PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C J Henke

Publications and source records attributed to C J Henke.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Relationship of first-year costs of treating localized prostate cancer to initial choice of therapy and stage at diagnosis: results from the CAPSURE database.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship among the initial choice of therapy, stage at presentation, and first-year treatment costs in men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer. METHODS: First-year resource use and clinical data were collected for 235 subjects with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer. The costs were estimated from the standard Medicare payment schedules. The relationship among the initial therapy, stage at presentation, and overall cost was examined for the entire cohort and in the subgroup of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. In addition, the inpatient, outpatient, and medication cost components were evaluated separately to determine what influenced the changes in cost by stage. RESULTS: The mean first-year cost of treating localized prostate cancer in CaPSURE was $6375. When broken down by stage, the mean first-year cost for patients with Stage T1c was $5731, with T2a/b was $6426, and with Stage T2c was $6810 (P = 0.059). The initial treatment choice was significantly associated with the total first-year costs (P <0.001). The mean cost specifically for radical prostatectomy patients with Stage T1c disease was $6881, with T2a/b was $7216, and with T2c was $8027 (P = 0.004). The increases in the first-year cost with higher stage appeared to primarily be associated with increased inpatient resource use and the greater use of adjuvant hormonal therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The first-year costs of treating localized prostate cancer in CaPSURE are associated with the choice of primary and adjuvant therapy. This supports the notion that cost savings may be possible with earlier detection of disease or by minimizing the use of hormonal adjuvant therapy.

Aged↗

An economic evaluation of a chlorhexidine chip for treating chronic periodontitis: the CHIP (chlorhexidine in periodontitis) study.

BACKGROUND: The authors previously suggested that an adjunctive, controlled-release chlorhexidine, or CHX, chip may reduce periodontal surgical needs at little additional cost. This article presents an economic analysis of the CHX chip in general dental practice. METHODS: In a one-year prospective clinical trial, 484 chronic periodontitis patients in 52 general practices across the United States were treated with either scaling and root planing, or SRP, plus any therapy prescribed by treating, unblinded dentists; or SRP plus other therapy as above but including the CHX chip. Economic data were collected from bills, case report forms and 12-month treatment recommendations from blinded periodontist evaluators. RESULTS: Total dental charges were higher for SRP + CHX chip patients vs. SRP patients when CHX chip costs were included (P = .027) but lower when CHX chip costs were excluded (P = .012). About one-half of the CHX chip acquisition cost was offset by savings in other charges. SRP + CHX chip patients were about 50 percent less likely to undergo surgical procedures than were SRP patients (P = .021). At the end of the trial, periodontist evaluators recommended similar additional procedures for both groups: SRP, about 46 percent; maintenance, about 37 percent; surgery, 56 percent for SRP alone and 63 percent for SRP + CHX chip. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive CHX chip use for general-practice patients with periodontitis increased costs but reduced surgeries over one year. At study's end, periodontists recommended similar additional surgical treatment for both groups. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In general practice, routine use of the CHX chip suggests that costs will be partially offset by reduced surgery over at least one year.

Adult↗

Work loss costs due to peptic ulcer disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease in a health maintenance organization.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the value of work time and productivity loss because of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: A total of 300 adult members of Northern California Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program with outpatient diagnoses of PUD or GERD were randomly selected for a record review to confirm diagnosis. A telephone survey was conducted soliciting information about work loss because of their disease. Reported work losses were valued at self-reported hourly wage to derive work loss costs. A total of 117 PUD and 102 GERD patients participated. RESULTS: About 75% of each sample was employed full-time or part-time. In all, 42% of potentially working PUD patients and 41% of GERD patients reported some lost work productivity because of their disease. The average loss (per person working) was $606 for PUD and $237 for GERD over a 3-month period. Reduced productivity while at work and part-time work because of the disease were the most costly productivity losses for PUD, whereas time off for physician visits and reduced productivity while at work were the most costly losses for GERD. CONCLUSIONS: Work loss costs for patients with PUD and GERD may be nearly as large as direct medical care costs, and are consistent with the more acute nature of PUD and the chronic pattern of GERD. The work losses resulting from these diseases are large enough to warrant consideration in guideline development and policy decisions for patients with PUD and GERD.

