Biomedical subjects

C L Tattersall

Publications and source records attributed to C L Tattersall.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Mean deviation fluctuation in eyes with stable Humphrey 24-2 visual fields.

AIM: To describe the expected fluctuation in the mean deviation (MD) scores on a large, long-term series of stable visual field reports for particular grades of defect in order to give clinicians an aid to the correct diagnosis of glaucomatous progression. METHOD: Visual field reports of subjects with five reliable consecutive Humphrey 24-2 visual fields, recorded over a period of at least 3 years, were scored using the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) system. The AGIS scores of the first and last visual fields were required to be identical. RESULTS: A total of 202 eyes from 202 patients were used in the study, with a total of 1010 visual fields being used in the analysis. Visual fields with no defect (AGIS score 0) had a 99% confidence interval (CI) of 0.3 dB, mild defects 0.4 dB, moderate defects 0.8 dB, severe 1 dB, and 1.3 dB for end-stage defects when considering variation of MD scores. Using a one-way ANOVA incorporating all stages showed very little fluctuation throughout the series (P=0.96). The correlation between the CI and grade of field defect showed a good positive correlation (r=0.7, P=0.0003) indicating an increase in CI as field defects worsen. CONCLUSION: When considering a series of reliable visual fields in a stable eye, one should expect only very little fluctuation in the MD, indicating that an increase in the MD beyond that of the 99% CI described may suggest progression. The reliability indices of the visual field test should be regarded as a primary consideration when assessing visual fields.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2006

Longitudinal glaucoma screening for siblings of patients with primary open angle glaucoma: the Nottingham Family Glaucoma Screening Study.

AIMS: To assess the prevalence and cumulative incidence of open angle glaucoma (OAG) in a cohort group of siblings of OAG probands. METHODS: Between 1994 and 2003, a group of siblings of OAG probands underwent both initial and follow up standardised ophthalmic examinations. Siblings were classified as "definite glaucoma" (primary OAG (POAG) and normal tension glaucoma (NTG)), "glaucoma suspects" (NTG suspects or ocular hypertension (OHT)), and normal. The prevalence and cumulative incidence of OAG over the follow up interval were calculated. RESULTS: At the initial study, 271 siblings (mean age 63.6 years; female to male ratio 1.2) from 156 probands were examined. 32 (11.8%) were classified as definite glaucoma and 15 (5.5%) as suspects. In the follow up study, 157 of the 224 "normal" siblings from the initial study were examined (mean interval from initial study 7.0 (SD 1.0) years). 11 (7%) were classified as definite glaucoma and 30 (19.1%) as suspects. There were significant trends of increasing prevalence and incidence of OAG with age and a lifetime risk estimated at approximately 20% by age 70. CONCLUSION: Siblings of glaucoma patients have an increased risk of developing glaucoma and the risk increases with age. An effective and repeated screening programme should be considered for this high risk group.

Age Distribution↗

PubMed2006

Detecting glaucoma with RADAAR: the Bridlington Eye Assessment Project.

AIMS: To develop a diagnostic algorithm using rim/disc area asymmetry ratio (RADAAR) to discriminate between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT). METHODS: RADAAR was calculated by dividing rim/disc area ratio of the larger disc by that of the smaller disc. RADAAR normal tolerances in each disc sector were generated using 611 population based normal elderly individuals (mean age 72.5 years). Overall status for each individual was equal to the worst disc sector. Sensitivity was assessed in 45 patients with open angle glaucoma. RESULTS: RADAAR variance was significantly greater in glaucoma compared with normality in all disc sectors (p<0.001). Normal RADAAR limits were not dependent on age or sex. Overall, at the 99th percentile limit, the diagnostic algorithm's specificity was 95.1% with a sensitivity of 55.6%. Males with glaucoma showed greater RADAAR variance than females. Corresponding sensitivity of the diagnostic algorithm was 63.0% and 44.4% in males and females respectively, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.43). CONCLUSION: The RADAAR diagnostic algorithm detected glaucoma with moderate sensitivity but was limited by significant numbers of glaucoma patients with symmetrical optic disc changes. RADAAR may have greater sensitivity in males than in females although this requires confirmation in further studies.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Is poor life expectancy a predictive factor in the progression of primary open angle glaucoma?

AIM: To investigate the disease progression and final visual outcome of glaucoma patients with poor life expectancy, compared to matched patients with a longer life expectancy. METHOD: Visual fields at diagnosis and at the last ophthalmic appointment before death were analysed for glaucoma patients referred between 1991 and 1995, and deceased before the end of 2001. These patients were matched to the patients living beyond 2001. Functional vision was also assessed, and classified as better than the NHS partial sighted criteria. RESULTS: A total of 61 deceased patients were identified, resulting in 40 matched pairs. In all, 6.5% of the patients with poor life expectancy progressed from functional vision to beyond partial sighted criteria, and none of the matched patients progressed to this extent. At final assessment an association between poor life expectancy and progression beyond functional vision was found existing (P = 0.02), with a lesser association at diagnosis (P = 0.06). Visual field scores of the matched pairs who had test results available for both initial and final assessment (n = 23 pairs) showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups at diagnosis (P = 0.52); However, a significant difference at final the assessment did exist (P = 0.042). No difference between the initial (off medication) intraocular pressures (IOPs) was found (P = 0.82). At the final assessment a significant difference existed (P = 0.025), with the surviving group having a higher final mean pressure (15.9 mmHg, SD 2.8, vs 18.3 mmHg, SD 4.9). CONCLUSION: Patients with poor life expectancy progressed more than the matched surviving patients, when measured from an initially similar position, despite better IOP control.

Aged↗