PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Jinks

Publications and source records attributed to C Jinks.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

A brief screening tool for knee pain in primary care (KNEST). 2. Results from a survey in the general population aged 50 and over.

OBJECTIVE: To use a brief screening tool to identify knee pain (all knee pain, non-chronic and chronic knee pain) and associated health-care use in the general population aged 50 yr and over. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was mailed to 8995 individuals registered with three general practices in North Staffordshire, UK. The questionnaire included a Knee Pain Screening Tool (KNEST), the Short Form 36 (SF36), demographic questions and, for those who reported knee pain, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). RESULTS: The survey achieved a 77% response. The 12-month period prevalence of all knee pain was 46.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 45.6%, 48.0%]. Figures for non-chronic knee pain (pain of less than 3 months duration) and chronic knee pain (pain of more than 3 months duration) were 21.5% (95% CI 20.5%, 22.5%) and 25.3% (95% CI 24.3%, 26.4%) respectively. An estimated 6% of the older population had non-chronic but severe knee pain or disability. Thirty-three per cent of all knee pain sufferers had consulted their general practitioner (GP) about their symptom in the last year. This included 34% of those with non-chronic but severe knee pain or disability and 56% of those with chronic and severe knee pain or disability. The use of private treatments or services for knee pain was minimal. A third of those with chronic and severe knee pain or disability had not used any services (including GP) in the last year. CONCLUSIONS: The KNEST is a simple tool for the identification of individuals with knee pain and their health-care use. Focusing only on chronic knee pain will underestimate the total need and demand for health-care in knee pain sufferers in the general older population, as non-chronic as well as chronic knee pain has a significant impact on people's lives and on their use of primary health-care. The KNEST, when combined with the WOMAC, identifies population groups who have potentially diverse health-care needs and who might benefit from effective health-care. These data can be used alongside evidence on effective treatments by service planners when considering needs for the care of older adults in primary care.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Postal surveys in primary care: the hidden burden.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate and analyse concerns raised by unsolicited mailing of a health survey to a community sample of older people. DESIGN: Observation and monitoring of all telephone calls received throughout a 6-week survey mailing period. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total sample of all those aged over 50 years registered with three general practices in North Staffordshire (n=8995). MAIN VARIABLE STUDIED: The frequency of telephone contact following the receipt of a postal questionnaire, and the nature of any associated distress. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who receive unsolicited postal surveys may experience anxiety because of the actual receipt of the questionnaire, concerns about taking part or not taking part, personal issues, anger, worthiness or frustration with NHS services. Anxiety may also be triggered because of administrative issues, for example lost mail or overlap between mailing periods. Researchers can adopt measures both to reduce the potential anxiety and often hidden burden of postal surveys, and to facilitate individuals' positive participation in research.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

A brief screening tool for knee pain in primary care. 1. Validity and reliability.

OBJECTIVES: To design and test the performance of a new knee pain screening tool (KNEST), both separately and together with a combination of existing questionnaires, which will be used to assess the general health status of knee pain sufferers in primary care. METHODS: A postal survey of knee pain and disability was sent to a random sample of 240 individuals aged over 55 yr registered with two general practices in North STAFFORDSHIRE: The survey questionnaire consisted of the KNEST; a pain manikin; the Short Form 36 (SF-36); the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); demographic questions; and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) for those who reported knee pain. A second, identical questionnaire was sent 2 weeks later to a random subsample of responders (n=80) to test repeatability. RESULTS: An 85% baseline response rate was achieved for the first questionnaire. The 12-month prevalence of knee pain identified from baseline responders to the survey was 45%. A response rate of 74% was achieved for the repeatability questionnaire. Each section of the questionnaire was well completed and repeatability was good for nearly all measures (most reliability scores exceeded 0.6). A new core question about knee pain showed good internal reliability, with an agreement score of 91% between baseline and retest assessment, and good construct validity in relation to knee pain identified on the pain manikin (agreement 95%). Good agreement was found between recalled consultation for knee pain in the questionnaire and evidence of consultation for knee pain in general practice records. CONCLUSIONS: The KNEST appears to be a reliable and valid composite tool for the study of population needs and outcomes of care for people aged over 55 yr with knee pain.

Disability Evaluation↗
PubMed2000

Mobile medics? The mobility of doctors in the European Economic Area.

The Treaty of Rome seeks to generate a common European market whereby all barriers to the free movement of produce, capital, services and labour are removed. Current EU policy on the free movement of labour requires that healthcare workers, who are EU citizens and meet certain training criteria, have the right to register to practice in member states other than the one in which they trained. This policy is underpinned by the EEC Directives. For example, the Medical Directive 93/16/EEC describes the framework for the mutual recognition of medical diplomas, certificates and other evidence of qualifications through out the European Economic Area (EEA). The potential impact of this for health policy is clear-workforce planning and the demand for doctors, (and also nurses and other health care professionals), could be particularly affected by new forces impacting on their supply. This paper reports on the reality of labour mobility today, and on the factors upon which mobility depends, by the means of a case study which, investigated the movement into UK of doctors from the EEA. At a formal level there is mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of qualifications. However, formal and 'real life' recognition could be in tension equating in policy terms to an implementation deficit. As a result, there is a 'mixed picture' which makes predicting the future (both for individual countries and for the European Union) even more difficult. Furthermore, different policy objectives have to be reconciled. Do we want high mobility; or do we want to preserve national manpower planning?

Certification↗
PubMed1998

Workforce planning. Catching the drift.

NHS workforce planning has traditionally ignored the role of doctors and nurses trained in continental Europe and Scandinavia. At present doctors trained in the European Economic Area make up 10 per cent of senior house officers in England and Wales. But the numbers coming to the UK are falling. Falling medical unemployment in Europe will mean these doctors have less incentive to come to the UK, leaving a considerable gap in the NHS workforce. More local research is needed into working patterns and career plans of European-trained nurses and doctors.

European Union↗