Absenteeism↗

An economic evaluation of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the outpatient treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To examine treatment costs of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adult outpatients given oral (p.o.) levofloxacin or cefuroxime axetil as initial therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with a primary diagnosis of CAP were enrolled in a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, active-controlled Phase III clinical trial. Both inpatients and outpatients were assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups: (1) intravenous (i.v.) or p.o. levofloxacin; or (2) i.v. ceftriaxone and/or p.o. cefuroxime axetil. METHODS: To make legitimate and meaningful cost comparisons between similar types of patients receiving drugs via the same route of administration (i.e., orally), this outpatient economic study examined the resource utilization of the 211 patients enrolled as outpatients who received oral formulations as initial treatment (levofloxacin, 103 patients; cefuroxime axetil, 108 patients). Resource utilization data and clinical trial data were collected concurrently. To generate cost estimates, Medicare cost estimates for resources were multiplied by the resource units used by patients in each treatment arm. RESULTS: Cost estimates indicated a total cost difference that favored the levofloxacin group (base case: $169; sensitivity analysis: $223 [P = .008]). The results for the base case were not significant (P = .094). In addition, within the cost categories, there was a statistically significant study drug cost differential favoring levofloxacin ($86; P = .0001 for both the base case and sensitivity analysis). CONCLUSION: Oral levofloxacin is less costly than oral cefuroxime axetil in the outpatient treatment of adults with CAP.

Adult↗

A cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis of contingency contracting-enhanced methadone detoxification treatment.

We examined treatment costs in an ongoing study in which 102 opioid-addicted patients had been randomly assigned to either 180-day methadone detoxification or the same treatment enhanced with contingency contracting. In the latter condition, study participants received regular reinforcers contingent on negative urine toxicology screens and breath analyses for a range of drugs and alcohol. Both conditions involved psychosocial treatment, and all participants were stabilized to a daily methadone dose of approximately 80 mg during the first 4 months, followed by a 2-month taper. Individuals participating in the enhanced condition were more likely to provide continuously drug-free urine samples and alcohol-free breath samples during the final month of treatment than were participants in the control condition. Cost of treatment was calculated individually for each participant based on actual services received. First, unit cost for each service was determined, including adjusted staff salaries for direct treatment and opportunity cost of facilities utilized during service delivery. Next, we valued each patient's use of services during the first 120 days of the study and then added the cost of methadone, laboratory work, and contingent reinforcers. A subsample (n = 45) also provided data on health care utilization during treatment, which we valued using standard Medicare unit costs. The marginal cost of enhancing the standard treatment with contingency contracting was approximately 8%. An incremental cost of $17.27 produced an additional 1% increase in the number of participants providing continuously substance-free urine and breath samples during month 4 of the study. For every additional dollar spent on treatment, a $4.87 health care cost offset was realized; however, this difference was statistically insignificant due to extreme variances and small subsample size.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

