PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C J Kasales

Publications and source records attributed to C J Kasales.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Optimization of shaded surface display for CT angiography.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors performed this study to determine the optimum threshold for performing computed tomographic (CT) angiography with shaded surface display (SSD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dedicated phantom was developed with an 8-mm luminal diameter. Each of 19 vessels had stenoses ranging from 0% to 93.8%. Five blinded, experienced reviewers separately measured each vessel by using SSD with display thresholds of 50, 100, 150, and 200 HU. RESULTS: For vessel diameters of 2 mm and larger, the best threshold value was 100 HU. This yielded measurements within 2% of the actual diameter and produced no false occlusions. For vessels 1 mm in diameter, the best threshold remained 100 HU, but this threshold was significantly less accurate than the standard (P = .0001) and produced two false occlusions in 15 vessels. For vessels 0.5 mm in diameter, the best threshold was 50 HU, although this still produced measurements significantly less accurate than the gold standard (P = .036) and one false occlusion in 15 vessels. CONCLUSION: CT angiography with SSD and an optimized threshold value is a useful technique in vessels 1 mm and larger.

Angiography↗
PubMed2001

Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging.

OBJECTIVE: We performed a comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques used to assess appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis were examined with sonography, unenhanced focused appendiceal CT, complete abdominopelvic CT using IV contrast material, focused appendiceal CT with colonic contrast material, and repeated sonography with colonic contrast material. Each sonogram was videotaped for subsequent interpretation by three radiologists and two sonographers. The mean sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, inter- and intraobserver variability, and diagnostic confidence scores of all observers were used for comparative performance assessments. The three CT examinations were filmed and interpreted separately by four radiologists. Patient discomfort was assessed on a 10-point scale for each radiologic study. Diagnoses were confirmed by pathologic evaluation of resected appendixes or clinical follow-up for a minimum of 3 months after presentation. RESULTS: Twenty-four of the 100 patients had positive findings for acute appendicitis. Both sonographic techniques had high specificity (85-89%) and comparable accuracy (73-75%) but low sensitivity (33-35%) and inter- and intraobserver variability (kappa = 0.15-0.20 and 0.39-0.42, respectively). Unenhanced focused appendiceal CT, abdominopelvic CT, and focused appendiceal CT with colonic contrast material all significantly outperformed sonography (p <0.0001), with sensitivities of 78%, 72%, and 80%; specificities of 86%, 91%, and 87%; and accuracies of 84%, 87%, and 85%, respectively. Abdominopelvic CT gave the greatest confidence in cases with negative findings (p = 0.001), and focused appendiceal CT with colonic contrast material gave the greatest confidence for cases with positive findings (p = 0.02). In terms of inter- and intraobserver variability, focused appendiceal CT with colonic contrast material yielded the highest, and unenhanced focused appendiceal CT the lowest, agreement (interobserver kappa = 0.45 vs. 0.36 and intraobserver kappa = 0.85 vs. 0.76, respectively) (p <0.05). Colonic contrast material was unsuccessfully advanced into the cecum in 18% of patients and leaked in another 24%. Patient discomfort was greatest with focused appendiceal CT using colonic contrast material and least with unenhanced focused appendiceal CT (p <0.05). CONCLUSION: A standard abdominopelvic CT scan is recommended as the initial examination for appendicitis in adult patients. However, focused appendiceal CT with colonic contrast material material should be used as a problem-solving technique in difficult cases.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Training in obstetric sonography for radiology residents and fellows in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess the current experience of radiology residents and fellows in obstetric sonography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Written surveys were sent to the directors of 206 accredited radiology residency programs and 85 fellowship programs in the United States. The surveys encompassed obstetric sonographic experience during routine working hours and after hours, the level of supervision, the types of scanning performed, and the extent of formal lectures available during training. Additional questions concerned the relative knowledge of laboratory accreditation processes and training of faculty covering obstetric sonography. RESULTS: Sixty (29%) of 206 accredited radiology residency programs and 24 (28%) of 85 fellowship programs returned surveys. The experience among residency programs was similar, providing fewer than 4 weeks per year of obstetric sonography, usually within their own department of radiology. Residents were more likely to be sent to outside departments for second or third trimester sonography experience. A decrease in scanning assistance was reported for examinations performed after hours, more so for second or third trimester studies. Lecture topics revealed similar deficiencies for residency and fellowship programs. CONCLUSION: Greater emphasis on the performance of prenatal sonographic examinations may be warranted during formal sonography rotations. Current levels of experience in obstetric sonography may not be providing sufficient experience to allow residents to appropriately manage call cases or for practicing radiologists to provide such services after their training is completed.

