PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Louvet

Publications and source records attributed to C Louvet.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Phase II study of an optimized 5-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin strategy (OPTIMOX2) with celecoxib in metastatic colorectal cancer: a GERCOR study.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin stop and go in combination with leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil has been successfully used in a previous study (OPTIMOX1) in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCR). Celecoxib is an anti-cyclooxygenase-2 drug with anti-neoplastic properties. In the present study, celecoxib was evaluated in combination with FOLFOX7 regimen and as a single agent in maintenance therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II study examined for previously untreated MCR patients the stop-and-go procedure [six cycles of folinic acid, 5FU and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX7) followed by chemotherapy-free intervals (CFIs) and reintroduction at progression] with continuous administration of celecoxib (800 mg/day). RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included, 42 eligible: performance status (%) 0/1/2=45/40/15, median age 60 (31-76) years. Response rate (RR) was 43% (95% CI 28%-58%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months; median overall survival was 15.8 months. Grade 3/4 toxicity criteria were neurotoxicity 9.5%, thrombocytopenia 21.4%, neutropenia 7.1%, diarrhea 7.1%, nausea 4.8% and vomiting 2.4%. Median CFI 1 (n=27) duration was 3.9 months (range 2-39 months). CONCLUSION: With an acceptable safety profile, celecoxib combined with FOLFOX7 achieved RR and PFS in the lower range of that obtained with FOLFOX7 alone. These results indicate the lack of synergy between FOLFOX7 and celecoxib. PFS of 6 months appears lower than PFS obtained in OPTIMOX1 study with simplified LV5FU2 in maintenance therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

A phase II study of FOLFIRI-3 (double infusion of irinotecan combined with LV5FU) after FOLFOX in advanced colorectal cancer patients.

In advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with oxaliplatin, efficacy of irinotecan-based chemotherapy is poor and the best regimen is not defined. We designed FOLFIRI-3 and conducted a phase II study to establish its efficacy and safety in advanced colorectal cancer patients previously treated with FOLFOX. FOLFIRI-3 consisted of irinotecan 100 mg m-2 as a 60-min infusion on day 1, running concurrently with leucovorin 200 mg m-2 as a 2-h infusion on day 1, followed by 46-h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) 2000 mg m-2, and irinotecan 100 mg m-2 repeated on day 3, at the end of the 5FU infusion, every 2 weeks. Sixty-five patients entered the study. The intent-to-treat objective response rate was 23% (95% CI 13-33%). Disease was stable in 37% of patients, progressed in 26% and was not assessable in 14%. From the start of FOLFIRI-3, median progression-free survival was 4.7 months and median survival 10.5 months. Main toxicities (% of patients) were grade 3-4 diarrhoea 23% and grade 4 neutropenia 11%. FOLFIRI-3 is a promising regimen achieving high response rate and progression-free survival in patients previously treated with FOLFOX with a moderate toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial.

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine (Gem) is the standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. Given the promising phase II results obtained with the Gem-oxaliplatin (GemOx) combination, we conducted a phase III study comparing GemOx with Gem alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were stratified according to center, performance status, and type of disease (locally advanced v metastatic) and randomly assigned to either GemOx (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 as a 100-minute infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks) or Gem (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 as a weekly 30-minute infusion). RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-six patients were enrolled; 313 were eligible, and 157 and 156 were allocated to the GemOx and Gem arms, respectively. GemOx was superior to Gem in terms of response rate (26.8% v 17.3%, respectively; P = .04), progression-free survival (5.8 v 3.7 months, respectively; P = .04), and clinical benefit (38.2% v 26.9%, respectively; P = .03). Median overall survival (OS) for GemOx and Gem was 9.0 and 7.1 months, respectively (P = .13). GemOx was well tolerated overall, although a higher incidence of National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 and 4 toxicity per patient was observed for platelets (14.0% for GemOx v 3.2% for Gem), vomiting (8.9% for GemOx v 3.2% for Gem), and neurosensory symptoms (19.1% for GemOx v 0% for Gem). CONCLUSION: These results confirm the efficacy and safety of GemOx, but this study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant advantage in terms of OS compared with Gem. Because GemOx is the first combined treatment to be superior to Gem alone in terms of clinical benefit, this promising regimen deserves further development.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

[Indications and methods for adjuvant chemotherapy of colonic cancer].