A cost analysis of a Helicobacter pylori eradication strategy in a large health maintenance organization.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe the effect of a Helicobacter pylori eradication strategy on health care costs among a cohort of health maintenance organization (HMO) members with peptic ulcer disease (PUD). METHODS: Patients were identified from an outpatient diagnosis database and verified at chart review to have new-onset PUD by upper endoscopy or upper gastrointestinal radiographic series. Health plan registration and accounting databases were used to track costs over 12 months after initial diagnosis. Costs were analyzed separately for an initial 2-month interval and a 10-month follow-up period. Inpatient and pharmacy costs are those directly attributable to PUD (either a PUD-related discharge diagnosis or an antiulcer medication prescription). Outpatient costs are total costs. All cost differences were adjusted for age and gender. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 93 patients meeting selection criteria received H. pylori treatment. During the 2-month treatment window, adjusted PUD-related inpatient costs were higher for the H. pylori treated group (difference, $234.00/person), whereas total outpatient costs and PUD-related pharmacy costs were similar. During the 10-month follow-up period, PUD-related inpatient and pharmacy adjusted costs were similar, but adjusted outpatient costs in the H. pylori treated group were lower than in the untreated group (difference, $508.00/person). Total adjusted follow-up period costs were $555.00/person less in the H. pylori treated group (p = 0.05). Total 12-month costs in the H. pylori treated group were $285.00/per person less than in untreated patients, (p > 0.2); 30% of H. pylori treated patients were still receiving antisecretory therapy 1 yr after diagnosis, compared to 41.9% of untreated patients. CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori treatment is associated with a decreased cost of follow-up care for patients with PUD, primarily due to decreased outpatient utilization.

Ambulatory Care↗

Costs of acid-related disorders to a health maintenance organization.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the economic impact of the acid-related disorders (ARDs), which include dyspepsia, gastritis, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and peptic ulcer disease (PUD), in managed care patient populations. OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of medically attended ARDs, and their direct medical costs from the perspective of a large health maintenance organization (HMO). METHODS: A total of 1,550 ARDs subjects (age > or = 18 years), were randomly sampled from outpatient diagnosis and pharmacy databases of the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program of Northern California and verified by chart review. Five age- and gender-matched controls were identified per subject. One-year prevalence, excess annual costs, and initial 6-month costs for incident cases were estimated using the HMO cost accounting system. RESULTS: Total ARDs prevalence (5.8%) increases with advancing age. GERD is the most common ARD (2.9% overall prevalence). Annual per person attributable costs were $1,183, $471, and $431 respectively for PUD, GERD, and gastritis/dyspepsia. Excess inpatient costs for PUD explain its higher costs. Outpatient costs were somewhat higher for GERD ($279) than for PUD or gastritis/dyspepsia. Pharmacy costs were relatively low for each condition, in part because many patients were treated with generic cimetidine. Total annual HMO expenditures for ARDs were $59.4 million, with 40.6%, 36.8%, and 22.6% respectively for GERD, PUD, and gastritis/dyspepsia. CONCLUSIONS: Acid-related disorders, particularly GERD and PUD, contribute substantially to the direct costs of medical care in this managed care population.

Adult↗

Switching the histamine H2 receptor antagonist famotidine to nonprescription status in Canada. An economic evaluation.

The aim of this study was to compare the direct medical costs associated with the treatment of patients with heartburn/nonulcer dyspepsia under 2 scenarios: (i) no nonprescription histamine H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) is available (the 'status quo scenario'); and (ii) the H2RA famotidine (at a daily dosage of 10mg) is available over-the-counter (OTC) at retail pharmacies (the 'OTC scenario'). We employed a decision analysis model over a 16-week period that considered direct medical costs from 2 alternative perspectives: (i) society, including the cost of self-medication borne by patients; and (ii) a provincial third-party payer for healthcare. Data concerning direct medical costs associated with consumer self-medication and physician prescription of medication (including pharmacist dispensing fees), tests and procedures, and consultations with general practitioners and specialists were drawn from a clinician panel, published unit costs, and special surveys of institutional databases. All costs are reported in 1993 Canadian dollars ($Can; $Can1 = $US0.72, October 1995). From a societal perspective, the expected cost per patient over a 16-week period is not substantially different between the status quo and the OTC scenarios ($Can98 and $Can96, respectively). From a provincial third-party payer perspective, the expected costs per patient for the same scenarios are $Can95 and $Can89, a saving of $Can6 per patient. These results are sensitive to the proportion of patients who initially choose to see their physician rather than self-medicate, and the percentage of patients achieving successful treatment of symptoms. Changes in the rate or the cost of nonprescription medication, tests/procedures and physician visits do not affect the relative cost rankings. The total number of physician visits remained constant in both scenarios. From the societal cost perspective, the availability of famotidine in nonprescription form yields total costs that are similar to the status quo. However, from the perspective of the provincial payer, the expected costs per patient are likely to be slightly lower than the status quo if famotidine is available in unrestricted OTC scenario use. To generate significant savings to provincial payers, the number of people choosing immediate physician contact would have to be reduced, although not substantially, in the OTC scenario.

