PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C L Cunningham

Publications and source records attributed to C L Cunningham.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Localization of genes influencing ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and locomotor activity in BXD recombinant inbred mice.

Genetic differences in ethanol's ability to induce conditioned place preference were studied in 20 BXD Recombinant Inbred (RI) mouse strains and in the C57BL/6J and DBA/2J progenitor strains. Male mice from each strain were exposed to a Pavlovian conditioning procedure in which a distinctive floor stimulus (CS+) was paired four times with ethanol (2 g/kg). A different floor stimulus (CS-) was paired with saline. Control mice were injected only with saline. Floor preference testing without ethanol revealed significant genetic differences in conditioned place preference, with some strains spending nearly 80% time on the ethanol-paired floor while others spent only 50% (i.e., no preference). Control mice showed genetic differences in unconditioned preference for the floor cues, but unconditioned preference was not genetically correlated with conditioned preference. There were also substantial genetic differences in ethanol-stimulated activity, but contrary to psychomotor stimulant theory, ethanol-induced activity on conditioning trials was not positively correlated with strength of conditioned place preference. However, there was a significant negative genetic correlation (r = -0.42) between test session activity and preference. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analyses showed strong associations (P < 0.01) between conditioned place preference and marker loci on chromosomes 4, 8, 9, 18 and 19. Weaker associations (0.01 < P < 0.05) were identified on several other chromosomes. Analysis also yielded several significant QTL for unconditioned preference, ethanol-stimulated activity, and sensitization. Overall, these data support the conclusion that genotype influences ethanol-induced conditioned place preference, presumably via genetic differences in sensitivity to ethanol's rewarding effects. Moreover, several chromosomal regions containing candidate genes of potential relevance to ethanol-induced conditioned place preference have been identified.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Intravenous cocaine self-administration in the C57BL/6J mouse.

Freely behaving C57BL/6J mice with intrajugular catheters were trained to nose-poke for cocaine (0.75 mg/kg per 5-microliters infusion) under a fixed-ratio-10 schedule of reinforcement. Mice were given a choice between two nose-poke holes on opposite sides of the apparatus. Nose-pokes by experimental (O) subjects (operant group) were reinforced on only one side and reinforcer delivery coincided with the onset of a 10-s time-out light stimulus. Drug delivery to control subjects (yoked group) was determined by the behavior of O mice. Nose-poke rate increased in O subjects, whereas yoked subjects did not acquire the nose-poking response. Moreover, nose-poking was selective for the cocaine-paired side in O subjects. When saline infusions were substituted for cocaine (i.e., extinction), nose-poking in O subjects decreased, whereas yoked controls were unaffected. O subjects developed a preference for the drug-associated side of the apparatus during extinction. Overall, these data offer strong evidence of cocaine-directed behavior in the C57BL/6 inbred mouse strain. More generally, these findings support the feasibility of using intravenous self-administration to assess reinforcement in genetically well-defined populations.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Modulation of ethanol reinforcement by conditioned hyperthermia.

The present study was designed to determine whether a signal for availability of self-administered ethanol would acquire the ability to elicit a conditioned thermal response and to alter ethanol self-administration. Non-deprived male albino rats (n = 8) were exposed to a differential conditioning procedure in which brief (30-min) periods of access to sweetened ethanol on a fixed-ratio operant schedule were either signalled (CS+trials) or unsignalled (Blank+trials). A different stimulus signalled trials on which barpressing was not reinforced (CS-trials). Body temperature was recorded continuously from implanted telemetry devices. As in previous studies involving experimenter-administered ethanol injections, the stimulus paired with self-administered ethanol (CS+) acquired the ability to elicit a conditioned increase in body temperature. Moreover, barpressing for ethanol was greater on signalled trials (CS+) than on unsignalled trials (Blank+), indicating that ethanol's reinforcing efficacy was altered by CS+. Ethanol self-administration was significantly correlated with the anticipatory increase in body temperature on CS+ trials (Pearson r = +0.77). When ethanol was removed, leaving sucrose alone as the reinforcer, the signal's effect on barpressing was eliminated. This finding suggests the signal's effect depended on ethanol's pharmacological properties. In general, these data are consistent with theories that attribute the signal's effect to conditioned changes in motivation to obtain ethanol or to an interaction between the conditioned response and ethanol's unconditioned effects. The specific pattern of results appears to support hypotheses linking ethanol's thermal and motivational effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed1994

Motivational properties of ethanol in mice selectively bred for ethanol-induced locomotor differences.

Ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation has been proposed to be positively correlated with the rewarding effects of ethanol (Wise and Bozarth 1987). The present experiments provided a test of this hypothesis using a genetic model. Three behavioral indices of the motivational effects of ethanol (drinking, taste conditioning, place conditioning) were examined in mice from two independent FAST lines, selectively bred for sensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation, and mice from two independent SLOW lines, selectively bred for insensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation. In a single-bottle procedure, mice were allowed access to drinking tubes containing ethanol in a concentration (1-12% v/v) that increased over 24 consecutive days. FAST mice consumed greater amounts of ethanol solution. In a two-bottle procedure, mice were allowed access to tubes containing water or various concentrations of ethanol (2-8% v/v) over 6 days. FAST mice generally showed greater preference for ethanol solutions than SLOW mice. In a conditioned taste aversion procedure, mice received access to saccharin solution followed by injection of 2.5 g/kg ethanol (IP). SLOW mice developed aversion to the saccharin flavor more readily than FAST mice. In a series of place conditioning experiments, tactile stimuli were paired with various doses of ethanol (0.8-2.0 g/kg). During conditioning, FAST mice showed locomotor stimulation after 1.0, 1.2 and 2.0 g/kg ethanol while SLOW mice did not. During testing, mice conditioned with 1.2 g/kg and 2.0 g/kg ethanol showed conditioned place preference, but there were no line differences in magnitude of preference. These results indicate that genetic selection for sensitivity to ethanol-stimulated activity has resulted in genetic differences in ethanol drinking and ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion but not ethanol-induced conditioned place preference. Overall, these data provide mixed support for the psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed1993

Drug-induced hypothermia and conditioned place aversion.

This study examined the relationship between ethanol's thermal and motivational effects in a place conditioning task. In three experiments, male albino rats were exposed to a differential conditioning procedure that paired a distinctive tactile stimulus with ethanol (1.2 or 1.8 g/kg) or lithium chloride (3 meq/kg); a different stimulus was paired with saline. Different groups were exposed to ambient temperatures (Ta) of 5 degrees, 21 degrees or 32 degrees C during each 60-min conditioning trial. Both ethanol and lithium chloride produced hypothermia and conditioned place aversion in rats conditioned at normal Ta. Exposure to high Ta reduced drug-induced hypothermia, increased activity, and decreased conditioned place aversion. Exposure to low Ta did not enhance drug-induced hypothermia or change conditioned place aversion. In general, these findings support the suggestion that the hedonic effects of ethanol and lithium chloride interact with their thermal effects.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Pavlovian conditioning of heart rate and body temperature with morphine: effects of CS duration.

Rats were exposed to a conditioning procedure that varied the duration of overlap between a light-noise conditioned stimulus (CS) and the effects of a morphine (5 mg/kg) unconditioned stimulus (US). Three paired (P) groups differed in CS duration (5, 15, or 60 min) but had the same CS-US interval (30 s). A control group (U) received explicitly unpaired presentations of CS and US. P groups showed CS-specific attenuation of the bradycardic response and enhancement of the hyperthermic response to morphine. During placebo tests, the CS elicited conditioned increases in heart rate and body temperature in Groups P15 and P60. Group P5 showed a conditioned increase in heart rate but not in body temperature. Overall, strength of conditioning was directly related to CS duration. These data indicate that duration of overlap between a CS and drug-induced changes in a target response system is an important determinant of Pavlovian drug conditioning.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Haloperidol does not alter expression of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference.