Within the past 12 years, many progresses have been performed in adjuvant chemotherapy of colon cancer. 5FU + levamisole was first considered as standard treatment in the early 1990s, then FUFOL and later LV5FU2. More recently, FOLFOX4 achieves a better disease-free survival at 3 years as compared to LV5FU2, and should now be considered as a standard treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for 6 months for stage III patients. It is an option for stage II patients. Elderly patients could be treated according to the same modalities as younger patients, based on physiological age and relative contra-indications from associated diseases.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

[Long term survival in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with leucovorin and 5-fluoro-uracil chemotherapy].

PURPOSE: Median survival in advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-fluoro-uracil (5FU) and leucovorin (LV) is between 12 and 18 months. The aim of this study was to evaluate long term survival in this disease. METHODS: We report here, retrospectively, the survival of 445 patients who entered in first-line prospective studies with LV-5FU-based regimen chemotherapy, between 1985 and 1995. RESULTS: Median survival was 18 months. The 3, 5 and 10 year survival were respectively 17.9%, 4.5% and 2.4%. Seventy-five patients survived more than 3 years, among them, 10 achieved a complete and 34 a partial response, 12 had curative liver or lung surgery. Fifteen patients lived more than 5 years, 2 achieved a complete and 7 a partial response. Seven had curative surgery. Eleven patients were still alive in 2002, among them 7 in complete remission at 5 years, including 3 who did not have surgery. CONCLUSION: This study shows that some patients with metastatic colorectal cancer can achieve long survival, especially when secondary curative surgery can be performed. However, 1% of the patients can be cured with LV-5FU chemotherapy alone. These results will be probably improve with the use of the new drugs: oxaliplatin and irinotecan.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Oxaliplatin reintroduction in patients previously treated with leucovorin, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: FOLFOX, a bimonthly combination of leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, is active in metastatic colorectal cancer, but sometimes causes cumulative sensory neurotoxicity. This retrospective study investigated FOLFOX reintroduction after a break in treatment or following disease progression on another regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: FOLFOX was reintroduced in 29 patients. During their previous FOLFOX therapy, 24 had achieved a response, four were stable and one had progression. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 33 weeks. Grade 3 neuropathy developed in nine and grade 2 neuropathy in eight patients. RESULTS: Following FOLFOX reintroduction, six patients (21%) showed a response, 15 (52%) were stable and eight (28%) had progression. Median PFS was 18 weeks. Grade 3 neuropathy developed in four patients and grade 2 neuropathy in 11. Two patients with previous grade 3 neuropathy had no recurrence of neuropathy after eight and 18 cycles, respectively. Among 13 patients who received no treatment between periods of FOLFOX therapy, four (31%) had a response and eight (62%) had stable disease. CONCLUSION: Reintroduction of oxaliplatin was feasible and achieved a response or stabilization in 73% of patients. These results support the concept of intensified, repeated short courses of FOLFOX, a strategy currently being evaluated prospectively in the OPTIMOX study.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma: a GERCOR study.

BACKGROUND: Since gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GEMOX) has been used in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, we studied its activity and tolerability in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma (ABTA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive adult patients with confirmed ABTA were recruited from four centers. Those in group A had performance status (PS) 0-2, bilirubin <2.5x normal and received GEMOX as first-line chemotherapy. Those in group B had PS >2 and/or bilirubin >2.5x normal and/or prior chemotherapy. All received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 as a 10 mg/m2/min infusion on day 1, followed by oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 as a 2-h infusion on day 2, every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Tumor sites were gallbladder (19), extrahepatic bile ducts (5), ampulla of vater (3) and intrahepatic bile ducts (29). Results for group A (n = 3) were: objective response 36% [95% confidence interval (CI) 18.7% to 52.3%], stable disease 26%, progressive disease 39%, median progression-free survival (PFS) 5.7 months and overall survival (OS) 15.4 months. Results for group B (n = 23) were: objective response 22% (95% CI 6.5% to 37.4%), stable disease 30%, progressive disease 48%, PFS 3.9 months and OS 7.6 months. National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia 14% of patients, thrombocytopenia 9%, nausea/vomiting 5% and peripheral neuropathy 7%. CONCLUSION: The GEMOX combination is active and well tolerated in ABTA.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