Canada↗

A pharmacoeconomic model of divalproex vs. lithium in the acute and prophylactic treatment of bipolar I disorder.

BACKGROUND: Divalproex and lithium are the two most rigorously studied pharmacologic treatments for acute mania in bipolar I disorder in randomized, controlled trials. The differences between the drugs in their time course of onset, predictors of response, and side effects have potentially important pharmacoeconomic implications. METHOD: Utilizing data from published studies, the University of Cincinnati Mania Project, and a consensus panel of psychiatrists, we developed a decision-analytic model to estimate the costs of treating patients with bipolar I disorder, acutely and prophylactically, for 1 year with divalproex or lithium. RESULTS: In the overall group of patients with bipolar I disorder, initial treatment with divalproex led to costs that were 9% lower than costs for initial treatment with lithium. Cost savings associated with divalproex were greatest for patients with mixed mania and rapid cycling, whereas cost savings for patients with classic mania were greater for lithium. CONCLUSION: According to the decision-analytic model developed in this study, divalproex, possibly because of a more rapid rate of antimanic activity associated with oral loading, is a less costly treatment than lithium in the acute and prophylactic treatment of patients with bipolar I disorder over 1 year.

Acute Disease↗

What explains the variation among rheumatologists in their use of prednisone and second line agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which characteristics of rheumatologists and their practices explain the variation in their use of prednisone and 2nd line agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We used multiple logistic regression to examine the relationship between the use of prednisone, hydroxychloroquine, intramuscular gold, and methotrexate, and the following categories of rheumatologist characteristics: professional experience, primary payment method, practice setting, location of rheumatology training, and demographic characteristics. Our explanatory variables also included 12 patient characteristics and a random effect term. RESULTS: Much of the variation among rheumatologists in the use of these agents is explained by the rheumatologist characteristics. Depending on the agent, professional experience explained 15 to 54%, payment method 3 to 27%, practice setting 6 to 39%, training location 12 to 53%, and demographic characteristics 3 to 23% of the rheumatologist associated variation in use of each agent. CONCLUSION: There are identifiable characteristics of rheumatologists and their practices that strongly influence their treatment decisions for RA. These findings have important policy implications.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗

Medical costs, Medicaid, and managed mental health treatment: the Hawaii study.

In a randomized, prospective design with Medicaid enrollees, managed mental health treatment reduced medical services costs and utilization by 23 to 40 percent relative to control groups. For enrollees with chronic medical diagnoses, managed treatment reduced medical costs by 28 to 47 percent, while medical costs for fee-for-service enrollees increased by 17 percent. For enrollees without chronic medical diagnoses, traditional fee-for-service also reduced medical costs by about 20% but used three times as many outpatient visits. Costs of managed treatment were recovered in 6 to 24 months, suggesting that managed mental health treatment should be incorporated in health reform initiatives.

Chronic Disease↗

HMO membership, treatment, and mortality risk among prostatic cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment and mortality risk were compared between prostate cancer patients receiving care in fee-for-service settings and those receiving care in a health maintenance organization (HMO). METHODS: Two samples were obtained from a population-based tumor registry. Patients in the first sample (n = 201) were interviewed shortly after diagnosis to obtain data on income, education, overall health status, and expenditures for health status, and expenditures for health care. These data were combined with information from the tumor registry on cancer stage, age, treatment, place of residence, and source of care. Only tumor registry data were obtained for most patients in the second sample (n = 962). For both samples, survival time was monitored for up to 80 months. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of data from the interviewed sample indicated that HMO patients were less likely to receive surgery but more likely to receive radiation therapy than were those in fee-for-service settings. Mortality risk was lower for the HMO patients than for those in fee-for-service plans. Findings based on the second sample were nearly identical. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that HMOs may offer important advantages to lower-income patients at risk for specific life-threatening diseases.