A recent experiment (Risinger et al., Psychopharmacology, 107 (1992) 453-456) has shown that haloperidol does not prevent acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference, suggesting that dopaminergic mechanisms do not mediate the primary rewarding properties of ethanol. The present experiment examined whether haloperidol would prevent the expression of conditioned reward to ethanol-paired stimuli using the place conditioning paradigm. DBA/2J mice received four pairings of a tactile stimulus with ethanol (2 g/kg, IP). A different stimulus was paired with saline. Before preference testing, different groups received one of three doses of haloperidol (0, 0.05 or 0.1 mg/kg); ethanol was not given. Haloperidol produced a dose-dependent decrease in locomotor activity, but did not affect conditioned place preference. These results suggest that expression of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference is mediated by non-dopaminergic mechanisms.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Genetic determinants of ethanol reinforcement.

In this paper, we present examples of some of the several behaviors which have been taken to indicate the reinforcing efficacy of drugs, including ethanol. Efforts to identify the genetic determinants of these behaviors have employed diverse pharmacogenetic methods. For example, we have used selective breeding to develop mice selected for severe or attenuated ethanol withdrawal and have found that Withdrawal Seizure Prone mice show a greater conditioned preference for ethanol-associated locations than the selected Withdrawal Seizure Resistant line. Similarly, HOT mice, selected for insensitivity to ethanol-induced hypothermia, had greater conditioned place preference after ethanol training than COLD mice, selected for ethanol hypothermic sensitivity. We have also developed selected mouse lines responsive or unresponsive to ethanol-stimulated locomotor activity. These FAST and SLOW lines develop sensitization rather than tolerance to ethanol-induced activity. Using inbred strains of mice, others had shown that strains differed in preference for drinking ethanol solutions. We found that these strains also differed in acceptance of ethanol. Single-gene techniques have been used to show that preference drinking is significantly altered in mutant rodent strains lacking hypothalamic vasopressin, or with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. In a specific panel of Recombinant Inbred mouse strains, we found that a single gene appeared to control a significant portion of the variance in preference drinking. These examples show that traits putatively related to drug reinforcement show substantial genetic control. Specifically, single-gene methods show promise of identification and mapping of genes related to drug reinforcement.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Genetic differences in the rewarding and activating effects of morphine and ethanol.

The influence of genotype on the rewarding and locomotor activating effects of morphine and ethanol was examined in the place conditioning paradigm. Two inbred mouse strains (C57BL/6J and DBA/2J) were exposed to a differential conditioning procedure in which each mouse received four pairings of a distinctive floor stimulus with IP injection of morphine (0, 2.5, 5 or 10 mg/kg) or ethanol (0, 1, 2, 3 or 4 g/kg). A different floor stimulus was paired with saline. Conditioning trials lasted 30 min and each experiment concluded with a floor preference test in the absence of drug. In accord with previous studies, morphine evoked a dose-dependent increase in activity during conditioning that was greater in C57BL/6J mice than in DBA/2J mice. In contrast, ethanol produced a dose-dependent increase in activity that was greater in DBA/2J than in C57BL/6J mice. Both strains showed conditioned place preference with morphine, but only the DBA/2J strain showed conditioned place preference with ethanol. No conditioned place aversion was seen. With both drugs, stronger place preference conditioning was obtained in DBA/2J mice, supporting the general conclusion that sensitivity to drug reward is influenced by genotype. The fact that the same genotype is more sensitive to the rewarding effects of two different drugs supports theories postulating commonality in the biological mechanisms of drug reward. Although the outcome of the ethanol study supports predictions of the psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction concerning the relationship between drug-induced activation and reward, the outcome of the morphine study does not.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Haloperidol reduces ethanol-induced motor activity stimulation but not conditioned place preference.

