PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Lawler

Publications and source records attributed to C Lawler.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Comparison of bedside- and laboratory-inoculated Bactec high- and low-volume resin bottles for the recovery of microorganisms causing peritonitis in CAPD patients.

There is not yet a universally accepted protocol for the recovery of microorganisms causing peritonitis in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). We prospectively analyzed 343 peritoneal effluent specimens by three protocols: 1) 10 ml of effluent centrifuged and the pellet plated onto blood, MacConkey agars, and into thioglycolate broth (routine method); 2) 5 ml and 10 ml inoculated at the bedside into Bactec 16A and 26A aerobic resin-containing blood culture bottles, respectively; and 3) 5 ml and 10 ml inoculated in the laboratory into Bactec 16A and 26A media, respectively. One hundred and forty (41%) peritoneal effluent specimens had microorganisms recovered, and, of these, 101 were recovered by routine culture compared to 117 (p < .021), 125 (p < .0001), 115 (p < .047), and 116 (p < .032) for bedside-inoculated 16A and 26A and for laboratory-inoculated 16A and 26A, respectively. Bedside-inoculated bottles were not significantly better than laboratory-inoculated bottles, and high-volume bottles were not significantly better than low-volume bottles for detection of patients positive for microorganisms; however, the number of total microorganisms recovered were significantly better from all inoculated blood culture bottles compared to routine culture. Bedside- and laboratory-inoculated resin-containing blood culture bottles are superior to the routine method for recovery of microorganisms causing peritonitis in CAPD patients.

Ascitic Fluid↗
PubMed1996

Perception of breast cancer risk among women in breast center and primary care settings: correlation with age and family history of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: A great deal of information about breast cancer risk is available to the public. The accuracy of impressions formed from this information is unknown. METHODS: A total of 750 women attending a breast center and 112 women attending a primary care office completed written surveys of their perceptions of average population risk, personal lifetime risk, and personal 10-year risk of getting breast cancer. Data sufficient to apply the Gail model were obtained, and a calculated estimate of risk was generated. Ratios of perceived to calculated risk were correlated with the respondent's age, family history of breast cancer, and location in a breast center or primary care office. RESULTS: Women in both practice settings overestimated population risk by more than twofold. Eighty percent overestimated personal lifetime risk by more than 50% and 35% by more than fivefold. Only 7% significantly underestimated risk. Ten-year risk estimates were even more inaccurate, with 69% overestimating risk by more than fivefold, 46% by more than 10-fold, and 17% by more than 20-fold. Results from a primary care population were nearly identical. Women at the extremes of age were most inaccurate in estimating risk. It was surprising that family history had little impact on perception of personal risk. CONCLUSIONS: Women in both breast center and primary care settings have a fals:ly high perception of both short-term and long-term breast cancer risk. Health care providers should recognize these misconceptions and be aware that many women may benefit from risk counseling.

Adult↗