A phase I-II, dose-escalating trial of ZD9331 in combination with irinotecan (CPT11) in previously pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: To establish the recommended dose (RD) of the thymidylate-synthase inhibitor ZD9331 administered with irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer, and to assess toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-tumor activity in a phase I/II open, multicenter, intrapatient chemotherapy dose escalating trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients who failed first-line therapy (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin +/- oxaliplatin) received every 2 weeks CPT-11 180 mg/m2 D1, followed by ZD9331 30-minute infusion D2 at three dose levels: 90, 120 and 150 mg/m2. RESULTS: RD of ZD9331 was established at 90 mg/m2 for the first two cycles, with possibility to escalate at 120 mg/m2 according to safety evaluation. Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (67% of patients), grade 3 vomiting (14%), grade 3 nausea (10%) and grade 3 diarrhea (5%). ZD9331 dose level does not affect the PK of CPT-11 or SN-38. Tumor growth control (PR + SD) was achieved for 14 (66.7%) patients. Median time to progression was 6 months, and median survival was 8.4 months. CONCLUSION: ZD9331 90 mg/m2 combined with CPT-11 180 mg/m2 may be a viable option for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, with possible escalation to 120 mg/m2 of ZD9331 according to safety evaluation.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Phase II study of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) combination in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer (M/AGC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the 54 eligible patients with measurable or assessable M/AGC, 53 received oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) and FA 400 mg/m(2) (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed by 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) (10-minute infusion) and then 5-FU 3,000 mg/m(2) (46-hour continuous infusion) every 14 days. RESULTS: Patients (69% male, 31% female) had a median age of 61 years (range, 31 to 75 years), 89% had a performance status of 0 or 1, 70% had newly diagnosed disease, and 87% had metastatic disease. All had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma. With a median of three involved organs, disease sites included the lymph nodes (67%), stomach (65%), and liver (61%). A median of 10 cycles per patient and 468 complete cycles were administered. Best responses in the 49 assessable patients were two complete responses and 20 partial responses, giving an overall best response rate of 44.9%. Eight patients underwent complementary treatment with curative intent (six with surgery and two with chemoradiotherapy). Median follow-up, time to progression, and overall survival were 18.6 months, 6.2 months, and 8.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 38%, 19%, 4%, and 11% of patients, respectively, and febrile neutropenia occurred in six patients (one episode each). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 21% of patients (oxaliplatin-specific scale). Seven patients withdrew because of treatment-related toxicity. CONCLUSION: This oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA regimen shows good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in M/AGC patients, and may prove to be a suitable alternative regimen in this indication.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: final results of a GERCOR multicenter phase II study.

PURPOSE: Based on preclinical in vitro synergy data, this study evaluated the activity and toxicity of a gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination in patients with metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated metastatic and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients were enrolled onto this multicenter phase II study. Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) as a 10-mg/m(2)/min infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks. Patients with metastatic disease were treated until evidence of progressive disease, whereas patients with locally advanced disease received six cycles in the absence of progression, followed when appropriate by concomitant radiochemotherapy. RESULTS: Among 64 eligible patients included in eight centers, 30 had locally advanced and 34 had metastatic disease. Response rate for the 62 patients with measurable disease was 30.6% (95% confidence interval, 19.7% to 42.3%), 31.0% for locally advanced and 30.3% for metastatic patients. Among 58 assessable patients, 40% had clinical benefit. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival (OS) were 5.3 and 9.2 months, respectively, with 36% of patients alive at 1 year. Median OS for patients with metastatic disease and locally advanced disease were 8.7 and 11.5 months, respectively. With 574 treatment cycles (median per patient, nine; range, zero to 27), grade 3/4 toxicity per patient was 11% for neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, 14% for nausea or vomiting, 6.2% for diarrhea, and 11% for peripheral neuropathy, with no toxic deaths. CONCLUSION: Palliative effects, response rate, and survival observed with this well-tolerated gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination deserve additional evaluation. A comparative study of combination therapy versus gemcitabine alone is ongoing.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Optimisation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin combination chemotherapy with a new schedule of hydroxyurea, leucovorin, 5-FU and cisplatin (HLFP regimen) for metastatic oesophageal cancer.