Data Collection↗
PubMed2001

CT angiography: in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methods.

OBJECTIVE: Five image reconstruction techniques have been used with CT angiography: axial (cross-sectional), maximum intensity projection (MIP), curved multiplanar reconstruction (MPR), shaded-surface display, and volume rendering. This study used a phantom to compare the accuracy of these techniques for measuring stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A 19-vessel phantom containing various grades of concentric stenoses (0-100%) and three lengths (5, 7.5, and 10 mm) of stenoses was used for this study. Scans were obtained with a slice thickness of 2.0 mm, slice interval of 1.0 mm, pitch of 1.0, 120 kVp, 200 mA, and with the vessels oriented parallel to the z-axis and opacified with nonionic contrast material. CT angiography images were produced using five optimized techniques: axial, MIP, MPR, shaded-surface display, and volume rendering; and measurements were made with an electronic cursor in the normal lumen and mid stenosis by five separate investigators who were unaware of vessel and stenosis diameters. Each of the techniques was first optimized according to the radiology literature and our own preliminary testing. RESULTS: For vessels greater than 4 mm in diameter, axial, MIP, MPR, shaded-surface display, and volume-rendering CT angiography techniques all had a measurement error of less than 2.5%. However, axial, MIP, MPR, and shaded-surface display techniques were less accurate in estimating smaller (<or=4 mm) diameters. Volume rendering tended to be more accurate in the measurement of vessels with a 2.0- to 4.0-mm diameter and was statistically more accurate for diameters of 0.5-1.0 mm (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: All five CT angiography display techniques (axial, MIP, MPR, shaded-surface display, and volume rendering) accurately display vessels and stenoses greater than 4 mm in diameter. However, volume rendering tends to be more accurate for stenoses of 2-4 mm and was statistically better in the measurement of diameters of 0.5-1.0 mm (p < 0.001). Volume rendering is an accurate method for evaluating all grades of stenoses.

Angiography↗
PubMed2000

Mucosal detail at CT virtual reality: surface versus volume rendering.

PURPOSE: To evaluate computed tomographic virtual reality with volumetric versus surface rendering. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Virtual reality images were reconstructed for 27 normal or pathologic colonic, gastric, or bronchial structures in four ways: the transition zone (a) reconstructed separately from the wall by using volume rendering; (b) with attenuation equal to air; (c) with attenuation equal to wall (soft tissue); (d) with attenuation halfway between air and wall. The four reconstructed images were randomized. Four experienced imagers blinded to the reconstruction graded them from best to worst with predetermined criteria. RESULTS: All readers rated images with the transition zone as a separate structure as overwhelmingly superior (P <.001): Nineteen cases had complete concurrence among all readers. The best of the surface-rendering reconstructions had the transition zone attenuation equal to the wall attenuation (P <.001). The third best reconstruction had the transition zone attenuation equal to the air attenuation, and the worst had the transition zone attenuation halfway between the air and wall attenuation. CONCLUSION: Virtual reality is best with volume rendering, with the transition zone (mucosa) between the wall and air reconstructed as a separate structure.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Diagnosis and differentiation of congenital diaphragmatic hernia from other noncardiac thoracic fetal masses.

