Primary percutaneous intervention in octogenarians with acute myocardial infarction: the treatment of choice.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Age Factors↗
Biomedical subjects
C L Grines
Publications and source records attributed to C L Grines.
Impaired culprit vessel flow in acute coronary syndromes ineligible for thrombolysis.
The majority of patients with acute myocardial infarction and other acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are considered ineligible for thrombolysis and do not routinely receive reperfusion therapy. We hypothesized that predictors and outcomes of angiographically impaired culprit vessel flow can be identified and compared. This trial evaluated the outcomes following triage angiography in acute coronary syndromes ineligible for thrombolytic therapy. Eligible patients (n=201) with<24 hours of symptoms were randomized to early triage angiography and subsequent therapies based on the angiogram versus conventional medical therapy. This analysis was performed in 165 patients, from experimental and control arms, in whom angiography was performed on the index hospitalization with the outcome of interest being target vessel flow (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grades 0 to 2) on initial angiography. Patients with and without impaired culprit lesion flow were similar with respect to age, gender, diabetes, and prior coronary disease. A family history of premature coronary disease was more common in those with impaired flow, 50.0 versus 28.5% (p=0.02). Abnormal culprit vessel flow was found in 19.2% of patients who underwent angiography within 6 hours of symptom onset; however, after 24 hours this rate was reduced to 11.7%. Impaired culprit lesion flow can be expected in approximately 20% of patients presenting with ACS who are ineligible for reperfusion therapy by conventional guidelines and therefore represents an opportunity for early intervention within 6 hours of the onset of symptoms in these patients.
Actuarial Analysis↗
A comparative analysis of primary stenting and optimal balloon coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. Six month results from the STENT PAMI trial.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of balloon PTCA with final coronary stenosis diameter (SD) < or =30 %, with elective coronary stenting. METHODS: We performed a comparative analysis of the 6 month outcomes in patients treated with primary stenting and those who obtained an optimal balloon PTCA result treated during the first 12 hours of AMI onset included in the STENT PAMI randomized trial. RESULTS: The results were analysed into 3 groups: primary stenting (441 patients, SD=22+/-6 %), optimal PTCA (245 patients), and non-optimal PTCA (182 patients, SD= 37+/-5 %). At the end of the 6 months primary stent group presented with the lowest restenosis(23 vs. 31 vs. 45 %, p=0.001, respectively). Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization rate (TVR) (7 vs. 15.5 vs. 19 %, p=0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: At the 6 month follow-up, primary stenting offered the lowest restenosis and ischemia-driven TVR rates. Compared to optimal balloon PTCA. Non-optimal primary balloon PTCA pts (SD=31-50 %), had the worst late angiographic outcomes and should be treated more actively with coronary stent implantation.
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
Use of low-molecular-weight heparin in percutaneous intervention.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aged↗
Optimization of platelet therapy.
Percutaneous coronary intervention produces vessel wall injury and activation of platelets that are responsible for producing peri-procedural ischemic complications. The importance of adequate antiplatelet therapy during coronary intervention to reduce platelet mediated ischaemic complications has been recognized for some time. Until recently, adjunctive treatment with aspirin was the only available antiplatelet therapy after coronary intervention that had demonstrated benefit. During the last decade, newer and more potent agents have demonstrated consistent reductions in ischaemic events after intervention and appear to have some enduring effect. Additionally, optimization of antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and the thienopyridines after coronary stenting has been an important advance allowing for the current liberal use of coronary stents.
Abciximab↗
Low-molecular-weight heparin therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention: the NICE 1 and NICE 4 trials. National Investigators Collaborating on Enoxaparin Investigators.
Early coronary intervention in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) may be facilitated by adjunctive pharmacotherapies. Concomitant therapies such as low-molecular-weight heparins and platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor blockade offer advantages in safety and efficacy during coronary intervention. Data from randomized clinical trials support the administration of both enoxaparin and platelet GP IIb/IIIa blockade to patients who present with non-ST segment elevation ACS. Enoxaparin, with its proven efficacy, predictability of action, and ease of administration, has been shown to be superior to unfractionated heparin in preventing major coronary events. Abciximab administration during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces the incidence of ischemic adverse outcomes and appears to improve survival in long-term follow-up. The preliminary experience with combining these two therapies during PCI in the NICE 4 trial demonstrates a low incidence of minor/major bleeding and transfusion, and infrequent major cardiac events to 30 days follow-up. Algorithms for the use of these newer adjunctive pharmacotherapies in the care of patients presenting to the cardiac catheterization laboratory are presented.