To improve the efficacy and tolerance of the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin combination in metastatic esophageal cancer, we designed a new therapeutic schedule, the HLFP regimen. 42 patients with metastatic oesophageal adenocarcinoma (n=10) or squamous cell carcinoma (n=32) were prospectively enrolled in the study. All had bidimensionally measurable disease. The HLFP regimen consisted of twice-monthly oral administration of hydroxyurea 1 g/m(2) on days 0, 1 and 2; a 2-h infusion of leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) and a bolus of 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) followed by a 22-h infusion of 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2; and, every two cycles, 80 mg/m(2) cisplatin on day 3. Relief of dysphagia and other symptoms were monitored, together with body weight changes. Major objective responses were observed in 24 patients (57%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 42-72%), including four complete responses (10%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 8 and 12.7 months, respectively. Weight gain was observed in 48% of patients, and dysphagia improved in 76%. Grade 3-4 toxicity occurred in 40% of patients, with grade 4 neutropenia in 12% and grade 3 thrombocytopenia, vomiting and diarrhoea in 7-9% of patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. These results suggest that the HLFP regimen is an active and well-tolerated chemotherapy for metastatic oesophageal carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

Correlation between progression free survival and response rate in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: All endpoint measures currently used to evaluate chemotherapeutic treatment benefit in clinical trials of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (MCRC) have disadvantages. Overall survival (OS) is the most objective parameter but is flawed as an efficacy criterion, partly because potentially active second-line treatments are not controlled in many Phase III studies, and measured OS may be influenced (positively or negatively) to an unknown degree by second-line therapy. Measuring progression free survival (PFS) may be a means of isolating the real impact of first-line regimens. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, the authors analyzed pooled data from all Phase III studies on first-line treatment in patients with MCRC reported from 1990 through 2000 for correlations between PFS, response rate (RR), and OS in MCRC patients that may suggest PFS as an improved indicator of the efficacy of first-line treatment. Spearman rho correlation coefficients (r) and regression equations were used. RESULTS: The authors analyzed data from 29 studies involving nearly 13,500 patients. Significant correlations were found between PFS and RR (r = 0.655; P < 0.0001; a 10% RR increment corresponded to a 1-month increase in PFS), between RR and OS (r = 0.408; P = 0.0009; an 11.4% RR increment corresponded to a 1-month increase in OS), and between PFS and OS (r = 0.481; P < 0.0001; a 1-month increase in PFS corresponded to a 0.68-month increase in OS). CONCLUSIONS: PFS is the most appropriate primary endpoint for MCRC studies, because it can express the antitumor activity of a first-line chemotherapy regimen regardless of measures used after disease progression. PFS deserves further evaluation as an endpoint measure.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2001

