Biomedical subjects

C J Höijer

Publications and source records attributed to C J Höijer.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Early pacemaker twiddler syndrome.

Twiddler's syndrome is a well-known complication of pacemaker treatment. It was first described by Bayliss et al. when a patient manipulated and rotated the pulse generator in the pocket so many turns that it resulted in lead dislodgment, diaphragmatic stimulation and loss of capture. In this case report we present a patient who managed to rotate her dual chamber pulse generator so quickly after implantation that exit block occurred within 17 h. She had wound the two leads as far as their tips in a perfect formation around the pulse generator.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation.

AIMS: Many patients with sinus node disease or atrioventricular block have previously received pacemakers with only ventricular stimulation (VVI or VVIR). This study aimed to investigate whether quality of life and cardiac function were affected by an upgrade to dual chamber pacing (DDDR or DDIR) following long-term ventricular stimulation. METHODS: After implantation of an atrial lead and a DDDR pulse generator, a randomized, double-blind crossover study was performed in 19 patients, previously treated with ventricular pacing for a median time of 6 X 8 years. Patients were randomized to 8 weeks with either VVIR or DDDR/DDIR pacing; after this time, the other mode was programmed for 8 weeks. At the end of each period, the patients' quality of life was evaluated and echocardiography was performed together with Holter monitoring and blood samples for brain natriuretic peptide. RESULTS: Sixteen of the patients preferred DDDR and two VVIR pacing (P=0 X 001); one was undecided. Seven patients demanded an early crossover while paced in the VVIR mode, vs none in the DDDR mode (P=0 X 008). Quality of life was higher in the DDDR mode in 11 of 17 modalities, reaching statistical significance for dyspnoea (P<0 X 05) and general activity (P<0 X 05). Echocardiography showed significantly larger left ventricular end-diastolic dimensions in the DDDR mode (P=0 X 01), whereas end-systolic dimensions did not differ. Left ventricular systolic function was significantly superior in the DDDR mode (mean aortic velocity-time integral: P<0 X 001) and left atrial diameter was significantly smaller in the DDDR mode (P=0 X 01). The plasma level of brain natriuretic peptide was significantly lower in DDDR mode (P=0 X 002). CONCLUSION: An upgrade to dual chamber rate adaptive pacing results in significantly improved quality of life and cardiac function as compared to continued VVIR stimulation and should thus be considered in patients with ventricular pacemakers who have not developed permanent atrial fibrillation or flutter.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation: feasibility and intermediate term follow-up.

AIMS: To evaluate the feasibility and follow-up results of atrial lead implantation and a change to dual chamber pacing following long-term treatment with single chamber ventricular stimulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: During a 30-month period, 70 consecutive patients with ventricular pacemakers were referred for pulse generator exchange or lead reoperation. Using defined criteria, an upgrade procedure was considered indicated in 34 of the cases (49%); these patients had a mean age of 74.8+/-8.8 years, and had been treated with VVI or VVIR pacing for a mean time of 7.8+/-3.8 years (range 1.8-17). An atrial lead was successfully implanted via ipsilateral subclavian venipuncture through the existing pectoral pacemaker pocket in 33 of the 34 cases (97% of the attempts). Postoperatively, one atrial lead dislodgement was seen, and another patient required atrial lead adjustment due to P wave undersensing. The mean follow-up period was 14+/-10 months. During this time, four patients developed permanent atrial fibrillation (annual incidence 11%. In 82% of the patients in whom an upgrade procedure was attempted, dual chamber pacing was maintained at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Restoration of AV synchrony is possible in a substantial proportion of patients treated with long-term ventricular stimulation. Atrial lead placement through ipsilateral subclavian venipuncture is generally feasible, and the vast majority of cases remain in dual chamber pacing with normal function during intermediate term follow-up.

Aged↗