PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C L Grines

Publications and source records attributed to C L Grines.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Implications of recurrent ischemia after reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction: a comparison of thrombolytic therapy and primary angioplasty.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence and implications of recurrent ischemia after different reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: The rates and effects of recurrent ischemia after reperfusion with thrombolytic therapy and with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty have not been compared. METHODS: At 12 centers 395 patients presenting within 12 h of the onset of acute myocardial infarction were prospectively randomized to receive recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) or primary coronary angioplasty. Sixteen clinical variables were examined by using univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis to identify the predictors of recurrent ischemia. The relation of recurrent ischemic events to patient outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: Recurrent ischemia developed in 76 patients (19.2%) before hospital discharge, resulting in reinfarction in 18 patients (4.6%) and death in 5 (2.6%). Recurrent ischemia occurred in 56 patients (28.0%) after rt-PA but in only 20 patients (10.3%) after coronary angioplasty (p < 0.0001), directly contributing to a higher rate of death or reinfarction (7.5% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.05), catheterization and revascularization procedures and prolonged hospital stay after thrombolysis. By multivariate analysis, treatment with coronary angioplasty rather than rt-PA was the strongest predictor of freedom from recurrent ischemia. Although the incidence of recurrent ischemia after angioplasty and after rt-PA was similar within the 1st 2 days of admission (9.2% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.11), after hospital day 2 recurrent ischemia occurred in only 2 patients who received primary angioplasty compared with 27 patients who received rt-PA (1.1% vs. 13.5%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The development of recurrent ischemia adversely affects patient outcome, increasing morbidity, mortality and resource utilization. The much lower rate of recurrent ischemia after primary coronary angioplasty than after rt-PA results in improved survival without reinfarction and allows a shorter, less complicated hospital stay. Given the extremely low rate of recurrent ischemia after hospital day 2, safe early discharge on day 3 after primary coronary angioplasty should be feasible in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1995

Cardiologist versus internist management of patients with unstable angina: treatment patterns and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the impact of generalist versus specialist direction on the pattern of care and outcome in patients admitted to the hospital for unstable angina. BACKGROUND: Physicians trained as internists or as cardiologists may have different approaches to treating patients with unstable angina. METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively collected cohort of patients discharged with a diagnosis-related group (DRG) diagnosis of unstable angina from William Beaumont Hospital, a large community-based hospital in southeast Michigan. Of 890 consecutive patients, 225 were treated by internists and 665 by cardiologists. We compared these two groups with respect to patterns of use of established pharmacotherapies for unstable angina, diagnostic testing and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Patients treated by internists less often had a previous cardiac history (53% vs. 80%, p < or = 0.0001). Internists were less likely to use aspirin (68% vs. 78%, p = 0.032), heparin (67% vs. 84%, p < or = 0.001) or beta-adrenergic blocking agents (18% vs. 30%, p < or = 0.004) in their initial management. Exercise tests were performed more frequently by internist-treated patients (37% vs. 22%, p < or = 0.001), but catheterization (27% vs. 61%, p < or = 0.0001) and angioplasty (7% vs. 40%, p < or = 0.0001) were utilized less frequently. The incidence of myocardial infarction was similar (11% vs. 9%) in the two groups, but the mortality rate tended to be higher (4.0% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.06) in the internist group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with unstable angina treated by internists were less likely to receive effective medical therapy or revascularization procedures and experienced a trend to poorer outcome. This study does not support a positive gatekeeper role for generalists in the treatment of unstable angina.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Baseline and 6-month costs of primary angioplasty therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results from the primary angioplasty registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe the economic outcomes from a prospective multicenter registry of primary coronary angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Interest in coronary angioplasty without preceding thrombolytic therapy as a primary reperfusion strategy has increased as a result of three recent randomized trials showing outcomes equivalent to or better than standard thrombolytic therapy. METHODS: The Primary Angioplasty Registry enrolled 270 patients with acute myocardial infarction at six private tertiary care medical centers. Baseline and follow-up medical costs and counts of resources consumed were collected from enrollment to the 6-month follow-up visit. Correlates and predictors of cost were identified with multivariable linear regression modeling. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of patients had a revascularization procedure during the baseline hospital period: 85% had coronary angioplasty only; 4% had coronary bypass surgery only; 6% had both procedures. The total mean baseline hospital cost (not charge) was $13,113, with mean physician fees of $5,694. During the follow-up period, repeat coronary angiography was performed in 21% of patients, whereas 13% had repeat angioplasty and 3% bypass surgery. Mean hospital follow-up costs were $3,174, with mean physician fees of $1,443. Independent correlates of higher baseline hospital costs included older age (p = 0.049), anterior infarction (p = 0.03), initial Killip class (p < 0.0001), more severe coronary disease (p = 0.0015), need for bypass surgery alone or in addition to angioplasty (p < 0.0001) and recurrent ischemia (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Costs of primary angioplasty for patients with acute myocardial infarction eligible for thrombolysis were strongly influenced by infarction- and procedure-related complications but only modestly influenced by patient selection factors.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Primary angioplasty.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1994

Primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (the Primary Angioplasty Registry).