This experiment examined the impact of a dopamine receptor blocker on ethanol's rewarding effect in a place conditioning paradigm. DBA/2J mice received four pairings of a tactile stimulus with ethanol (2 g/kg, IP), haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg, IP)+ethanol, or haloperidol alone. A different stimulus was paired with saline. Ethanol produced increases in locomotor activity that were reduced by haloperidol. However, conditioned preference for the ethanol-paired stimulus was not affected by haloperidol. Haloperidol alone decreased locomotor activity during conditioning and produced a place aversion. These results indicate a dissociation of ethanol's activating and rewarding effects. Moreover, they suggest that ethanol's ability to induce conditioned place preference is mediated by nondopaminergic mechanisms.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Context-drug pairings enhance tolerance to ethanol-induced disruption of operant responding.

Much of the research implicating learning in the development of tolerance to ethanol-induced impairment has used an experimental design in which different groups receive drug either before or after an opportunity to perform an instrumental or operant task. The stronger tolerance observed in subjects who perform while intoxicated is most often attributed to the reinforced practice of a learned compensatory response. Using an experimental procedure modeled after Chen (1979), the present study examined an alternative theoretical basis for tolerance in the before-versus-after design. Specifically, the effects of Pavlovian context-drug pairings were assessed under circumstances that precluded reinforced practice of the operant response. Three groups of food-deprived rats were initially trained to barpress for sucrose on an FR15 schedule. After 30 sessions, the bar was retracted and the dipper was covered for a 3-day tolerance acquisition phase. During this phase, each group received an IP injection 15 min before and 45 min after each session. The Paired group received ethanol (1.2 g/kg) before and saline after the session, thus pairing ethanol with cues of the test chamber. The Unpaired group received saline before and ethanol after the session, while the No-Drug group always received saline. During a final test phase, all groups received ethanol (1.5 g/kg) before access to sucrose on the FR schedule. The Paired group completed the first FR15 sequence more rapidly than either control group, indicating that context-ethanol pairings enhanced tolerance to the drug's disruptive effect on the initiation of operant responding.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Genetic differences in ethanol-induced hyperglycemia and conditioned taste aversion.

Genetic differences in the hyperglycemic response to acute ethanol exposure and ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion were examined using inbred mice. Adult male C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice were injected with ethanol (0-6 g/kg, I.P.) and blood glucose levels determined over 4 h. C57 mice demonstrated greater dose-dependent elevations in blood glucose compared to DBA mice. In a conditioned taste aversion procedure, water deprived mice received ethanol injections (1-4 g/kg, I.P.) immediately after access to a NaCl flavored solution. DBA mice developed aversion to the ethanol-paired flavor at a lower dose (2 g/kg) than C57 mice. These results provide further support for a possible inverse genetic relationship between sensitivity to ethanol-induced hyperglycemia and sensitivity to conditioned taste aversion.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Effect of Ro 15-4513 on ethanol-induced conditioned place preference.

The benzodiazepine receptor inverse agonist Ro 15-4513 reverses a number of ethanol's effects, including its reinforcing properties as measured through self-administration. The present study examined the effect of this putative ethanol antagonist in a place conditioning design that has been shown to be sensitive to ethanol's rewarding properties in mice. Using an unbiased differential conditioning procedure, DBA/2J mice received, on alternate days, pairings of a distinctive floor stimulus (CS+) with either ethanol (2 g/kg), Ro 15-4513 (3 mg/kg), or a combination of ethanol and Ro 15-4513. On alternate days, a different distinctive floor stimulus (CS-) was paired with vehicle. Under these conditions, ethanol produced a conditioned place preference that was unaffected by Ro 15-4513. Ro 15-4513 alone did not produce either a place preference or aversion. Ro 15-4513 did produce reductions in locomotor activity during conditioning, indicating it was behaviorally active. These results indicate that a dose of Ro 15-4513 that alters general activity does not affect ethanol reward.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Conditioned activation induced by ethanol: role in sensitization and conditioned place preference.