Aged↗

Effect of parenterally administered gold therapy on the course of adult rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the course of rheumatoid arthritis over 5 years in adults and to evaluate the effect of parenterally administered gold salts on that course. DESIGN: A prospective observational study of adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Data derived from annual interviews with patients from 1983 to 1988 and from physician surveys in 1983 and 1987. SETTING: Rheumatology practices in the community. PATIENTS: The study began in 1982 with 822 adults who had rheumatoid arthritis and were under the care of rheumatologists. INTERVENTIONS: Those selected by rheumatologists in the management of their patients. MEASUREMENTS: Information describing sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, course, and therapy was collected from patients and verified by physician reports. Functional status, measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire, and the number of painful joints were used as outcome variables. Outcome variables were adjusted for age, sex, disease duration, baseline values of the outcome variable, and the use of four disease-remittive agents other than gold. MAIN RESULTS: Multivariate repeated-measures analysis of variance showed no change in the course of rheumatoid arthritis over 5 years. The use of parenteral gold for at least 2 consecutive years at the start of the observation period produced, on average, no change in the course over 5 years in the two outcome variables. CONCLUSION: In our study of a community-based population of adults with rheumatoid arthritis who were under the care of community rheumatologists, we found that there was, on average, no statistically significant change in function or number of painful joints between 1983 and 1988. Patients receiving parenteral gold therapy for at least 2 consecutive years did not show a statistically significant difference in outcome when compared with those not receiving such therapy.

Antirheumatic Agents↗

Somatization, psychiatric disorder, and stress in utilization of ambulatory medical services.

Examined the prediction from Mechanic's (1972) attribution theory of somatization that somatizers who are under stress will overuse ambulatory medical services. Two hundred fourteen volunteer patients from university ambulatory care clinics completed the Diagnostic Interview Schedule and the Life Experiences Inventory. We examined somatization, psychiatric diagnoses, and life stress-and the interaction of these factors-in predicting frequency of medical visits during the preceding year, after controlling for need (active medical problems) and predisposing factors. As hypothesized, life stress interacted with somatization in predicting number of medical visits; somatizers who were under stress made more visits to the clinics than did nonsomatizers or somatizers who were not under stress. Although stress affected somatizers most, stress was predictive of increased medical utilization for all patients. These results suggest that psychological services intended to reduce overutilization of outpatient medical services might best focus on stress reduction and be most beneficial to somatizers.

Adolescent↗

Practice variation in rheumatologists' encounters with their patients who have rheumatoid arthritis.

This article examines practice variation among rheumatologists in their use of time and procedures in follow-up outpatient encounters with rheumatoid arthritis patients. It focuses on differences across individual physicians rather than differences in populations of patients. In addition, the total variance is divided into parts due to patient characteristics, the providers' economic and other incentives to do procedures or reduce contact time, individual practice styles, and the random sampling of encounters. Data are taken from a stratified random sampling of U.S. rheumatologists. Analyses are based on 1,154 outpatient follow-up encounters with rheumatoid arthritis patients provided by 66 physicians, each of whom reported at least ten such encounters. There are large differences among the physicians in visit length, number of monitoring procedures used per encounter, and whether the encounter included measurements of complete blood count/urinalysis or erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Individual practice style differences are far more important causes of the variation that was observed among providers than are patient differences or practice incentive differences. It was determined that 5-40% of the cost of specific management activities could be saved by reducing the highest use.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