During a 14-month period, 6 experienced centers prospectively enrolled 271 patients into a registry in which percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was the primary treatment for acute myocardial infarction. Patients age > 18 years who presented with ST-segment elevation on the 12-lead electrocardiogram were enrolled if symptom duration was < 12 hours and there was no proclivity for bleeding. An independent core angiographic laboratory processed the angiographic data. Of 271 patients giving informed consent, 245 (90%) were deemed anatomically suitable and underwent angioplasty therapy. Upon leaving the catheterization laboratory 98% of patients had achieved reperfusion; 92% had a residual visual stenosis < or = 50%. Emergency bypass surgery was required in 14 patients (5%) for either failed angioplasty (n = 3) or presumed life-threatening anatomy (n = 11). The in-hospital mortality rate was 4%, whereas the reinfarction rate was 3% and the stroke rate was 1%, with 1 intracranial hemorrhage and 2 embolic events. Bleeding requiring > or = 2 units of blood occurred in 46 patients (18%); 14 of these transfusions were related to coronary artery bypass surgery. Primary angioplasty is associated with a high reperfusion rate, low in-hospital mortality and few recurrent myocardial ischemic events. These results point to the need for a large-scale trial comparing angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy in the setting of acute myocardial infarction.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Usefulness of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty after new device coronary interventions.

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is often required immediately after laser and atherectomy devices to enlarge lumen dimensions and to salvage device failures. Between January 1989 and June 1992, adjunctive PTCA was applied to 83% of narrowings treated with new interventional devices, including 85% of transluminal extraction atherectomy (n = 290), 72% of high-speed mechanical rotational atherectomy (n = 79), and 89% of excimer laser angioplasty (n = 118) lesions (p = NS). Device success was defined as a decrease in diameter stenosis > or = 20%; procedural success was defined as a final diameter stenosis < or = 50% after PTCA; and salvage PTCA was defined as use of PTCA to manage device-induced vessel occlusion. Although adjunctive PTCA was applied to 487 lesions, it was used to further enlarge the lumen after initial device success in 139 lesions (28.5%). In contrast, adjunctive PTCA was used after initial device failure in 348 lesions (71.5%), including after minimal or no change (decrease in diameter stenosis by 0 to 19%) in diameter stenosis in 244 lesions (50%) and after worsening of diameter stenosis in 104 lesions (21.5%). Salvage PTCA after device-induced vessel occlusion was performed in 61 lesions (12.6%). However, final procedural success after PTCA was achieved in 412 lesions (85%), with a low incidence of Q-wave myocardial infarction (3.5%), emergency bypass surgery (1.8%) and death (2.3%).

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Success, complications, and restenosis following rotational and transluminal extraction atherectomy of ostial stenoses.

Our objectives were to determine procedural success, clinical complications, and follow-up restenosis rates after rotational burr and transluminal extraction atherectomy of coronary artery and saphenous vein graft ostial stenoses. Balloon angioplasty of ostial lesions has been associated with low rates of success and high rates of clinical complications and restenosis compared to nonostial lesions. Atherectomy, due to its ability to excise (extraction atherectomy) or pulverize (rotational atherectomy) atheroma and the internal elastic lamina, may result in improved procedural outcome. We retrospectively studied 101 patients with ostial stenoses treated by rotational burr and transluminal extraction atherectomy over a 3-yr period. Quantitative angiography and clinical follow-up were reviewed to determine success, complication, and restenosis rates. Rotational burr (n = 29) and transluminal extraction (n = 72) atherectomy were associated with high procedural success (93% and 90%, respectively) and a low incidence of complications (6.9% and 4.2%, respectively). Post-atherectomy angiographic success was low (52% and 69%, respectively) and required adjunctive balloon angioplasty in 85% of patients overall. This lower success rate likely reflects device undersizing as the overall post-atherectomy artery to device ratio was near unity (0.95). The rates of angiographic ostial restenosis remain high (39.1% and 65.9%, respectively, P < 0.05). The high rate of restenosis after transluminal extraction atherectomy was due to the higher rate of restenosis in saphenous vein grafts (80%) compared to TEC treated coronary arteries (59%). When only coronary artery lesions were compared, there was no significant difference between atherectomy device groups with respect to restenosis rates or late loss.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Successful reversal of cardiogenic shock precipitated by saphenous vein graft distal embolization using aspiration thrombectomy.

