Biomedical subjects

C Iodice

Publications and source records attributed to C Iodice.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of vector and conventional bioelectrical impedance analysis in the optimal dry weight prescription in hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Dry weight prescription is commonly based on symptoms induced by inappropriate fluid removal by hemodialysis (HD). Aim of this study was to compare the assessment of volume status by conventional bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and the resistance-reactance (RXc) graph method in HD patients achieving their target dry weight determined on clinical criteria. METHODS: We studied 39 HD patients (23 males and 16 females, mean age 52 +/- 17 years, dialytic age 41.2 +/- 37 months). Dry weight, prescribed according to the standard clinical criteria, was constantly achieved in the last 3 months. Patients symptom-free over the last 3 months were defined as asymptomatic. Patients with either muscular cramps or hypotensive episodes were defined as symptomatic. Thirty-three healthy volunteers (11 males, 22 females, mean age 50 +/- 11 years) constituted the control group. Standard, single frequency (50 kHz), tetrapolar, BIA measurements were obtained in controls, and in patients before, every 60 min, and 30 min after one HD session. Total body water (TBW), and extracellular water (ECW) were calculated using conventional BIA regression equations. In both groups, tissue hydration was also assessed by the RXc graph method. RESULTS: On the basis of 95% tolerance interval (mean +/- 2 SD) for the ECW (%) calculated in healthy subjects (ECW = 35-44%), HD patients were divided into 3 groups according to their post-HD ECW: 72% normohydrated with ECW 35-44%, 10% overhydrated with ECW >44%, and 18% underhydrated with ECW <35%. Patients were also classified into 3 categories according to the RXc graph method: 38% normohydrated with vectors within the reference 75% tolerance ellipse, 0% overhydrated with short vectors below the lower pole of the 75% tolerance ellipse, and 62% underhydrated with long vectors above the upper pole of the 75% tolerance ellipse. The progressive removal of body fluid during HD treatment was associated with a progressive increase in both impedance vector components, R and Xc. Eleven of thirty-nine patients (28%) were symptomatic during HD treatment in the last 3 months. The majority of these (73%) were classified as normohydrated according to ECW estimates, while 9 and 18% were classified as over- and underhydrated, respectively. This frequency distribution was significantly different from that obtained with the RXc graph method (chi(2) = 6.9, p = 0.03) where the majority (73%) were classified as underhydrated, while 0 and 27% were classified as over- and normohydrated, respectively. The frequency distribution of the 28 asymptomatic patients also significantly differed between conventional BIA and RXc graph hydration categories (chi(2) = 10.8, p = 0.005), since 11, 71 and 18% vs. 0, 43 and 57% of patients were classified as over-, normo-, and underhydrated, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The classification of volume status based on conventional BIA was insensitive to either clinical situation (presence or absence of symptoms). In contrast, the classification based on the RXc graph was consistent with the clinical course in symptomatic patients (73% dehydrated, and 27% normohydrated), while it did not reflect the clinical course in asymptomatic patients, 57% of whom were classified as (already) underhydrated. A longitudinal study will establish the clinical usefulness of RXc graph indications in asymptomatic patients.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Daily nutrient intake in hemodialysis].

BACKGROUND: Although there is a higher nutrient requirement, food intake in haemodialysis patients is often inadequate. Protein nitrogen appearance (PNA) indirectly estimates the mean protein intake during the short interdialysis period, but it does not measure the daily nutrient intake, which is generally unknown. We carried out a longitudinal study aimed at estimating the daily nutrient intake and its relationship with the nutritional status of haemodialysis patients. METHODS: We selected 28 haemodialysis patients with adequate nutritional status and no evidence of risk-factor for malnutrition. Patients were treated with biocompatible membranes, low-flux and high bicarbonate dialysis, Kt/V > 1.2, PNA > 1.1 g/kg/day and erythropoietin. We measured every four months daily PNA, protein and calorie intake (DPI, DCI) as well as weight gain (WG) during an entire week for one-year. The nutritional status was assessed by biochemical and BIA markers. RESULTS: Twenty seven subjects (8 F, 19 M; age 57.1 +- 2.7 yeas; dialysis age 105 +- 13 months) completed the trial. The mean interdialytic PNA did not change in both long- and short-interdialysis periods, resulting in the "normal" range (> 1.1 g/kg/day); however, daily levels of protein and calorie intake were significantly reduced on the third day during the long interdialysis interval. Eight patients showed time-averaged values of DPI and DCI lower than 0.8 g/kg/day and 25 Kcal/kg/day, respectively, on the third day (LOW group), values that were associated with similar changes in WG. Such a highly reduced nutrient intake during the third interdialysis day was associated with a normal PNA value (1.23 +- 0.05 g/kg/day vs 1.30 +- 0.06 in CON, NS) when measured during the short interdialysis period (S), just as it is in clinical practice; in contrast, when the PNA value was measured during the long interdialysis period it was found to be significantly reduced (1.07 +- 0.08 g/kg/day vs 1.37 +- 0.06 in CON, p < 0.05 and vs S, p < 0.05). During the study, the body weight progressively decreased from 68.0 +- 5.5 to 65.8 +- 5.9 kg (p < 0.05) in the LOW group, due to the decrease in lean body mass, as suggested by the reduction in serum creatinine (9.2 +- 1.1 vs 8.1 +- 0.7 mg/dL, p < 0.05), creatinine generation (835 +- 155 vs 723 +- 106 mg/die, p < 0.05) and serum albumin (3.96 +- 0.07 vs 3.66 +- 0.06 g/dL, p < 0.05). Moreover, reactance and phase angle declined in the LOW group (from 54 +- 4 to 44 +- 3 ohms, p < 0.05 and 5.5 +- 0.3 to 4.5 +- 0.3 degrees, p < 0.05, respectively). At the end of the study the nutritional status in the LOW group was reduced as compared to the CON group. CONCLUSIONS: In stable, well-nourished haemodialysis patients, in absence of known risk factors for malnutrition, the daily nutrient intake is variable and progressively reduce during the interdialytic interval. The measurement of interdialytic PNA, as is done in clinical practice, does not enable the discovery of such abnormal eating behaviour; the low daily nutrient intake, on the contrary, can be evidenced by the daily measurement of either PNA or weight gain, and it can also be inferred by the reduced PNA during the long interdialytic period. Finally, the persistent reduction in nutrient intake below the threshold of 0.8 g/kg/day of proteins and 25 Kcal/kg/day one day a week, is capable of inducing body protein wasting and moderate impairment of the nutritional status.

Dietary Proteins↗