Abciximab↗
Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.
BACKGROUND: Coronary-stent implantation is frequently performed for treatment of acute myocardial infarction. However, few studies have compared stent implantation with primary angioplasty alone. METHODS: We designed a multicenter study to compare primary angioplasty with angioplasty accompanied by implantation of a heparin-coated Palmaz-Schatz stent. Patients with acute myocardial infarction underwent emergency catheterization and angioplasty. Those with vessels suitable for stenting were randomly assigned to undergo angioplasty with stenting (452 patients) or angioplasty alone (448 patients). RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) minimal luminal diameter was larger after stenting than after angioplasty alone (2.56+/-0.44 mm vs. 2.12+/-0.45 mm, P<0.001), although fewer patients assigned to stenting had grade 3 blood flow (according to the classification of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction trial) (89.4 percent, vs. 92.7 percent in the angioplasty group; P=0.10). After six months, fewer patients in the stent group than in the angioplasty group had angina (11.3 percent vs. 16.9 percent, P=0.02) or needed target-vessel revascularization because of ischemia (7.7 percent vs. 17.0 percent, P<0.001). In addition, the combined primary end point of death, reinfarction, disabling stroke, or target-vessel revascularization because of ischemia occurred in fewer patients in the stent group than in the angioplasty group (12.6 percent vs. 20.1 percent, P<0.01). The decrease in the combined end point was due entirely to the decreased need for target-vessel revascularization. The six-month mortality rates were 4.2 percent in the stent group and 2.7 percent in the angioplasty group (P=0.27). Angiographic follow-up at 6.5 months demonstrated a lower incidence of restenosis in the stent group than in the angioplasty group (20.3 percent vs. 33.5 percent, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction, routine implantation of a stent has clinical benefits beyond those of primary coronary angioplasty alone.
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
Usefulness of intravenous enoxaparin for percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina pectoris.
This pilot study was designed to determine whether the low molecular weight heparin, enoxaparin, could be used for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to provide antithrombotic effects without the full systemic anticoagulation that occurs with the use of unfractionated heparin. Sixty patients were randomized to receive intravenous enoxaparin (1 mg/kg bolus dose) or unfractionated heparin at the time of coronary intervention. Laboratory testing was performed at baseline, 5 minutes, and 4 hours after study drug to test if a single bolus dose of intravenous enoxaparin can consistently achieve therapeutic antithrombotic effect, thus eliminating the need for multiple doses of heparin and closely monitoring levels of anticoagulation during PCI. Thirty percent of patients who received unfractionated heparin required a second bolus of intravenous heparin to achieve the target-activated clotting time of 300 seconds before PCI. Enoxaparin showed antithrombotic properties comparable to that of unfractionated heparin as measured by anti-Xa levels, with less inhibition of thrombin (factor IIa) at the time points measured (p <0.0001). Angioplasty success rates, in-hospital ischemia, bleeding, and vascular complications were similar in both groups. Thus, intravenous enoxaparin has predictable and effective antithrombotic effects during elective PCI. Although the level of anticoagulation attained with enoxaparin is significantly lower than that after unfractionated heparin, no increase in ischemic complications were noted. The use of a single bolus of intravenous enoxaparin, without the need for measuring the activated clotting time or titrating heparin anticoagulation, has the potential for simplifying the performance and perhaps enhancing the safety of PCI.
Aged↗
Low- versus high-dose recombinant urokinase for the treatment of chronic saphenous vein graft occlusion.