A 74-year-old male had cardiac catheterization complicated by embolization of a thrombotic proximal saphenous vein graft lesion. Cardiogenic shock ensued. Successful aspiration thrombectomy was performed using a 7F multipurpose guiding catheter advanced to the site of obstruction. There was complete angiographic resolution and reversal of cardiogenic shock.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Clinical and angiographic results of transluminal extraction coronary atherectomy in saphenous vein bypass grafts.

BACKGROUND: Transluminal extraction coronary (TEC) atherectomy is a relatively new device that has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Because of its ability to aspirate clot and atheromatous material, TEC atherectomy may be useful in patients with stenoses in saphenous vein bypass grafts. METHODS AND RESULTS: TEC atherectomy was performed on 158 saphenous vein graft lesions in 146 consecutive patients with a mean age of 65 +/- 8 years (78% men). Clinical indications for atherectomy included stable angina (37%), unstable angina (54%), and postinfarction angina after recent (< 1 month) myocardial infarction (8%). Patients with acute myocardial infarction and target vessels < 2 mm in diameter were excluded. The mean age of the bypass graft was 8.3 +/- 3.0 years, and 17% were diffusely diseased and degenerated. Complex lesion morphology included total occlusion (6%), eccentricity (64%), ulceration (18%), and thrombus (28%). The TEC atherectomy cutter was successfully advanced through 144 lesions (91%), but technical failures occurred in 14 lesions (9%), and these were subsequently managed by successful balloon angioplasty. Quantitative angiography revealed an increase in lumen diameter from 0.9 +/- 0.5 mm, to 1.5 +/- 0.7 mm after TEC atherectomy, to 2.3 +/- 0.8 mm after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) (P < .001), which corresponded to decreases in diameter stenosis from 75 +/- 14%, to 58 +/- 20% after TEC atherectomy, to 36 +/- 22% after PTCA (P < .001). Device success was achieved in 39.2% (post-TEC atherectomy decrease in diameter stenosis > or = 20%), and procedural success was achieved in 84% (final diameter stenosis < 50% in the absence of a major complication). Angiographic complications were evident in 33 lesions (20.7%) immediately after TEC atherectomy and in 8 lesions (5%) after PTCA, including distal embolization (11.9%), no-reflow (8.8%), and abrupt closure (5.0%), but no perforations. Adjunctive PTCA (and other medical therapy) successfully managed 61% of angiographic complications. Serious clinical complications included in-hospital death in 3 patients (2.0%), emergency bypass surgery in 1 patient who died (0.7%), Q wave myocardial infarction in 3 patients (2.0%), non-Q wave myocardial infarction in 4 patients (2.7%), vascular injury requiring surgical repair and/or blood transfusion in 9 patients (6.1%), and hemorrhagic cerebral infarction in 4 patients (2.7%). Using a composite clinical end point defined as in-hospital death, emergency bypass surgery, or myocardial infarction, the strongest independent correlate (P < .001) of a severe clinical complication was the development of one or more serious angiographic complications (no-reflow, distal embolization, or abrupt closure) immediately after TEC atherectomy. Complete clinical follow-up was available in 118 (92%) of 128 eligible patients at an interval of 6.0 +/- 2.5 months after discharge. Late cardiac outcome included recurrent angina treated with medical therapy (18%), repeat percutaneous intervention on the original target lesion (26%), repeat coronary artery bypass surgery (5%), Q wave myocardial infarction (4%), and late cardiac death (7%). Angiographic follow-up in 105 (80%) of 132 eligible lesions revealed a restenosis rate of 69% (defined as a diameter stenosis > 50%), including 30 lesions (29%) with total occlusion of the original lesion. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stenoses in saphenous vein bypass grafts, TEC atherectomy is limited by the frequent need for adjunctive balloon angioplasty to achieve adequate lumen enlargement and to manage TEC atherectomy-induced complications. Although the incidence of serious clinical complications is similar to that of other percutaneous interventions in vein grafts, there is a high incidence of restenosis and late vessel occlusion. Prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the best revascularization strategy for high-risk patients with old degenerated vein

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Six-month clinical and angiographic follow-up after direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Final results from the Primary Angioplasty Registry.

