Biomedical subjects

C L Lott

Publications and source records attributed to C L Lott.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1993

Classification and correlates of ethical dilemmas in hospital social work.

The authors used categories based on the NASW Code of Ethics to code hospital social workers' descriptions of ethical dilemmas according to the specific principles in conflict. They also developed codes to identify discharge destination and medical care issues involved in the ethical dilemma. Most ethical dilemmas were found to involve conflicts between client self-determination and client best interest. Ethical dilemmas were more likely when patient mental status was impaired and when decision making was problematic. Ethical dilemmas were related to delayed discharge, in-hospital mortality, and less-than-adequate postdischarge care. The study enhances understanding of ethical dilemmas and advances a methodology for studying their occurrence and consequences.

Aged↗

PubMed1986

Type A behavior pattern and the judgment of control.

We investigated the control judgments of Type A and B actors and observers after five tasks in which actual response-outcome contingency and success were varied systematically. Results indicated that, overall, actors provided higher control judgments than did observers, and both actual contingency and success influenced judged control. Type A and B actors did not differ in their self-perceptions of control but observers judged the Type A actors to have exerted more control than the Type B actors, primarily on positive contingency tasks. These findings suggest that Type As, because of their more active, dynamic style, may be credited by observers with more control or competence than is warranted. By contrast, the more relaxed style of the Type B may lead to lower than warranted evaluations of control or competence. Lastly, Type As were found to learn the contingencies better than Type Bs with important implications for the actual exercise of control.

Achievement↗

PubMed1985

Type A behavior pattern and the judgment of noncontingency: mediating roles of mood and perspective.

Past research indicates that Type A's and B's differ in their behavioral responses to lack of control. The present study examined perceptual judgments of noncontingency in an attempt to clarify further the role of a control dynamic in Type A-B differences. Type A's and B's assumed the role of either an actor or an observer on a standard contingency judgment task. Consistent with previous research, both Type A's and B's exhibited an illusion of control when in the role of actor. Only Type B's exhibited an illusion of control when observing another person perform the task. Additional analyses indicated that the absence of an illusion of control by Type A observers reflected accuracy rather than a motivational distortion. Mood was also found to mediate control judgments, but only for actors. The plausibility of a memory-based interpretation for the mood effects is discussed.

Achievement↗