PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Kipp

Publications and source records attributed to C Kipp.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

The 0.8% ultraviolet B content of an ultraviolet A sunlamp induces 75% of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in human keratinocytes in vitro.

Tanning lamps, emitting predominantly ultraviolet (UV) A, are used widely throughout the U.K. and other countries, but little is known about the long-term risks associated with their use, especially with respect to skin cancer. We have exposed normal human epidermal keratinocytes to a commercial tanning lamp and used the comet assay in association with DNA repair enzymes T4 endonuclease V and endonuclease III to investigate the relative yields of directly formed cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and indirectly formed types of oxidative DNA damage. To put the risk of using tanning lamps into perspective, the sunbed used in this study (five Philips Performance 80W-R UVA tubes at a distance of 35 cm) was found to be approximately 0.7 times as potent at inducing CPDs as U.K. natural sunlight around noon on a fine summer day. This compares with a relative risk for CPD induction and erythema of 0.8 and 0.7 times, respectively, calculated from the relevant action spectra of tanning lamps and British noontime sunlight. To determine the relative contribution of UVB and UVA to the induction of CPDs and oxidative DNA damage, we modified the spectral output of the tanning lamps with a series of Schott WG UVB filters. The induction of CPDs was more dependent on the UVB component of the sunbed than oxidative types of damage. Schott WG UVB filters with 50% transmission at 305 nm reduced the yield of T4 endonuclease V sites by 42% while there was only a 17% decrease in the yield of endonuclease III sites. CPD induction was not completely abolished after irradiation through WG335 and WG345 nm filters despite there being no detectable UVB. From these data, it was estimated that, although the tanning lamps emitted only 0.8% of their total output in the UVB range, these wavelengths were responsible for the induction of over 75% of CPDs and 50% of the oxidative damage to DNA.

Cells, Cultured↗

The soluble eumelanin precursor 5,6-dihydroxyindole-2-carboxylic acid enhances oxidative damage in human keratinocyte DNA after UVA irradiation.

Soluble melanin precursors are present in serum and may act as skin chromophores contributing to UVR-induced oxidative damage. Our study aimed to determine whether the soluble eumelanin precursor 5,6-dihydroxy-indole-2-carboxylic acid (DHICA) photosensitizes DNA damage in human keratinocytes exposed to UVA irradiation. The HaCaT keratinocytes were incubated with and without DHICA, before irradiation with broadband UVA (320-400 nm). The DNA photodamage was assessed using the comet assay that detects frank single-strand breaks (SSB) and specific oxidative lesions with the addition of endonuclease III. Without DHICA incubation, there was no significant increase in SSB, compared to unirradiated cells, for doses up to 48.5 J/cm2 (< 1 minimum erythemal dose). Preincubation with 0.5 microM DHICA caused an increase in SSB at every UVA dose (significant from 12.1 to 48.5 J/cm2), while varying the DHICA concentration (0.125-2 microM) showed this effect to be concentration dependent such that SSB increased and endonuclease III-sensitive sites decreased with increasing DHICA concentration. The irradiation of cells in the presence of antioxidants (catalase, mannitol and histidine) suggests that DHICA-induced photosensitization is mediated via singlet oxygen and, to a lesser extent, hydroxyl radicals. These results indicate that DHICA can induce strand breaks with UVA at clinically relevant doses via a mechanism involving reactive oxygen species.

Antioxidants↗

Furocoumarin-induced epidermal melanogenesis does not protect against skin photocarcinogenesis in hairless mice.

Topical 6,4,4'-trimethylangelicin (TMA) plus UVA was used to induce intense epidermal pigmentation in inbred HRA.HRII-c/+/Skh hairless pigmented mice over a 13 day period. Subsequent UVB/UVA exposure was used to assess the photoprotective properties of this tan using skin tumors as an endpoint. Comparisons were always made with sibling albino mice. The TMA/UVA treatment was shown to be not carcinogenic when treated mice were compared with untreated control mice over 25 weeks. The tan faded despite daily exposure to UVB/UVA and did not afford any protection when TMA/UVA-treated mice with subsequent UVB/UVA were compared with pigmented mice treated with UVB/UVA only. In one group, the TMA-induced tan was maintained by application of TMA three times a week prior to UVB/UVA for the duration of the experiment. This treatment was associated with a significant increase in tumor risk in both pigmented and albino mice compared to groups treated with UVB/UVA alone. Although pigmented mice had a significant photoprotective advantage, it was shown to be outweighed by the carcinogenic risks of the TMA maintenance treatment when they were compared with mice that did not have this treatment. Nonpretanned pigmented mice developed mild pigmentation during UVB/UVA treatment that was shown to have no protective effect when those mice were compared with albinos. We conclude that induced epidermal tanning with or without furocoumarin enhancement is not an effective way to prevent skin cancer in the HRA.HRII-c/+/Skh mouse model.

Animals↗