PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C I Foote

Publications and source records attributed to C I Foote.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Galactosyltransferase function during mammalian fertilization.

Gamete recognition has been studied extensively in the mouse. In this system, it is generally believed that sperm bind to a class of O-linked oligosaccharides on the zona pellucida glycoprotein, ZP3. The best characterized sperm receptor for ZP3 is beta1, 4-galactosyltransferase (GalT), which functions in a lectin-like capacity by binding to N-terminal N-acetylglucosamine residues on ZP3 oligosaccharides. Multivalent oligosaccharides on ZP3, as well as synthetic polymers terminating in N-acetylglucosamine aggregate GalT, leading to activation of a heterotrimeric G protein cascade and culminating in the acrosome reaction. Following fertilization, cortical granules release N-acetylglucosaminidase, which removes the binding site for sperm GalT and facilitates the zona block to polyspermic binding. Genetic manipulation of GalT expression has confirmed its function as a ZP3 receptor. Overexpressing GalT on sperm leads to increased binding of ZP3, increased G protein activation, and precocious acrosome reactions. In contrast, sperm from mice made null for GalT by homologous recombination are refractory to ZP3, in that they are unable to bind soluble ZP3 and fail to undergo the acrosome reaction in response to zona glycoproteins. Surprisingly, GalT null sperm still bind to the zona and achieve low rates of fertilization in vitro. This then suggests that sperm-egg binding involves receptor-ligand interactions independent of GalT and ZP3. The current model suggests that GalT functions as the ZP3 receptor that is responsible for inducing the acrosome reaction, whereas initial sperm-zona binding is dictated by other sperm surface receptors. Consistent with this, at least three other zona pellucida monosaccharides have been implicated in sperm binding, and novel sperm surface glycoproteins have been suggested to function in gamete binding. A large scaffolding protein has been identified that associates with the GalT cytoplasmic domain and may be responsible for orchestrating its signal transduction capacities that lead to the acrosome reaction.

Acrosome Reaction↗

Functional interaction between the SSeCKS scaffolding protein and the cytoplasmic domain of beta1,4-galactosyltransferase.

The beta1,4-galactosyltransferase family contains at least seven unique gene products, of which beta1,4-galactosyltransferase I (GalT) is the most exhaustively studied. GalT exists in the Golgi complex, similar to many other glycosyltransferases, as well as on the cell surface, where it functions as a signaling receptor for extracellular glycoside ligands. When expressed on the surface, GalT associates with the cytoskeleton and, upon ligand-induced aggregation, induces cell-type specific intracellular signal cascades. In an effort to define the mechanisms by which surface GalT exerts these intracellular effects, we used the yeast two-hybrid system to identify proteins that specifically interact with the GalT cytoplasmic domain. The yeast two-hybrid screen identified two distinct clones (1.12 and 2.52) that showed identity to portions of SSeCKS (Src Suppressed C Kinase Substrate). SSeCKS is a previously defined kinase and cytoskeleton scaffolding protein whose subcellular distribution and functions are remarkably similar to those attributed to GalT. Both SSeCKS and GalT have been localized to the perinuclear/Golgi region as well as to filopodia/lamellipodia. SSeCKS and GalT have been implicated in regulating cell growth, actin filament dynamics, and cell spreading. Interestingly, 1.12 and 2.52-GFP constructs were localized to subcellular domains that correlated with the two purported subcellular distributions for GalT; 2.52 being confined to the Golgi, whereas 1.12 localized primarily to filopodia. Coimmunoprecipitation assays demonstrate stable binding between the GalT cytoplasmic domain and the 1.12 and 2.52 domains of SSeCKS in appropriately transfected cells. Similar assays demonstrate binding between the endogenous GalT and SSeCKS proteins also. Coimmunoprecipitation assays were performed in both directions and produced similar results (i.e. using either anti-GalT domain or anti-SSeCKS domain antibodies as the precipitating reagent). A functional interaction between the GalT cytoplasmic domain and SSeCKS was illustrated by the ability of either the 1.12 or 2.52 SSeCKS domain to restore a normal adhesive phenotype in cells overexpressing the TL-GFP dominant negative construct. TL-GFP is composed of the GalT cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains fused to GFP, and leads to a loss of cell adhesion on laminin by displacing the endogenous GalT from its cytoskeleton binding sites. This is the first reported interaction between a glycosyltransferase and a scaffolding protein, and suggests that SSeCKS serve to integrate the various functions ascribed to the GalT cytoplasmic domain.

A Kinase Anchor Proteins↗

The pattern of disulfide linkages in the extracellular loop regions of connexin 32 suggests a model for the docking interface of gap junctions.

Connexins, like true cell adhesion molecules, have extracellular domains that provide strong and specific homophilic, and in some cases, heterophilic interactions between cells. Though the structure of the binding domains of adhesion proteins have been determined, the extracellular domains of connexins, consisting of two loops of approximately 34-37 amino acids each, are not easily studied in isolation from the rest of the molecule. As an alternative, we used a novel application of site-directed mutagenesis in which four of the six conserved cysteines in the extracellular loops of connexin 32 were moved individually and in all possible pairwise and some quadruple combinations. This mapping allowed us to deduce that all disulfides form between the two loops of a single connexin, with the first cysteine in one loop connected to the third of the other. Furthermore, the periodicity of movements that produced functional channels indicated that these loops are likely to form antiparallel beta sheets. A possible model that could explain how these domains from apposed connexins interact to form a complete channel is discussed.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Membrane integration of in vitro-translated gap junctional proteins: co- and post-translational mechanisms.

Connexins (Cx) are protein components of gap junction channels that permit the passage of small molecules between neighboring cells. cDNAs of a large family of connexins have been isolated and sequenced. A gap junction channel consists of two connexons, one from each cell in contact, composed of six connexin subunits. It has been suggested by Musil and coworkers that the oligomerization of formation of a connexon occurs at the level of the trans-Golgi network. In the present study, we initiated an analysis of the early stages of protein synthesis and membrane insertion of Cx32 and Cx26, two connexins that we have demonstrated are co-expressed in the same junctions in hepatocytes. Using an in vitro transcription and a coupled cell-free translation and translocation system, we observed that both Cx32 and Cx26 could insert into microsome membranes co-translationally, producing a topological structure indistinguishable from that in isolated gap junctions. To our surprise, Cx26 could also insert into membranes post-translationally with a native orientation. This post-translational membrane insertion process is dependent on nucleotides but not their hydrolysis. Cx32, on the other hand, could not insert into membranes post-translationally. These disparate properties of Cx32 and Cx26 are not due to the significant difference in the lengths of their C-terminal domains, but rather to their internal amino acid sequences. These observations raise the possibility that there may be another pathway for Cx26 to insert into membranes in cells and this feature may be important for the regulation of its functions. These findings may also lead us to a new approach to reconstitution without detergent extraction.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