Recanalization of a totally occluded saphenous vein graft (SVG) using commercially available urokinase from human kidney cells has been shown to be effective, but the duration of infusion and complications such as allergic reactions, bleeding events, and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction have limited its acceptance. Recently, genetic engineering has allowed the synthesis of recombinant urokinase (r-UK). Patients with an occluded SVG from 37 centers were randomized to receive a 6-hour infusion of either low-dose (125,000 IU/hour) or high-dose (350,000 IU/hour) r-UK followed by up to a maximum of 18 hours of r-UK (125,000 IU/hour) via a subselective catheter directly into the occluded vein graft. The primary study end point was final preintervention achievement of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow > or = 2 using core angiographic analysis. One hundred seven patients were randomized and 98 received the study drug (low dose 52 patients, high dose 46 patients). TIMI flow > or = 2 after completion of the study drug was higher in the high-dose group (51% vs 24%, p = 0.019). This difference narrowed, but a trend was still evident on the final angiogram after adjunctive mechanical intervention (72% vs 58%, p = 0.254). Bleeding complications were frequent; severe or life-threatening bleeding occurred in 12% of patients on the low dose and 11% of patients on the high dose (p = NS), including 2 intracerebral bleeds, both of which were fatal with 1 in each group. Thus, in patients with an occluded SVG, a randomized trial of direct low-dose versus high-dose r-UK infusion demonstrated increased recanalization rates (TIMI flow > or = 2) in the high-dose arm. Percutaneous revascularization of SVG with r-UK can be accomplished with acceptable success rates, but complications are frequent.
Adult↗
Clinical and angiographic follow-Up after primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) stent pilot trial.
BACKGROUND: Restenosis has been reported in as many as 50% of patients within 6 months after PTCA in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which necessitates repeat target-vessel revascularization (TVR) in approximately 20% of patients during this time period. Routine (primary) stent implantation after PTCA has the potential to further improve late outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Primary stenting was performed as part of a prospective study in 236 consecutive patients without contraindications who presented with AMI of <12 hours' duration at 9 international centers. A mean of 1.4+/-0.7 stents were implanted per patient (97% Palmaz-Schatz) at 17.3+/-2.4 atm. During a clinical follow-up period of 7.4+/-2.6 months, death occurred in 4 patients (1.7%), reinfarction occurred in 5 patients (2.1%), and TVR was required in 26 patients (11.1%). By Cox regression analysis, small reference-vessel diameter and the number of stents implanted were the strongest determinants of TVR. Angiographic restenosis occurred in 27.5% of lesions. By multiple logistic regression analysis, the number of stents implanted and the absence of thrombus on the baseline angiogram were independent determinants of binary restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of routine stent implantation during mechanical reperfusion of AMI is safe and is associated with favorable event-free survival and low rates of restenosis compared with primary PTCA alone.
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
Local intramural heparin delivery during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: results of the Local PAMI Pilot Study.
The feasibility and safety of local heparin delivery during acute infarct angioplasty was evaluated in a prospective, multicenter, 120-patient series. Angioplasty was performed using standard techniques, after which heparin (4,000 U) was delivered locally; 25% of patients received stents. Procedural success was reported in 98% of patients; 6.7% of patients suffered death, reinfarction, recurrent ischemia, or stroke during the index hospitalization. The 6-month target vessel revascularization rate was 12.5%. Local heparin therapy with provisional stenting in acute myocardial infarction patients is safe, feasible, associated with a low rate of infarct artery revascularization at 6 months, and may potentially eliminate the need for systemic heparin following the procedure.
Aged↗
Long-term outcome after primary angioplasty: report from the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction (PAMI-I) trial.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the two-year outcome after primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Primary angioplasty, that is, angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy, has been shown to be an effective reperfusion modality for patients suffering an acute myocardial infarction. This report reviews the two-year clinical outcome of patients randomized in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trial. METHODS: At 12 clinical centers, 395 patients who presented within 12 h of the onset of myocardial infarction were randomized to undergo primary angioplasty (195 patients) or to receive tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) (200 patients) followed by conservative care. Patients were followed by physician visits, phone call, letter and review of hospital records for any hospital admission at one month, six months, one year and two years. RESULTS: At two years, patients undergoing primary angioplasty had less recurrent ischemia (36.4% vs. 48% for t-PA, p = 0.026), lower reintervention rates (27.2% vs. 46.5% for t-PA, p < 0.0001) and reduced hospital readmission rates (58.5% vs. 69.0% for t-PA, p = 0.035). The combined end point of death or reinfarction was 14.9% for angioplasty versus 23% for t-PA, p = 0.034. Multivariate analysis found angioplasty to be independently predictive of a reduction in death, reinfarction or target vessel revascularization (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The initial benefit of primary angioplasty performed by experienced operators is maintained over a two-year follow-up period with improved infarct-free survival and reduced rate of reintervention.
