methylation threshold hypothesis. On average, 20-25% In-As remains unmethylated regardless of the exposure level. The wide range of interindividual variability in methylation capacity found in some studies warrants further investigation.
Inorganic arsenic is known to cause skin cancer by ingestion and lung cancer by inhalation. However, whether arsenic ingestion causes internal cancers is still a matter of debate. This paper has reviewed the epidemiologic literature that bears on this question. Published studies of populations who have ingested arsenic in medicines, wine substitutes, or water supplies, as well as workers exposed to arsenic by inhalation, were considered in terms of whether the observed associations might be explained by the presence of biases, the consistency of the evidence, and the biologic plausibility of the associations. Many studies were found to be uninformative because of low statistical power or potential biases. The most informative studies, which were from Taiwan and Japan, involved exposure to arsenic in drinking water. These studies strongly suggest that ingested inorganic arsenic does cause cancers of the bladder, kidney, lung, and liver, and possibly other sites. However, confirmatory studies are needed.
Ingestion of arsenic, both from water supplies and medicinal preparations, is known to cause skin cancer. The evidence assessed here indicates that arsenic can also cause liver, lung, kidney, and bladder cancer and that the population cancer risks due to arsenic in U.S. water supplies may be comparable to those from environmental tobacco smoke and radon in homes. Large population studies in an area of Taiwan with high arsenic levels in well water (170-800 micrograms/L) were used to establish dose-response relationships between cancer risks and the concentration of inorganic arsenic naturally present in water supplies. It was estimated that at the current EPA standard of 50 micrograms/L, the lifetime risk of dying from cancer of the liver, lung, kidney, or bladder from drinking 1 L/day of water could be as high as 13 per 1000 persons. It has been estimated that more than 350,000 people in the United States may be supplied with water containing more than 50 micrograms/L arsenic, and more than 2.5 million people may be supplied with water with levels above 25 micrograms/L. For average arsenic levels and water consumption patterns in the United States, the risk estimate was around 1/1000. Although further research is needed to validate these findings, measures to reduce arsenic levels in water supplies should be considered.
Toluene is a widely used industrial solvent, and humans may also have high exposures to toluene from the deliberate inhalation ("sniffing") of paint reducer, paint thinner, or paint for their narcotic effects. A number of case reports describe neonatal effects that have been attributed to toluene abuse during pregnancy. These effects may include intrauterine growth retardation, premature delivery, congenital malformations, and postnatal developmental retardation. The possibility of exposures to other fetotoxic agents, either as impurities or admixtures in toluene-containing products, or by deliberate or accidental exposures to other chemicals or drugs, cannot be excluded in these cases. The fetotoxic effects of toluene have been demonstrated in controlled studies in animals and are comparable to those observed in humans who have abused toluene-containing products before or during pregnancy. Intrauterine developmental retardation is the most clearly established effect in animals, as evidenced by decreased late fetal weight and retarded skeletal development. There is also limited evidence in rodents for skeletal and kidney abnormalities, as well as some evidence for effects on postnatal physical and possibly neurobehavioral development. Estimated daily exposures from experimental studies in animals are compared to estimated human daily intakes at the occupational permissible exposure level and at the level reported to produce euphoria in humans. Acceptable human intakes under California's Proposition 65 and under U.S. Environmental Protection Agency procedures are discussed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomarkers of effect have important potential in epidemiology, since they may enable ascertainment of exposure-effect associations in relatively inexpensive cross-sectional studies, with confirmation by short follow-up after cessation of exposure. Arsenic is known to cause human skin and lung cancer, and may also cause various internal cancers including bladder, kidney, and liver cancer. The strongest epidemiological association between arsenic ingestion and an internal cancer is that with bladder cancer. Epidemiological studies of a Taiwanese population exposed to high levels of arsenic from drinking water reported relative risks for bladder cancer well above any other known environmental carcinogen. Populations at increased risk for bladder cancer from other exposures, such as smoking and schistosomiasis infection, have elevated frequencies of micronuclei in exfoliated bladder cells. We have therefore proposed that the bladder cell micronucleus assay could be an appropriate biological marker of genotoxic effect of arsenic exposure. In this paper, we present the rationale for choosing the bladder cell micronucleus assay as a potential biomarker of effect for arsenic. We also briefly describe the studies we are conducting using this biomarker in currently exposed populations.