BACKGROUND: After direct angioplasty in the setting of acute myocardial infarction, patients were followed clinically and angiographically for 6 months at six experienced centers to evaluate outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 258 patients with 6-month follow-up after surviving initial hospitalization, 5 (2%) died, 8 (3%) had nonfatal infarctions, 56 (22%) had chest pain, of whom 25 (10%) required hospitalization, and 42 (16%) patients needed repeat angioplasty. Of 203 eligible patients, 154 (76%) had angiographic follow-up. The infarct-related artery remained patent (defined as TIMI 2 or 3 flow) in 87%, while 13% developed reocclusion (TIMI 0 or 1 flow) by 6 months after discharge. Patients with reocclusion were more likely to have adverse events, including 35% with clinically evident reinfarction and 59% requiring repeat angioplasty. The median ejection fraction improvement from acute to follow-up study was 6%, with no improvement in patients with a reoccluded infarct-related artery and an 8% improvement in patients with a patent infarct-related artery. CONCLUSIONS: The positive clinical outcomes recorded immediately after direct angioplasty persisted through 6 months of follow-up. Although the incidence of clinical end points was equivalent to or lower than thrombolytic therapy trials, restenosis is a substantial problem. These findings provide evidence beyond the initial hospitalization that direct angioplasty is a reasonable choice for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Are residual stenoses after excimer laser angioplasty and coronary atherectomy due to inefficient or small devices? Comparison with balloon angioplasty.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether residual stenoses after excimer laser angioplasty and atherectomy were due to inefficient tissue ablation/removal or to undersized devices. BACKGROUND: Significant residual stenoses are commonly observed after use of laser and atherectomy devices. It is not known whether these residual stenoses are due to inefficient or undersized devices. METHODS: To determine the relative contribution of these factors, the minimal lumen diameter, percent diameter stenosis and normal reference diameter were measured immediately before and after coronary interventions in 696 lesions, including transluminal extraction atherectomy, high speed mechanical rotational atherectomy, excimer laser angioplasty and conventional balloon angioplasty. The ratio of the diameter of the device to the normal reference diameter (D/A, a measure of device sizing) and the ratio of the residual lumen diameter after use of the device to the device diameter (RLD/D, a measure of the efficiency of lumen enlargement) were calculated. RESULTS: Baseline diameter stenoses were similar for all interventions. The percent diameter stenoses were greater immediately after extraction atherectomy (60 +/- 21%), rotational atherectomy (54 +/- 23%) and excimer laser angioplasty (61 +/- 18%) compared with balloon angioplasty (26 +/- 12%, p < 0.001). The D/A ratio was smaller after extraction atherectomy (0.63 +/- 0.14), rotational atherectomy (0.59 +/- 0.17) and excimer laser angioplasty (0.51 +/- 0.11) compared with balloon angioplasty (1.05 +/- 0.13, p < 0.001). The RLD/D ratio was similar after extraction atherectomy (0.73 +/- 0.24) and balloon angioplasty (0.71 +/- 0.11) but was greater after rotational atherectomy (0.92 +/- 0.16, p < 0.001) and excimer laser angioplasty (0.85 +/- 0.30, p < 0.01) compared with balloon angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Residual stenoses after extraction atherectomy, rotational atherectomy and excimer laser angioplasty were more severe than after balloon angioplasty but were due to undersized devices (low D/A ratio), not to inefficient devices (low RLD/D ratio). Rotational atherectomy and excimer laser angioplasty were more efficient (higher RLD/D) than balloon angioplasty, whereas extraction atherectomy and balloon angioplasty were similar.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The success of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction is limited by bleeding complications, the impossibility of reperfusing all occluded coronary arteries, recurrent myocardial ischemia, and the relatively small number of patients who are appropriate candidates for this therapy. We hypothesized that these problems could be overcome by the use of immediate percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), without previous thrombolytic therapy. METHODS: At 12 clinical centers, 395 patients who presented within 12 hours of the onset of myocardial infarction were treated with intravenous heparin and aspirin and then randomly assigned to undergo immediate PTCA (without previous thrombolytic therapy, 195 patients) or to receive intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA, 200 patients) followed by conservative care. Radionuclide ventriculography was performed to assess ventricular function within 24 hours and at six weeks. RESULTS: Among the patients randomly assigned to PTCA, 90 percent underwent the procedure; the success rate was 97 percent, and no patient required emergency coronary-artery bypass surgery. The in-hospital mortality rates in the t-PA and PTCA groups were 6.5 and 2.6 percent, respectively (P = 0.06). In a post hoc analysis, the mortality rates in the subgroups classified as "not low risk" were 10.4 and 2.0 percent, respectively (P = 0.01). Reinfarction or death in the hospital occurred in 12.0 percent of the patients treated with t-PA and 5.1 percent of those treated with PTCA (P = 0.02). Intracranial bleeding occurred more frequently among patients who received t-PA than among those who underwent PTCA (2.0 vs. 0 percent, P = 0.05). The mean (+/- SD) ejection fractions at rest (53 +/- 13 vs. 53 +/- 13 percent) and during exercise (56 +/- 13 vs. 56 +/- 14 percent) were similar in the t-PA and PTCA groups at six weeks. By six months, reinfarction or death had occurred in 32 patients who received t-PA (16.8 percent) and 16 treated with PTCA (8.5 percent, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with t-PA therapy for acute myocardial infarction, immediate PTCA reduced the combined occurrence of nonfatal reinfarction or death, was associated with a lower rate of intracranial hemorrhage, and resulted in similar left ventricular systolic function.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Glidewire treatment of resistant coronary occlusions.

