PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C L Deckers

Publications and source records attributed to C L Deckers.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Monotherapy versus polytherapy for epilepsy: a multicenter double-blind randomized study.

PURPOSE: Monotherapy has been the gold standard in epilepsy treatment for the last 20 years, partly because of the reputation for increased toxicity of polytherapy. However, monotherapy and polytherapy have not been compared in a double-blind clinical trial. Open trials that compared the two treatments were not optimally designed and compared the two at unequal drug loads (i.e., at nonequivalent dosages). We report on a double-blind clinical trial in which a combination of carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproate (VPA) was compared with CBZ monotherapy. Patients started with equal drug loads, and neurotoxicity was the primary outcome measure. METHODS: The 130 adult patients with untreated generalized tonic-clonic and/or partial seizures were randomized to equal drug loads of either monotherapy (400 mg CBZ per day) or polytherapy (200 mg CBZ plus 300 mg VPA per day). Outcome was measured by seizure counts, clinimetric epilepsy scales, and neuropsychological tests at baseline, at 2 and 12 months, and irregularly between 2 and 12 months. RESULTS: No statistical differences were found between the two treatments in the reduction of seizure frequencies, in overall neurotoxicity, or in overall systemic toxicity. The frequencies and clinimetric scores of certain adverse effects did differ (e.g., more monotherapy patients remained sedated, and more polytherapy patients gained weight). Fewer polytherapy patients withdrew because of adverse effects (14 vs. 22%), although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.15). Neuropsychological assessment did not show significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found in overall neurotoxicity between monotherapy and polytherapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Selection of antiepileptic drug polytherapy based on mechanisms of action: the evidence reviewed.

PURPOSE: When monotherapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) fails, combination therapy is tried in an attempt to improve effectiveness by improving efficacy, tolerability, or both. We reviewed the available studies (both animal and human) on AED polytherapy to determine whether AEDs can be selected for combination therapy based on their mechanisms of action, and if so, which combinations are associated with increased effectiveness. Because various designs and methods of analysis were used in these studies, it was also necessary to evaluate the appropriateness of these approaches. METHODS: Published papers reporting on AED polytherapy in animals or humans were identified by Medline search and by checking references cited in these papers. RESULTS: Thirty-nine papers were identified reporting on two-drug AED combinations. Several combinations were reported to offer improved effectiveness, but no uniform approach was used in either animal or human studies for the evaluation of pharmacodynamic drug interactions; efficacy was often the only end point. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that AED polytherapy based on mechanisms of action may enhance effectiveness. In particular, combining a sodium channel blocker with a drug enhancing GABAergic inhibition appears to be advantageous. Combining two GABA mimetic drugs or combining an AMPA antagonist with an NMDA antagonist may enhance efficacy, but tolerability is sometimes reduced. Combining two sodium channel blockers seems less promising. However, given the incomplete knowledge of the pathophysiology of seizures and indeed of the exact mechanisms of action of AEDs, an empirical but rational approach for evaluating AED combinations is of fundamental importance. This would involve appropriate testing of all possible combinations in animal models and subsequent evaluation of advantageous combinations in clinical trials. Testing procedures in animals should include the isobologram method, and the concept of drug load should be the basis of studies in patients with epilepsy.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Effects of polytherapy compared with monotherapy in antiepileptic drugs: an animal study.

Although monotherapy in epilepsy treatment is frequently advocated, this is not based on studies with equal drug loads. This study was performed to investigate the experimental background of polytherapy with standardized drug loads. Dose-dependent effects on grip strength, accelerod performance, and spontaneous behavior of rats was used to study the effect of combining valproate and ethosuximide. The potency of the drugs (combination) was obtained by fitting the sigmoid Emax equation to the data. Drug interaction was assessed using the isobologram method and quantified by comparing equivalent drug loads with their 95% confidence intervals. We found that the effects of valproate and ethosuximide combine in a simple additive way in the grip strength experiment as well as in the accelerod experiment. In the behavioral studies, however, a higher drug load of the combination was needed to obtain the same amount of sedation, signifying infra-additivity. Infra-additivity of sedative effects is an important finding because this is by far the most frequent side effect mentioned in human studies. However, assessment of the therapeutic effect of the combination will have to be completed before a preference for mono- or polytherapy, based on the balance of adverse effects and efficacy, can be expressed.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Reappraisal of polytherapy in epilepsy: a critical review of drug load and adverse effects.

PURPOSE: We reviewed the literature to determine whether an analysis of published data could clarify the relationship between antiepileptic drug (AED) polytherapy and adverse affects (AE). We highlight the problems encountered. METHODS: We made a Medline-search for articles published between 1974 and 1994 reporting the number of AE and doses or serum levels of every AED, per patient or treatment group, and used the PDD/DDD ratio to calculate AED load per patient from doses or the OSL/AToxL ratio to do so from serum levels of individual drugs. The PDD/DDD is the sum of ratios of the actual prescribed daily doses divided by the published average therapeutic dose of each drug. The OSL/AToxL is the sum of each observed serum level divided by its average toxic level. RESULTS: We retrieved 118 trial reports. Most had to be excluded because of incomplete reporting of concomitant medication or AE. The data of the 15 articles selected for further analysis indicate a relationship between drug load and number of AE. We noted no relationship between the number of AEDs administered and AE. In add-on studies, the difference in neurotoxicity between the active and placebo arm may be obscured if the relative increase in drug load is small, as exemplified by the study of McGuire et al.. CONCLUSIONS: Articles reporting add-on trials of new AEDs generally do not provide detailed information about the basic medication to which the new AED is added, which makes calculation of total drug load impossible. Furthermore, often only frequency of AE is reported, not severity or development of tolerance, making it difficult to judge the impact of AE. However, despite the paucity of available information, we present some evidence that toxicity in AED polytherapy may be related to total drug load, rather than to the number of drugs administered. Therefore, the present trend to reject polytherapy for fear of increased toxicity is not warranted, which removes one of the objections to initiating specific research to prove or disprove the value of AED combinations as long as the drug load is appropriate.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed1997

Adverse effects in epilepsy therapy. Wait and see or go for it?