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
Anticoagulation requirements for coronary interventions and the role of low molecular weight heparins.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anticoagulants↗
Usefulness of technetium-99m sestamibi infarct size in predicting posthospital mortality following acute myocardial infarction.
In this multicenter study, 249 patients who underwent tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi infarct size measurement at hospital discharge were followed up for a median duration of 7 months. Infarct size was significantly associated with mortality (chi-square = 5.8, p = 0.02) and could stratify patients into lower and higher risk subsets: 1-year mortality 2% for infarct size < 14% versus 8% for infarct size > or = 14% of the left ventricle.
Aged↗
Comparison of acute results of prophylactic intraaortic balloon pumping with cardiopulmonary support for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PCTA)
High-risk patients not eligible for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are being considered for percutaneous coronary interventions, using cardiopulmonary support (CPS) or intraaortic balloon pump (IABP). However, few data are available regarding case selection and outcome with various support devices. Over a 4-yr period, 149 patients underwent high-risk coronary angioplasty, using elective placement of support devices. Based on physician preference, 58 patients underwent CPS and 91 underwent IABP support prior to the angioplasty. Patients selected for CPS-assisted angioplasty were more likely to be males, and to have a history of chronic angina, congestive heart failure, and lower ejection fraction (26+/-13% vs. 32+/-14%, P = 0.01). Multivessel disease was present in 95% of CPS patients and 89% of IABP patients (P = 0.35). Multivessel angioplasty was performed more frequently in the CPS group (40% vs. 20%, P = 0.01), and angioplasty success was higher in the CPS groups (99% vs. 87%, P = 0.005). Major cardiac events such as myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, stroke, and death did not differ between the groups. Peripheral vascular complications such as hematomas (36% vs. 24%, P = 0.16), vascular repair (14% vs. 3%, P = 0.03), and transfusions (60% vs. 27%, P = 0.0001) were higher in the CPS group. In conclusion, despite a higher risk profile, CPS allowed longer balloon inflations and higher PTCA success rates compared to IABP. However, peripheral vascular complications were higher in the CPS group, and major cardiac events were similar to those in IABP-treated patients. These data suggest that either method of support may be acceptable during high-risk PTCA.
Aged↗
Intercenter variability in outcome for patients treated with direct coronary angioplasty during acute myocardial infarction.
BACKGROUND: Direct coronary angioplasty is an effective therapy for acute myocardial infarction, but its success may be dependent on both ready availability and operator skill. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the center performing direct coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction while controlling for parameters known to affect outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study group consisted of 99 patients with ST elevation who were treated with direct angioplasty in four high-volume centers. Patients were injected with technetium-99m sestamibi intravenously and then taken to the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Antegrade flow was graded before and after direct coronary angioplasty. Single photon emission computed tomography was performed 1 to 6 hours after injection to measure myocardium at risk and residual blood flow to the jeopardized zone using previously published quantitative methods. A repeat sestamibi injection and tomographic acquisition were performed at hospital discharge to measure actual infarct size. There were no significant differences by center for baseline clinical characteristics, mean myocardium at risk (29% to 37% left ventricle [LV]), time to reperfusion (3.1 to 4.1 hours), residual blood flow, infarct location, or antegrade flow. Despite these similarities, there were differences in outcome measures by center. Mean infarct size was as follows: center 1, 15%; center 2, 12%; center 3, 10%, center 4, 23% (all LV; p = 0.11 ). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction at discharge also demonstrated significant differences: center 1, 0.57; center 2, 0.47; center 3, 0.53; center 4, 0.47 (p = 0.002). The prevalence of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow after angioplasty significantly differed by center: center 1, 92%; center 2, 94%; center 3, 87%; center 4, 71 %; (p = 0.01). There was a low mortality rate for all four centers ranging from 0% to 6%. After adjustment for myocardium at risk, residual blood flow, and time to reperfusion, the primary outcome of the center where the angioplasty was performed was an independent determinant of both infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSION: The success of direct coronary angioplasty in reducing infarct size and preserving left ventricular function depends on the center performing the procedure. Direct measurement of the effectiveness of this reperfusion modality in community practice is required to assess the impact of this effect.
