Biomedical subjects

C Jill Harrison

Publications and source records attributed to C Jill Harrison.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2025

Phylogeny, chromosomal mapping and expression analyses of wheat CLAVATA pathway components suggest differential selection on receptor-like kinases, CLEs and T3 WOXes.

Ensuring continuous global food security is a major challenge of the 21st century. Wheat contributes approximately 20% of the total calories consumed by humans, and an estimated 60% increase in production will be required by 2050 to meet forecast global demand. In cereals like wheat, inflorescence (ear) size and branching patterns determine the number of flowers (florets) and grains produced, and these aspects of plant architecture are regulated by the activity of stem cells in the growing shoot tips. CLAVATA peptide and receptor-like kinase signalling regulates angiosperm stem cell activity, and as changes in CLAVATA function can improve crop yields, CLAVATA is a key target for reverse engineering. Here, we identify components of the wheat CLAVATA pathway using genome searches against Triticum aestivum and its wild relatives Triticum turgidum ssp. durum, Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides, Triticum urartu and Aegilops tauschii. Using phylogenetic and synteny analysis, we determine the relationship between homoeologues and infer patterns of gene family evolution. Whilst CLAVATA1, BARELY ANY MERISTEM, RECEPTOR-LIKE PROTEIN KINASE 2, CORYNE and CLAVATA2 receptor-like kinase homologues are mainly present as single genome copies as in other grasses, CLAVATA3-like but not TRACHEARY ELEMENT DIFFERENTIATION FACTOR (TDIF)-like peptide encoding genes and WUSCHEL-LIKE HOMEOBOX (WOX) genes have expanded copy numbers with many gene gains and losses during evolution. Our results highlight wheat CLAVATA pathway components for reverse genetic analysis and indicate potential differential selection on wheat receptor-like kinases, their peptide ligands and WOXes.

Triticum↗

PubMed2006

Anisocotyly and meristem initiation in an unorthodox plant, Streptocarpus rexii (Gesneriaceae).

In common with most Old World Gesneriaceae; Streptocarpus Lindl. shows anisocotylous growth, i.e., the continuous growth of one cotyledon after germination. Linked to this phenomenon is an unorthodox behaviour of the shoot apical meristem (SAM) that determines the growth pattern of acaulescent species (subgenus Streptocarpus). In contrast caulescent species develop a conventional central post-embryonic SAM (mainly subgenus Streptocarpella). We used S. rexii Lindl. as a model to investigate anisocotyly and meristem initiation in Streptocarpus by using histological techniques and analyses of the expression pattern of the meristematic marker SrSTM1 during ontogeny. In contrast to Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh., S. rexii does not establish a SAM during embryogenesis, and the first evidence of a SAM-like structure occurs during post-embryonic development on the axis (the petiolode) between the two cotyledons. The expression pattern of SrSTM1 suggests a function in maintaining cell division activity in the cotyledons before becoming localized in the basal meristem, initially at the proximal ends of both cotyledons, later at the base of the continuously growing macrocotyledon, and the groove meristem on the petiolode. The latter is equivalent to a displaced SAM seemingly originating de novo under the influence of endogenous factors. Applied cytokinin retains SrSTM1expression in the small cotyledon, thus promoting isocotyly and re-establishment of a central post-embryonic SAM. Hormone-dependent delocalization of the process of meristem development could underlie anisocotyly and the unorthodox SAM formation in Streptocarpus.

Cotyledon↗

PubMed2006

A step by step guide to phylogeny reconstruction.

The aim of this paper is to enable those who have never reconstructed a phylogeny to do so from scratch. The paper does not attempt to be a comprehensive theoretical guide, but describes one rigorous way of obtaining phylogenetic trees. Those who follow the methods outlined should be able to understand the basic ideas behind the steps taken, the meaning of the phylogenetic trees obtained and the scope of questions that can be answered with phylogenetic methods. The protocols have been successfully tested by volunteers with no phylogenetic experience.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2005

Independent recruitment of a conserved developmental mechanism during leaf evolution.

Vascular plants evolved in the Middle to Late Silurian period, about 420 million years ago. The fossil record indicates that these primitive plants had branched stems with sporangia but no leaves. Leaf-like lateral outgrowths subsequently evolved on at least two independent occasions. In extant plants, these events are represented by microphyllous leaves in lycophytes (clubmosses, spikemosses and quillworts) and megaphyllous leaves in euphyllophytes (ferns, gymnosperms and angiosperms). Our current understanding of how leaves develop is restricted to processes that operate during megaphyll formation. Because microphylls and megaphylls evolved independently, different mechanisms might be required for leaf formation. Here we show that this is not so. Gene expression data from a microphyllous lycophyte, phylogenetic analyses, and a cross-species complementation experiment all show that a common developmental mechanism can underpin both microphyll and megaphyll formation. We propose that this mechanism might have operated originally in the context of primitive plant apices to facilitate bifurcation. Recruitment of this pathway to form leaves occurred independently and in parallel in different plant lineages.

Antirrhinum↗