OBJECTIVES: Attention for adverse effects (AEs) is important for optimizing epilepsy treatment. However, a uniform strategy is lacking. In particular there appears to be a dichotomy between those who "wait and see" and those who "go for it", i.e. routinely check a list of AEs. Our intention is to identify the effects of different approaches. METHODS: Trial reports on carbamazepine or valproate monotherapy (Medline-search), and data from the Nijmegen Epilepsy Research Group were analyzed. RESULTS: Analysis suggests that for certain AEs, such as diplopia, dysarthria, affect and mood disturbances, headache, dizziness, gastro-intestinal disturbances, dermatological disturbances and idiosyncratic reactions, it does not matter which approach is chosen. However, sedation, cognitive impairments, sexual dysfunction, hair changes, nystagmus, gait disturbances, tremor and weight changes are reported more frequently when routinely checked. The value of routine laboratory monitoring is, however, questioned. CONCLUSIONS: Use of different strategies to detect AEs obstructs estimation of risks of AEDs. Baseline measurements and regular checking for those AEs, which are reported more frequently by authors who actively search for AEs, is advisable.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed1997

Newer anticonvulsant drugs: role of pharmacology, drug interactions and adverse reactions in drug choice.

In the last few years a number of new anticonvulsants have been introduced into clinical practice mainly as add-on therapy in patients who do not become seizure-free while receiving established anticonvulsants. Up to now, no single drug has been shown to be more effective at controlling seizures of a particular type than another, so other factors such as mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, dosage regimens or the spectrum of adverse drug reactions and interactions are used when making a choice between one agent and another. The mechanism of action of tiagabine and vigabatrin is very specific; both agents increase gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels through inhibition of reuptake and catabolism respectively. However, the mechanism of action of gabapentin is unknown and those of felbamate, lamotrigine and topiramate are not sufficiently clarified as yet, and may be multiple. Great advances have been made in improving the pharmacokinetic characteristics of these newer anticonvulsants. Gabapentin and vigabatrin exhibit relatively ideal pharmacokinetic properties as they are not bound to proteins, are excreted mostly unchanged in the urine and show linear pharmacokinetics. Lamotrigine possesses a highly variable elimination half-life depending on the co-medication. Tiagabine is highly protein bound and zonisamide shows nonlinear pharmacokinetics; both these drugs are extensively metabolised. Problematic drug interactions between newer anticonvulsants and other drugs in general occur rarely when these agents are given concomitantly. However, in common with most new drugs, there are very few data on the use of the newer anticonvulsants in women of childbearing age. Studies done so far on interactions with oral contraceptives used low anticonvulsant dosages for a very short time. The newer anticonvulsants elicit adverse reactions that, while not being unique, are particularly associated with that drug. For example, felbamate may cause aplastic anaemia and fulminant liver failure, lamotrigine is prone to cause skin rash, and oxcarbazepine may cause symptomatic hyponatraemia. Topiramate and zonisamide cause kidney stones, and vigabatrin may induce psychiatric syndromes. Although highly diverse in structure and activity, these newer drugs offer new possibilities for treating refractory epilepsy. However, since no single factor can dictate the choice of drug nor predict the success of treatment, prescribing of these rather expensive drugs has to depend upon careful consideration of the aims of treatment, the characteristics of the drug and the needs of the individual patient.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Alternative pathways of apoptosis induced by methylprednisolone and valinomycin analyzed by flow cytometry.

Apoptosis of murine thymocytes induced by either methylprednisolone or valinomycin was studied by flow cytometry. The apoptosis induced by methylprednisolone followed three stages: an initial decrease in cell volume, indicated by a fall in forward scatter accompanied by faint ethidium bromide staining, a second stage in which the cells became brightly stained by ethidium bromide, and a final stage when the cells were apparently less fluorescent as the nuclei disintegrated into apoptotic bodies. As the forward scatter of cells decreased there was a simultaneous depolarization of the cells and an elevation of intracellular calcium. These early changes preceded the fragmentation of the DNA which also preceded the intense staining of the cells by ethidium bromide. Methylprednisolone-induced apoptosis was inhibited by low concentrations (1 x 10(-7) M) of valinomycin and nonactin, neither of which could themselves induce apoptosis at these low concentrations. Cadmidazolium and cycloheximide arrested the program at an early stage. Okadaic acid allowed volume loss and ethidium bromide staining to proceed in the absence of DNA fragmentation. At high concentrations (1 x 10(-5) M) valinomycin induced a form of apoptosis, but nonactin only caused the cells to fragment. The valinomycin-induced apoptosis, although it involved the degradation of DNA and the disintegration of the nuclei into apoptotic bodies, differed from the methylprednisolone apoptosis as it did not involve a decrease of cell volume and was not inhibited by cycloheximide or affected by okadaic acid.

Animals↗