This retrospective study was designed to evaluate individual sonographic parameters that might help differentiate congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) from other noncardiac thoracic masses such as cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung (CAML) and congenital lobar emphysema (CLE) prenatally. Twenty-four cases of CDH, CAML, and CLE detected during prenatal ultrasound and documented postnatally (with surgical, autopsy, or radiological proof) were identified through extensive chart and record review. The hard copy gray-scale images were retrospectively reviewed for imaging characteristics that may differentiate the three entities. Additionally, the prospective diagnosis during prenatal ultrasound was also compared with the postnatal diagnosis. The most reliable indicators in our retrospective review included confident visualization of a diaphragmatic defect (92.3/100.0 PPV/NPV, p< or =0.002) and/or localization of the stomach within the chest as well as the presence of severe cardiac deviation (both 92.3/62.5 PPV/NPV, p< or =0.01). Other sonographic indicators (including the presence of cystic areas, side and size of the lesion and the presence of polyhydramnios) offered lower levels of sensitivity and specificity. Prospective diagnosis during real-time assessment was also integral, offering >80% sensitivity and specificity (p< or =0.001). Accurate prenatal diagnosis of CDH is difficult despite the relative frequency of this lesion. The classic triad of a thoracic mass accompanying a displaced heart, absence of a normally positioned fluid-filled stomach and polyhydramnios, although seen with CDH, may not adequately differentiate this entity from other noncardiac fetal thoracic masses. Realtime assessment remains integral to the appropriate diagnosis.

Cystic Adenomatoid Malformation of Lung, Congenita↗
PubMed1998

CT bronchoscopy: optimization of imaging parameters.

The authors evaluated the relative importance of the following scanning parameters at computed tomographic bronchoscopy in an anesthetized adult sheep's thorax: section thickness (2, 4, 8 mm), pitch (1.0, 1.5, 2.0), milliampere setting (100, 175, 250 mA), and overlap of reconstructed sections (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%). Five blinded readers ranked the images twice in comparison with photographs of the mounted specimen. Differences in image quality were significant (P < .001) with section thickness of 2 mm and a pitch of 1.0. The milliampere setting had only a minor effect on image quality, and a 50% overlap of reconstructed sections was best.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

The clinical usefulness of routine stacked multiplanar reconstruction in helical abdominal computed tomography.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluate the usefulness of stacked multiplanar reconstructions in routine, thick-section abdominal computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five routine, thick-section contrast abdominal CTs performed with equivalent technique were reformatted by multiplanar reconstructions in sagittal and coronal planes sequentially from side-to-side and front-to-back. The image sets were submitted, first axial images only followed by axial plus multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs), to 5 separate physician readers including 2 radiologists and 3 nonradiologists. These readers graded the visualization of a variety of normal and up to 5 pathologic lesions per patient on a scale of 1 to 5 (5 = best). RESULTS: The addition of sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstructions significantly improved the visualization of all normal anatomic structures (mean axial only, 3.8; mean axial plus MPR, 4.1; P < 0.0001). In addition, most pathologic lesions were statistically better visualized with the addition of multiplanar reconstructions (mean axial images only, 3.9; mean axial plus MPR, 4.1; P < 0.0001). All five readers found improved visualization in nearly every category with the addition of the multiplanar reconstructions. However, in only 7% of cases, did a reviewer find new diagnostic information with the addition of MPR images. CONCLUSIONS: Stacked multiplanar reconstructions of routine, thick-section abdominal CT has clinical value in both the display of normal anatomic and pathologic lesions. Further studies, however, are required to confirm these findings before it is commonly used.