Previous studies of ethanol-induced activation and place preference conditioning have shown that repeated exposure to ethanol produces sensitization to ethanol's locomotor activating effect in mice. This experiment was designed to determine whether the behavioral sensitization to ethanol that occurs during place preference conditioning is due to development of a Pavlovian conditioned activity response. Mice (DBA/2J) in the experimental group (BEFORE) received four pairings of a distinctive floor stimulus with ethanol (2 g/kg, IP); a different floor stimulus was paired with saline (counterbalanced). Mice in two control groups were exposed equally to each floor stimulus and were handled and injected as often as experimental mice. One control group (AFTER) always received ethanol in the home cage 1 h after exposure to the floor stimulus, while the other control group (NO-DRUG) never received ethanol during conditioning. BEFORE group mice showed a significant conditioned place preference, whereas control mice did not. Activity tests after saline or ethanol indicated higher activity levels in BEFORE mice compared to control mice, regardless of floor stimulus. Moreover, BEFORE mice were more active on their CS+ floor than on their CS- floor during saline tests; activity was equally elevated on both floors during ethanol tests. These results support the hypothesis that sensitization to ethanol's activating effect is mediated by Pavlovian conditioning. Further, they suggest that place conditioning established-associative control by two kinds of stimuli; the specific tactile cues serving as CS+ and CS- and the general environmental cues common to both CS+ and CS- trials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Ambient temperature effects on taste aversion conditioned by ethanol: contribution of ethanol-induced hypothermia.

Six experiments examined the effects of low (5-10 degrees C), normal (21 degrees C), or high (32 degrees) ambient temperature on conditioned taste aversion and body temperature changes produced by ethanol, lithium chloride, or morphine sulfate. Fluid-deprived rats received five to seven taste conditioning trials at 48-hr intervals. On each trial, access to saccharin at normal ambient temperature was followed by injection of drug or saline and placement for 6 hr into a temperature-controlled enclosure. Exposure to low ambient temperature facilitated, whereas exposure to high ambient temperature retarded acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion. The ability of an alteration in ambient temperature to influence conditioned taste aversion varied as a function of ethanol dose and was related to ambient temperature's effect on ethanol-induced hypothermia. More specifically, strength of conditioned taste aversion was negatively correlated with core body temperature after ethanol injection. Alterations in ambient temperature alone did not affect ingestion of a paired flavor solution in the absence of drug. Moreover, alterations in ambient temperature did not appear to influence conditioned taste aversion by changing ethanol pharmacokinetics. Finally, high and low ambient temperature did not affect development of taste aversion conditioned by lithium chloride or morphine sulfate. The overall pattern of data presented by these experiments supports the hypothesis that ambient-temperature influences strength of ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion by altering the hypothermic response to ethanol. More generally, these data support the suggestion that body temperature change induced by ethanol is related to ethanol's aversive motivational effects and may be involved in modulating ethanol intake.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Assessment of ethanol's hedonic effects in mice selectively bred for sensitivity to ethanol-induced hypothermia.

Mice selectively bred for sensitivity (COLD) or insensitivity (HOT) to the hypothermic effect of ethanol were tested in three tasks purported to assess ethanol's hedonic properties: place conditioning, taste conditioning, and ethanol drinking. In the place conditioning task, distinctive tactile (floor) stimuli were differentially paired with injection of ethanol (2.25 g/kg) or saline, and preference for the tactile stimuli was assessed during a choice test without ethanol. In the taste conditioning task, fluid-deprived mice were given repeated access to saccharin followed by injection of ethanol (2.25 g/kg). In the drinking task, mice were given access on alternate days to a single drinking tube containing water or ethanol in a concentration that gradually increased from 1 to 12% (v/v) over days. HOT mice showed greater conditioned preference for ethanol-paired flavor cues, and greater aversion for ethanol-paired flavor cues, and drank less ethanol at concentrations above 5% than COLD mice. HOT mice also showed higher levels of ethanol-stimulated activity than COLD mice. Control experiments indicated that the lines did not differ in initial preference for the tactile and flavor stimuli used in the conditioning tasks. Because the same line differences were seen in mice selected from two genetically independent populations, these studies offer strong evidence of genetic correlations between ethanol's thermal effect and its effect on activity, place conditioning and taste conditioning. Evidence of a genetic correlation between ethanol's thermal effect and ethanol drinking, however, is weaker since it is based on a line difference observed in only one of the genetic replicates. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Alcohol Drinking↗