Intravenous chemotherapy, early debulking surgery, and consolidation intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of a cisplatin-anthracycline combination, early debulking surgery, and intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been demonstrated through separate studies. We evaluated a multimodal treatment strategy integrating these therapeutic options. METHODS: Women with stage III or IV ovarian carcinoma received six cycles of cisplatin/epirubicin alternating with leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil. Patients with a residual disease (RD) measuring more than 2 cm after the initial laparotomy underwent an early debulking surgery after the first three cycles of chemotherapy. A second-look laparotomy (SLL) was performed after six cycles of intravenous chemotherapy. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatin, VP16, and mitoxantrone was then administered in patients with no or RD < 2 cm after SLL. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were included. After initial laparotomy, 11 patients (12%) had no macroscopic residual disease, 38 (44%) had a RD < or =2 cm, and 38 (44%) had a RD > 2 cm. After early debulking surgery, an additional 18 patients (21%) had a RD < 2 cm. Seventy-five patients were evaluable for response to intravenous chemotherapy: the overall response rate was 80%, and 30 patients achieved a pathological complete response (40%). Eight percent of the patients had stable disease and 12% had a progression. Sixty-eight patients received intraperitoneal chemotherapy after second-look laparotomy. With a 72-month median follow-up, median overall survival and progression-free survival were, respectively, 37 and 19 months. Five-year survival was 41%. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma may be improved by a sequential treatment strategy including intravenous chemotherapy, early debulking surgery, and intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Randomized adjuvant study comparing two schemes of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in stage B2 and C colon adenocarcinoma: study design and preliminary safety results. Groupe d'Etude et de Recherche Clinique en Oncologie Radiotherapies.

The aim of this randomized open-label study was to compare a bimonthly with a monthly regimen of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin for the adjuvant treatment of colon and high-rectum adenocarcinoma. The bimonthly regimen was administered for 2 consecutive days every 14 days as d,L-leucovorin 200 mg/m2 or L-leucovorin 100 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion followed by 5-FU bolus of 400 mg/m2 and a 600 mg/m2 5-FU 22-hour continuous infusion (LVSFU2). In the monthly regimen, d,L-leucovorin 200 mg/m2 or L-leucovorin 100 mg/m2 15-minute infusion followed by a 400 mg/m2 15 minute 5-FU bolus was administered for 5 consecutive days every 28 days (FUFOL). Nine hundred five patients with recently resected stage B2 or C colon or high-rectum adenocarcinoma (inferior pole of the tumor subperitoneal) were recruited into the study. Patients were randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design to receive either LV5FU2 or FUFOL for 24 or 36 weeks. Characteristics of the patients in the two different treatment groups were similar at baseline. Compliance was good. Mean 5-FU dose intensities were 930 mg/ m2/wk and 463 mg/m2/wk for LVSFU2 and FUFOL, respectively. The incidence of maximal grade III-IV toxicities for LVSFU2 and FUFOL was neutropenia 6% and 16% (P < .001), diarrhea 4% and 10% (P < .001), and mucositis 2% and 7% (P < .001), respectively. Maximum grade III-IV toxicities in the LV5FU2 treatment group were significantly lower than in the FUFOL group (10% v 26%; P < .001). Although patients in the LV5FU2 group received twice the dose of 5-FU compared with those in the FUFOL group, LV5FU2 was shown to be less toxic. Efficacy data will be available in 2001.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

High-dose intensity oxaliplatin added to the simplified bimonthly leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil regimen as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (FOLFOX 7).

This phase II study examined a regimen (FOLFOX7) of leucovorin (LV), high-dose intensity oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. 48 patients were enrolled - 36 refractory and 12 resistant to prior therapy with LV-5-FU. Oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) was infused with LV (400 mg/m2) over 2 h on day 1, followed by bolus 400 mg/m2 and a 46-h infusion (2400 g/m2) of 5-FU, every 2 weeks. Patients who responded or were stable received eight cycles. Patients were evaluated every 2 months. 20 patients (42%) had partial responses (95% confidence interval (CI): 28-56%), 19 (40%) had stable disease and 9 (19%) progressed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months and median survival 16.1 months. Toxic effects of National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) grade 3/4 were: peripheral neuropathy 15%, nausea 8%, diarrhoea 11%, neutropenia 9%, thrombocytopenia 11%. Overall, 38% of patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicities, and 64% received 90% or more of the scheduled oxaliplatin dose intensity during the first four cycles. FOLFOX7 was highly active, with good tolerability, in pretreated patients resistant to LV-5-FU [corrected].

Aged↗