Humans↗
PubMed1997

Comparison of 1.0-, 1.5-, and 2.0-pitch abdominal helical computed tomography in evaluation of normal structures and pathologic lesions.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors performed a comprehensive prospective clinical trial comparing 1.0-, 1.5-, and 2.0-pitch abdominal helical computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of normal and pathologic structures/lesions. METHODS: Seventy-five consecutive patients were randomized by computer into one of three equal groups: helical CT pitch 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0. The imaging parameters and contrast enhancement of all 75 patients were kept constant. The 75 studies were masked, placed into a randomized order, and evaluated by five separate experienced radiologists who rated visualization of 25 normal structures and up to five pathologic findings per patient using a scale of 1 (not seen) to 5 (very well seen/very sharp margins). RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in 1.0- and 1.5-pitch abdominal CT scans when assessing the display of normal and pathologic lesions. In addition, helical pitch 1.0 and 1.5 studies were equivalent for both normal and pathologic structures/lesions, whereas equivalency was not demonstrated for helical pitch 2.0 studies. Overall study assessment questions again found equivalency between helical 1.0- and 1.5-pitch studies. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal CT performed with pitches of 1.0 and 1.5 are equivalent. Because of its advantages, we advocate the routine use of an extended pitch (1.5) in routine abdominal CT. Further studies are required to evaluate the usefulness of the helical 2.0-pitch technique.

Contrast Media↗
PubMed1997

Thoracic spiral CT: delivery of contrast material pushed with injectable saline solution in a power injector.

A method of power injection of contrast material pushed with injectable saline solution during thoracic computed tomography (CT) was evaluated in 75 patients to help decrease the amount of contrast material necessary. Patients received 50-125 mL of 60% nonionic contrast material alone or pushed with 50 mL of saline. A volume of 75 mL of contrast material pushed with saline provided enhancement of the thoracic vasculature equal to that provided by a 125-mL volume of contrast material administered alone (P < .001) and caused significantly less beam-hardening artifact (P < .01).

Aorta, Thoracic↗
PubMed1997

Technical factors of CT angiography studied with a carotid artery phantom.

PURPOSE: To evaluate scanning parameters (conventional versus spiral CT, section thickness, and pitch) and vessel orientation in the performance of CT angiography. METHODS: Conventional CT and 1.0-, 1.5-, and 2.0-pitch spiral CT acquisitions of a carotid phantom designed with vessels oriented parallel to the z-axis, 45 degrees oblique, and perpendicular to the z-axis were obtained with section thicknesses of 2, 4, and 8 mm. The phantom contained 32 vessels with 0% to 100% stenoses. Normal and stenotic luminal diameters were measured and the number of artifacts was assessed. RESULTS: No overall difference was observed among conventional and spiral CT acquisitions obtained with pitches of 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0. With thicker sections, CT angiographic accuracy decreased and artifacts increased. The three-vessel orientations were relatively comparable in accuracy in terms of the percentage of stenosis measured. Vessels parallel to the z-axis suffered less artifactual degradation. Unique artifacts, such as luminal distortion and beam hardening, were observed in vessels oriented at 45 degrees and perpendicular to the z-axis. CONCLUSION: Use of thinner sections with vessels oriented parallel to the z-axis optimizes CT angiographic quality. There is no apparent degradation with the use of spiral CT, and a pitch of 1.5 or 2.0 provides results equivalent to 1.0-pitch spiral studies.