Aged↗
Prospective, multicenter study of the safety and feasibility of primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: in-hospital and 30-day results of the PAMI stent pilot trial. Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Stent Pilot Trial Investigators.
OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to examine the safety and feasibility of a routine (primary) stent strategy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Limitations of reperfusion by primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in AMI include in-hospital recurrent ischemia or reinfarction in 10% to 15% of patients, restenosis in 37% to 49% and late infarct-related artery reocclusion in 9% to 14%. By lowering the residual stenosis and sealing dissection planes created by PTCA, primary stenting may further improve short- and long-term outcomes after mechanical reperfusion. METHODS: Three hundred twelve consecutive patients treated with primary PTCA for AMI at nine international centers were prospectively enrolled. After PTCA, stenting was attempted in all eligible lesions (vessel size 3.0 to 4.0 mm; lesion length < or = 2 stents; and the absence of giant thrombus burden after PTCA, major side branch jeopardy or excessive proximal tortuosity or calcification). Patients with stents were treated with aspirin, ticlopidine and a 60-h tapering heparin regimen. RESULTS: Stenting was attempted in 240 (77%) of 312 patients, successfully in 236 (98%), with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow restored in 230 patients (96%). Patients with stents had low rates of in-hospital death (0.8%), reinfarction (1.7%), recurrent ischemia (3.8%) and predischarge target vessel revascularization for ischemia (1.3%). At 30-day follow-up, no additional deaths or reinfarctions occurred among patients with stents, and target vessel revascularization was required in only one additional patient (0.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Primary stenting is safe and feasible in the majority of patients with AMI and results in excellent short-term outcomes.
Aged↗
Safety and cost-effectiveness of early discharge after primary angioplasty in low risk patients with acute myocardial infarction. PAMI-II Investigators. Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction.
OBJECTIVES: The second Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI-II) study evaluated the hypothesis that primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), with subsequent discharge from the hospital 3 days later, is safe and cost-effective in low risk patients. BACKGROUND: In low risk patients with myocardial infarction (MI), few data exist regarding the need for intensive care and noninvasive testing or the appropriate length of hospital stay. METHODS: Patients with acute MI underwent emergency catheterization with primary PTCA when appropriate. Low risk patients (age <70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction >45%, one- or two-vessel disease, successful PTCA, no persistent arrhythmias) were randomized to receive accelerated care (admission to a nonintensive care unit and day 3 hospital discharge without noninvasive testing [n = 237] or traditional care [n = 234]). RESULTS: Patients who received accelerated care had similar in-hospital outcomes but were discharged 3 days earlier (4.2+/-2.3 vs. 7.1+/-4.7 days, p = 0.0001) and had lower hospital costs ($9,658+/-5,287 vs. $11,604+/-6,125 p = 0.002) than the patients who received traditional care. At 6 months, accelerated and traditional care groups had a similar rate of mortality (0.8% vs. 0.4%, p = 1.00), unstable ischemia (10.1% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.52), reinfarction (0.8% vs. 0.4%, p = 1.00), stroke (0.4% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.07), congestive heart failure (4.6% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.85) or their combined occurrence (15.2% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.49). The study was designed to detect a 10% difference in event rates; at 6 months, only a 2.3% difference was measured between groups, indicating an actual power of 0.19. CONCLUSIONS: Early identification of low risk patients with MI allowed safe omission of the intensive care phase and noninvasive testing, and a day 3 hospital discharge strategy, resulting in substantial cost savings.
Aged↗