Inability to cross the site of occlusion with a guidewire is the most common cause of failed angioplasty. The Glidewire, a kink-resistant, flexible wire with a hydrophilic coating, was applied to 71 (59 total, 12 subtotal) refractory occlusions, resulting in an overall angioplasty success rate of 45%. The Glidewire may improve the success rate for PTCA of total and subtotal occlusions that cannot be crossed with conventional guidewires.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed1993

Detailed angiographic analysis of high-speed mechanical rotational atherectomy in human coronary arteries.

BACKGROUND: Several types of atherectomy devices have been developed recently for treatment of patients with ischemic heart disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Mechanical rotational atherectomy (MRA) using a high-speed rotational burr (Rotablator) was performed on 116 lesions in 104 patients. MRA alone was performed in 27 lesions (23%), and conventional balloon angioplasty (PTCA) was performed after MRA in 89 lesions (77%). Diameter stenosis decreased from 70 +/- 13% before MRA to 54 +/- 23% after MRA, and the final diameter stenosis (after MRA alone or with adjunctive PTCA) was 30 +/- 20% (P < .001). Minimal lumen diameter increased from 1.0 +/- 0.5 mm before MRA to 1.4 +/- 0.7 mm after MRA, and the final minimal lumen diameter was 2.3 +/- 0.7 mm (P < .001). MRA resulted in a decrease in diameter stenosis of 20% or more in 44% of lesions, and the final diameter stenosis (after MRA alone or after PTCA) was less than 50% in 75% of lesions. Considering the small diameter of available burrs, the magnitude of lumen enlargement was equal to 91% of the burr diameter, and only 9% of the burr diameter was "lost" due to elastic recoil or spasm. These angiographic results were obtained despite the presence of complex lesion morphology, including the presence of calcification in 17% of lesions and ostial location in 26% of lesions. Significant angiographic complications included abrupt closure (13 lesions, 11.2%), no reflow (8 lesions, 7%), severe coronary vasospasm (16 lesions, 13.8%), and guide wire fracture (3 lesions, 2.7%). There were no coronary artery perforations. Adjunctive therapy, including salvage PTCA, thrombolytic agents, and vasodilators, was successful in treating angiographic complications in 42 of 49 lesions (86%). Clinical complications included Q-wave myocardial infarction (5 patients, 4.8%), non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (3 patients, 2.9%), femoral vascular injury requiring surgery (3 patients, 2.9%) or blood transfusion (8 patients, 7.7%), abrupt closure requiring emergency bypass graft surgery (2 patients, 1.9%), and in-hospital death (1 patient, 1.0%). Angiographic follow-up (mean follow-up interval, 5.0 +/- 2.0 months) was available in 84% of successfully treated patients and revealed a restenosis rate of 51%, defined as a residual diameter stenosis of more than 50%. There was no significant difference in restenosis rates between de novo lesions (50%) and restenosis (54%) lesions. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that for the treatment of most coronary stenoses, PTCA is required after MRA to achieve satisfactory lumen enlargement or to salvage complications. Angiographic complications appear to be more common after MRA, and salvage PTCA often is required to manage these device-induced complications. The combination of MRA and PTCA does not prevent restenosis.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