Brain Ischemia↗
PubMed1996

Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variability in CT tumor measurements.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the variability between radiologists interpreting thoracic and abdominal/pelvic CT scans in selecting specific sites of metastatic tumor for measurement (indicator lesions) and to assess interobserver and intraobserver variability in tumor measurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three separate experienced radiologists were asked to review 24 combined thoracic and abdominal CT scans in patients with metastatic tumor. Each radiologist was asked to identify the indicator lesions representative of each patient's tumor bulk. In the second phase of the study, 105 specific foci on 26 combined thoracic and abdominal CT studies (including the original 24) were reviewed twice by the same three radiologists. Up to eight foci were randomly identified per patient, and each observer was asked to determine the slice with the maximum diameter for each tumor focus and to measure it in three dimensions (maximum diameter, its perpendicular, and length). RESULTS: A total of 132 tumor sites were present on the CT studies in phase I, all of which were chosen by at least one observer as an indicator lesion. Of the 116 of these that were separate and nonoverlapped, 57 (49%) were measured by only one observer, whereas 32 (28%) and 27 (23%) were measured by two or all three observers, respectively. Observers were more inclined to pick round or defined/well-defined lesions rather than irregular, oval, or poorly defined ones, although this tendency was not statistically significant. The second phase of the study showed considerable interobserver variability (15%) in CT tumor measurement, which was worse for poorly defined and irregular lesions. Intraobserver variability in measuring individual foci was less (6%). CONCLUSION: Radiologists interpreting thoracic and/or abdominal/pelvic CT scans for metastatic cancer should measure and report a significant number of each patient's tumor sites, especially larger ones in different anatomic areas. When interpreting a follow-up CT scan of a patient with metastatic cancer, the interpreting radiologist should remeasure the indicator lesions on the previous and on the follow-up CT scans, especially when the results will change the patient's treatment response category.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗
PubMed1996

Routine use of a higher order interpolator and bone algorithm in thoracic CT.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the utility of the routine use of high spatial frequency algorithms and higher order helical interpolators for imaging lung parenchyma during routine thoracic CT. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 50 consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated thoracic CT using the same imaging parameters and scanner. The helical volume was reconstructed three separate times using standard and higher order (180 degrees linear with double-sided lobes) interpolators and standard and high spatial frequency (bone) algorithms. The images were photographed and given to five separate readers who were kept unaware of the interpolator and algorithm and who were asked to evaluate simultaneously each patient's three sets of images for best, in-between, and worst images of the lung interstitium, pathology, and normal anatomy. RESULTS: All five readers rated the standard interpolator and algorithm images as the worst (p < .01). All five readers consistently rated the double-sided lobe interpolator and bone algorithm images as the best (p < .01). CONCLUSION: A second reconstruction of routine thoracic helical CT data using higher order helical interpolators and a bone algorithm significantly improves interstitial detail of lung parenchyma and overall visualization of normal anatomy and pathologic processes.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Reconstructed helical CT scans: improvement in z-axis resolution compared with overlapped and nonoverlapped conventional CT scans.

OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study was designed to assess the z-axis resolving capabilities of reconstructed helical CT scans obtained with various imaging parameters versus those of conventional CT scans and the effect of decreasing slice index on the z-axis resolution of helical CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A z-axis line-pair phantom was imaged using conventional nonoverlapped CT scans, conventional CT scans that overlapped by 50%, and helical CT scans with pitches of 1.0 and 1.5. All helical images were reconstructed at comparable slice indexes (image indexes of 2.0, 1.0, and 0.5 mm for pitch = 1.0, and image indexes of 3.0, 1.5, and 0.75 mm for pitch = 1.5). Midline coronal and sagittal reconstructed images were obtained to allow standardized visualization of line pairs. The reconstructed images were reviewed separately by 10 radiologists. RESULTS: The overall z-axis resolution of reconstructed helical CT scans equaled or exceeded that of nonoverlapped conventional CT scans in all cases and equaled that of 50% overlapped conventional CT scans in 75% of cases. The 1.0-pitch helical sequences showed improved z-axis resolution with decreasing slice index. No statistically significant improvement in z-axis resolution could be determined by the observers for 1.5-pitch sequences with decreasing slice index. CONCLUSION: The use of helical CT with a pitch of 1.0 or 1.5 and an increased slice index can improve the z-axis resolution of reconstructed images when compared with nonoverlapped conventional CT and frequently equals the resolution of 50% overlapped conventional CT. This improvement in z-axis resolution should improve the appearance of reconstructed images (as used in CT angiography and three-dimensional imaging) by reducing partial volume artifacts while affording faster scanning at a reduced skin-surface radiation dose.

Humans↗